Zeek Receiver To Make Second Distribution, Explains ‘Rising Tide’ Method: [Also See Link To Business North Carolina Story On Kenneth D. Bell]

EDITOR’S NOTE: (Updated 3:06 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) The information below is from Kenneth D. Bell, the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards’ Ponzi- and pyramid-scheme case. It is reproduced verbatim from an announcement by Bell dated June 18. Also, make sure you read the Comments thread below for the URL to a June feature on Bell by Business North Carolina. The story touches on the issue of certain MLMers proceeding from one fraud scheme to another. In addition, the publication reports that Bell, prior to his appointment as Zeek’s receiver, served as a federal prosecutor who investigated a Hezbollah terrorist cell. Many Zeekers perhaps already know about the Hezbollah prosecution. Business North Carolina is reporting that, during his career as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bell encountered a person who wanted to hire a hit man  . . .

**___________________________**

ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE RECEIVER – June 18, 2015

I am pleased to announce that we will be making a second partial interim distribution to all Affiliates who hold Allowed Claims on the next Court authorized distribution date (July 31, 2015), which, when combined with the first partial interim distribution and the amounts paid by Zeek Rewards before it was shut down, will return to victims 60% of allowed claimed losses due to the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme.

There has been some confusion about how the amounts of distributions are calculated using the Court ordered “rising tide” method. The rising tide method of loss calculation is designed to make every recognized claimant equally whole (as a percentage of their investment). Take for example two recognized claimants, each of whom invested $10,000 into the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme. The first claimant received nothing back from Zeek Rewards while the scheme was operating. The second claimant received $4,000 out of Zeek Rewards before it was shut down. Under the rising tide method, the second claimant is deemed to have already received 40% of her investment back, while the first claimant has received nothing back. When we made the first partial interim distribution of 40% the first claimant received $4,000, but the second claimant did not receive a distribution check.

When the second interim partial distribution is made, the first claimant will receive an additional $2,000, and the second claimant (who did not get a first distribution) will receive $2,000. This will ensure that both claimants have received 60% of the amounts they invested. While some Affiliates have complained about the rising tide method, I believe it is the most fair way to make the Zeek Rewards victims equally whole; two investors put $10,000 into the scheme and each will receive $6,000 total, whether it was received from the scheme itself, or from distributions from the receivership, or a combination of both.

There also has been some confusion about our quarterly distributions. Some mistakenly believe that they will receive a distribution every quarter. There was a first partial interim distribution and will soon be a second. Each quarter we send distribution checks only to claimants who completed the claims process since the last quarter.

Unfortunately, nearly 50,000 claimants with recognized claims have not received a first, nor will they receive a second, partial interim distribution. The only reason for this is that those 50,000 claimants have not electronically signed the Release and OFAC certification available through the claims portal. Many have called or emailed asking for personal assistance signing and submitting these forms. We will soon create and post on the receivership website an instructional video showing how to electronically sign and submit the Release and OFAC certification through the claims portal. The cost to create and post this video will be a minimal expense to the receivership.

We have received calls and emails asking that we cut off the recovery rights of the 50,000 recognized claimants who have not completed the process and distribute their share of distributions to those who have. That day may come, but it has not yet. I will give each claimant with a recognized claim every opportunity to receive their share of the recovery. Nonetheless, I implore everyone to promptly complete the Court required process. Sometime before the end of the receivership I will have no option but to ask the Court for permission to distribute all remaining receivership assets to only those recognized claimants who have completed the process.

If your contact information has changed, or the claims portal shows that you were issued a check that you have not received, or a check you were mailed was issued in the wrong name, please click on the following link to learn how to let us know: https://cert.gardencitygroup.com/zrwdet/fs/home.

After this second partial interim distribution, the receivership will maintain sufficient funds to pay those claimants who have not yet, but hopefully will, electronically sign the Release and the OFAC certification, and sufficient funds to allow the receivership team to continue to pursue additional recoveries for the ultimate benefit of eligible Affiliates. We are not going to hold onto money that we could otherwise distribute to victims.

We are in negotiations or litigation with financial services firms to recover tens of millions of dollars for Affiliates. The litigation against U.S and foreign net winners (those who took more money out of the scheme than they put in, essentially holding the victims money) is progressing. I remain confident that we will succeed in all of these efforts. Unfortunately, litigation is never quick, and once we have judgments against the net winners, in amounts exceeding $200 million, we will have to collect on those judgments. I don’t anticipate making a third partial interim distribution for quite some time because the funds for such a distribution will largely have to come from litigation recoveries that will take quite some time.

I know and understand that recovering only 60% of your investment is not what you want. I have read letters from and spoken to many of you. I know the hardships that Zeek Rewards inflicted on thousands of people. It may be no comfort, but a 60% recovery by victims of a Ponzi scheme is unusually high, and I am proud that the receivership team spends less as a percentage of total recoveries than any receivership of which I am aware.

I am entirely confident that when we are finished with our work on your behalf your total recovery will be more than the 60% we will distribute. I ask you for your patience, and thank you for your continuing support.

About the Author

One Response to “Zeek Receiver To Make Second Distribution, Explains ‘Rising Tide’ Method: [Also See Link To Business North Carolina Story On Kenneth D. Bell]”

  1. Quick note: Business North Carolina has a feature on Kenneth D. Bell and the Zeek case.

    The deck: “ZeekRewards seemed too good to be true – and it was. Its collapse put former federal prosecutor Ken Bell on an international money chase.”

    Written by Edward Martin, the feature describes some of Bell’s work when he was a federal prosecutor — including the well-known Hezbollah case.

    It also touches on MLMers who may proceed from one fraud scheme to another.

    A snippet from the story:

    _________________________________________________

    “I can understand why some people, in desperation, thought, ‘God sent this my way’ or something like that,” Bell says. “But folks really do have to remember the adage, if it sounds too good to be true, it really is. A 125% return in 90 days, nobody should think that’s possible.” But there was also a second tier — the pros. “Some of these folks had been engaged in this kind of thing before, and frankly, some of our largest winners re-engaged in similar schemes right away.”

    _________________________________________________

    All in all, a very interesting read — one that reports that Bell, during his career as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, encountered someone who “sought a hit man capable of ‘putting two bullets in the brain of that arrogant bastard prosecutor.'”

    SOURCE: http://www.businessnc.com/articles/2015-06/bounty-hunter-category/

    Patrick

      (Quote)

Leave a Reply