Tag: Commodity Futures Trading Commission

  • SEC: Binary Options Case Triggers Investor Alert

    breakingnews725Is there a double whammy in your MLM future — first being ripped off in a binary-options “program,” only to be ripped off a second time by scammers posing as government agencies and offering purported refunds for a fee?

    Naturally some MLMers have added binary options to their offerings, with some incredible solicitations and tales being told online. BehindMLM.com, for example, recently reported on the purported death of “Bob Roberts,” an asserted figure from a “program” known as Options Rider.

    In 2015, the PP Blog reported that Quebec’s securities regulator was concerned that binary-options scammers were steering people into reload schemes and posing as government entities. Meanwhile, there was the tale of SpotFN, a purported binary-options platform that reached across the oceans and plains to pluck investors in Missouri.

    At least one Missouri investor was told his money could be retrieved by paying a fee to a purported insurance company, authorities said.

    Binary-options “programs” also are appearing on the Ponzi boards, alongside HYIP, cycler and “advertising” scams.

    In 2013, the SEC brought an action against Cyprus-based Banc de Binary Ltd., its founder Oren Shabat Laurent and three affiliates alleging “that they failed to register the offering before soliciting U.S. customers through YouTube videos, spam e-mails, and other Internet advertising.”

    Banc de Binary has agreed to pay $11 million in a settlement, the SEC said today.

    This includes “$7.1 million in disgorgement and $1.95 million in penalties to the SEC as well as $2 million in penalties to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which filed a parallel action,” the SEC said.

    “Banc de Binary and its affiliates completely disregarded U.S. laws and registration requirements, and as a result they must surrender millions of dollars and be suspended from the industry,” said Michele Layne, director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office.

    Harmed investors will receive a distribution from a Fair Fund administered by the National Futures Association, the SEC said.

    Although it is nice that money apparently is available to compensate Banc de Binary customers, that’s not always the case, perhaps particularly with cross-border schemes.

    The settlement wasn’t the only news the SEC announced today. Indeed, the agency announced an Investor Alert that warns of “impersonators” tag-teaming the Banc de Binary case.

    “The SEC has become aware of some impersonators claiming to be affiliated with the SEC or other government agencies who have contacted harmed investors in this Banc de Binary case and asked them to pay a fee to facilitate their settlement payout,” the SEC said.  “It’s important for all investors to know that the SEC never makes people pay to get their money back.”

    Read the Investor Alert. “Avoid becoming a victim twice,” the SEC urged.

    Read the CFTC’s statement, which says a U.S. federal court has imposed “a permanent ban on offering or trading any further off-exchange binary options to U.S. customers.”

    Read Banc de Binary restitution information from the National Futures Association.




  • BULLETIN: Traders Operated ‘The Cartel’; Banks Charged Criminally

    breakingnews72Forex traders at four multinational banks — Citicorp, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Barclays PLC and Royal Bank of Scotland plc — formed “The Cartel” and conspired to manipulate the prices of the U.S. dollar and the euro, the U.S. Department of Justice said today.

    All four banks have been charged criminally in an investigation that began when Eric Holder was Attorney General, said Loretta Lynch, Holder’s successor.

    UBS AG, a fifth multinational, has been charged criminally with manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and other benchmark interest rates, the Justice Department said. The UBS prosecution came about after the agency ripped up an earlier nonprosecution agreement (NPA) with bank, alleging that UBS had violated the terms of a pact reached in December 2012 to resolve the LIBOR matter.

    Barclays also breached an NPA struck in June 2012 over the LIBOR matter and has agreed to pay an additional $60 million, the Justice Department said.

    The charges, all felonies, include conspiring to fix prices and rig bids. They are filed against Citicorp, Barclays, JPMorgan and RBS.

    A felony charge of wire fraud was filed against UBS, the Justice Department said.

    “In other words,” Lynch said, according to her prepared remarks released by the Justice Department, “UBS promised, in other resolutions, not to commit additional crimes — but it did.”

    As for Citicorp, Barclays, JPMorgan and RBS, Lynch said, “Starting as early as December 2007, currency traders at several multinational banks formed a group dubbed ‘The Cartel.’ It is perhaps fitting that those traders chose that name, as it aptly describes the brazenly illegal behavior they were engaged in on a near-daily basis. For more than five years, traders in ‘The Cartel’ used a private electronic chatroom to manipulate the spot market’s exchange rate between euros and dollars using coded language to conceal their collusion.”

    All five of the banks have agreed to plead guilty to the criminal charges at the “parent level,” the Justice Department said.

    Here, according to the Justice Department, are the market-manipulation timelines and the agreed-to criminal fines:

    • Citicorp, involved from as early as December 2007 until at least January 2013, $925 million.
    • Barclays, involved from as early as December 2007 until July 2011, and then from December 2011 until August 2012, $650 million.
    • JPMorgan, involved from at least as early as July 2010 until January 2013, $550 million.
    • RBS, involved from at least as early as December 2007 until at least April 2010, $395 million.
    • UBS (for NPA breach that occurred after December 2012), $203 million.

    A statement by the Justice Department includes the type of language the agency normally directs at street criminals when it is trying to send a message. In this instance, however, the language is directed at the banks. From the statement (italics added):

    Citicorp, Barclays, JPMorgan, RBS and UBS have each agreed to a three-year period of corporate probation, which, if approved by the court, will be overseen by the court and require regular reporting to authorities as well as cessation of all criminal activity.  All five banks will continue cooperating with the government’s ongoing criminal investigations, and no plea agreement prevents the department from prosecuting culpable individuals for related misconduct.  Citicorp, Barclays, JPMorgan and RBS have agreed to send disclosure notices to all of their customers and counter-parties that may have been affected by the sales and trading practices described in the plea agreements.

    Today, in connection with its FX investigation, the Federal Reserve also announced that it was imposing on the five banks fines of over $1.6 billion; and Barclays settled related claims with the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for an additional combined penalty of approximately $1.3 billion.  In conjunction with previously announced settlements with regulatory agencies in the United States and abroad, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA), today’s resolutions bring the total fines and penalties paid by these five banks for their conduct in the FX spot market to nearly $9 billion. 

    Holder, Lynch said, “oversaw this investigation from its inception.

    “His relentless work made this resolution possible, and I want to thank him for his commitment to this important effort,” she said.

    Lynch replaced Holder last month.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: CFTC Chairman Issues Extraordinary Statement In Response To Congressional Proposal To Cut Agency Budget In Wake Of White-Collar Fraud Epidemic And Expanded Responsibilities

    UPDATED 9:05 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The white-collar fraud epidemic has become a political football — one that actually uses a football analogy. This is a statement from Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission:

    “The result of the House bill is to effectively put the interests of Wall Street ahead of those of the American public by significantly underfunding the agency Congress tasked to oversee derivatives – the same complex financial instruments that helped contribute to the most significant economic downturn since the Great Depression.

    “The CFTC’s hardworking staff is just 10 percent more in numbers than at our peak in the 1990s, yet Congress has now directed the agency to oversee the swaps market that is eight times larger than the futures market. Picture the NFL expanding eightfold to play more than 100 football games in a weekend, leaving just one referee per game, and, in some cases, no referee. Imagine the mayhem on the field, the resulting injuries to players, and the loss of confidence fans would have in the integrity of the game.

    “We would not want similar mayhem and loss of confidence in markets so critical to farmers, ranchers and end users that may result from this bill’s significant underfunding of the CFTC.”

    The statement comes on the heels of vote by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies to cut the CFTC budget, the agency said on its website.

    It also occurred on the same day the CFTC announced that it had filed and simultaneously settled charges against Luis Salazar-Correa of Las Vegas.

    Salazar-Correa and his Nevada-based company, Prosperity Team LLC, were accused of fraudulently soliciting at least 183 individuals and drafting them into a Forex Ponzi scheme that gathered at least $2.482 million.

    Demonstrating that the fraud epidemic is a global plague and that the world’s antifraud agencies are cooperating in a bid to tame the beast, CFTC thanked the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission, the International Financial Services Commission of Belize, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority and the U.K. Financial Services Authority for assisting in the Salazar-Correa/Prosperity Team probe.

    CFTC also thanked the FBI, the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Nevada.

    In March Congressional testimony, Gensler said the agency needed both more employees and more money to carry out its tasks.

    The CFTC, Gensler said in March, needed to add about 305 employees to its current staff of 710 to keep up with its expanded responsibilities. It also needed an additional outlay of tens of millions of dollars, the chairman said.

    But Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican, apparently has joined other politicians in advancing a bill that would slash $25 million from CFTC’s current budget of about $205 million.

    In the era of white-collar fraud, the proposed bill would provide the CFTC only $25,000 “for the expenses for consultations and meetings hosted by the Commission with foreign governmental and other regulatory officials.”

     

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: CFTC Files Actions In Utah, Wyoming, New York And Illinois Against Domestic AND Offshore Firms In Second Phase Of Forex Sweep; 11 Companies Accused Of Illegally Soliciting U.S. Customers

    URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING:

    UPDATED 8:14 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has gone to federal courts in four different states and simultaneously filed actions against 11 separate companies in the second phase of an enforcement sweep.

    The firms, some of which conduct business offshore but allegedly use webhosting companies or other service-providers in the United States,  are accused of illegally targeting U.S. customers. In addition to today’s actions against 11 firms, 14 companies were charged in January, bringing the sweep total to 25.

    Not all of the firms charged today used U.S.-based webhosts or service-providers or had a physical footprint in the United States, according to court records. At least one of the firms used the services of technology companies in Hong Kong and Canada, but all of the firms allegedly had the capacity to transact business with U.S. customers over the Internet.

    “These actions reflect the CFTC’s continued resolve to make the forex market safer for investors by strictly enforcing the CFTC’s new forex regulations, which became effective in October 2010,” said David Meister, CFTC’s director of enforcement. “These new regulations require entities that wish to participate in the forex market to register with the CFTC and abide by regulations that are intended to protect the public from potentially fraudulent operations.”

    Named defendants in today’s announced cases were:

    • 1st Investment Management LLC, a Wyoming LLC.
    • City Credit Capital (UK) Ltd., a United Kingdom company.
    • Enfinium Pty Ltd., an Australian company.
    • GBFX LLC, a New York LLC.
    • Gold & Bennett LLC, a New York LLC.
    • InterForex Inc., a British Virgin Islands company.
    • Lucid Financial Inc., a Utah corporation.
    • MF Financial Ltd., a Belize company with offices in New York City.
    • O.C.M. Online Capital Markets Limited, a British Virgin Islands company.
    • Trading Point of Financial Instruments Ltd., a Cyprus company.
    • Windsor Brokers Ltd., a Cyprus company.

    The agency said it “strongly urges the public to check whether a company is registered before investing funds. If a company is not registered, an investor should be wary of providing funds to that company.”

    Registrations can be checked through the National Futures Association.

    CFTC said today that it received assistance in its probe from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Wyoming, the Utah Attorney General’s Office, the Utah Division of Securities and the U.K.  Financial Services Authority.

    Each of of the firms was charged with violating provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and other U.S. laws.

    Here is a link to a CFTC page through which all of today’s complaints can be accessed. (Look on the right side of the page.)

     

  • CFTC Revokes Registrations Of 2 Texas Firms That Operated Forex Ponzi Scheme Targeted At Elderly Churchgoers And Others In At Least 4 States; Firms Used ‘Charts’ Showing Magnificent Earnings And Cherry-Picked Name Of Warren Buffett For Fraud Pitch

    SCREEN SHOT OF SECTION OF OCT. 25, 2010, FINDINGS OF FACT: M25 and M37 used a "chart" projecting magnificent earnings and encouraged investors to roll over their returns by plying them with a purported "renewal bonus." After 11 years, $100,000 would turn into $1 million, according to the firms' claims. The firms also claimed they outperformed legendary investor Warren Buffett, according to uncontested findings of fact by U.S. District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. It is common in online fraud schemes for pitchmen to use charts and spreadsheets that promise spectacular returns. It also is common for scammers to trade on the name of Warren Buffett or other well-known business titans as a means showing off, sanitizing fraud schemes and gaining "legitimacy" by osmosis. (Red Emphasis added by PP Blog.)

    EDITOR’S NOTE: The cases against M25 Investments Inc. (M25) and M37 Investments LLC (M37) include elements that are common in online fraud schemes. For starters, the offers were targeted at senior citizens and people of faith. Moreover, the firms relied on PowerPoint presentations and charts that wowed victims with tales of fantastic earnings. The fraud schemes also traded on the name of a celebrity — in this case, famed investor Warren Buffett.

    Much of the information in the story below comes from uncontested findings of fact by a federal judge. Taken line by line, the CFTC’s allegations upon which the judicial findings were based paint a picture of the sort of fraudulent sales pitches that occur daily on the Ponzi forums and personal websites of hucksters. Spreadsheets that show fabulous earnings projections are in common use in the universe of fraudsters, for instance. So is the use of the name of a celebrity or famous company to sanitize a scheme and disarm skeptics.

    And appeals to faith are used daily online to separate Believers from their money.

    Even as this story is being published, members of Club Asteria are doing the sorts of things that led to a two-year legal quagmire for M25 and M37, a litigation nightmare the firms brought on themselves by relying on cheerleaders to drive business, engaging in affinity fraud and then trying to cover it up, according to court filings.

    Club Asteria members, for example, are using spreadsheets and earnings charts to lure prospects. Meanwhile, they’re trading on the name of the World Bank, citing guaranteed earnings, mixing in appeals to charity and using religious imagery to drive business to the Virginia-based firm . . .

    Two Texas firms that targeted a Forex Ponzi scheme at elderly people of faith and others in at least four states have had their registrations revoked by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

    The revocations against M25 Investments Inc. (M25) and M37 Investments LLC (M37) of Waxahachie mean that the firms no longer are registered Commodity Trading Advisors. CFTC’s issuance of the revocations follows on the heels of an administrative action the agency filed in February. The CFTC also sued the firms in federal court two years ago, gaining restitution and penalties of more than $16 million.

    An administrative law judge found the firms “unfit for registration” last month. Neither firm contested the administrative action.

    On Oct. 25, 2010, U.S. District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn found that the firms operated a Ponzi scheme that gained a head of steam by luring customers with promissory notes that guaranteed interest payments of 2 percent a month or 24 percent a year.

    Neither M25 nor M37 contested the findings. Both firms agreed to an issuance of a consent order with specified penalties and a demand for restitution. The firms neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

    Business was solicited online and through word-of-mouth, and clients often did not even know the difference between the two firms, Lynn ruled.

    “Some or all” of the firms’ customers were unqualified investors who did not have the required millions of dollars of assets to become an “eligible contract participant,” the judge ruled.

    Sales pitches for both firms claimed the ability to outperform famed investor Warren Buffett while making ancillary claims the companies could turn $100,000 into $1 million if customers stayed with them for 11 years and plowed their interest payments and annual renewal bonuses of 2 percent back into the companies.

    The scheme gathered about $8 million from about 213 customers, the judge ruled, noting that company “representatives” solicited business after church services and in customers’ homes.

    On March 31, 2009, according to the judge’s uncontested findings of fact, the firms owed customers $7.6 million but had only $3.9 million in total assets. Investors were shielded from the news and issued false account statements showing gains.

  • MIND-BOGGLER: Forex Scammer Who Never Traded Forex Charged In $35 Million Ponzi Scheme; CFTC’s Real-Life Complaint Against Keith F. Simmons And Co-Defendants Reads Like Bizarre Fiction

    And people actually are questioning President Obama’s November 2009 decision to create the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force when things such as this are going on?

    An unregistered North Carolina company that churned tens of millions of dollars in a long-running shell game and described itself as a Forex dealer was operated by a now-convicted felon who worked with another now-convicted felon and told the FBI he never actually traded Forex, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has alleged in court filings that only can be described as alarming.

    Black Diamond Capital Solutions LLC, operated by convicted felon Keith F. Simmons of West Jefferson, N.C., became a cancer on the legitimate Forex landscape, the CFTC charged. The firm and associated companies combined to create a sales force consisting of scammers who ultimately stole from investors and each other, pocketing huge sums to fund businesses not disclosed to investors and to pay for things such as luxury cars, real estate, maid service and sky-diving vacations.

    One of the alleged scammers — Deanna Salazar, a purported alternative-investments specialist and the owner of Life Plus Group LLC of Yucca Valley, Calif. — herself is a now-convicted felon. She has been linked to multiple fraud schemes, including a local one in California in which investors allegedly were told they were financing B-movies, and now has been linked by the CFTC to Simmons’ spectacular Forex Ponzi scheme.

    Salazar, according to the CFTC, never conducted “any due diligence” on Simmons or his Black Diamond companies. Instead, she simply passed along his bogus claims, including a claim that Simmons used an “exclusive” computerized trading system that had led to an “actual result” of $5,000 turning into $194,340 in three years.

    In 2008 alone, according to the bogus “actual” trading results, an account-holder purportedly enjoyed monthly Forex returns that ranged between 4.765 percent and 13.357 percent, according to the CFTC.

    Two other alleged Simmons’ associates — Bryan Coats of Clayton, N.C., and Jonathan Davey, a CPA from Newark, Ohio — also blindly followed Simmons and helped him orchestrate the massive Ponzi scheme, the CFTC alleged.

    Davey, according to records, organized a Belize company known as Divine Circulation Services Ltd. that assisted Simmons in pulling off the scam, which the CFTC alleged traded on religion. Davey also was at the helm of a Belize firm known as Sovereign Grace Inc., a firm that benefited from the scam, the CFTC said.

    Coats, meanwhile, was at the head of companies known as Genesis Wealth Management LLC and Genesis Wealth Partners LP, both of Delaware.

    Multiple companies with high-sounding names were created by the defendants and either assisted in pulling off the scam or benefited from the scam, the CFTC said. Among the names of the companies were Safe Harbor Ventures Inc., owned by Shari Davey, Davey’s wife, and Safe Harbor Wealth Inc.

    Salazar’s husband — Lawrence Salazar — also benefited from the scheme, the CFTC alleged.

    All in all, the CFTC charged, the scheme netted at least $35 million from at least 240 investors. It is believed that most if not “all” of the customers were not even eligible to become investors in the purportedly private program because they lacked assets totaling at least $5 million and thus were not “eligible contract participants.”

    Adding yet-another layer of the bizarre, Simmons allegedly told the FBI and the CFTC that Black Diamond did not engage in Forex — despite the fact it had gathered tens of millions of dollars by holding itself out as a Forex company and customers received statements showing their purported gains, the CFTC charged.

    When the Ponzi began to collapse in early 2009 — and with Black Diamond never having done any actual Forex trading — Salazar, Coats and Davey continued either to work for the firm or to steer business to it, the CFTC alleged.

    On March 19, 2009 Simmons sent an email to Salazar and Coats, instructing them that the company “would be shutting down for restructuring” and that all accounts would be liquidated with investors profits paid out, the CFTC alleged.

    Incredibly, the CFTC alleged, Simmons claimed a month later — in April 2009 — that Black Diamond’s trading was only hypothetical, despite the fact customers had sent in tens of millions of dollars to conduct real trading and received statements showing their gains.

    A months-long round of excuse-making about why customers weren’t getting paid then began, starting with Simmons’ assertion that a restructuring was under way. Coinciding with the restructuring claim were bank statements showing  that Black Diamond had “less than $200,000” in its accounts, the CFTC alleged.

    The CFTC, alleging that Simmons had purported to be an active Forex dealer who’d turned $5,000 from one investor into more than $194,000 and then insisted he had not executed a single trade despite issuing account statements showing gains of more than 13 percent a month, then defaulted to a strategy of claiming multiple “accounting reviews” were under way.

    He then claimed “excessive withdrawal requests by customers were causing delays in the return of funds.”

    Simmons also claimed a “non-existent German liquidity provider by the name of Klaus was attempting to provide $120 million to Black Diamond to payout customers and replace Black Diamond on the purported platform, but his alleged transfer of funds was frozen by bank or regulatory procedures,” the CFTC charged.

    At the same time, Simmons said “interventions” by the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the CFTC had led to a situation that made it impossible for Black Diamond to pay customers, the CFTC alleged.

    Simmons made excuses from March 2009 through Dec. 17, 2009, the date he was arrested on criminal charges to which he already has pleaded guilty.

    Salazar, Coats and Davey strung customers along while Simmons was piling on excuses that were becoming increasingly “complex and outrageous,” the CFTC alleged.

    By passing on the excuses after earlier having performed no due diligence — and by continuing to forward the excuses to investors — Salazar, Coats and Davey “recklessly failed to ascertain the cause of the funding problem at Black Diamond” and helped perpetuate lies, the CFTC alleged.

    Salazar even helped Simmons shape the lies, according to the CFTC.

    In July 2009, Salazar worked with Simmons “to draft the excuse” about why Black Diamond wasn’t making payments, the CFTC charged.

    Coats, meanwhile, also worked with Simmons on creating an excuse that payments were not immediately forthcoming because of “stricter capital requirements imposed on our banking system,” the CFTC charged.

    Davey informed customers that payouts could not be made because the Federal Reserve had forced Simmons to fill out “anti-money laundering” forms and had frozen $16 million until he completed the task.

    In an approach often employed on Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forums such as TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup, Simmons and Coats warned investors not to contact regulators or attempt to interfere with payment facilitators.

    “Simmons threatened certain customers that if they contacted the alleged paymaster, Black Diamond would lose access to the paymaster services and the payout to customers would be jeopardized,” the CFTC alleged.

    The agency did not identify the alleged paymasters in the complaint.

    And in an act reminiscent of some of developments in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme case, Coats allegedly warned investors that the CFTC was “randomly calling all Forex . . . clients across the America to try and identify possible Madoff scams,” the CFTC alleged.

    It was Coats’ “suggestion,” the CFTC alleged, that “members not have any discussions with the Commission.” The suggestion occurred while Black Diamond was refusing to return clients’ money.

    In the ASD case, members were urged not to cooperate with the U.S. Secret Service and not to fill out forms that would identify them as victims of a scam.

    Salazar, Coats and Davey continued to solicit funds for Black Diamond even though the company was not paying out and was engaged in chronic excuse-making, the CFTC alleged.

    Despite assertions that Black Diamond had a miraculous trading platform and expert software developers, “the so-called system developers and the Black Diamond trading platform never existed, the CFTC charged.

    Although Salazar’s customers plowed more than $7 million into the scheme — including more than $2 million paid directly to Salazar that was supposed to go to Black Diamond — she “failed to send Black Diamond approximately $1.5 million,” the CFTC charged.

    Black Diamond transmitted more than $1.9 million to Salazar, but she returned only $600,000 of that sum to customers and kept $1.3 million for herself, the CFTC alleged.

    Of the $2.8 million Salazar cherry-picked in the scam, the CFTC alleged, she used more than $400,000 to purchase cars and took “expensive personal trips.”

    Coats’ customers plowed more than $27 million into the scam, and Coats took purported management fees or owner gains of more than $400,000, including about $200,000 after Black Diamond quit paying customers, the CFTC alleged.

    Customer funds were used by Coats to acquire an “expensive car,” maid service, home improvements and “a sky diving trip,” the CFTC said.

    Davey used customer funds to make $1.3 million in “loans” to his “Sovereign Grace” firm and other companies he controlled. He also bought 47 acres of land and built a “lavish home,” the CFTC charged.

  • TalkGold Ponzi And Criminals’ Forum Deletes ‘Sticky’ Thread On InstaForex; Firm Named Defendant In CFTC Sweep Used Payment Processor Whose Contact Person Is Referenced In International Money-Laundering And Narcotics Case

    The TalkGold Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forum has deleted a “sticky” thread reportedly paid for by InstaForex, a dubious company named a defendant in a registration sweep conducted by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission last month.

    The PP Blog reported two days ago that InstaForex was using TalkGold to promote a scheme by which participants who sent InstaForex at least 1,000  U.S. dollars could qualify to win a Lotus Elise valued at more than $50,000. Although sweepstakes that require a purchase are illegal in the United States, InstaForex bizarrely instructed investors that they could improve their odds of winning the car by opening up to 100 accounts each.

    Some of the InstaForex promoters used photographs of attractive women to promote the scheme. It was unclear whether the photos were actual pictures of the promoters or whether they were stage props designed to lure skeptical investors.

    Why any investor from any country would open a single account — let alone 100 accounts — with a firm that advertises on TalkGold was left to the imagination. TalkGold and similar sites such as MoneyMakerGroup are referenced in multiple filings in U.S. federal courts as places from which international Ponzi and fraud schemes are pushed.

    A separate ad for which InstaForex apparently paid TalkGold $95 remains operational on the forum. The ad shows an image of a red Lotus and claims the company is “THE BEST BROKER IN ASIA.” Directly below the ad is an ad for a company that claims to provide a return of 525 percent “After 1 Minute” and 9,860 percent “After 6 Hours.”

    Just four of the thousands of schemes pushed on TalkGold — Imperia Invest IBC, EMG/Finanzas Forex, Legisi and Pathway to Prosperity — created tens of thousands of victims globally while gathering hundreds of millions of dollars, according to court records.

    The precise time at which TalkGold deleted the paid “sticky” thread on InstaForex and the precise reason why the thread of at least 109 pages was deleted were unclear. Records suggest the thread was deleted in the past 24 hours. The once-massive thread now returns a “No Thread specified” error.

    Among other things, InstaForex advertised that it accepted payments through Perfect Money, a murky money-services business purportedly operating from Panama. Imperia Invest, which the SEC accused in October of stealing millions of dollars from thousands of participants, also used Perfect Money, according to court filings.

    Included among the Imperia Invest victims were thousands of Americans with hearing impairments, according to the SEC.

    Meanwhile, the name of Roger Alberto Santamaria del Cid — the purported contact person of Perfect Money — appears in federal court filings in the EMG/Finanzas Forex forfeiture case.

    A Florida-based task force that specializes in detecting and uncovering massive fraud schemes brought the EMG/Finanzas Forex case last year. Del Cid, Perfect Money’s purported contact person in Panama, is listed as EMG’s “Secretary” in court filings that allege that tens of millions of dollars seized in the probe were tied to the international narcotics trade.

    EMG/Finanzas Forex was so corrupt that some participants were told the only way they could get their money out was to recruit new investors, have the new investors pay them directly — and use the proceeds from the new investors to recover their initial outlays, according to court filings.

    The very first EMG post on the now-shuttered ASA Monitor Ponzi and criminals’ forum referenced yet-another widely promoted Ponzi scheme: 12DailyPro. The 12DailyPro case, brought by the SEC in February 2006, also is cited in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi prosecution brought by the U.S. Secret Service in August 2008. ASD also was promoted on TalkGold.

    Writing on ASA Monitor, an EMG/Finanzas Forex aficionado claimed to have learned the ropes from 12DailyPro.

    “I have been in internet business for 3 years now and in autosurf industry from 12dailypro,” the ASA poster began. He (or she) then proceeded to tell readers about how they could earn commissions by recruiting for EMG/Finanzas, which the Feds later described as an international menace with tentacles in Central America, South America and Europe.

    Court filings in the EMG/Finanzas case paint a picture of an incredibly elaborate maze of companies and bank accounts set up to confuse both investors and law enforcement. At least 59 bank accounts, 294 bars of gold and nine luxury vehicles were seized.

    The EMG allegations were explosive because they showcased the undeniable fact that people who promote programs such as HYIPs and autosurfs because such programs may pay “commissions” to recruit new members may be operating as fronts or conduits for international drug dealers and money-launderers.

  • SPECIAL REPORT: Forex Firms Named In CFTC Sweep Used Same Offshore Processor As Alleged Imperia Invest Fraud; Name Of Man Linked To ‘Perfect Money’ Appears In Ponzi Forfeiture Complaint In Which Feds Tied Cash To International Narcotics Trade

    InstaForex, a company accused by the CFTC last month of targeting U.S. customers to purchase unregistered offerings and paying through Perfect Money, says participants can win this Lotus — but they have to pay to play by depositing at least $1,000 USD. Sweepstakes that require a purchase by participants are illegal in the United States.

    SPECIAL REPORT: UPDATED 2:27 P.M. ET (U.S.A., FEB. 9) Federal court and web records show that at least three of the 14 purported Forex dealers named defendants in a major sweep of unregistered firms last month by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission advertised that they accepted funds from Perfect Money.

    Perfect Money is a murky money-services business purportedly based in Panama that allegedly was used by a company that defrauded thousands of deaf investors by promising Visa debit cards and returns of 1.2 percent per day, according to federal records. The name of a man purported to be Perfect Money’s contact person in Panama City is referenced in federal court filings that tie money from the alleged EMG/Finanzas Forex fraud scheme to an international narcotics probe that led to the seizure of at least 59 bank accounts in the United States and the companion seizure of 294 bars of gold and at least seven luxury vehicles.

    The number of purported Forex dealers that allegedly accepted Perfect Money and were named defendants in the CFTC sweep could be higher than three because not all of the defendants publicly disclosed the precise mechanisms by which they accepted payments from U.S. customers.

    According to court filings and web records, some of the companies also advertised that they accepted funds from Liberty Reserve, another murky offshore processor, and even PayPal. PayPal’s Acceptable Use Policy specifically bans the use of its services for “currency exchanges,” businesses that support Ponzi and pyramid schemes and businesses associated with “off-shore banking.”

    PayPal says it requires “pre-approval” for any businesses “selling stocks, bonds, securities, options, futures (forex) or an investment interest.” Whether any of the businesses named in the CFTC Forex complaints received approval from PayPal to either use its name in promos or use its services to collect money is unclear.

    Records show (see paragraph 17 of SEC complaint) that Perfect Money payments were accepted by Imperia Invest IBC, the mysterious offshore company accused by the SEC in October 2010 of pulling off a spectacular fraud that fleeced at least 14,000 people of millions of dollars. Included among the Imperia victims were thousands of Americans with hearing impairments, the SEC said.

    Imperia was promoted on Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forums such as TalkGold, which also promoted at least two of the companies named defendants in the CFTC’s Forex sweep. One of the companies — InstaTrade Corp., doing business as InstaForex — is advertising on TalkGold that participants will have a chance in the months ahead to win a Lotus Elise, a sports coupe that carries a price tag of more than $50,000.

    To win the expensive car, however, investors have to pay to play, according to InstaForex. Sweepstakes that require a purchase are illegal in the United States, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

    InstaForex investors can qualify to win the Lotus by replenishing “the real trading account in InstaForex Company with 1000 USD or more during [the] Campaign period,” the company says in stilted English.

    “Participant has a right to register in the Campaign more than 1 account and raise his/her chances for the victory,” InstaForex continues in stilted English. “However, in case contest administration detects more than 100 accounts registered by one person, it reserves the right to decrease the number of accounts till (sic) 100.”

    Meanwhile, the name of Roger Alberto Santamaria del Cid — the purported contact person of Perfect Money — appears in federal court filings in the EMG/Finanzas Forex forfeiture case. The EMG/Finanzas case was brought last year by a federal task force based in Florida and alleges that tens of millions of dollars seized in Arizona as part of the probe were linked to the international narcotics trade. (See Paragraph 10 of the federal affidavit for the reference to del Cid, who is identified as the “Secretary” of EMG. Del Cid is referenced in domain-registration data for PerfectMoney.com as the contact person for Perfect Money Finance Corp.)

    Elements of the prosecution against more than $100 million in assets linked to EMG/Finanzas were brought by members of the same task force that brought civil and criminal prosecutions against Florida-based AdSurfDaily. Some of the members of the task force have experience working with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the U.S. Secret Service, the IRS and other agencies to reverse-engineer fantastically complex financial crimes.

    At least one of the investigators, according to records, was instrumental in bringing the successful money-laundering conspiracy prosecution against the e-Gold payment processor in 2007. The e-Gold case was brought in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It resulted in guilty pleas announced on July 21, 2008.

    About two weeks later, the U.S. Secret Service raided ASD’s headquarters in Quincy, Fla. Federal prosecutors later alleged ASD was operating a Ponzi scheme that had gathered at least $110 million — and had ceased using e-Gold “shortly after” the e-Gold indictments were announced in April 2007.

    Federal prosecutors also alleged that 12DailyPro and PhoenixSurf — two autosurfs charged by the SEC with operating Ponzi schemes — also had used e-Gold. In December 2010, prosecutors said that ASD also had the ability to accept money from e-Bullion, yet-another processor accused of accepting and distributing Ponzi funds from various schemes.

    James Fayed, the operator of e-Bullion, was accused of arranging the July 2008 murder of Pamela Fayed, his estranged wife and potential witness against him. Pamela Fayed’s body was found in a California parking garage  just days before the ASD raid in Florida.

    Erma Seabaugh, known among ASD members as the “Web Room Lady,” used E-Bullion in November 2007 to transfer $10,510 to ASD, according to a forfeiture complaint filed in December 2010.

    On Jan. 26, the CFTC sued 14 purported Forex companies simultaneously, alleging that they were unregistered entities that were illegally targeting  U.S. residents. At least three of the companies — ForInvest (Perfect Money reference appears online), InstaTrade Corp. (see Paragraph 21 of CFTC complaint for the Perfect Money reference) and Kingdom Forex Trading and Futures Ltd. (see Paragraph 17 of CFTC complaint for the Perfect Money reference) — accepted Perfect Money, according to records.

    Two of the complaints — InstaTrade and Kingdom Forex — were brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the same venue in which the e-Gold case was brought in 2007. The case against ForInvest was brought in U.S. District Court from the Northern District of Illinois.

    Perfect Money advertised a relationship with at least two of the defendants named in the CFTC cases: InstaForex and FXOpen, according to web records.

    On its website, Perfect Money advertised its relationship with InstaForex and FXOpen, two companies accused by the CFTC of targeting Americans with unregistered Forex offerings. The FXOpen website now appears to be blocked from loading in the United States. It was not immediately clear if the site will load in other parts of the world.
  • BULLETIN: CFTC Conducts Major Sweep; 14 Forex Firms Accused Of Illegal Solicitation Of U.S. Citizens; Actions Filed In New York, Chicago, D.C. And Kansas City

    BULLETIN: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has gone to federal courts in New York, Chicago, the District of Columbia and Kansas City and simultaneously filed 14 lawsuits against Forex companies to enforce registration requirements and provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    One of the lawsuits — one filed in the District of Columbia against a Nevada company known as Kingdom Forex Trading and Futures Ltd. that claims to be a “legally registered company in Belize and Nevis” — alleges that the firm was not registered with the CFTC but that U.S. customers were instructed to send money via wire and credit/debit cards.  Money also can be sent by Liberty Reserve, a payment processor favored by online financial schemes. Liberty Reserve says it operates from Costa Rica.

    The case against Kingdom Forex has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer, the same judge assigned to hear the AdSurfDaily autosurf Ponzi scheme cases.

    This morning, Liberty Reserve was advertising on its website a company known as FXOpen.com. FXOpen.com, according to the CFTC, is the website of a firm known as FXOpen Investments Inc. — yet-another of the defendants sued in the sweep.

    FXOpen is described in the complaint as “company of undisclosed origin” that claims “its headquarters is located at Ebene Heights No. 34, Cybercity Ebene, Mauritius.”

    It also claims to have “worldwide regional offices” in Cairo, Egypt; Paris, France; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Jakarta, Indonesia; Almaty, Kazakhstan; and Moscow, Russia, CFTC charged.

    “FXOpen’s websites, including www.fxopen.com, are hosted on servers” in the United States, CFTC charged in the complaint.

    The firm, whose website would not load this morning when visitors clicked the link at the Liberty Reserve page, is accused of directly soliciting U.S. investors and claiming U.S. law does not apply to it.

    “[I]n the ‘Forum’ section of its website, FXOpen representatives specifically solicit United States residents to open accounts with FXOpen, in part by advertising that potential customers in the United States can escape United States laws and regulations by opening accounts with FXOpen,” CFTC charged.

    “For example, on October 5, 2010, in response to a question regarding whether FXOpen could accept applicants from the United States after October 18, 2010 following recent CFTC rulings, an FXOpen representative answered with a post, stating, ‘Since we don’t have an office in the US, nor are we an affiliate of a US based broker, we are not bound by CFTC rulings. Rest assured we will be able to accept US clients for the foreseeable future unless a legal impediment appears,’” CFTC charged in the complaint.

    All of the companies named defendants in the sweep are accused of “illegally soliciting members of the public to engage in foreign currency (forex) transactions and that they are operating without being registered with the CFTC,” the agency said.

    Among the defendants are domestic and offshore companies.

    Here is the lineup of defendants in what the CFTC described as a major nationwide sweep:

    • EuroForex Development LLC, a Delaware LLC.
    • FIG Solutions Limited Inc., a Delaware corporation.
    • ForInvest, a Delaware corporation.
    • FXOpen Investments Inc., a Delaware LLC.
    • FXPRICE, a Delaware LLC.
    • GIGFX LLC., a Delaware company.
    • InovaTrade. Inc., a company with purported offices in Florida.
    • InstaTrade Corp., d/b/a InstaForex, a British Virgin Islands company.
    • InvesttechFX Technologies. Inc., a Canadian corporation located in Toronto.
    • J&K Futures. Inc., a company with purported offices in California and New York.
    • Kingdom Forex Trading and Futures. Ltd., a Nevada company.
    • Prime Forex LLC, a Delaware LLC.
    • Wall Street Brokers LLC, a Delaware LLC.
    • ZtradeFX LLC, a Connecticut LLC.
  • BULLETIN: Pedro de Sousa, Guillermo Rosario Arrested By FBI; CFTC Lays Out Yet-Another Florida Fraud Case

    BULLETIN: Pedro de Sousa and Guillermo Rosario of FX Professional International Solutions Inc. (FXP) have been arrested by the FBI. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said the men operated a Forex fraud that issued false account statements, falsely claimed no losing months between 2005 and 2008 when they had lost money in 31 of 40 months reviewed by investigators and claimed winning months through FXP dating back to 2002 — even though the company did not exist prior to 2004.

    “Rosario and de Sousa falsely represented to customers that since 2002 FXP had annual forex trading profits of 21 percent to 85 percent with no losing years,” the CFTC said.

    “However, FXP did not exist prior to 2004,” the agency said.

    Although de Sousa and Rosario sent customers false monthly account statements showing profits every month from 2005 through 2008, their forex trading “resulted in monthly losses in 31 of 40 months during this period,” the CFTC said.

    Rosario also is known as Guillermo Rosario-Colon. He lives in Coral Gables, Fla. Meanwhile, de Sousa also is known as Pedroiz J. Sanz. He lives in Orlando, according to the CFTC.

    Neither Rosario nor de Sousa was registered with the CFTC. Their company also was known as FX Professional Solutions LLC. Both entities were dissolved for failure to file an annual report, and FXP was never registered with the CFTC, the agency said.

    “Rosario asserted to one of the [c]ustomers that he had devised a system of trading forex that he was confident would, at a minimum, consistently return 20% in annual profits,” CFTC charged.

    “Beginning in May 2005 and continuing to February 2009, Defendants sent false monthly account statements to the Customers,” CFTC charged. “With very limited exceptions, these statements claimed profits of between 0.16% and 2.55% every month when, in fact, actual forex trading conducted by Defendants during this period (with or without the Customers’ funds) resulted in net monthly losses more than 75% of the time.”

    When the scheme was collapsing last year and customers were asking questions and demanding their money back, FXP acknowledged losses to customers, according to the CFTC.

    When a customer asked to see trading records, Rosario refused on the basis of “customer confidentiality,” the CFTC said.

    De Sousa, meanwhile, told customers that the company started sending out bogus account statements because it feared that acknowledging losses would lead to redemption requests it could not fund, the CFTC said.

    “In April 2009, one of the Customers asked de Sousa why FXP continued to send monthly statements indicating profitable trading during the latter half of 2008 if, in fact, FXP was losing money during this period,” CFTC said. “De Sousa replied that Rosario was afraid that if they told customers about the losses, customers would request to withdraw their money, and that Defendants would not have the funds to honor the withdrawal requests.

    “For this reason, according to de Sousa, beginning in or about September 2008,
    Defendants ‘started faking the statements’ that they sent to the Customers,” CFTC charged.

    Investigators determined that the company had been “issuing false statements from as far back as 2005,” CFTC said.

  • BULLETIN: SEC Halts Alleged $105 Million Ponzi Scheme Operating ‘Offshore’; Daniel Spitzer Charged In Complex International Fraud Case; Several Agencies Credited With Assisting Probe

    Saying his offshore Ponzi scheme was on the verge of collapse but still collecting money, the SEC has charged a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands with fraud.

    Several international authorities assisted in the probe, the SEC said.

    Daniel Spitzer, a U.S. citizen who resides in St. Thomas, was charged in the scheme. The SEC said the scheme netted $105 million and roped in 400 investors, dating back “at least” to 2004.

    Spitzer is 51, and “desperate for money” to keep the scheme afloat, the SEC charged, describing him as a “purported fund manager.”

    “Daniel Spitzer ran an elaborate Ponzi scheme that he disguised by moving investor money through a complex network of foreign bank and brokerage accounts,” said Merri Jo Gillette, director of the SEC’s Chicago Regional Office. “He deceived investors into believing that he was using a sophisticated investment strategy that didn’t really exist.”

    In an emergency action in Illinois, the SEC said the scheme was on the verge of collapsing and that Spitzer still was collecting money in March to prevent its collapse. Earlier, Spitzer spent more than $900,000 “in cash at the Wynn Las Vegas Casino,” the agency said.

    “Since at least August 2009 and continuing through to the present, Spitzer has attempted to delay and avoided paying requested investor redemptions,” the SEC charged. “Spitzer is desperate for money and has continued to prey on victims.”

    Spitzer was spending money at the casino in October 2009, even as he was delaying payments to investors, according to court filings.

    Also named defendants in the case were these Spitzer-connected companies: Kenzie Financial Management Inc. of St. Thomas; Kenzie Services LLC of Nevis; Draseena Funds Group Corp., an Illinois corporation with offices in Clearwater, Fla., and Stateline, Nev.; DN Management Co. LLC of Nevada; Aneesard Management LLC, also known as Nerium Management Co. LLC of Nevada; Nerium Management Co. of Illinois; Arrow Fund LLC of Nevada; Arrow Fund II LLC of Nevada; Conservium Fund LLC of Nevada; Nerium Currency Fund LP of Nevada; Senior Strength Q Fund LLC of Nevada; SSecurity Fund LLC of Nevada; Three Oaks Advanced Fund LLC of Nevada; Three Oaks Currency Fund LP of Nevada; Three Oaks Fund 25 LLC of Nevada; Three Oaks Senior Strength Fund LLC of Nevada; and USFirst Fund LLC of Nevada.

    Just three months ago, the SEC said, Spitzer railroaded an investor for $100,000 by telling the investor the money would be used “in one of Spitzer’s more conservative investment funds.

    “Rather than invest in said fund, in April 2010, Spitzer used this investor’s money to make $9,492 in Ponzi payments to four other investors, transferred $27,102 to the First Bank of Puerto Rico, and paid $26,257 for third party expenses,” the SEC charged.

    Assisting in the probe were the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Irish Financial Regulator, Danish Financial Supervisory Authority, Autorité des marches financier in France, the Ontario Securities Commission and the Financial Intelligence and Investigations Unit Attached to the Royal Anguilla Police Force in Anguilla, the SEC said.