Summary of Todd Disner’s alleged Zeek winnings. Source: Exhibit by court-appointed receiver.
Zeek Rewards “winner” Todd Disner owes the receivership estate $2,079,757.88, according to a motion asking the court clerk to enter a default judgment.
Receiver Kenneth D. Bell filed for the judgment July 9 in federal court for the Western District of North Carolina, seeking not only Disner’s alleged Zeek haul of $1,800,037.06, but also interest of $279,720.82.
Zeek’s records show that Disner paid $11,810.49 into the “program,” beginning with an initial outlay of $480 on March 4, 2011, shortly after Zeek started business.
From that initial outlay and others, $1,811,847.55 flowed back to him, the receiver advised Senior U.S. District Judge Graham C. Mullen and the court clerk. The lion’s share of Disner’s outlay — $10,000 — was paid to Zeek on July 6, 2012. Zeek collapsed six weeks later, on Aug. 17, 2012.
Disner’s last Zeek withdrawal totaled $102,617.73 and occurred on July 30, 2012, less than three weeks prior to the SEC action that spelled doom for the “program.” His largest withdrawal, according to the receiver’s filing, was for $177,026.27 on July 9, 2012.
A former AdSurfDaily Ponzi pitchman who once sued the United States for alleged misdeeds in the ASD case, Disner regularly withdrew tens of thousands of dollars at a time from Zeek, according to the receiver’s filing.
Zeek operated as part of Rex Venture Group.
Bell also filed today for clerk’s default judgment against alleged winners David Sorrells and Michael Van Leeuwen. The receiver is seeking $1,197,241.12 from Sorrells, including $157,672.63 in interest. Meanwhile, he is seeking $1,617,444.99 from Van Leeuwen, including $213,012.07 in interest.
Disner’s unsuccessful lawsuit against the United States for allegedly violating his right to privacy in the ASD case was docketed on Nov. 7, 2011.
Bell’s filing shows that Zeek paid Disner $7,199.49 on the same day.
In February 2014, the PP Blog reported that TelexFree had planned a purported “international convention” in Spain in early March.
The pitch for the convention, hosted in Madrid, was voiced by Sann Rogrigues, whom the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission successfully had sued in 2006 amid allegations he was operating a pyramid scheme and engaging in affinity fraud aimed at the Brazilian community.
Rodrigues, now accused of securities fraud and a defendant in the SEC’s TelexFree civil case announced in April, reportedly was one of TelexFree’s top hucksters and had “earned” millions of dollars.
As the PP Blog reported in February (italics added):
The promo [for the Madrid convention] curiously is playing against the backdrop of an image of the Pyramids of Giza. For good measure, images of other famous world landmarks are thrown in. These include St. Basil’s Cathedral (near the Kremlin) in Moscow; Big Ben in London; The Eiffel Tower in Paris; the Empire State Building and the Statue of Liberty in New York; the Leaning Tower of Pisa; and the Burj al Arab Hotel in Dubai.
Despite the fact TelexFree was under investigation in Brazil and almost certainly knew its days were numbered in the United States because investigators were closing in, TelexFree proceeded with the Madrid event. The confab was held under a cloud growing increasingly black. On Feb. 28, the eve of the convention, the PP Blog reported that Massachusetts securities regulators were investigating TelexFree, the first confirmation of such a probe by a regulator in the United States.
James Merrill, TelexFree’s former president, attended the Madrid event with at least two other TelexFree executives or managers: Carlos Wanzeler, now described as an international fugitive who’d engaged in a criminal wire-fraud conspiracy with Merrill, and Steve Labriola, another defendant in the SEC’s fraud case.
Here is part of what Merrill said from the stage in Madrid, as reported by the PP Blog on March 3, 2014 (italics added):
Carlos Wanzeler was up here talking about Carlos Costa . . . two of the greatest leaders that I’ve met in my life,” Merrill said. “They’re very strong. They’re courageous, and they’re fighting for you. And I want you all to know that they didn’t join my team, I joined their team. OK. They’re great leaders.”
Racketeering allegations later would surface in the United States, questioning the greatness of all three men. MLM attorney Gerald Nehra, billed as an honoree at the Madrid convention, is another defendant named in the RICO actions, which were brought as prospective class-action lawsuits by TelexFree members.
Despite the fact Nehra had been billed as a star attraction of the Madrid confab, he appears not to have shown.
Instead, Labriola, who suggested from the Madrid stage that TelexFree was suited for the impoverished people of Haiti, strolled out to accept Nehra’s award.
“I was asked to come up and receive this for Jerry,” Labriola told the crowd.
Labriola did not say who asked him to accept the award for Nehra. Precisely how long TelexFree had been operating in Spain remains unclear. But only in MLM La-La Land does the juxtaposition of the images of a recidivist securities violator-in-waiting (Rodrigues) and an MLM lawyer (Nehra) make sense in marketing materials, especially since TelexFree promoters were claiming $15,125 sent to the firm returned $57,200 in a year without the need for members to sell a single product.
Now, El Pais, Spain’s largest newspaper, is reporting that TelexFree might have fleeced 50,000 Spanish investors.
Read the El Pais story. (Use the Chrome browser for a translation from Spanish to English or another language or access Google’s translation tool here.)
NOTE: Our thanks to a longtime PP Blog reader who provided the El Pais link.
ALSO: Coming soon on the PP Blog: a Special Report titled “How TelexFree’s ‘Big Revolution’ Dragged The MLM Trade, Lawyers, Payment Vendors And Service-Providers Into A La-La Land Rabbithole.”
Here’s a snippet (italics added):
On at least one occasion — in March 2014 — undercover [Homeland Security Investigations] agents were in the same conference room as TelexFree “speakers,” including alleged owners James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler, both of whom were charged criminally in May with wire-fraud conspiracy. The room was part of the Marriott Copley Place Hotel in Boston, according to an affidavit. It turned out that, on the same date agents were in the room, a TelexFree speaker claimed from the stage that certain affiliates had been provided a private jet and that the jet had flown between the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Passengers on the jet were said to have been greeted by “the Prime Minister of Haiti’s motorcade.” The rep was pitching a TelexFree-related credit-repair “program.” Just two days earlier, on March 7, a TelexFree-related Blog falsely claimed that the TelexFree “program” at large had gained “SEC Approval from USA.”
The South China Morning Post is reporting that police raiding a “pyramid-selling gang” in Guangyuan were attacked with knives.
At least two officers were stabbed when trapped in a room, the publication reported.
From the South China Morning Post, paraphrasing a report on the state-influenced People’s Daily website and information from the municipal public security bureau (italics added):
Witnesses said they saw the two policemen being carried from the room and their uniforms were bloodied. It appeared that they had been stabbed with knives.
The bureau said the policemen were mobbed by members of the pyramid-selling group and their batons and guns were taken from them.
BULLETIN: (UPDATED 9:55 A.M. EDT, JULY 3, U.S.A.) The court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi- and pyramid case has moved for default against alleged Zeek winner Todd Disner. Disner, of Miami, also was a pitchman for the 2008 AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme, a $119 million fraud that put ASD operator Andy Bowdoin in federal prison.
Disner received more than $1.875 million through Zeek, receiver Kenneth D. Bell alleged. Zeek launched after the U.S. Secret Service exposed the ASD Ponzi scheme. ASD was a 1-percent-a-day scam. Zeek, according to court filings, sucked in participants with claims payouts averaged more than 1.4 percent a day over the course of a week.
Bell said in court filings today that Disner was among a number of Zeek winners who have failed to plead or otherwise defend against the clawback lawsuits filed against them in February. June 30 was the deadline for filing responsive pleadings.
The receiver also is seeking default against alleged Zeek winner and clawback defendant Michael Van Leeuwen, also known as “Coach Van,” of Fayetteville, N.C., and David Sorrells of Scottsdale, Az. Van Leeuwen allegedly received more than $1.4 million through Zeek, and Sorrells allegedly received more than $1 million.
Meanwhile, Bell also is seeking default against alleged Zeek insider Darryle Douglas of Orange, Calif.
Douglas received more than $1.975 million from Zeek, Bell said in court filings in February.
From a promo for Zeek online in 2012. The “program” operated through Rex Venture Group and later was charged by the SEC with selling unregistered securities as investment contracts.
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Feb. 5, 2014, Zeek figures and alleged insiders Dawn Wright-Olivares and Daniel Olivares pleaded guilty to federal crimes. Wright-Olivares pleaded guilty to investment-fraud conspiracy and tax-fraud conspiracy. Olivares pleaded guilty to investment-fraud conspiracy. Federal prosecutors in the Western District of North Carolina are maintaining an information site here.
Kenneth D. Bell, the court-appointed receiver in the SEC civil case, also is the special master in the criminal prosecution. The charging document in the criminal case references unnamed “co-conspirators” who are “known and unknown” to federal prosecutors.
UPDATED 5:10 P.M. EDT U.S.A. In court filings apt to find favor in MLM HYIP Ponzi Land, some alleged “winners” in the Zeek Rewards “program” have tried to turn the tables on the court-appointed receiver by claiming he owes them “treble” damages for alleged violations of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Similar claims were made from the sidelines of the AdSurfDaily MLM Ponzi scheme in 2008. Some ASD members contended that then-Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum should be charged with Deceptive Trade Practices, apparently for having the temerity to bring a pyramid-scheme action against ASD.
Other ASD members contended at the time that federal prosecutors and a U.S. Secret Service agent should be investigated and charged with crimes for their roles in the ASD Ponzi prosecution.
Among the alleged winners in Zeek who’ve filed a counterclaim against receiver Kenneth D. Bell are Rhonda Gates of Nashville, an alleged winner of more than $1.425 million; Durant Brockett of Las Vegas, an alleged winner of more than $1.72 million; and Aaron and Shara Andrews of Lake Worth, Fla., alleged winners of more than $1 million through a Florida shell entity known as Innovation Marketing.
In addition to claiming Bell owes them damages for Deceptive Trade Practices, the counterclaimants assert Bell interfered in contracts with payment processors such as Payza and NXPay and violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Bell sued them in late February, alleging in a clawback action that their gains were illicit because Zeek was illicit. He also sued several other Zeek alleged winners, including former ASD members Todd Disner of Miami and Jerry Napier of Owosso, Mich. Disner allegedly received more than $1.875 million through Zeek; Napier allegedly received more than $1.745 million.
Disner, in 2011, sought unsuccessfully to sue the United States for alleged violations of his Fourth Amendment rights in its prosecution of the ASD Ponzi case. His co-plaintiff in the case was Dwight Owen Schweitzer, whom filings by Bell described as a Zeek winner of more than $1,000. Several alleged Zeek winners ventured into the “program” after earlier stints at ASD, including Terralynn Hoy, a Florida MLMer who moderated a forum that called purported “sovereign” being Curtis Richmond a “hero” for his efforts to derail the civil-forfeiture action against ASD-related assets.
Richmond, a Californian, was a member of a “sham” Utah “Indian” tribe that once sought to have U.S. Marshals serve bogus arrest warrants against federal judges. ASD figure Kenneth Wayne Leaming later was arrested by an FBI Terrorism Task Force, after allegedly harboring federal fugitives from a separate home-business caper, being a felon in possession of firearms and filing false liens against a judge and prosecutors involved in the ASD case.
Other alleged Zeek winners sued by Bell in clawback litigation include Trudy Gilmond of St. Albans, Vt. (more than $1.75 million); Darren Miller of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho (more than $1.635 million); Michael Van Leeuwen, also known as “Coach Van” of Fayetteville, N.C. (more than $1.4 million); David Sorrells of Scottsdale, Az. (more than $1 million); T. Le Mont Silver Sr. of Orlando, Fla. (more than $773,000 under at least two user names, and more than $943,000 through a Florida shell entity known as Global Internet Formula Inc. with one or more Zeek user names); Karen Silver, Silver’s wife (more than $600,000); David and Mary Kettner of Peoria, Az. (more than $930,000 via one or more user names and shell companies known as Desert Oasis International Marketing LLC and Kettner & Associates LLC); and Lori Jean Weber of Land O’Lakes, Fla. (more than $1.94 million through a shell company known as P.A.W.S. Capital Management LLC.)
Whether other alleged winners would join Gates, Brockett and Aaron and Shara Andrews in asserting claims for damages against Bell was not immediately clear.
What is clear is that a legal war has broken out over Zeek, with alleged winners challenging Bell’s clawback claims by asserting Zeek wasn’t selling unregistered securities as alleged in 2012 by the SEC, that they worked for the money they received or were due, that the alleged winners were not investors, that the SEC’s case against Zeek cannot withstand scrutiny under the “Howey Test” for what constitutes a security, that the SEC had a duty to catch Zeek much earlier — and, in any event and if all else fails, attorneys Bell sued last week and Bell himself are to blame for the unpleasantness.
From Brockett’s June 30 “affirmative defenses” to the receiver’s clawback claims (italics added):
The Receiver has filed suit against two attorneys who provided legal advice to [Zeek operator Rex Venture Group] and Affiliates, including Brockett. Brockett relied on that advice in concluding that RVG was a legitimate business and in committing over $100,000 in his personal resources to grow his now defunct business. Because Brockett’s damages were caused in part by the conduct of the two lawyers, Brockett is entitled in equity at and at law to a credit for all money the Receiver recovers from the two attorneys as a result of his claims against them.
Also from Brockett’s “affirmative defenses” (italics added):
On information and belief, the SEC knew or should have known of the RVG Ponzi scheme, but delayed unreasonably in its prosecution of claims against RVG. Alternatively, the SEC knew for some time that RVG was operating as a Ponzi scheme but intentionally delayed disclosing that information to Affiliates and to the public. That unreasonable delay has prejudiced Brockett because he has paid taxes on the money he earned working on behalf of RVG, contributed a significant portion of his earnings to his retirement plan, and has incurred business expenses as a part of his work on behalf of RVG. The Receiver in this action stands in the SEC’s shoes and also delayed to Brockett’s detriment and now seeks return of all monies Brockett earned in connection with RVG, with no credit for the taxes or business expenses that Brockett legitimately paid, but that could have been avoided had the SEC or the Receiver timely advised Brockett of RVG’s true nature or acted in a more expeditious manner.
And from Brockett’s counterclaims against the receiver (italics added/editing for space performed):
On information and belief, RVG was not involved in the sale or marketing of any securities, so the SEC was without jurisdiction and the Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the SEC Action. Consequently, the appointment of the Receiver was void and of no effect, and all of the Receiver’s actions in his capacity as receiver for RVG have been unlawful and without justification . . .
RVG’s and the Receiver’s conduct described above and in the Complaint constitutes unfair methods of competition, unfair trade practices, and deceptive trade practices in violation of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C. GEN. STAT. § 75-1.1, et seq.
The conduct was illegal, offends public policy and is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, and deceptive.
Bell, the Zeek receiver, is a former federal prosecutor who once received a prestigious award from the U.S. Department of Justice for his work prosecuting a Hezbollah terrorist cell operating in North Carolina.
But some of the alleged Zeek winners now describe him with adjectives that could peel paint.
And as they do this, they seek to gut or circumvent the SEC’s authority to prosecute HYIP schemes while contending the agency fumbled the ball in investigating and prosecuting Zeek — that is, if anything was worth investigating and prosecuting at all.
It is a narrative apt to go over well in MLM HYIP Ponzi Land, the latest major expression of which is TelexFree, a rabbit hole case if ever there was one.
