Author: PatrickPretty.com

  • Wayne McLeod Becomes Subject Of FBI Probe; Agency Asks Victims, Witnesses To Come Forward

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This story originally was published June 30. The PP Blog later encountered a database problem, which caused the site to go down and resulted in the temporary loss of some data. The data now has been retrieved.

    The FBI in Jacksonville has opened a probe into Kenneth “Wayne” McLeod, the Florida man who appears to have committed suicide last week when his alleged $34 million Ponzi scheme was exposed by the SEC.

    In a statement on its website, the FBI confirmed an investigation was under way and asked victims and witnesses to come forward.

    “Victims and other individuals with knowledge of FEBG are encouraged to call the FBI’s Jacksonville Field Office at (904) 248-7000 or to contact us via e-mail at Jacksonville@ic.fbi.gov and include “FEBG” in the e-mail subject line,” the agency said.

    Individuals are asked to provide the following:

    1. Their full name, address, and contact information.
    2. Their point of contact at Federal Employee Benefits Group (FEBG), McLeod’s company, and how they learned of the company and the investment opportunity.
    3. Their understanding of the terms of their investment(s).
    4. The total dollar amount of their investment(s).
    5. A description of any records they have in their possession that confirm their investment(s) — for example, statements, correspondence, etc.

    “Clients of FEBG should be aware that not all of the firm’s investments are at risk,” the FBI said. “However, individuals who invested in the ‘FEBG Bond Fund’ or ‘FEBG Special Fund’ may be victims of investment fraud and are welcome to contact the FBI.”

    McLeod was 48 when he died June 22. The SEC said his Jacksonville company was paid “up to” $15,000 by government agencies for seminars conducted by McLeod.

    The SEC alleged last week that McLeod was operating a Ponzi scheme dating back to at least 1988. The scheme was alleged to have gathered “at least” $34 million.

    McLeod’s company conducted seminars at various federal agencies, and also used the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Glynco, Ga., as a seminar outlet, according to the firm’s website.

    FLETC is operated by the Department of Homeland Security and serves as an interagency law-enforcement training organization for 88 federal agencies.

    If the company’s seminar schedule is accurate, FEBG completed a seminar for U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) at the FLETC facility in Georgia June 8 — 14 days prior to McLeod’s death. Another ICE seminar was listed for July 2 at the same FLETC facility.

    Seminars for the Federal Air Marshals Service (FAMS) were scheduled July 7-9 in Miami. Dual seminars were scheduled for July 21 — one at the Georgia FLETC facility for ICE, and another in San Antonio for “SSA – OIG,” which stands for Social Security Administration, Office of the Inspector General.

    Seminar schedules dating back to 2006 appear on the site, featuring names such as the FBI, WIFLE (Women in Federal Law Enforcement), the DEA, the IRS, the U.S. Census Bureau, USSS (United States Secret Service), the U.S. Forest Service, USPS (United States Postal Service), ATF (the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives), NAADHS (National Association of African-Americans in the Department of Homeland Security, US Bankruptcy Court and US District Court, the Federal Public Defenders Office, the National Park Service, the US Fish & Wildlife Service, NABNA (National Association of Black Narcotics Agents), DCIS (Defense Criminal Investigative Service), NCIS (Naval Criminal Investigative Service) and others.

    It was not immediately clear if members of each of the agencies or employee associations invested in the alleged scheme. Also unclear was the total exposure of investors to losses.

  • KABOOM! Affidavit In Pathway To Prosperity Case Paints Picture Of Wanton Criminality; Complaint References TalkGold, ASAMonitor, MoneyMakerGroup Posts; United States Throws Down Gauntlet

    Federal prosecutors serving under U.S. Attorney A. Courtney Cox of the Southern District of Illinois have thrown down the gauntlet, declaring that “[a] large percentage, if not all, HYIPs, are Ponzi schemes.”

    In a criminal complaint and accompanying affidavit that only can be described as remarkable, prosecutors and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service said the Pathway To Prosperity (PTP) HYIP was operated by a man with convictions for selling and cultivating drugs and driving the getaway car in a robbery.

    Part of the strategy of the HYIP scheme was to tell investors it was not an HYIP scheme and to trade on the purported moral fiber of operator Nicholas A. Smirnow, investigators said.

    Smirnow, 53, has a criminal past dating back to at least 1979, including convictions for breaking and entering and possession of stolen property, authorities said. Smirnow, who was charged Friday with operating an international Ponzi scheme from Canada and the Turks and Caicos Islands that gathered more than $70 million and fleeced more than 40,000 people, also told a colleague he was involved in a double homicide in Canada and claimed to have ties to organized crime in Ontario.

    U.S. and Canadian authorities are working under a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) between the countries “in which both parties agreed to provide evidence to the other in criminal investigations,” prosecutors said.  “An ‘MLAT’ request was submitted by the Office of International Affairs of the U.S. Department of Justice to the International Assistance Group of the Department of Justice Canada on January 13, 2010.

    “While the Ontario Provincial Police has provided some materials to the United States Postal Inspection Service informally, as it is permitted to do under Section 3(2) of the Canadian Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, the government is awaiting the production of the balance of the investigation materials by Canada,” U.S. authorities said.

    Certain records of  the Canadian payment processors AlertPay and Solid Trust Pay (STP) have been obtained by the United States, U.S. officials said.

    “STP was interviewed by the Anti Rackets Section of the Ontario Provincial Police (“OPP”),” the U.S. affidavit says. “The OPP advised [the investigating U.S. postal inspector] that STP also identified [Smirnow] as P-2-P’s principal, based upon identification documents submitted by Smirnow and communications between the two.”

    Investigators also have acquired records from International Payout Solutions (IPS), a payment processor based in Florida, authorities said.

    About 75 percent of payments made in the scheme flowed through STP, U.S. authorities said. The postal inspector said he had determined the identities of 11 people or entities that had received the most money from the scheme.

    “The largest payee of the top eleven was Tru-Mar Holdings which received $2,117,752.50,” the complaint said. “Tru-Mar Invest and Tru-Mar Holdings were names under which TMI Group, SA (“Tru-Mar”) operated. According to documents submitted by Tru-Mar to IPS, the principal of TMI Group, SA was E.M.”

    A second big winner was a company in Sweden referred to as “SV Holdings” and operated by “SV.”

    “The third largest payee is a company owned by someone I will refer to as ‘K.B.,” the postal inspector said in the affidavit. “K.B. received over $500,000 from P-2-P. K.B. was the owner of a web site that touts high yield investment programs. From the nature of K.B.’s business, it does not appear likely that P-2-P funneled $500,000 to K.B. to make legitimate investments on P-2-P’s behalf.”

    Other payees in the top 11 included “CWM from Oregon, JP from Florida, and CM of Washington State,” according to the complaint. Because the investigator could not contact some of the winners, they were not referred to either by names or initials in the complaint.

    Although Smirnow claimed not to be operating an HYIP scheme, the claim was a lie. Posts on forums such as ASA Monitor, TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup sought to sanitize the scheme, authorities said.

    Not only was P2P an HYIP Ponzi scheme, it was operating in virtually every corner of earth, authorities said.

    “[Smirnow,] a Canadian citizen, was a resident of the Greater Toronto Area in the Province of Ontario, Canada,” prosecutors said. “When his scheme was first hatched, it was operated out of a rented house in Baysville, Ontario, which served as both his office and personal residence. Sometime around September 2007 [Smirnow] diverted approximately $315,000 Canadian in investor funds to purchase a substantial personal residence. He later fled Canada for the Philippines when his scheme began to unravel and also transferred some of P-2-P’s money to the Philippines as well.”

    The scheme was almost unimaginably widespread, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service said in an affidavit.

    “Financial records of payment processors utilized by P-2-P to collect investment funds from investors show that approximately 40,000 investors in 120 countries established accounts with P-2-P,” a postal inspector said. “Despite the fact that the investment was supposedly ‘guaranteed, investors lost approximately $70 million as a result of [Smirnow’s] actions.”

    The probe began when the U.S. government received a referral from the Illinois Securities Department “concerning an elderly Southern District of Illinois resident who had made a substantial investment in P-2-P,” the postal inspector said in the affidavit.

    “In addition to P-2-P’s own website, I discovered that P-2-P’s investment scheme was marketed on other websites, including High Yield Investment Program forums, which I was able to access directly through the internet,” the inspector said.

    Before long, the inspector determined that the scheme cost investors losses in 48 of the 50 U.S. states, and 18 of the 38 counties that comprise the Southern District of Illinois, prosecutors said.

    Such penetration in Illinois may suggest Smirnow had a promotional arm in the state. The complaint spells out a case against conspirators “known and unknown,” and the complaint notes that family members told other family members about the scheme.

    “When P-2-P’s funds were depleted and when investors did not receive a return of their funds as they had been promised, [Smirnow] caused a posting on P-2-P’s private forum warning investors not to complain to payment processors about P-2-P’s failure to return their money or they would find themselves ‘on the outside looking in,’” prosecutors charged.

    The postal inspector has spoken to “hundreds of P-2-P investors” during the course of the investigation, according to court filings.

    “Hundreds [of people] sent me copies of printouts they had made of P-2-P’s website, postings that had been made on the P-2-P’s members forum, and internet sites touting high yield investment programs which contained postings related to P-2-P,” the postal inspector said.

    International Financial Experts Weigh In On Alleged Fraud

    Prior to bringing the P2P case, prosecutors consulted with Professor James E. Byrne, an associate professor of law at George Mason University. Byrne has been an expert witness for both the Federal Reserve and the SEC in the area of High Yield Investment Programs, according to court filings. He also is an expert in international banking and served as chair of the Group of Experts on Commercial Fraud of the Secretariat of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), co-chair of the UNCITRAL Symposium on International Commercial Fraud, and co-chair of the North American and European Standing Committees on Combating Commercial Fraud.

    “In my considered professional opinion, the investment scheme described in the materials that I have reviewed are not legitimate but resemble and are classic instances of so-called high yield frauds and fraudulent pyramid schemes,” Byrne said in an affidavit. “The proposed returns are excessive for even the most risky legitimate investments and are simply preposterous for investments whose principal is supposedly guaranteed.”

    “It is apparent to me that the materials and the scheme which they describe were deliberately and artfully constructed, drawing on similar scams to deceive, confuse, entice and trap would-be investors,” Byrne said.

    Another professor and financial expert, Todd T. Milbourne of the Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis, also consulted with the government in the case. Prior to joining Washington University, Professor Milbourne was on the full-time faculty at the London Business School from 1996 to 1999. In 1999-2000, he was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago.

    Milbourne also described the alleged scheme as preposterous.

    “According to Professor Milbourne, Warren Buffett, Chairman arid CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, is considered one of the best investment managers there is,” prosecutors said, referring to their consultation with Milbourne. “[Buffet’s] nickname is the ‘Oracle of Omaha.’ Between 1977 and 2009, the average return to stockholders of Berkshire Hathaway was 27.3%, more than double the average return of the S&P 500,” prosecutors said.

    “However, Warren Buffet’s performance pales in comparison with the supposed financial acumen of [Smirnow], who claimed to be capable of achieving annual returns exceeding 500% in all four of his plans, more than twenty times better than the performance of one of the best performing money managers in the world,” prosecutors said.

    Countries Affected

    The scope of the alleged scheme was described as mind-boggling.

    “In reviewing records submitted by P-2-P to payment processors, I have found accounts set up by P-2-P investors from all of the permanently inhabited continents of the world,” the postal inspector said. “P-2-P account holders, when they registered for a P-2-P account, gave addresses in the following countries . . . :  the United States, Canada, and Mexico in North America; Costa Rica, EI Salvador, Honduras and Panama in Central America;

    “Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Equador, Guyana, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela in South America; The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Netherlands Antilles, Saint Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean;

    “Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, United Kingdom,
    Ireland, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Andorra, Portugal, Spain, Malta, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia,
    “Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russian Federation, Belarus, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Republic of Georgia, Greece, Macedonia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Yugoslavia in Europe;

    “Turkey, Cyprus, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Republic of Maldives, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, North Korea, Peoples Republic of China, Peoples Republic of China Hong Kong SAR, Singapore, Macau, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Japan, in Asia.”

    See story from earlier today that references another alleged Ponzi scheme known as Legisi, which involved more than $70 million, affected at least 3,000 investors and also was pitched on ASA Monitor, Talk Gold and MoneyMakerGroup.

  • OBTAINED: Feds’ Affidavit In Nick Smirnow/P2P Case; Full Story To Follow

    The PP Blog has obtained an affidavit filed by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service in the Nicholas A. Smirnow/Pathway To Prosperity (P2P) case. Smirnow was charged criminally Friday with operating an international Ponzi scheme that fleeced more than 40,000 investors.

    Smirnow, according to investigators, has:

    A. A 2002 conviction for the crime of breaking and entering.
    B. A 2001 conviction for the crime of robbery with a firearm.
    C. A 1996 conviction for the crime of cultivation of a narcotic for purpose of
    trafficking.
    D. A 1981 conviction for the crime of possession of stolen property.
    E. A 1979 conviction for the crime of trafficking in a controlled drug.

    Smirnow “admitted having gone to prison for robbery and characterized his involvement in that crime as being ‘the wheel man,’” according to the affidavit, which is based in part on statements made by Canadian authorities. “Smirnow also admitted involvement in a double homicide in the Hamilton Niagara area of Ontario. He also claimed to have organized crime ties there.”

    Additional details from the affidavit will follow in a separate story this evening (U.S.A, EDT) . . .

    12:33 A.M. June 1. 2010. See follow-up story.

  • REQUIEM FOR THE FORUM PIMPS? Court Documents In Legisi Case Reference Secret Service, MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi Forum; SEC Has Postings From Legisi’s ‘Private’ Forum, Too

    This grainy likeness of Legisi President Gregory McKnight is part of a PDF exhibit of evidence in the SEC's Ponzi case against the firm. This particular exhibit was gleaned on May 7, 2007, about 10 days prior to the entries in the case of undercover agents from the U.S. Secret Service and the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation, according to court filings.

    HYIP or autosurf Ponzi promoter? Player? Forum “expert?” Moderator? Cheerleader?

    Get ready for a surprise: Your downline perhaps already has identified you as a pimp or even one of the masterminds.

    If your plan is to continue to promote the programs on the Ponzi forums and though emails, you should know that things could be occurring behind the scenes that could put you four-square at the center of investigations. Not all HYIP and autosurf players are crooked. Not all of them understand the wink-nod nature of the HYIP and autosurf trades. In other words, they aren’t a crook or pimp like you and can’t be relied upon not to implicate you. They aren’t playing your game.

    You, on the other hand, are a veteran pusher of Ponzi poison and perhaps a tax schemer who recommended yet another pig and painted it yet again with lipstick. Your victims very well may come to see themselves as your marks, as their knowledge of this shadowy and insidious business grows. Some of them will talk. Some of them have talked.

    It’s now clear from court filings that some of them even are making handwritten notes and/or printing out emails and forum conversations — even if the forums purportedly are “private.”

    And, speaking of “private,” how crazy are you going to look — and how vulnerable to prosecution are you going to be — if you happen to be pitching a purported “offshore” program that requires a loyalty oath and forces members to swear they aren’t government informants or agents?

    Just agreeing to such bizarre terms potentially makes you a co-conspirator.

    Here’s how silly you could end up looking later as you try to impress forum mates today with your “insider” knowledge and claims of due diligence. The reality you cannot deny is that an undercover investigation already could be under way into the program you’re pushing.

    While you’re singing the praises of a company and talking about its purported expert management,  you could be revealing yourself as just another willfully blind pimp while demonstrating your actual lack of knowledge about the programs you’re pushing.

    Have you connected the dots yet? If not, here they are — in a nutshell: Your lack of knowledge can be construed as evidence of your guilt. You’re pushing programs you know virtually nothing about except what you’ve been told by people who rely on you to be the human equivalent of a trained seal who performs for a treat. You are not registered to sell securities, and you very likely are implicating yourself in a criminal wire-fraud, money-laundering and tax-evasion scheme.

    There you are, pitching a program, professing your knowledge while perhaps even dissing the doubters, and you don’t even know the program you’re cheering already is the subject of an undercover investigation.

    There’s a good chance the boss knows, though. He perhaps is in a secret panic. If word of the depths of the investigation leaks or the names of the agencies leak, well, the money stops streaming in. Maybe he didn’t tell you because he was too busy trying to figure out how to make it all go away when money was being seized in other investigations — and those seizures were leading to the choking of cash conduits for the programs you are pushing while purporting to be an expert.

    Paperwork later could reveal you weren’t an insider at all (or at least not enough of one actually to have the ear of the boss), that you were just another commission-grubbing or “earnings”-hungry liar in a sea of commission-grubbing and earnings-hungry liars. You’d say anything for a commission, which is why you’re now the potential target of a criminal prosecution and an accompanying lawsuit filed by victims. You have criminal and civil exposure. At the very least, you could become an unindicted co-conspirator, which means the government holds the hammer and sees you as a potentially useful witness.

    You never imagined yourself singing for your supper, of course. You were too busy picking the pockets of friends, neighbors and people you didn’t even know. If you get a break and become an unindicted co-conspirator, here’s what the jury will think as you’re singing for your supper: trained seal. Performed on cue for the schemers. Now batting the government’s ball to stay out of prison.

    Jurors contemplating how you got yourself in this box actually will be willing to give an actual trained seal more credit. Seals perform for treats because they don’t know any better; you performed for money and did know better — and you likely knew the money was stolen to begin with.

    Indeed, the marks who relied on your misrepresentations and claims of “due diligence” and other purported research could be maintaining a substantial paper trail. After all, it’s their money, and they want to make sure it’s safe. They’ve relied on your assertions. They’ll hold your feet to the fire when things start to go south, they’ll hold you to your claims and perhaps share your name, forum username and phone number with law enforcement.

    What Willfully Blind Promoters Can Learn From The Legisi Case

    Did you know that the U.S. Secret Service and the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (OFIR) sent undercover agents to interview Gregory McKnight, operator of the alleged Legisi Ponzi scheme, in May 2007, a full year before knowledge about the depths of an SEC investigation became public? Some Legisi members later learned the SEC was asking questions, but the inquiry was dismissed as routine. The SEC says Legisi continued to collect money up to November 2007, months after McKnight got the surprise of his life when he realized that two men with whom he had conversed actually were undercover agents.

    It is likely that very few Legisi members knew that the Secret Service and OFIR had infiltrated Legisi in May 2007. Undercover agents walked right through the front door, according to court filings.

    And did you know that the undercover agents were backed up by a Michigan state trooper who was only a short distance away — outside in the parking lot?

    How silly do you think your forum posts, your cheerleading look now? You were championing a program that already was under investigation by at least three agencies that were in the process of sharing information and assembling a time-consuming case that crossed international borders. The public filings were 12 months away.

    These are among many details about the probe, the paperwork for which originally was filed under seal by the SEC in May 2008. The Secret Service and OFIR agents posed as investors who wanted information on the Legisi program, which the SEC said was a massive Ponzi scheme. They recorded their discussion with McKnight, which took place in Legisi’s office in Flint, Mich. The Secret Service prepared a transcript of the conversation, which the SEC presented to a federal judge as part of 267 pages of exhibits used to gain an asset freeze.

    After the undercover agents met with McKnight, they left the building and met with the trooper in the parking lot. A short time later, the agents — this time accompanied by the trooper — went back inside and presented their identification to McKnight, according to court documents.

    Here’s what happened next, according to the SEC:

    “Within hours of the interview, an announcement appeared on the Legisi website stating that the Legisi program was closed to new investors, effective immediately, and representing that Legisi had to close that afternoon because of a ‘massive influx’ of new investors.

    “McKnight also cut off access to the Legisi website by the public by requiring a login and password to enter the site,” the SEC said.

    After McKnight found out he had been talking to undercover agents, he told them that Legisi did not accept checks for the program. Even as the interview was taking place, an unnamed individual approached the office with a check made out to Legisi Marketing Inc., according to court filings.

    This section of the Legisi Terms of Service purports that members must avow they are not an "informant, nor associated with any informant" of the IRS, FBI, CIA and the SEC, among others. The others included "Her Majesty's Police," the Intelligence Services of Great Britain, the Serious Fraud Office, Interpol and others.

    It has become clear that law enforcement is using multiple tools, including undercover operatives, infiltrations, Internet archives and notes kept by victims, to investigate and then prosecute HYIPs and autosurfs. Records viewed by the PP Blog show that the law-enforcement community is making one tie after another between and among various illegal investment businesses and their participants.

    The common signatures of the promoters of these illegal enterprises are greed and wanton lawlessness — all so the scammers can enjoy the proceeds of theft. This work has not generated headlines; it mostly has gone about quietly, but there simply no longer is any doubt that multiple state and federal agencies have pooled resources and talents to destroy these insidious enterprises and a day of reckoning is at hand for the purveyors.

    As the screen shot on the left shows, Legisi participants even were asked to certify that they weren’t “informants” or representatives of agencies such as the SEC, FBI, and IRS.

    Last week the PP Blog wrote about the fraud case filed by the SEC against Mazu.com operator Matt Gagnon, Gagnon was accused of helping Legisi pull off a $72 million Ponzi scheme affecting more than 3,000 investors by using Mazu to shill for Legisi while not disclosing that “he was to receive 50% of Legisi’s purported ‘profits’ under his agreement” with McKnight.

    Gagnon allegedly netted about $3.8 million in the scheme.

    The filing of the complaint against Gagnon prompted the Blog to perform some more research into Legisi. Among the documents we obtained was the 267-page exhibit of evidence originally filed under seal by the SEC in the case against Legisi on May 5, 2008.

    Prior to reading the document, we had wondered just how effective companies that purported to offer “private” HYIP and autosurf programs could be. For example, could these so-called “private” programs keep out what some investors describe as the prying eyes of government and the tax man?

    If such purportedly programs offered a “private,” members’-only forum, could those forums have any expectation that the prying eyes of government and the tax man could be kept out?

    “Private” is one of the big selling points of some HYIPs and autosurfs. We’ve always viewed the claims as dubious. After all, the schemes operate on the Internet. They involve people. People talk. It’s one thing to say you offer a “private” forum; it’s quite another to contain discussion to a single forum, perhaps especially when participants begin to smell a rat.

    We learned this in a big way when we were covering events surrounding the collapse of the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf last year. When some members finally removed their blinders, AVG had no way to contain discussion to its purportedly “private” forum — not that it should have had any expectation that it could contain discussion even if things were going swimmingly.

    When AVG started to tank, some of its members couldn’t wait to share details about events that occurred in the “private” forum. Threats against them for purported copyright violations and to ban IPs and kick members out of the program for sharing information outside “association” walls did not work. In fact, they became the signatures of a scam in progress and the relentless efforts to hide it.

    But getting back to Legisi and the issue of whether a “private” forum provided any protection for members and any insulation from the prosecution  of Legisi . . .

    It turns out that the government did not even have to “break in” to Legisi’s “private” forum, so to speak, to gain information on the program. Legisi members concerned about losing their money were keeping notes, including handwritten notes, and printing out page after page of posts from the “private” forum and Legisi’s own website.

    Included in evidence exhibits are page after page of posts from Legisi's "private" forum and other communications such as emails to customer service and printouts Legisi members made while visiting the company's website and keeping notes about the program.

    Legisi members bothered by the company’s explanations and efforts to maintain secrecy when dealing with investors’ money turned over the information to the SEC.

    Yep. Avatars, pictures, user names, real names and all.

    In this evidence exhibit given to a federal judge prior to the Legisi asset freeze, a Legisi prospect writes the name "Money Maker Group.com" in longhand. The prospect also wrote the name "Matt Gagnon" in longhand and a telephone number for Gagnon.

    Prior to filing its case against Legisi, the SEC also had other hard-copy printouts from members, including emails and information from Legisi members’ back offices. At least one of the exhibits included the handwritten notes of a Legisi member.

    The words “Money Maker Group.com” are spelled out in longhand on one of the exhibits, as are telephone numbers of individuals associated with the program. One of the numbers has the name “Matt Gagnon” spelled out in longhand above it.

    Still promoting HYIPs and autosurfs? Still shilling in forums public and “private?”

    Your day of reckoning could be drawing near.

  • Nicholas A. Smirnow, Pathway To Prosperity (P2P) Operator, A ‘Convicted Burglar, Robber And Drug Dealer’ Who Fleeced At Least 40,000 People In International Ponzi Scheme

    Here is how Pathway To Prosperity (P2P), operated by Nicholas A. Smirnow, was described by members of the indefatigable, Ponzi-pushing ASA Monitor forum in 2007:

    “Just talked with Nick today on the phone,” one member said. “I always enjoy talking with him — honest and straightforward.”

    “This one is a WINNER,” another crowed. “People, you don’t know what you are missing if you aren’t in this program.”

    Here is how a member of TalkGold, another Ponzi-pushing site, described P2P:

    “[T]his program will go a long way to bringing back stability to investment sites,” he wrote. “[T]his one you can trust 100% and also the admin Nick . . . come and join our happy group.”

    Here is how P2P was described by a member of MoneyMakerGroup, yet another Ponzi-pushing site:

    “[T]his is the kind of program that is needed,” the poster wrote. “p-2-p gives the little man a chance to invest and relax knowing your money will be safe at the end of the investment.”

    And here, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, is how the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and federal prosecutors described Smirnow after charging him yesterday with operating an international Ponzi scheme that gathered more than $70 million and fleeced more than 40,000 people:

    “convicted burglar, robber and drug dealer who told a former employee that he was involved in a double homicide.”

    Smirnow, believed to be on the lam in the Philippines, used aliases such as Nicolay Smirnow, Alexander Judizcev, Nicholas Kachura and Jeff Prozorowiczm. The scam spread across the world, and P2P shielded itself by using a website in the Netherlands and a company incorporated in the Turks and Caicos Islands.

    Although the program pitched interest rates of up to 17,000 percent, a poster on ASA Monitor incongruously said, “This is not a HYIP — Nick does not believe in them.” Regardless, the same poster — despite his cheerleading — acknowledged he was worried “about the authorities getting in and shutting things down . . . but since it is not a site being heavily promoted like CEP and not so open, it may keep under the radar . . .”

    CEP was yet another Ponzi scheme.

    It has been an electrifying week for opponents of HYIP and autosurf frauds, who routinely are derided as “naysayers” by commission-grubbing pitchmen who spread Ponzi pain across the planet for a share of illegal profits.

    On Tuesday, the SEC announced it had charged Mazu.com operator Matthew J. Gagnon, 41, of Weslaco, Texas, and Portland, Ore., with helping “orchestrate a massive Ponzi scheme conducted by Gregory N. McKnight . . . and his company, Legisi Holdings, LLC.”

    The Legisi scheme raised about $72.6 million from more than 3,000 investors “by promising returns of upwards of 15% a month,” the SEC said.

    Like Pathway to Prosperity, Legisi also was promoted on ASA Monitor, TalkGold, MoneyMakerGroup and other forums criminals and their shills frequent to separate people from their money.

    A U.S. warrant for Smirnow’s arrest was issued yesterday — although Smirnow is believed to have been ducking Canadian authorities for months because of an investigation into his business practices.

    Smirnow now joins Robert Hodgins — yet another international fugitive allegedly associated with the drug and HYIP trades — on the lam.

    Hodgins, who provided debit cards for the alleged AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme and is believed also to have a tie to the PhoenixSurf autosurf Ponzi scheme and other autosurf and HYIP schemes, is wanted for helping a Colombian narco business launder money at ATM machines in Medellin and also for accepting $100,000 in purported drug proceeds for laundering money in the Dominican Republic.

    INTERPOL is searching for Hodgins.

    Read the Smirnow story in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

  • Narc That Car’s ‘F’ Rating Remains Intact As BBB Closes Inquiry; Firm ‘Failed To Provide Specific Information’ To Allay Pyramid Concerns

    Various claims about Narc That Car "training" have appeared online, as have videos of checks and even the postmarked envelopes in which the checks were enclosed.

    Narc That Car, also known as Crowd Sourcing International, did not provide the Better Business Bureau “specific information which would eliminate the BBB’s suspicion of the existence of a pyramid promotional scheme,” the BBB reports on its website.

    The BBB has closed its inquiry into Narc, leaving the company’s “F” rating intact and saying Narc also “admitted that they could not substantiate the claim that any major motor manufacturer was a client of Narc Technologies.”

    An “F” is the lowest rating on the BBB’s 14-point scale.

    Claims appeared online that Narc was working with Ford Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Co. Narc blamed the claims on affiliates who violated its advertising policies, saying it had a process to weed out false claims, the BBB said.

    Although Narc claimed to have hundreds of clients for its database product, the company had not substantiated the claim as of May 25, the BBB said.

    Narc, whose Crowd Sourcing International identity often is referred to by the acronym CSI, had been the subject of a BBB inquiry since January. The company purports to be in the business of paying people to record the license-plate numbers of cars for entry in a database used by companies that repossess vehicles.

    For its part, Narc says on its website that it is getting a bum deal from the BBB.

    “America was founded to create new opportunity,” the company said. “Our government created the Small Business Administration (SBA) to help new businesses. Over 2,000,000 people lost their jobs in 2009. New businesses create jobs. New businesses accounted for 70% of job creation over the last 10 years, stated by President Obama on March 17, 2009. Yet, the BBB penalizes new businesses.”

    Read the BBB report on Narc (Crowd Sourcing International) as of May 28, 2010.

  • UPDATE: Web References, Images Linked To Investing Raise New Questions About PPE-Life; Records Suggest Recruitment Bids Started In January And That Promoters Referenced Warren Buffet

    A video promotion for PPE-Life, which is facing a challenge for allegedly selling unregistered securities in South Carolina, references Warren Buffet. Buffet, the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, is a legendary stock trader. He is not believed to have any tie to PPE. The reference to Buffet as a "game changer" — and images of a bull and a bear — may make it harder for PPE to argue it is not selling securities as the South Carolina litigation proceeds. A PPE prospect or prosecutor reasonably could ask, "If PPE is not selling an investment, why does a video promo reference Warren Buffet and include images of a bull and bear?" Images of bulls and bears are inexorably linked to the investment business

    While securities regulators in South Carolina say a murky business known as PPE-Life recently has been holding recruitment meetings in the state, web records suggest that online recruitment efforts actually got under way months ago in anticipation of the company’s launch.

    Efforts to promote PPE appear to have begun in January, at least three months prior to PPE’s corporate registration being recorded in Florida and despite the fact virtually nothing was known about the firm’s business practices and business mix.

    At the same time, some promoters of PPE-Life appear to be building downlines by using a video that features narration about celebrated investment strategist Warren Buffet. The video is potentially embarrassing — if not problematic — for PPE because the company is facing a challenge in South Carolina amid allegations it is selling unregistered securities.

    Because Buffet — who is not believed to have any tie to PPE — is one of the foremost investment experts in the world, prospects and prosecutors alike reasonably could ask why his name is referenced in promotions for PPE if the company is not in the securities business. They also could ask why his name is referenced at all if Buffet has no tie to PPE.

    On Tuesday, the office of South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster described PPE-Life as a Florida company reluctant to provide details about its business, including the name of an unspecified “international bank” with which it purportedly is affiliated. McMaster ordered the company to cease and desist from selling securities and collecting money in the state.

    Advertisements and web records dating back to January, however, described PPE-Life as the “marketing arm” of an entity known as “PPE Bank International.” No such entity appears to have been registered in Florida, although a corporation named “PPE-Life Inc.” was formally registered on April 29, about three months after recruitment ads referencing both PPE-Life and PPE Bank International began to appear online.

    Other online references to PPE describe it as an “Agent with an offshore Lending Institution.”

    When John Barter, a PPE officer, was asked at a May 20 recruitment meeting in Sumter, S.C., to identify the bank, Barter allegedly responded that “I am the bank.”

    “Barter did not identify any bank and provided no evidence any such bank existed, but instead asserted, ‘I am the bank,’” according to South Carolina securities regulators.

    A domain name — PPELife.com — also was registered in January. The domain redirects to a website that displays a video. A message that reads “PPE Marketing welcomes you!” appears in the upper-right corner of the website, and the video includes images and commentary about NBA legend Michael Jordan and Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, along with an image of a bull and a bear and narration about Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffet.

    “Warren Buffet didn’t invent the stock market,” the video’s narrator intoned. “He changed the game of investing.” Gates was described as having changed the game of technology, and Jordan was described as having changed the game of basketball.

    It is not believed that Buffet, Gates and Jordan have any tie to PPE.

    It is common for multilevel-marketing (MLM) companies and affiliates to use images of celebrities and captains of industry in web promotions — even if the individuals depicted in photographs and mentioned by narrators have no connection to the business opportunities being advertised.

    The video appears to be a recruitment video to help participants build downlines in PPE and other programs. Although PPE’s name is not mentioned in the video, it is possible that the references to Buffet and Gates could put PPE in the position of explaining why promoters are spotligting the names of individuals associated with publicly traded companies if PPE is not in the business of selling securities. Meanwhile, the images of bulls and bears are inexorably tied to investment opportunities.

    Elsewhere on the web, a free classified ad with a publication date of Jan. 24, 2010, says this:

    “Ppe life is the marketing arm of ppe bank international. as a result of this marriage, banking has gone mlm!”

    The ad further claimed that PPE had chosen a service-provider for a recruitment feeder system.

    “what does this mean to you?” the ad asked. “this means that you can receive a paid position in this ground floor global opportunity for only $66 (one-time) not $599 (one-time). for $66 one- time, you will join a group of experienced entrepreneurs in a simple, forced 2×2, three-phase feeder system that will generate a third phase payout of $1,840. $599 of your $1840 will be used to to pay for your independent associate membership in ppe life. as an independent associate of ppe life you will receive: *a mastercard or visa credit card with a $1,000 limit (without a credit check)… *a monthly subscription to ppe lif …”

    The final words of the ad appear to have been cut off.

    Web records suggest that PPE affiliates are using at least two different feeder companies to build downlines in PPE. The presence of the feeder system suggests PPE’s recruitment efforts may be more widespread than initially believed, crossing both domestic and international borders.

    McMaster’s office said Tuesday that people who attended a May 20 PPE sit-down meeting in South Carolina were asked to pay $599 as an “initial membership fee” and a $50 per month “maintenance fee” thereafter. Attendees further were advised that returns of “up to $440,000 per year” could be earned through PPE.

    Attendees also were told they’d become eligible for loans at a “significant discount” and that funds collected from participants would be used to purchase “debentures earning 40% to 50% interest.”

    People who signed up were told they could earn “1.5% of loan payments on loans made to any members who subsequently join[ed] PPE” and also would receive a “free” credit card with a $1,000 limit, authorities said.

  • FBI, SEC Nab Pair Using Gmail To Run Insider-Trading Scam; Undercover Agents Responded To Offer To Sell Disney Earnings Report

    So, you want to use Google’s free Gmail service to pull off a scam? From this day forward you should not be confident that you’re not already caught. The FBI today announced that it set up a sting to nail two people who were trying to sell the quarterly earnings report of Walt Disney Co. before its scheduled release date by communicating with potential buyers through a Gmail account.

    Arrested today on federal charges of wire fraud and conspiracy were Bonnie J. Hoxie and Yonnie Sebbag. Hoxie, 33, of Los Angeles, was a Disney administrative assistant and had access to the company’s confidential communications. Sebbag, 29, also of Los Angeles, is a friend of Hoxie’s and used the alias “Jonathan Cyrus.”

    The scheme began when Sebbag and Hoxie sent anonymous letters through the U.S. mail to “multiple hedge funds and other investment companies, many of which were located in Manhattan, offering to sell the Inside Information for purposes of illegal insider trading,” authorities said.

    FBI agents posing as hedge-fund traders interested in obtaining the information communicated with the scammers, authorities said.

    In a separate fraud action by the SEC, the agency said the letters all had Los Angeles postmarks and stated (emphasis added):

    Hi, I have access to Disney’s (DIS) quarterly earnings report before its release on 05/03/10 [sic]. I am willing to share this information for a fee that we can determine later. I am sorry but I can’t disclose my identity for confidentiality reasons but we can correspond by email if you would like to discuss it. My email is [Actual Gmail Address Email Deleted By PPBlog]. I count on your discretion as you can count on mine. Thank you and I look forward to talking to you.

    At least 20 hedge funds, including funds based in several U.S. states and European countries, received the same or substantially the same letter, the SEC said.

    The SEC’s filing suggests the scammers were made to believe that the actual undercover agents were worried about the scammers being agents.

    “First of all, i am not a fed,” Sebbag allegedly wrote to the undercover agents. “I have no way to prove it at this point but i am not asking you to disclose your identity not i will disclose mine. It is up to you to determine if this is worth the risk as i did. I work for Disney, that is all i can tell you.”

    Sebbag, though, did not work for Disney. He lied about that and relied on the information provided by Hoxie, an actual Disney employee and Sebbag’s co-conspirator, authorities said.

    On May 14, the FBI “paid” Sebbag $15,000 for the inside information after meeting him in New York to seal the deal.

    “This investigation should serve as a warning, if you’re contemplating acquiring and profiteering from insider information, sometimes the person you’re trying to sell it to is really an undercover FBI agent,” said George Venizelos, acting assistant director-in-charge
    of the New York FBI field office.

    “What the case also shows is that the FBI’s vigilance is needed to police the small percentage of bad apples who can cause so much damage,” Venizelos said. “The majority behave like the dozens of hedge funds and investment companies that received Hoxie and Sebbag’s offers of insider Disney information: none took the bait, and almost all notified the FBI.”

    The SEC’s director of enforcement said the case sends a powerful message.

    “Hoxie and Sebbag stole Disney’s confidential pre-release earnings information and put it up for sale,” said Robert Khuzami. “Fortunately, multiple hedge funds reported the illicit scheme, and the SEC and criminal law enforcement authorities acted quickly to stop this brazen attempt to establish an ongoing insider trading business.”

    Prosecuutors noted that, after Sebbag received the $15,000, he “further agreed that he would provide similar confidential information in the future in return for a thirty percent share of any profits from the insider-trading scheme.”

    It is common for scammers to use free email addresses to cloak their identities.

    Credit for the busts was given to the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, which President Obama created in November 2009.

  • ONLINE PONZI FORUM BOMBSHELL: Matt Gagnon A ‘Danger To The Investing Public,’ SEC Says; Federal Judge Freezes Assets Of Mazu.com Pitchman Who Promoted Legisi, Other Alleged Scams

    Matt Gagnon of Mazu.com

    Ponzi forum operator or moderator? Online HYIP aficionado? Think you’re safe pitching fraud schemes because you’re “only” a promoter or forum “expert” and not the operator of the programs?

    Have a secret partnership deal with an HYIP fraudster? Using fancy, professional-sounding terms such as “due diligence” in your forum posts? Claiming you’ve done thorough research before recommending an “opportunity.”

    Pitching programs that advertise unusually large returns — while at once showcasing your knowledge about investment scams and steering people away from certain programs because they sound too good to be true?

    In an action that may send shockwaves across the Web world and Ponzi forums such as ASA Monitor, TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup, the SEC has gone to federal court and filed an emergency action to halt “a series of fraudulent, unregistered securities offerings” made through Mazu.com.

    U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh of the the Eastern District of Michigan has frozen the assets of Matthew J. Gagnon, 41, of Weslaco, Texas, and Portland, Ore. Gagnon is Mazu.com’s operator.

    “From January 2006 through approximately August 2007, Gagnon helped orchestrate a massive Ponzi scheme conducted by Gregory N. McKnight . . . and his company, Legisi Holdings, LLC,” the SEC said.

    The Legisi scheme raised about $72.6 million from more than 3,000 investors “by promising returns of upwards of 15% a month,” the SEC said.

    “Gagnon promoted Legisi but in doing so misled investors by claiming, among other things, that he had thoroughly researched McKnight and Legisi and had determined Legisi to be a legitimate and safe investment,” the SEC said.

    Among other things, the SEC alleged that Gagnon “had no basis for the claims he made about McKnight and Legisi.

    “Gagnon also failed to disclose to investors that he was to receive 50% of Legisi’s purported ‘profits’ under his agreement with McKnight,” the SEC said. “Gagnon received a net of approximately $3.8 million in Legisi investor funds from McKnight for his participation in the scheme.”

    Then, beginning in August 2007, “Gagnon fraudulently offered and sold securities representing interests in a new company that purportedly was to develop resort properties,” the SEC said.

    In this scheme, Gagnon “falsely claimed that the investment was risk-free and ‘SEC compliant,’ and guaranteed a 200% return in 14 months. In reality, however, Gagnon sent the money to a twice-convicted felon, did not register the investment with the SEC, and knew such an outlandish return was impossible,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon took in at least $361,865 from 21 investors, the SEC said.

    Still unfinished, Gagnon — in April 2009 — began promoting “a fraudulent offering of interests in a purported Forex trading venture,” the SEC said. “Gagnon guaranteed that the venture would generate returns of 2% a month or 30% a year for his investors. Gagnon’s claims were false, and Gagnon had no basis for making the claims.”

    Gagnon next turned to another Forex sceme, the SEC said.

    From October 2009 to November 2009, Gagnon “offered another purported Forex trading venture in which he claimed to have a trader in Europe who would trade foreign currencies for investors in exchange for 40% of any profits he generated,” the SEC said. “Gagnon removed this offer from his website in November 2009 when he received notice that the SEC had subpoenaed his bank records.”

    Despite his knowledge about Ponzi and fraud schemes, Gagnon repeatedly pitched such schemes, the SEC said.

    “Gagnon has been unrelenting in his efforts to raise money from the public through
    fraudulent, unregistered offerings,” the SEC said. “He remains a danger to the investing public.”

    Despite his sales pitches, “Gagnon has never been associated with a registered broker-dealer and has never been registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer or in any other capacity,” the SEC said.

    Among the people to whom Gagnon directed money was the late Bryan K. Foster, who was convicted in 1997 of five felony counts of wire fraud and sentenced to 41 months in prison. These convictions were recorded in U.S. District Court in Montana, according to records.

    In 2000, Foster was convicted in Colorado of one felony count of wire fraud and sentenced to five years in prison, according to records.

    Between July 13, 2007 and September 17, 2007, Gagnon sent at least $800,000 to accounts in the name of Trails Home LLC, which was controlled Foster, the SEC said. Money from the illegal Legisi program was included in the sum transferred to Foster for his purported investment program, the SEC said.

    The Legisi Program

    In 2005, McKnight was an underemployed General Motors worker living outside Flint, Mich., the SEC said, adding that he had financial problems.

    “In December 2005, McKnight began offering and selling interests in a pooled investment program variously called Legisi.com or Legisi,” the SEC said. “McKnight promoted the offering around the globe through an Internet website at www.legisi.com,” promising monthly returns of up to 15 percent.

    By February 2006, “McKnight incorporated a shell company called Legisi Holdings, LLC in the bank-secrecy haven of Nevis in the West Indies,” the SEC said.

    “McKnight asserted on the Legisi website that the Legisi program was merely a ‘loan program’ through which investors would ‘loan’ money to Legisi and, in return, Legisi would pay investors high rates of interest.

    But Legisi actually was “a classic pooled investment vehicle, in which investors invested money into a common venture with the expectation that the money would be used to generate profits, for McKnight and the investors, solely through the efforts of McKnight or others working on his behalf. The Legisi program was a security in the form of an investment contract,” the SEC said.

    “The Legisi program was also a massive Ponzi scheme,” the SEC said.

    In January 2006, McKnight and Gagnon discussed a deal by which Gagnon would promote Legisi on the Mazu.com website, the SEC said.

    “McKnight and Gagnon had known each other for several years after Gagnon recruited McKnight into a multilevel marketing business called ‘Mannatech,’” the SEC said. “McKnight became part of Gagnon’s ‘down line,’ meaning that a portion of McKnight’s commissions from selling Mannatech products went to Gagnon.”

    McKnight paid Gagnon “a total of approximately $4,532,512 between January 29, 2006 and April 14, 2008,” the SEC said. “All of the money Gagnon received from McKnight consisted of investor funds. There were no ‘profits’ generated by Legisi.”

    Gagnon netted about $3.8 million in the scheme, the SEC said.

    “On behalf of McKnight, Gagnon solicited investors around the world through the publicly available Mazu.com website,” the SEC said. “Gagnon wrote and/or reviewed and approved the content of the Mazu website. No valid registration statement was filed or was in effect with the Commission in connection with Gagnon’s offer and sale of Legisi program investment contracts.”

    SEC: Forum Moderators Helped Push Ponzi Scheme

    “Between approximately January 2006 and August 2007, Mazu employees working on Gagnon’s behalf and at his direction promoted the Legisi program in emails, in Mazu Business Packs and DVDs they sent to investors, and on the Legisi Forum,” the SEC charged.

    “The Legisi Forum was an on-line chat room accessible through the Legisi.com website. Several Mazu employees served as ‘moderators’ on the Legisi Forum. Mazu’s support services also included answering questions over the telephone and email,” the SEC said.

    Forum shills performed services for Legisi and deflected concerns when CNN carried a negative report on the company, the SEC said.

    “The Mazu employees acting as moderators encouraged readers to invest in Legisi, assisted them in transferring money to Legisi, encouraged investors to bring in new investors, and offered investors personal assistance in bringing in referrals,” the SEC said. “They also encouraged investors to keep their monthly earnings with Legisi, rather than withdrawing them, in order to achieve purportedly higher returns. They made sure transfers of money between investors and Legisi went smoothly. The moderators updated investors on changes to the Legisi program like new minimum investment amounts and referral fee rules.

    “The moderators made posts on the Legisi Forum to prevent and diffuse investor rumors and concerns,” the SEC continued. “After an article questioning Legisi’s legitimacy appeared on the CNN Money website on May 8, 2007, one moderator wrote, ‘I think it is worth mentioning that the Forum is probably being read by people who are not Legisi members. So let’s not raise red flags to any bulls out there shall we. . .. Of course so far as any discussion on the [CNN Money] article is concerned I’m sure that everyone is aware that Greg went into Legisi knowing the law and planning for this eventuality. So keep a cool head and stop worrying about what you should do.”

    No Due Diligence

    McKnight was operating a classic Ponzi scheme fueled in part by Gagnon’s cheerleading on Mazu.com, the SEC said.

    Despite the relentless hype, Gagnon performed no due diligence and simply fabricated information or passed along claims as though they were factual, the SEC said.

    “Gagnon did not obtain or review any of McKnight’s trading records, bank and brokerage account statements, or e-currency account records at any point prior to, or during, Gagnon’s promotion of Legisi,” the SEC charged.

    SEC: Gagnon ‘Recklessly Disregarded’ Scam Warning Signs

    “Throughout the time that Gagnon promoted Legisi, he simultaneously warned readers about a type of fraud referred to as a high yield investment program. High yield investment programs, commonly called ‘HYIPs,’ typically involve off-shore companies promising very high rates of interest generated by investment in foreign currencies and a variety of other vehicles, along with repeated hyping of the legitimacy of the program,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon understood the HYIP fraud universe, but nevertheless pitched Legisi, which had promoted an unusually high rate of return and had other markers of the exact kind of scam Mazu.com warned about on its website, the SEC said.

    “From at least April 2006 through at least May 2007 Gagnon provided on the Mazu website an accurate description of a HYIP by stating that they (emphasis added by PP Blog):

    collect funds from lenders as investment capital or deposits and promise a return that is usually extremely high in exchange for ‘borrowing your money.’ The result? Generally after a period of time you are free to withdraw your capital and or your profits, or you can ‘reinvest’ them to earn additional profits. In theory, the compounding can create a crazy return on investment given time . . .

    * * * * * *

    Sadly, most HYIPs are offshore fronts that don’t lie within U.S. jurisdiction and you have no recourse when they steal your money. Most HYIPs realize this and they bank on it! They’ve got you right where they want you. Most also allude to making their profit in legitimate investment vehicles when in reality, you have no idea where they’re making their profit.

    And Gagnon also warned readers about Ponzi schemes.

    “On the Mazu website between at least April 2006 and May 2007, Gagnon accurately described a Ponzi scheme as an ‘investment program touting huge returns in a short period of time. Any returns someone sees are paid out of monies gathered from the investors. No real product, investment, or business takes place,’” the SEC said.

    The Legisi Ponzi began to unravel by September 2007, its decay brought about in part by “the federal seizure of an e-currency provider that was holding $1.8 million for McKnight,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon then “attempted to extort money from McKnight,” the SEC said.

    “On September 9, 2007, Gagnon informed McKnight that he was ending the partnership between Legisi and Mazu,” the SEC said. “Gagnon offered McKnight a choice: send Gagnon and several of Gagnon’s associates approximately $2.5 million, tell the Legisi members that Gagnon was starting a real estate fund, and that Mazu and Legisi were parting amicably, or Gagnon would email the entire Legisi membership and tell them ‘the truth’ about McKnight’s fraud.”

    Read the SEC complaint.

  • South Carolina Attorney General Orders Florida Company To Halt Sales Of Alleged Securities; PPE-Life Inc. Told To ‘Cease And Desist’ Amid Fraud Fears

    A mysterious, upstart company registered as a corporation in Ocala, Fla., has been ordered by the attorney general of South Carolina to stop selling securities and collecting money in the state.

    Attorney General Henry McMaster ordered the company — PPE-Life Inc. (PPE) — to “cease and desist” after the state’s Securities Division opened a probe May 14 amid reports the company was holding recruitment meetings in Sumter, S.C.  Sumter, a military town, is home to Shaw Air Force Base.

    PPE held a meeting at a hotel about 5 miles away from the base May 20, according to records. It was unclear if members of the military were in attendance, but South Carolina has had a problem with fraud schemes targeted at military members and churchgoers.

    Two PPE representatives were named in the cease-and-desist order: John Barter, who is listed as an officer of the firm in Florida records, and Rick Crocker. Barter’s address was listed as Ocala, and Crocker’s was listed as Wilmington, N.C.

    Investigators said people who attended the May 20 meeting were told that PPE was the marketing arm of an unspecified “international bank.” When asked to identify the bank, Barter allegedly responded that “I am the bank.”

    Attendees also were kept in the dark about other details, which were dismissed as unimportant for the purposes of the meeting.

    Barter and Crocker “refused to respond to questions from attendees regarding the method by which PPE would make money or extend loans, or the products that PPE would invest in,” authorities said.

    The purpose of the meeting was to “sign up.” Details would be “sorted out at a later time,” authorities said attendees were told.

    Attendees were asked to pay $599 as an “initial membership fee” and a $50 per month “maintenance fee” thereafter and advised that returns of “up to $440,000 per year” could be earned through PPE.   Attendees further were told they’d become eligible for loans at a “significant discount” and that funds collected from participants would be used to purchase “debentures earning 40% to 50% interest.”

    People who signed up were told they could earn “1.5% of loan payments on loans made to any members who subsequently join[ed] PPE” and also would receive a “free” credit card with a $1,000 limit, authorities said.

    Meanwhile, attendees were told that PPE had spent “at least $1.5 million to ensure that the federal government would not shut down PPE” and that “older” members would benefit as “new members were recruited,” authorities said.

    At the May 20 meeting, someone raised a concern that the government could shut down the program, authorities said.

    In response to the concern, Barter said, “the Feds love us,” authorities said.

    They added that attendees were told that meetings had been held in Sumter for “at least six weeks.”

    Neither Barter nor Crocker is licensed to sell securities in South Carolina, authorties said.

    Read the cease-and-desist order against PPE, Barter and Crocker.

  • Data Network Affiliates Asks Members If They Know About Their ‘DNA Tax Benefits’; Pitch Highlights Mileage Deduction; Firm Quotes IRS In First Paragraph Of Email

    An email DataNetworkAffiliates’ (DNA) members received today led with a pitch that participating in DNA could result in large tax deductions for mileage.

    DNA purports to be in the business of paying members to record license-plate numbers for entry in a database that would be potentially useful to law enforcement and the AMBER Alert program for abducted children. The company also purports to be in the cell-phone business and other businesses such as juices and magnetic sleep systems.

    Today’s email to affiliates suggested that people who racked up mileage while recording plate numbers for DNA could qualify for large, business-related tax write-offs.

    “Did you know about your DNA Tax Benefits . . .” the DNA pitch began. “Imagine driving 10,000 miles for your DNA Business = up to a $5,000 Tax Deduction… “IRS Announces 2010 Standard Mileage Rates” IR-2009-111, Dec. 3, 2009… and this is just one of many…”

    DNA did not explain what “one of many” meant. The line that trailed off with the ellipses, however, was in the context of tax deductions. The headline on the email was titled, “DNA = FREE = A Great Opportunity with Great Tax Benefits.”

    DNA then published snippets from an IRS news release with a Washington dateline. Because DNA’s email included only snippets of the IRS release — and because DNA added commentary to the email and appears not to have distinguished its words from the words of the IRS — members could become confused about whether the IRS was talking or whether DNA was talking.

    DNA’s email instructed members to “[c]heck with your accountant to find out what you DNA Business will allow you to legally write off . . .”

    Here is the full IRS news release from Dec. 3 (italics added):

    IR-2009-111, Dec. 3, 2009

    WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2010 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

    Beginning on Jan. 1, 2010, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

    * 50 cents per mile for business miles driven
    * 16.5 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
    * 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations

    The new rates for business, medical and moving purposes are slightly lower than last year’s. The mileage rates for 2010 reflect generally lower transportation costs compared to a year ago.

    The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs as determined by the same study. Independent contractor Runzheimer International conducted the study.

    A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle. In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for any vehicle used for hire or for more than four vehicles used simultaneously.

    Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

    Revenue Procedure 2009-54 contains additional details regarding the standard mileage rates.

    Here is the portion of the email concerning tax write-offs DNA sent today (italics added):

    WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2010 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

    Beginning on Jan. 1, 2010, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

    * 50 cents per mile for business miles driven
    * 16.5 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
    * 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations

    Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

    Check with your accountant to find out what you DNA Business will allow you to legally write off…

    DNA spent the balance of the email on topics such as a “Travel Agent Package,” a “Back Relief System,” a “Foot Insole System,” cell phones, juices and other offerings.

    “CHECK OUT YOUR BACK OFFICE YOU CAN BUY $59.95 DNA MAGNETIC PRODUCTS FOR $19.95 AND THEY ARE CHEAPER BY THE DNA DOZEN . . .” DNA said. “BUY THE BACK RELIEF SYSTEM TODAY IT IS A GREAT DNA PRODUCT TO DEMONSTRATE . . .

    “I”N FACT YOU SHOULD BUY A DOZEN . . . GIVE THEM TO TEN FRIENDS OR 5 COUPLES TO TRY . . . THEY WILL MOST LIKELY BUY THEM AND . . . SIGN UP FOR FREE & START SELLING THEM . . .”

    DNA did not explain how it had arrived at the conclusion that people shown the products “most likely” will buy them.

    DNA, which uses a domain registered in the Cayman Islands and conducts customer service with a free gmail address, also did not say why it chose to highlight the tax advantages of repping for the company over the advantages of any actual product offered by the firm.

    The DNA program — and also a similar program operated by a company known as Narc That Car and Crowd Sourcing International — potentially could lead to tax challenges by the United States because of claims made by promoters and the nature of the business itself.

    Both DNA and Narc purport to pay members to record license-plate numbers. Both firms are multilevel-marketing (MLM) programs and have encouraged participants to write down plate numbers or record them on cell-phone cameras at retail outlets such as Walmart, Target, Giant Eagle and others.

    Promoters also have been encouraged to record plate numbers at places such as churches and doctors’ offices.

    The approach has led to questions about whether members would engage in tax abuses such as claiming trips to the grocery store and places of worship as deductible business miles because they recorded plate numbers while in parking lots. Because members have been encouraged to use cell phones and cameras to record plate numbers, a second tier of potential tax abuse could open up, with members trying to write off the costs in whole or in part of any item that had even a tenuous link to the purported business of recording plate numbers.

    There also are questions about whether DNA and Narc members could engage in grandiose frauds such as attending a funeral thousands of miles away and seeking to deduct the trip as a business expense because plate numbers were recorded at the destination site.

    Neither DNA nor Narc publish the names of purported clients of the database products. Affiliates have published purported “training” videos on YouTube that encouraged prospects to record plate numbers virtually anywhere. Some of the videos have suggested that members should behave inconspicuously while recording numbers — for example, driving to the parking lot of a retailer and remaining in the car while recording the plate numbers.

    Details about the propriety, safety and legality of the DNA and Narc programs have been given short-shrift in the purported training videos. It is known that members of an alleged Ponzi scheme known as AdSurfDaily have promoted DNA and Narc, and ASD has been linked to people who participate in tax schemes.

    Parts of DNA’s email today that did not deal with taxes appeared to have been copied from earlier emails and pasted into today’s email. DNA, for example, said today it was “CELEBRATING 69 DAYS IN BUSINESS . . .”

    Earlier emails made the same claim about a celebration for 69 days in business. DNA also celebrated a “Two Month Anniversary.”