Category: Uncategorized

  • REPORT: Former SEC Supervisor Aided Arizona ‘Numerologist’ Running A Ponzi Scheme; SEC Employee In Separate Case Probed For Threatening Boss, Bringing Weapons To Work

    H. David Kotz, SEC Inspector General
    H. David Kotz, SEC Inspector General

    A former supervisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission unwittingly aided a man accused of operating a Ponzi scheme in Arizona, according to a report by SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz.

    Meanwhile, Kotz reported that the Office of Inspector General (OIG) also investigated a case in which an SEC enforcement accountant allegedly threatened a supervisor by email. The supervisor, according to Kotz, reported the incident to the SEC’s Security Branch, claiming that the accountant “routinely brought a ‘large buck knife’ to work.”

    A “buck knife” commonly is associated with hunting, although the report did not identify the weapon as a hunting knife.

    On April 1, investigators interviewed the accountant and discovered he was carrying a folding knife with “a 31/2 to 4-inch blade.” An investigator also discovered two similar knives in the accountant’s back pack. The knives were confiscated “immediately,” and the accountant was placed on leave and banned from the building.

    “The OIG found that the Enforcement Accountant violated Title 18 U.S.C. § 930 of the
    Federal criminal code by knowingly carrying dangerous weapons into a federal facility,” according to the Kotz report. “Specifically, the OIG found that on April 1, 2009, the Enforcement Accountant knowingly possessed at least three ‘dangerous weapons’ in a ‘federal facility,’ as those terms are defined in 18 U.S.C. § 930(g), and had routinely been in possession of dangerous weapons within the SEC building for several years despite his own admission that he knew it was unlawful to do so.”

    Investigators also discovered evidence that suggested the accountant “was not completely truthful in his testimony before the OIG and in his previously-submitted Declaration for Federal Employment regarding his prior criminal conviction and probation for driving while intoxicated.”

    Federal prosecutors referred the case to an administrative proceeding, and the SEC is seeking to fire the accountant. The dismissal case is pending.

    Ponzi Case And ‘Soothsayer’

    In the Ponzi case, the OIG concluded that a former supervisor in the SEC’s Office of Administrative Services used an SEC computer to exchange “approximately 2,300 e-mails that were related to the Ponzi scheme perpetrator and his companies.”

    Although the Kotz report did not identify the specific Ponzi suspect by name, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) did in a June 11 news release: Jerome Carter of Scottsdale.

    ACC identified Carter as a purported “soothsayer” who could predict the future. Carter said on his website that he checked into a hotel in the World Trade Center on Sept. 10, 2001, one day before the 9/11 attacks.

    Getting a “bad feeling” later in the day, Carter said, he checked out of the hotel. The Trade Center complex was struck by two hijacked airliners the next day, killing nearly 3,000 people.

    Carter himself was killed in a motorcycle accident in September 2009, about four months after admitting he had operated the Ponzi scheme.

    “Through a website, video teleconferences, radio shows and event appearances, Carter proclaimed himself as an international numerologist and spiritual adviser who could predict the future,” ACC said. “While working as a life coach to individuals in his VIP coaching program, Carter represented to potential investors that he could, through the use of numerology concepts, improve their financial well-being by investing in futures and commodities.

    “As owner and operator of The Greatest Only Divine Productions, LLC and Good Only Done Productions, Carter sold investment and commodity contracts totaling $432,450 to at least 65 investors,” ACC said. “The Commission found that Carter used investor funds for his own personal use and benefit, but in Ponzi-like fashion, returned a total of $154,450 to some of the investors. In settling this matter, Carter admits to the Commission’s findings and agrees to the entry of the consent order.”

    During its probe of Carter, ACC came into possession of emails from the SEC supervisor and turned them over to the OIG.

    “The ACC investigator also informed the OIG that several other witnesses in the ACC investigation had identified the Supervisor as the person who handled money for this Ponzi scheme perpetrator and his companies,” the Kotz report said.

    OIG investigators did not name the supervisor in the report, but said she took early retirement after the OIG probe began and accepted a $25,000 buyout.

    “The OIG discovered that during the period in question, the Supervisor used her SEC e-mail account to conduct business on behalf of the Ponzi scheme perpetrator and his companies on virtually a daily basis,” the Kotz report said. “The OIG found that the Supervisor was extensively involved in handling the payments to and from his victims, and used her SEC e-mail account to communicate directly with those victims.”

    No evidence was found that the supervisor knew Carter was operating a Ponzi scheme.

    OIG investigators “did find that the Supervisor violated Commission rules and policies on the use of SEC office equipment, as well as the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch by using the SEC’s email system, her SEC computer, and other SEC resources to assist the Ponzi scheme perpetrator operate his companies, whether or not she knew those companies were a Ponzi scheme,” according to the report.

    Federal prosecutors declined to file criminal charges, the Kotz report said. The OIG recommended that the SEC try to claw back the $25,000 buyout accepted by the former supervisor, and the matter is pending.

    Read the Inspector General’s report.

  • BULLETIN: Tom Petters Guilty On All 20 Counts In $3.65 Billion Ponzi Scheme Case In Minnesota

    breakingnewsBULLETIN: Minnesota businessman Tom Petters has been found guilty by a Minnesota jury.

    UPDATED 6:03 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) Jury deliberations encompassed 32 hours over all or parts of five days. Petters blamed the fraud on subordinates, but the jury did not buy into his explanation that he had been inattentive to business since the stabbing death of his son in 2004.

    “There was a lot of people hurt, not just him,” a juror said, discounting Petters’ assertion that his family pain caused by the death of his son explained a massive fraud.

    It was the largest fraud in Minnesota history, consuming as much as $3.65 billion. The scheme, which featured phantom sales of merchandise to big-box retailers, collapsed in September 2008. All of the counts against Petters were felonies. He effectively faces life in prison.

    In addition to his liquidation business, which purported to buy merchandise from bankrupt retailers and resell it at a handsome profit to discount stores, Petters owned famous companies such as Sun Country Airlines and Polaroid Corp.

    Prosecutors said the scheme was sustained by bogus purchase orders and persistent lying to investors.

    Prosecutor Joe Dixon said the FBI, the IRS and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service put together an excellent case. Dixon noted that Petters faced a maximum sentence of 350 years in prison.

    At 5:45 P.M. ET (U.S.A.), jurors and prosecutors were expected to appear before cameras to answer questions. Here is a video uplink from the Star Tribune of Minneapolis/St. Paul.

    It’s live as of this post: 6:03 P.M. ET.

  • Shawn Merriman Pleads Guilty In Colorado Ponzi Case; Faces 20 Years In Prison For Swindling Investors And Using Money To Buy Rembrandt Paintings And Go On Safari

    breakingnewsShawn R. Merriman has pleaded guilty to mail fraud in a Ponzi scheme case that swindled dozens of investors in Colorado,  Minnesota and Utah. The scheme involved more than $20 million, prosecutors said.

    Merriman, 46, of Aurora, Colo., faces up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The SEC said he used some of the money to buy valuable art, including works by Rembrandt.

    Like Bernard Madoff and others, Merriman’s scheme featured bogus account statements.

    “Merriman repeatedly deceived investors, many of whom considered him a personal friend, by sending them fictitious account statements showing annual rates of return of 7 to 20 percent,” the SEC said.

    But Merriman “did not trade stocks and options after his first year of operations,” the SEC said.

    Regardless, “he used millions of dollars in investor funds to support his lavish lifestyle and pay out withdrawals by other investors. He also offered ‘rebates’ to existing investors to entice them to invest additional money with him.”

    Merriman also bought “classic cars, motorcycles, motor homes, a cabin in Idaho and fine art collections, including works by Rembrandt that are worth millions of dollars,” the SEC said.

    Partial list of art seized by prosecutors in Shawn Merriman Ponzi case.
    Partial list of art seized by prosecutors in Shawn Merriman Ponzi case.

    Among Merriman’s cars seized by prosecutors were an Aston Martin and a 1930 Lincoln. Prosecutors also seized at least 34 firearms, along with taxidermy. One of Merriman’s pastimes was safari.

    Prosecutors said Merriman operated his scheme for 15 years before it collapsed. He once was a Mormon bishop.

  • THE PONZI CHILL: In Weeks Prior To Exposure Of $1.2 Billion Scheme, Scott Rothstein Threatened Journalist With Lawsuit, Newspaper Says

    In what is becoming a familiar refrain in the Ponzi universe, former Fort Lauderdale attorney Scott Rothstein threatened a Florida newspaper and one of its reporters in the weeks prior to the exposure of his $1.2 billion fraud, the Sun Sentinel reported.

    The Sun Sentinel identified the reporter as Brittany Wallman.

    “Am I not making myself clear?” Rothstein railed in a June 29 email to the newspaper’s attorney. “I just arrived home only to receive another message from another business associate advising that a representative of your client is asking questions about me and my business in a manner clearly intended to cast me and my business interests in a negative light . . . Your client’s representative is a renegade that stands for everything that your client should never tolerate, and guaranteed to result in your client being sued if their reporter continues on her current path.”

    Rothstein, now charged with racketeering and other offenses, also tried to muzzle the newspaper in an earlier email that threatened legal action, according to the Sun Sentinel. On June 26, Rothstein railed against Wallman for asking questions that led to a July 11 story in which the Sun Sentinel reported Rothstein was paying Fort Lauderdale city police $1,080 a day to guard his home 24 hours a day — a cost of nearly $400,000 per year.

    Another email threat — this one smarmy and passive-aggressive — was sent Aug. 4.

    “Hey David . . . hope all is well. We are getting ready to file and serve our action against Brittany and the paper and wanted to give you a heads up. Do you want to accept service or should we just serve Brittany directly and the paper through its registered agent. Let me know… Be well, Scott.”

    No lawsuit ever was served, the Sun Sentinel reported. By late October, Rothstein was fleeing to Morocco, his alleged giant Ponzi scheme involving fraudulent legal settlements about to be exposed.

    In 2008, the Moultrie Observer, a Georgia newspaper, posted a note on its website that it planned to publish an editorial warning against Ponzi and pyramid schemes. The simple act of posting the note sparked a series of emailed threats against the newspaper.

    The threats coincided with the exposure of the alleged AdSurfDaily and Golden Panda Ad Builder Ponzi scheme in Florida and Georgia.

    “Curiously, the e-mails appeared to be a form letter with different names attached. And ironically, the only people who named any companies were those making the lawsuit threats,” the newspaper reported.

    Throughout July 2008, various members of ASD used online forums to threaten the company’s critics with lawsuits. The threats continued even after the U.S. Secret Service seized tens of millions of dollars from the bank accounts of ASD President Andy Bowdoin.

    Earlier this year, supporters of AdViewGlobal, an autosurf firm with close ties to ASD, took a page from the ASD playbook and threatened to sue critics. The threats were made despite the fact Bowdoin had been named a defendant in a federal lawsuit filed under RICO statutes.

  • MALWARE ALERT: Beware Of Email Purporting To Come From The U.S. Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (CDC)

    The swine-flu (H1N1) outbreak has led to a “strikingly large malware campaign,” AppRiver reports.

    An email being sent out by spammers at a rate of 18,000 per minute purports to be from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), but is actually from a fake CDC site that installs malware.

    Recipients are asked to complete registration for the “State Vaccination H1N1 Program,” and then their computers become infected.

    “The link is in fact to an executable file that contains a copy of a Trojan most commonly identified as xpack or Kryptik,” AppRiver reports.  “[O]nce installed on your PC, this Trojan will create a security-free gateway on your system and will proceed to download and install additional malware without your authorization. It also enables a remote hacker to take complete control of your computer. This malware can log your typed keystrokes and send confidential personal and financial data (including banking information, credit card numbers, and website passwords) to a remote hacker.”

    News of the swine-flu spam and malware attack came just days after Alan M. Ralsky, the “Godfather of Spam,” and three fellow spammers were sentenced to terms in federal prison.

    Ralsky, 64, of West Bloomfield, Mich., received 51 months. Scott Bradley, 48, also of West Bloomfield, received 40 months.

    Ralsky and Bradley also were sentenced to five years of supervised release following their release from prison. Each man was ordered to forfeit $250,000 seized by prosecutors in December 2007.

    How Wai John Hui, 51, a resident of Hong Kong and Canada, was sentenced to 51 months in prison.

    Hui was sentenced to three years’ supervised release following his prison term, and agreed to forfeit $500,000 to the United States.

    John S. Bown, 45, of Fresno, Calif., was sentenced to 32 months in prison and three years’ of supervised probation after release.  He agreed to forfeit $120,000 to the United States.

  • U.S. Attorney: Rothstein Ponzi Money Went To Politicians, Charities; ‘High-Ranking’ Police Officers Received ‘Gratuities’

    ponziblotterIn a criminal information and news release dripping with the word “co-conspirators,” federal prosecutors, the FBI and the IRS said Ponzi proceeds were used to grease wheels in law enforcement and pollute the worlds of business and politics in South Florida.

    Former attorney Scott Rothstein of Fort Lauderdale was arrested for racketeering yesterday. He was arraigned, denied bail and jailed. Residents are waiting for other shoes to drop in what is shaping up to be a scandal of monumental proportions.

    No co-conspirators were named immediately. But even police officers were involved and received “gratuities,” prosecutors said.  Politicians received donations designed to evade campaign-finance laws.

    One crime targeted at clients of Rothstein’s law firm involved $57 million, fraudulent legal documents, forgeries and a claim a lawsuit had been won when it actually had been settled against the interests of the clients, prosecutors said.

    “To perpetuate and conceal the fraud, defendant Rothstein and other co-conspirators created a false federal court order, purportedly signed by a Federal District Court Judge, stating that the clients had won the lawsuit and were owed a judgment of approximately $23 million. The false court order also stated that the defendant in the civil suit had transferred the funds to the Cayman Islands to avoid paying the judgment. Defendant Rothstein and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients that to recover those funds, the clients were required to post bonds. In this way, defendant Rothstein caused the clients to wire transfer approximately $57 million to a trust account he controlled, purportedly to satisfy the bonds.”

    But that was only a single element of a colossal fraud, prosecutors said.

    “Rothstein and other co-conspirators used the funds obtained through the Ponzi scheme for their own benefit,” prosecutors said. “This included, for example, using the money to fund and operate [the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA) law firm], to make contributions to federal, state, and local political candidates, and generous donations to public and private charitable institutions.

    “The money was also used to pay for lavish gifts, including exotic cars, jewelry, boats, cash and bonuses to individuals and members of RRA, to hire local police officers to provide security, and to provide gratuities to high ranking members of police agencies.

    “In addition, the money was used to purchase controlling interests in restaurants and other businesses, and to socialize with politicians and sports figures,” prosecutors continued. “These expenditures were calculated to enhance defendant Rothstein’s reputation and ability to solicit potential investors in the Ponzi scheme, provide an air of legitimacy and credibility to RRA, engender loyalty, and deflect law enforcement scrutiny.”

    Acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman of the Southern District of Florida said the crime was epic and had stained the legal profession.

    “Attorneys, like elected officials, hold a special position of trust in our society, and owe a corresponding duty to deal honestly with their clients and to promote their clients’ best interests,” Sloman said. “This attorney breached that duty and stole approximately $1.2 billion from clients and investors. He spent his clients’ money on real estate, cars, yachts, politics and philanthropy, all to create the illusion that he, his law firm, and his schemes were hugely successful.

    “Now, the mansions, Ferraris, yachts, the law firm and his friends are gone,” Sloman said. “[Rothstein] sought to buy power and influence at the expense of his clients, and instead has potentially bought himself a lengthy prison sentence.”

    The New York Times reported that Rothstein, who was disbarred by the Supreme Court of Florida last week, was overheard yesterday giving legal advice to people with whom he shared a holding cell before his arraignment.

    Rothstein, 47, faces up to 100 years in prison if convicted of racketeering and associated crimes such as mail fraud, wire fraud and money-laundering offenses.

    A veteran FBI agent said Rothstein’s world was filled with artificial realities.

    “Scott Rothstein appeared to be a charismatic, reputable attorney one could trust to invest one’s money and make a sizeable profit,” said John V. Gillies, Special Agent in Charge of the Miami Office of the FBI.

    “We now know it was all smoke and mirrors,” Gillies said.

    Daniel W. Auer, IRS Special Agent in Charge, said the investigation is ongoing.

    “We will continue to move forward with this investigation, wherever it leads, and we will bring to justice those who defrauded the American public and members of our community out of their hard-earned money,” Auer said.

  • Senators Ask For Sanctions Against Antigua For Stonewalling Receiver In Alleged Allen Stanford Ponzi Case

    breakingnewsEight U.S. Senators have introduced a resolution calling for banking sanctions against the Caribbean island nation of Antigua for stonewalling in the Ponzi scheme investigation of Allen Stanford.

    The senators said Stanford might have lent the Antigua government “at least” $85 million before the alleged scheme collapsed earlier this year and that the money “presumably came from Stanford investor funds.”

    Stanford is accused by U.S. regulators and criminal prosecutors of presiding over a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme through the sale of CDs. He is jailed in Texas awaiting trial.

    The resolution calls on the United States to use its voices in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank “to oppose making any loans to the Government of Antigua and Barbuda until that Government cooperates with the United States and compensates the victims of the Stanford Financial Group fraud.”

    “Instead of stonewalling efforts to recover assets linked to the scam perpetrated by Allen Stanford and his firm, the government of Antigua and Barbuda should join U.S. and international organizations in trying to find some measure of justice for victims,” said Sen. Thad Cochran, R.-Miss. “Government officials in Antigua and Barbuda must understand that their lack of cooperation is unacceptable.”

    A Democrat — Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire — joined seven Republicans in introducing the resolution.

    One Republican said Antigua and Barbuda were acting in “absurd” fashion.

    “The Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Allen Stanford cheated thousands of people, many of them in the United States, out of their investments,” said Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama.

    Shelby is ranking Republican on the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

    “It is essential that to the extent possible these victims get their money back,” Shelby said. “It is absurd that the Government of Antigua and Barbuda is standing in the way of helping victims, while also holding out its hand for funding. This resolution makes clear that the United States will not accept such behavior.”

    A Mississippi Republican agreed.

    “Thousands of people have been victimized by the Stanford Ponzi scheme, including many who lost their life savings,” said Sen. Roger Wicker. “The cooperation of the Antigua government is essential to helping the victims of this fraud, but this assistance has been consistently denied. It is completely unacceptable for Antigua to receive any loan from the IMF and the World Bank, both of which receive significant funding from U.S. taxpayers. The American government needs to let it be known that this lack of cooperation is not acceptable. This resolution will send that message.”

    The alleged Stanford Ponzi sparked a banking crisis that rippled across the Caribbean and into Central and South America.  At least one autosurf made a veiled reference to the crisis in February.

    BizAdSplash was one of three surfs that came to life in the months following the seizure of funds tied to AdSurfDaily Inc., a surf registered in the United States and accused of running a $100 million Ponzi scheme.

    One of the key sales points of BizAdSplash was its purported offshore location. Two other surfs — AdViewGlobal and AdGateWorld — also bragged about being offshore. Promoters for the surfs said the offshore locations provided protection from the SEC, the IRS and state attorneys general. Promotions for the new surfs repeatedly referenced ASD.

    “We want to let you know that even though our banks in Panama are closed for the next day and half, the payment processors are NOT CLOSED,” BizAdSplash said on Feb. 24. “You can still buy Ad Packages through your chosen payment processor. You will get your 100% match today and will continue into next week.

    “So,” BizAdSplash continued, “if you purchased new Ad Packages yesterday from outside your Balance, you received a 100% matching bonus.

    “This 100% matching bonus will continue on today, through the weekend and on through Friday, March 6th!!!” the surf exclaimed.

    On Feb. 27 — just three days later — BizAdSplash told customers it was ending its affiliation with StrictPay, a payment processor with Panamanian ties.

  • Scott Rothstein Arrested; Charged With Racketeering

    breakingnewsUPDATED 1:19 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) Former Fort Lauderdale attorney Scott Rothstein was arrested by the FBI this morning after being charged with racketeering and other offenses.

    The arrest occurred only days after Rothstein was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court. Rothstein pleaded not guilty. He then was jailed without bail.

    Separately, federal prosecutors moved late last week to seize even more assets tied to Rothstein, including a luxury apartment in New York in the same building convicted Ponzi schemer Marc Drier had an apartment.

    Like Rothstein, Drier was an attorney. He is serving 20 years for defrauding investment and law clients. Drier’s apartment in the building was 34C; Rothstein’s was 42D.

    A prosecution under RICO statutes suggests investigators believe that Rothstein was part of a broader criminal enterprise that included others. The charges, which also included mail fraud and wire fraud, were part of a “criminal information,” as opposed to an indictment.

    Rothstein’s 70-attorney law firm — Rothstein Rosenfeldt and Adler (RRA) — was described  in today’s criminal information as an “Enterprise” as defined under federal racketeering statutes. Prosecutors charged that Rothstein had conspirators “known and unknown” who engaged in “a pattern of racketering activity.”

    No alleged co-conspirators were named.

    “The principal purpose of the racketeering conspiracy was to generate money for [Rothstein] and his co-conspirators through the operation of the Enterprise and through various criminal activities, including mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering,” prosecutors charged.

    They asserted that the RRA law firm was the the “base of operations” for a Ponzi and fraud scheme.

    “RRA was utilized by the defendant and his co-conspirators to unlawfully obtain approximately $1.2 billion from investors,” prosecutors charged.

    See Nov. 22 story. See Nov. 23 story on allegations RRA attorneys and employees were being paid with Ponzi proceeds.

    Read a story at SunSentinel.com. (Look to the left on the Sun Sentinel page to see a link to a video, with remarks from Rothstein’s attorney, who notably did not protest Rothstein’s innocence.)

  • Surf’s Up Celebrates One Year As Bowdoin-Endorsed Blather Box; Forum Deletes Another Discussion About AdViewGlobal Autosurf Amid Member Complaints

    A year ago yesterday these words appeared on AdSurfDaily’s Breaking News site:

    “All ASD Members are encouraged to join the ASD Members Advocate forum. The ASD Members Advocate forum should be your source for up-to-the-minute opinions and commentaries about ASD. We encourage you to join and get involved. Log on to http://asdmembers.ning.com/

    “Surf’s Up, Baby!”

    blatherAt about the same time, the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf was preparing to set up shop — purportedly from Uruguay. The announcement by ASD that it had endorsed Surf’s Up occurred eight days after U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer issued a devastating ruling that ASD had not demonstrated it was a lawful business and not a Ponzi scheme that had gathered tens of millions of dollars from participants, placing the money in ASD President Andy Bowdoin’s personal bank accounts.

    Some of the Surf’s Up Mods went on to start a forum for AVG. That forum went missing during the summer of 2009, after AVG announced it was suspending cashouts and exercising its version of a “rebates aren’t guaranteed” clause. At first AVG, which had promoted a series of 200-percent, matching-bonus offers virtually nonstop in 2009, blamed its lack of cash on the greed of members.

    It later backed away from that position, saying it had been a victim of a $2.7 million theft. George and Judy Harris were AVG’s purported owners. George Harris is Bowdoin’s stepson. Bowdoin identified Harris as the head of ASD’s “real estate division” at an ASD rally in Miami on July 12, 2008. The company reportedly gathered millions of dollars at the rally.

    Less than three weeks later, the U.S. Secret Service seized 10 Bowdoin bank accounts containing a total of about $65.8 million, according to court filings. Money from two of Bowdoin’s accounts was used to start a new account at a separate bank, and more than $157,000 of the opening deposit was used to pay off the mortgage on the Tallahassee home shared by George and Judy Harris, according to federal prosecutors.

    Prosecutors made the announcement in a forfeiture complaint filed Dec. 19, 2008, exactly one month after Collyer’s November ruling went against ASD. Regardless, AVG launched in February 2009, in the wake of two forfeiture complaints and the filing of a racketeering lawsuit against Bowdoin.

    AVG spent part of the month of December 2008 gathering money from prospects and all of the month of January 2009. By March 20, 2009, AVG was announcing its bank account had been suspended because too many members had wired transactions in excess of $9,500.

    At the same time, AVG also announced the resignation of Gary Talbert, its chief executive officer. In January, AVG said it had no connection to ASD, despite the fact Talbert had been an executive at ASD and filed sworn court filings in the August 2008 forfeiture case against ASD.

    Even as AVG was making its series of announcements about bad financial news, promoter Shad Foss sent out an email claiming that $5,000 spent on ASD turned into $15,000 “instantly!” according to recipients of the email.

    In May 2009 — on the same day the Obama administration announced a crackdown on offshore financial fraud — AVG announced it had found a new company to facilitate offshore wire transfers. The surf provided members detailed wiring instructions. Three days later, the company AVG described as a facilitator of the wire transfers issued a public denial that it had any business relationship with AVG.

    AVG never addressed the denial, choosing instead to say it had removed the new wire facility it had just announced because of a breakdown in negotiations. By June 25, AVG was announcing the suspension of cashouts. The AVG forum set up by the Surf’s Up Mods then went dark, as did a forum set up by AVG itself.

    AVG threatened to sue members who spoke out about the firm, saying its communications were protected by copyright laws. The surf also threatened forum members that it would contact their ISPs and file abuse reports for questioning AVG in public.

    Both Surf’s Up and the AVG forum operated by some of its Mods championed the pro se pleadings of Curtis Richmond in the ASD case. Richmond was convicted of contempt of court for harassing federal judges in a separate case, and was among a number of RICO defendants in a separate lawsuit ordered to pay more than $108,000 in damages and costs for engaging in racketeering and mail fraud by nuisancing public employees with vexatious lawsuits.

    Surf’s Up has a history of deleting posts from members who attempt to raise the issue of AVG. The forum’s official explanation is that it is an ASD forum, not an AVG forum, even though its Mods started the AVG forum. Some Surf’s Up members said they joined AVG because of representations made by the Mods.

    A number of Surf’s Up members participated in letter-writing campaigns on Bowdoin’s behalf. Surf’s Up sent an email to members in February 2009, speaking approvingly of the campaigns.

    The email endorsed a mail campaign led by “Professor” Patrick Moriarty. One month later, Moriarty was indicted on tax-fraud charges in a separate case. Research showed that he once started a nonprofit organization for a Missouri man accused of murdering a woman in cold blood and shooting a police officer four times.

    Dozens of Surf’s Up members congratulated Bowdoin in March 2009, after the forum published a letter from Bowdoin. The letter said Bowdoin was reentering the ASD case as a pro se litigant, even though he had given up his claims to tens of millions of dollars in January, assuring Collyer and the prosecutors that he never intended ever to reassert the claims.

    In April 2009, in their final response to a series of pro se motions from Bowdoin to reenter the case, prosecutors revealed he had signed a proffer letter in the case prior to submitting to the forfeiture in January. Bowdoin, prosecutors said, had admitted ASD was operating illegally at the time of the August 2008 seizure and that the company made up numbers in a bid to keep new money flowing into the firm.

    Regardless, some Surf’s Up members continued to shill for Bowdoin. His critics were referred to as “Rats, Bed Bugs, Maggots, Cockroaches And Everything Else.”

    One Surf’s Up poster called for members to form a militia and take up arms against the government.

    In the fall of 2008 and thereafter, Surf’s Up perpetuated a myth that the government had admitted privately that ASD was not a Ponzi scheme. The claim, which was cited on both the forum and in emails, sustained itself even through the summer of 2009.

    Even after the government filed a second forfeiture complaint in December 2008 that accused ASD of operating a Ponzi scheme, Surf’s Up and some of its members continued to insist that prosecutors had said ASD was not a Ponzi scheme and were filing reckless motions in a bid to save face.

    Surf’s Up has not sought to dispel the myth — and a year into its tenure as a Bowdoin-endorsed blather shop, members have raised questions about why it is improper to discuss AdViewGlobal.

  • Michigan Man Who Claimed Investment Returns Of 131 Percent Guilty In Ponzi Scheme Case; Mark Richard Hamlin’s Day-Trading Scheme Comparable To ASD’s Dangerous ’80/20′ Reinvestment Program

    ponziblotterAs Ponzi schemes go, it was far from the largest. But the case of Mark Richard Hamlin demonstrated that even smaller operators use Ponzi schemes to fuel personal spending that consumes an extraordinary percentage of investors’ funds.

    Hamlin’s day-trading scheme in Michigan gathered about $2 million from at least 90 investors between 2005 and 2008, when it collapsed. Of that, Hamlin used $668,000 for his personal expenses, the SEC said.

    Investors’ funds were dumped into Hamlin’s personal bank accounts, the SEC said.

    “[He] used investor funds to pay, among other things, $66,150 for rent and other rent
    related payments, $67,919 for automobiles, $12,708 for jewelry, $14,185 for his wedding,
    $9,543 for vacations and travel, and $58,553 for cash withdrawals,” the SEC said in May.

    Now Hamlin has pleaded guilty to wire fraud in a criminal case brought by the FBI and U.S. Attorney Donald A. Davis of the Western District of Michigan.

    Hamlin, 28, of Williamston, Mich., faces up to 20 years in prison and a restitution order expected to exceed $1.3 million at his sentencing. The sentencing date was not immediately clear.

    “Hamlin admitted at his plea hearing that he set up a stock trading company known as Kingdom First Trading (KFT) and solicited investors by promising higher than market rate returns,” prosecutors said. “Hamlin consistently lost money in trading, and concealed his insolvency by e-mailing fraudulent account statements to his investors.

    “The statements falsely assured investors that they were earning sizable profits and accumulating large balances,” prosecutors continued. “Hamlin further concealed his insolvency by diverting money from new investors to pay ‘earnings’ to earlier investors. As a result, investors left their money with Hamlin, and in some instances contributed more.”

    Despite assertions that his trading had earned a return of 131 percent in 2005, 116 percent in 2006, 50 percent in 2007 and 17.22 percent in the early part of 2008, Hamlin suffered losses in each of the years — and hid the losses while collecting money from investors to make Ponzi payments.

    “Hamlin’s investments realized losses of $18,118 in 2005, $267,372 in 2006, $218,591 in
    2007, and $140,781 from January 2008 through June 2008,” the SEC said. “His trading was profitable during only nine of the 39 months of the offering, generating a total of $22,150 in profit.”

    During its relatively short lifespan, the scheme sustained itself because investors wooed by Hamlin’s bogus claims kept reinvesting their paper “earnings,” prosecutors said.

    The same thing happens in autosurf Ponzi schemes, which often encourage participants to take out only a small percentage and plow their fictitious balances back into the scheme to preserve a surf’s cash flow.

    Ponzi enablers position themselves as experts when rendering such advice, which often is described as an “80/20” program. Both the AdSurfDaily and AdViewGlobal autosurfs pitched 80/20 programs, and both federal prosecutors and private attorneys have made veiled references to the reinvestment schemes in court filings.

  • A PONZI WORLD FIRST? Regulators Have Evidence Accused Minnesota Schemer Trevor Cook Bought A ‘Submarine’ To Shuttle To Private Island

    You’ve heard about the Ponzi mansions. You’ve heard about the luxury automobiles — Scott Rothstein’s $1.6 million Bugatti and the $350,000 Rolls-Royces he and suspects in other Ponzi schemes enjoyed.

    Now comes word that Trevor Cook, implicated in Minnesota with radio talk-show host Pat Kiley in an alleged Ponzi scheme involving at least $194 million, owned a submarine.

    Not a submarine sandwich, but an actual, two-person, submersible submarine used for underwater transit. It allegedly was purchased on eBay for $40,000 and was used to tool around the waters that surrounded his private island in Canada.

    Yep, he allegedly bought himself his own island, too.

    An old-fashioned speedboat to access the island, perhaps, was too practical. And perhaps building a bridge to the island upon which Cook could pilot his Rolls was too expensive, even for an alleged Ponzi-schemer forcing himself to draw the line somewhere. (Yes, regulators say that Cook, like Rothstein and others, also owned a Rolls.)

    At least two people who’ve been deposed in the Cook case have referenced the submarine. And Cook referenced it himself in an email sent to an associate in Europe last spring, according to the Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul.

    He appeared to be disappointed after the purchase, the newspaper reported, because the waters surrounding the island were muddy. Not to worry, though: Cook ventured the sub would serve its intended purpose much farther south — in Panama, where he believed the water to be more sub-friendly than those dark waters in Canada.

    We obtained a copy of the Sept. 14 transcript in which SEC attorney Steven L. Klawans was conducting the deposition of witness Gerald Durand. The deposition turned to the matter of Cook’s affinity for expensive things.

    “Does Cook own any boats, planes or anything?” Klawans asked Durand.

    “I heard be bought a sub,” Durand replied.

    The transcript does not capture the emotional feel of the setting, but it’s easy to imagine that people observing the deposition were stunned.

    “A what?” Klawans intoned.

    “Submarine,” Durand reaffirmed.

    A moment later, in response to another question by Klawans, Durand told a story that may become the stuff of legend in the Ponzi world.

    “[Cook] told me . . . he bought the sub because he bought the island, so he needed a submarine to sail around the water up there. It’s a two-man deal. Paid $40,000 for it off of [eBay].”

    Visit the Star Tribune, whose coverage of both the alleged Tom Petters’ Ponzi scheme and the alleged Cook/Kiley Ponzi scheme has been riveting.

    Screen shot: Deposition in Cook/Kiley Ponzi case.
    Screen shot: Deposition in Cook/Kiley Ponzi case.