Category: Writing And Branding

  • UPDATE: Is Club Asteria Missing An Executive? Blurb For ‘Director Of Sales And Marketing’ Goes Missing From Website Amid Reports Firm Has Suspended Cashouts

    A blurb for a key leader of an online “program” that claims to elevate people out of poverty globally has gone missing.

    The blurb for Hank Needham, whom Club Asteria identified as its director of sales and marketing, appears to have vanished between June 19 and today. Also missing from the Club Asteria webpage that identifies its leaders is Needham’s photograph.

    Club Asteria has not announced Needham’s departure. Why the blurb has been removed from the website was not immediately clear. Also unclear is whether Needham remains a Club Asteria employee and continues to hold an executive post at the Virginia-based firm, which trades on the name of the World Bank.

    In general, companies announce the departure of a key executive long in advance of the departure for the purposes of maintaining continuity and stakeholder trust.

    Needham, Club Asteria noted prior to the removal of the blurb, was “responsible for establishing Country, Regional and Network Team Leaders.

    “Hank has 22 Years (sic) experience in building Sales Teams throughout Europe, United States, Asia and Africa with special emphasis in the Network Marketing and Communications Industry (sic),” according to the now-removed blurb.

    In May, Club Asteria announced that its PayPal account had been frozen. There are reports today that the company has suspended member payouts for up to 60 days, but the company has not confirmed the reports on the news section of its website. Members have been grumbling on Ponzi scheme forums for weeks about drastically reduced cashouts from the firm.

    Remarks attributed to Andrea Lucas, Club Asteria’s managing director, appeared on Ponzi forums today. Lucas was quoted as saying, “We have made the decision to accumulate revenue share disbursements for the next 30 to 60 days.”

    Such a statement — if true — may signal that Club Asteria is having a serious cash crisis.

    On April 11, Club Asteria announced on its news website that it takes “very seriously our responsibility to remain financially solvent.”

    Many Club Asteria members preemptively claimed in promos for the firm that it was not operating a Ponzi scheme. The claims were juxtaposed against competing claims that a $19.95 monthly payment to Club Asteria could result in guaranteed earnings of $400 a week — nearly $21,000 a year for a 12-month outlay of about $240.

    See story from earlier today.

  • Star Tribune, Minnesota’s Largest Newspaper, Targeted In International ‘Scareware’ Cyberattack; 2 Suspects Arrested In Latvia; Bogus Ad Agency Purportedly Based In Miami Allegedly Used To Dupe Famous American Publishing Company

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This is one of those stories that can cause people to scream. The U.S. publishing industry has been deeply affected by the Internet. Print advertisers — the people who pay the bills — now can communicate directly and immediately with readers, a development that is sucking the life out of traditional print publishers. Publishers large and small are seeking ways to monetize electronic versions of print publications because that’s what much of the audience prefers.

    But switching in whole or in part to electronic publications has exposed the industry to a whole new set of problems, including wanton theft of entire editorial wells, theft of other intellectual property and trademark infringement. The story below details another new threat: the targeting of a famous journalism brand to drive traffic to an electronic fraud scheme.

    In 2009, the PP Blog suspended publication of a companion Blog on Ponzi schemes and securities fraud because of the theft of its entire editorial well. Earlier this year, the Blog suspended the publication of ads provided by Google because of chronic harassment directed at the Blog and some of its readers by a cyberstalker on YouTube. The PP Blog also has experienced sustained DDoS attacks, threats of “war” and threats believed to have originated with people sympathetic to online criminals.

    On April 6, the PP Blog reported such an incident to a federal law-enforcement agency.

    One of the most prominent publishing companies in America’s heartland was duped in a scheme  in which international criminals fabricated an “advertising agency” purportedly based in Miami and placed an ad by posing as media buyers for a major hotel chain, federal prosecutors said.

    When the Star Tribune newspaper tested the ad, the criminals initially covered their tracks by causing the ad to appear to be a normal ad for the Best Western hotel chain, the purported client of the purported advertising agency.

    Within two days of the Feb. 19, 2010, placement of the “ad,” however, Star Tribune readers interested in what they believed was a Best Western offering were subjected to a browser hijack in the Netherlands and Latvia that caused their computers to freeze and display pop-up messages for a purported “antivirus” software product.

    Such “scareware” attacks have been responsible for tens of millions of dollars in losses globally by duping computer-users into believing their machines have been infected with a virus or malware and making purchases of software to eliminate the problem.

    After the Star Tribune realized it had been duped, the newspaper pulled all of its online ads, isolated the problem, contacted law enforcement “immediately” and let its readers know about the infected ad.

    Federal prosecutors now say “RevolTech Marketing,” the purported  “advertising agency” in Miami, was bogus. The ad allegedly was placed by a media buyer who identified herself as “Lisa Polowski.”

    Moreover, Best Western “had not retained RevolTech to place online advertisments on its behalf,” according to prosecutors. They added that losses from the scam targeted at the Star Tribune and its readers totaled “at least” $2 million.

    Two people — Peteris Sahurovs, 22, and Marina Maslobojeva, 23 — were arrested yesterday in Rezekne, Latvia, federal prosecutors said. They are charged with wire fraud, conspiracy and computer fraud for creating the phony agency, falsely claiming they represented Best Western, duping the Star Tribune and causing scareware to load on the personal computers of its readers.

    The Star Tribune is Minnesota’s largest newspaper. It covers news in multiple categories across the Minneapolis/St. Paul region, state, nation and world, and in recent years has been covering spectacular local Ponzi scheme cases with wide readership interest, including the Tom Petters’ and Trevor Cook cases.

    Prosecutors did not say why the Star Tribune had been targeted in the cyberattack. Scammers, spammers and online criminals, however, are known to monitor publications for cultural references and specific “keywords” — and then seek ways to use the publications to drive traffic to fraud schemes.

    The PP Blog, for instance, has received 2,859 unwanted communications in June 2011 alone, mostly from keyword spammers trying to publish ads on the Blog and leech off its traffic. In the Internet Age, criminal networks monitor coverage of any number of topics and seek ways to piggyback off the topics to create illegal profits.

    “The global reach of the Internet makes every computer user in the world a potential victim of cybercrime,” said U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones of the District of Minnesota. “Addressing cybercrime requires international cooperation; and in this case, the FBI, collaborating with our international law enforcement and prosecution partners, has worked tirelessly to disrupt two significant cybercriminal networks. Their efforts demonstrate that no matter the country, Internet criminals will be pursued, caught and prosecuted.”

    Jones’ reference to a second disruption of international cybercrime was in the context of a case brought in Washington state in which the United States seized 22 domestic computers and servers and arranged to have 25 international computers and servers disabled in a scareware probe known as “Operation Trident Tribunal.”

    Federal prosecutors said a scareware network had racked up $72 million in sales over three years by duping people into buying fake antivirus software.

    At least 960,000 computer users were duped in the scareware fraud, prosecutors said. Latvian authorities seized at least five bank accounts linked to the scheme.

    “This case shows that strong national and global partners can ensure there is no sanctuary
    for cyber-crooks,” said U.S. Attorney Jenny A. Durkan of the Western District of Washington.

    Read the Minnesota indictment.

  • BULLETIN: Christopher Pettengill Pleads Guilty In Trevor Cook Ponzi Scheme

    BULLETIN: Christopher Pettengill, a figure in the $194 million Trevor Cook Ponzi scheme, has pleaded guilty in Minneapolis to securities fraud, money-laundering and conspiracy, the FBI said.

    Read Breaking News coverage in the Star Tribune, which is reporting that Pettengill says he has been cooperating with federal investigators since January.

    Pettengill, 54, of Plymouth, Minn., was charged criminally on June 13. He potentially faces up to 20 years in federal prison.

    Cook is serving a 25-year sentence. Pettengill conceivably could be sentenced to a prison term shorter than 20 years, depending on his level of cooperation and his ability to persuade a federal judge that he deserves less time behind bars.

    Part of the Cook scheme traded on the acronymn UBS, a famous financial company, according to court records.

    It is common in the fraud universe for hucksters and criminals to leech off the brands of famous companies and to use famous names to sanitize fraud schemes.

    The Cook scheme also traded on the name “Oxford.” Some of the money ended up in  a company known as Crown Forex, which had a regal theme.

    Cook, former radio host Pat Kiley, and Jason Bo-Alan Beckman have been sued by the SEC. Cook and Kiley also confront a lawsuit from the CFTC.

    Jon Jason Greco, 40, of Minneapolis, was charged criminally in March with making false statements to federal agents. Greco was accused of hiding loot from the scheme.

     

  • BULLETIN: Defendant In January CFTC Sweep Ordered To Pay $280,000 Penalty; ‘ForInvest’ Also Ordered To Remove Forex Solicitation Pages From Internet; Firm Used Same Payment Processor As Imperia Invest IBC, Ponzi Forum Darling And Defendant In SEC Action

    BULLETIN: A Delaware company accused by the CFTC in January of illegally hawking Forex offers has been hit with a $280,000 penalty and ordered to remove its Forex solicitation pages from the Internet.

    U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel of the Northern District of Illinois entered the order against ForInvest Group of Delaware. ForInvest also is known as ForInvests Group LLC.

    ForInvest also was banned permanently “from engaging in any commodity-related activity, including trading, and from registering or seeking exemption from registration with the CFTC,” the CFTC said.

    The company was one of 14 Forex outfits sued by the CFTC in what was described as a nationwide sweep of unregistered firms illegally targeting U.S. residents.

    ForInvest advertised that it accepted payments via Perfect Money, a murky firm purportedly based in Panama that allegedly was used by a company that defrauded thousands of deaf investors in a scheme known as Imperia Invest IBC. The SEC said in October 2010 that Imperia Invest had stolen millions of dollars from investors.

    In the same CFTC sweep, the agency also sued InstaTrade Corp., doing business as InstaForex. InstaForex is an advertiser on the TalkGold Ponzi scheme and criminals forum, and research showed that InstaForex — like Imperia Invest and ForInvest — also used Perfect Money.

    Imperia Invest and InstaForex also were promoted on TalkGold and other Ponzi forums, according to records.

    Zagel ordered “[a]ny person or entity providing web-hosting or domain name registration services” for ForInvest  to preserve documents and “[a]ny person or entity providing web-hosting or domain name registration services to “remove or cause to be removed from the Internet all webpages within their control . . .”

    See earlier story.

    Read the ForInvest court order.

  • BULLETIN: Quebec Regulators Reference Cherryshares And Mega Pension Plan — Two ‘Programs’ Pushed On Ponzi Boards — In Freeze And Cease-Trade Orders Against 3 Canadian Promoters, 2 Companies

    BULLETIN: The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has obtained freeze and cease-trade orders against three Quebec residents and two business entities — and has shut down at least one website amid allegations that an international marketing scam was under way.

    At least two of the programs referenced in AMF’s action were promoted on the TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi forums: Cherryshares, an HYIP darling that collapsed last year, and Mega Pension Plan.

    Cherryshares was a paid advertiser on the Ponzi forums. It vanished under mysterious circumstances in December.

    AMF described the scams as insidious because the promoters didn’t ask for big money from individual investors, instead relying on relatively small sums to add up to a larger sum.

    “These seemingly modest amounts add up to anything but,” according to an AMF news release.

    Named in the AMF action are Warren English of Laval, and Alain-André Desarzens and Michèle Amiot of Rimouski. Desarzens and Amiot are married, AMF said.

    “Messrs. English and Desarzens had issued a mass e-mailing to thousands of potential investors with promises of pocketing a lot of money fast,” AMF said.

    Using different email addresses, English and Desarzens promoted “numerous investments,” including Cherryshares and Mega Pension Plan, AMF alleged.

    “They offered thousands of investors around the world, including two Quebeckers, the opportunity to generate possible returns ranging from U.S.$1,000 to $90,000 on a minimum investment of between U.S.$10 and $300,” AMF alleged.

    Even as he was soliciting  new prospects, English was under a cease-trade order issued by the Ontario Securities Commission in 2003, AMF said.

    Desarzens, meanwhile, was under a cease-trade order issued by the Pennsylvania Securities Commission in 1999, AMF said.

    English used some of the funds from the Mega Pension Plan scam to acquire a “luxury condominium” in Laval, AMF said.

    “Based on the data gathered by the AMF, Mr. English moved nearly $525,000 between his accounts and those of his company, Méga International Business,” AMF said.

    All in all, Desarzens allegedly acquired $875,000 as a result of scamming.

    No breakdown of which scam was more profitable was provided, but some of the cash ended up with Desarzens’ spouse — and some of it ended up with a Desarzens-controlled entity known as Institut des médecines universelles, AMF said.

    A website linked to Desarzens — www.myleads.8k.com — was ordered shut down.

  • UPDATE: PowerPoint Presentation For Club Asteria Says ‘Passive’ Income ‘100% GUARANTEED’: Is ‘Ken Russo’ Tone Deaf? Promoter Brags About $321 Payment Sent By Wire While Another Laments Payment Of 30 Cents; Members Say They’ll Contact AlertPay

    Screen shot from a PowerPoint presentation on Club Asteria. The presentation is attributed to Andrea Lucas and is accessible online. (White highlights in screen shot added by PP Blog.)

    UPDATED 9:09 A.M. EDT (June 14, U.S.A.) A PowerPoint pitch titled “Asteria Corporation” raises serious questions about the nature of the business “opportunity” and may undermine Club Asteria’s own claims that members alone are to blame for the company’s apparent troubles.

    The document is slugged “[ClubAsteriaPresentation]” and attributed to Asteria Corp. and Andrea Lucas. It describes the “program” as one that enables “passive” income and provides a “25% Matching Bonus” — and claims Gold and Silver members are “100% GUARANTEED to Make Money.”

    Screen shot: The "Properties" of this Club Asteria PowerPoint pitch identifies Andrea R. Lucas as the author.

    The PowerPoint presentation leads to questions about whether Club Asteria is selling unregistered securities as investment contracts. Meanwhile, it casts doubt on Club Asteria’s claim that members are uniquely responsible for positioning the program as a passive investment opportunity with guaranteed earnings.

    Virginia-based Club Asteria identifies Andrea Lucas as its managing director. The program, which members say has slashed payouts and sends money via wire from a Hong Kong company known as Asteria Holdings Limited, is being investigated by Italian authorities. Club Asteria acknowledged last month that its access to PayPal had been blocked, blaming the development on misrepresentations made by members. Member payouts plunged after the PayPal development.

    Promoters of Club Asteria routinely trade on the name of the World Bank.

    Separately, promoter “Ken Russo” — posting on the TalkGold Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forum as “DRdave” weeks after the PayPal freeze and the developments in Italy — noted he has received by wire $1,632 from Club Asteria since June 2. In separate posts, “Ken Russo” claimed to have received $1,311 on June 2 and $321 on June 12. Both payments came from “Asteria Holdings Limited (Hong Kong),” according to the posts.

    Other Ponzi-forum posters claim they were less fortunate than “Ken Russo.” A poster on MoneyMakerGroup, for example, lamented a payment this week of only 30 cents.

    “my astrios (sic) stand at almost 1000 and you will be shocked to know that i earned only 30 cents this week, thats (sic) like 4 cents per day for an investment of $1000,” the poster complained.

    Another MoneyMakerGroup poster said this: “I made 80 cents from my 2,500 asterios.”

    Even TalkGold, which provides the cyberspace criminals and hucksters use to fleece hundreds of thousands of people globally in one Ponzi or fraud scheme after another, is questioning why Russo appears to be doing so well while others have been left holding the bag.

    “Something unreal compare[d] to others cashouts amount (sic),” a TalkGold Mod wrote on June 10 about “Ken Russo’s” June 2 claim of a $1,311 Club Asteria payout.

    Other forum posters say they plan to retaliate against Club Asteria by filing disputes with Alert Pay, an offshore processor used by Club Asteria.

    “This worked for me with genius funds,” wrote one TalkGold promoter, referring to Genius Funds, an international scam promoted on the Ponzi boards that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) said last year stole $400 million.

    And the TalkGold poster who’d previously been ripped off in the Genius Funds scam and filed an Alert Pay dispute said he’d do the same thing with Club Asteria — and encouraged others to do the same.

    “Yesterday I filed 3 complaints for myself and family and if enough people do it, maybe they will block their alertpay account and share it out to us,” the poster claimed.

    He found a receptive audience, and a TalkGold poster who responded to his plea to contact Alert Pay suggested Andrea Lucas was trying to stop members from filing disputes.

    “I have contacted to Alertpay too just some days ago,” the TalkGold poster wrote. “Andrea Lucas contacted to me and started whine. Whaiting (sic) message from Alertpay.

    “I think their PayPal account was blocked in the same way as it’s going to be with their Alertpay account,” the poster wrote. “Some smart guys did it before us.”

    Some Club Asteria members have offered inducements for prospects to join the program, including partial reimbursements of monthly fees. Such members now potentially find themselves in the position of having locked in their own losses by bribing prospects up front and expecting to recapture the expense as the program expanded.

    In 2010, “Ken Russo” — while promoting the MPB Today “grocery” program on the Ponzi boards — said one of his downline members was offering up-front payments to incoming prospects to drive business to MPB Today.

  • PART 2: PROSECUTION BOMBSHELL(S): Operators And ‘Insiders’ Received ‘Millions Of Dollars’ From ASD; Bowdoin Changed Subject When Told What He Was Doing Was ‘Not Mathematically Possible’; Government Targeted ASD Money In Iowa Bank Accounts

    EDITOR’S NOTE: See Part One here.

    UPDATED 1:46 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) AdSurfDaily “paid out millions of dollars to operators and insiders,” according to a U.S. Secret Service affidavit originally filed under seal in February 2009.

    But ASD President Andy Bowdoin changed the subject when people told him that what Florida-based ASD was doing not only was illegal, but also was “not mathematically possible,” according to the affidavit.

    What he was trying to do, according to court filings, was establish at least three autosurfs that would generate Ponzi-extending cash while Bowdoin positioned them as legitimate “advertising” businesses.

    And Bowdoin also wanted to persuade members that he had discovered a formula that purportedly made it possible for ASD to set aside 50 percent of its daily revenue and pay participants 125 percent of what they paid in — all while planting the seed that members could expect a return of 8 percent a day on some days.

    Investigators saw things a different way, saying ASD was creating a minimum liability of $1.25 for every dollar it took in.

    “Try it — it works,” Bowdoin simply told the doubters, changing the subject instead of addressing the mathematical realities, according to the Secret Service.

    There was too little profit in operating legitimately, Bowdoin told a consultant, according to the Secret Service.

    As ASD was facing a Ponzi abyss, a consultant told Bowdoin there was a way for ASD to clean up its act, according to the Secret Service.

    “Bowdoin, however, was dissatisfied with the consultant’s revenue sharing proposal and with the limited revenue a legitimate business would produce,” the Secret Service alleged in the February 2009 affidavit. “Bowdoin rejected the consultant’s plan and terminated his relationship with the consultant.”

    Bowdoin had arrived at his 50-in/125-out formula after an earlier formula in which ASD purportedly had set aside 60 percent of its revenue to pay participants 150 percent of what they paid in had brought on a Ponzi collapse that caused the company to cease operations and leave investors in limbo for weeks in 2007, according to the Secret Service.

    ASD’s original formula was concocted by Bowdoin and his “silent partner,” a man who recruited Bowdoin into the 12DailyPro autosurf Ponzi scheme, according to the Secret Service.

    Both of ASD’s formulas were just a means of hiding ASD’s true nature as a financial beast with a fatal disease, according to court filings.

    Despite the spectacular collapse of 12DailyPro amid Ponzi allegations filed by the SEC in early 2006, Bowdoin and his silent partner ruminated that 12DailyPro simply had promised to pay out too much money on a daily basis, according to the Secret Service.

    Upstart ASD, Bowdoin and his silent partner speculated, could take regulators out of play and avoid the Ponzi fate of 12DailyPro by telling investors that the firm would pay out less money and by introducing verbal sleight-of-hand to disguise the true nature of the business, according to the Secret Service.

    ASD also speculated that it could circumvent the Ponzi problem and law-enforcement scrutiny by suggesting that ASD’s payouts, which the firm called “rebates,” were not “guaranteed,” according to the Secret Service.

    Despite telling members to “Try it — it works,” Bowdoin had no confidence in his business model and knew it was still a Ponzi despite the post-12DailyPro tweaking. In the end, according to court documents and other records, ASD still was telling investors they’d get back more than they paid in and, on a yearly basis, would receive a return of 365 percent at a “rebate” rate of 1 percent a day.

    Even as ASD was playing in the post-12DailyPro fields and grew eventually to suck in tens of millions of dollars a week, less than 2 percent of its revenue came from external sources. More than 98 percent came from members and was simply being recycled to other members to keep the Ponzi afloat, according federal prosecutors.

    At a certain point in time, Bowdoin did away with unlimited purchases and limited the amount investors could pay ASD to $12,000 “because he did not want members to lo[]se too much money should ASD collapse,” according to the February 2009 Secret Service affidavit.

    The import of the claim is that prosecutors can argue to a jury that Bowdoin himself was worried about the imminent demise of ASD — a demise Bowdoin brought on through the use of various mathematical concoctions, linguistic fantasies and fabrications designed to separate people from their money to keep the Ponzi afloat.

    Meanwhile, the claim sets the stage for prosecutors to tell a jury that Bowdoin anticipated a catastrophe and sought to insulate himself from prosecution by suggesting that ASD did not guarantee rebates and that customers were purchasing “advertising,” as opposed to entering into an investment contract with ASD.

    “[T]o ensure that no individual investor monopolized the rebate pool, and to reduce the
    likelihood that any individual investor would suffer a catastrophic loss, Bowdoin placed a limit on the amount of ‘advertising’ members could purchase,” the Secret Service said. “Of course, it would have made no sense to impose such limitations if ASD was actually selling, and members actually were purchasing, Internet advertising.”

    Bowdoin’s various stories were at odds with themselves, the Secret service alleged. Even as Bowdoin was telling members ASD was not in the investment business and instead was a provider of  advertising “rebates,” ASD’s computer systems described member payouts as “ROI” — for Return on Investment.

    And even as he positioned himself as a Christian “money magnet” and merchant who’d been recognized by the President of the United States — and even as he purportedly was enforcing a $12,000 purchase ceiling to minimize the chance an individual investor would become engulfed in a calamity — Bowdoin told attendees of company “rallies” in U.S. cities that ASD would match the money they plowed into the firm 50 cents on the dollar.

    “At the rallies, to raise more money, Bowdoin concocted the idea of running ‘rally-only promotions,’” the Secret Service alleged. “New members were told they would receive a 50% bonus for joining at the rally. For example, if a new member purchased $500 in ‘ad packages’ as a bonus she would be credited $750 to her account. Representatives of ASD stated this was a ‘World Wide Wealth’ program that was available to anyone with Internet access.”

    In early 2008, Bowdoin became a participant in a scheme with a “North Carolina” attorney to assure prospects that ASD had been vetted and was operating lawfully. ASD’s 26-minute legality video and the rallies caused tens of millions of dollars suddenly to flow into the firm, according to the Secret Service.

    Just a year earlier, the company suspended operations because it was starved for cash flow and faced a collapsed Ponzi, according to the Secret Service. ASD’s response to the collapse was to launch a new autosurf Ponzi under a new name — and to port the accounts of its original set of victims into the new scheme, where the payouts early loyalists had expected would be funded by incoming participants who did not know their money was being distributed to Bowdoin’s orginal victims.

    Later in 2008, as spring and summer warmth returned to northern climes, ASD found people throwing money at it. Some of the people who threw money at ASD did so at rallies in Iowa, according to the Secret Service.

    Affidavit For Seizure Targeted At At Least 7 Iowa Bank Accounts

    The PP Blog reported in December 2010 that funds traced to Bowdoin and two other ASD members had been targeted in yet-another forfeiture action in the District of Columbia. The action was filed less than three weeks after Bowdoin’s Dec. 1 arrest by federal agents in Florida on Ponzi-related charges of wire fraud, securities fraud and selling unregistered securities.

    Prosecutors’ December civil-forfeiture action was at least the third targeted at assets owned by Bowdoin. Assets of two other ASD members — Erma “Web Room Lady” Seabaugh and Robyn Lynn Stevenson (also: Robyn Lynn) of Florida — also were targeted.

    The civil case against Bowdoin’s assets is on hold because of the criminal allegations against him. But the cases against the assets of Seabaugh and Lynn remain active. Neither Seabaugh nor Lynn had filed a claim for the money as of Friday.

    In the case against Seabaugh’s assets, the government was authorized to seize $213,693 from a bank account, but found only $153,097 in the account. The Secret Service seized $96,525 from two bank accounts linked to Lynn.

    Some of the money Seabaugh plowed into ASD originated at E-Bullion, a shuttered California money-services business operated by convicted murderer James Fayed, who ordered the execution of his estranged wife in 2008.

    Pamela Fayed, a potential witness against her husband on matters pertaining to E-Bullion and an associated business known as Goldfinger Coin & Bullion, was slashed to death in a Los Angeles-area parking garage on July 28, 2008.

    On Aug. 1, 2008, the Secret Service seized tens of millions of dollars from Bowdoin’s bank accounts. The December 2010 claim by federal prosecutors that Seabaugh had used E-Bullion to fund one of her ASD accounts was the first public tie between ASD and E-Bullion, which has been linked to multiple Ponzi schemes.

    Seabaugh had multiple ASD accounts with multiple email addresses — and appeared to be “selling her own investment ‘ad packs’ to clients and representing herself as ASD,” the Secret Service alleged.

    The PP Blog learned on June 10 that the Secret Service, in February 2009, also targeted proceeds in seven bank accounts belonging to ASD members in Iowa for forfeiture. In an affidavit, the agency said the accounts contained at least $413,018.

    How the cases are evolving was not immediately clear. The Secret Service, according to the affidavit, identified the assets as proceeds of an ASD-related wire-fraud scheme.

    Acting as pro se pleaders and using a litigation template associated with ASD participant Curtis Richmond, one of the so-called Arby’s Indians, two of the individuals associated with the Iowa accounts cited by the Secret Service in the February 2009 affidavit later attempted unsuccessfully to intervene in the main civil-forfeiture case against Bowdoin’s assets.

    The February 2009 Secret Service affidavit identifies the individuals as Joyce and Michael Haws.

    “Joyce Haws was an active participant in and large promoter of the ASD wire fraud
    scheme,” the Secret Service alleged in the affidavit. “Ms. Haws was one of several people who requested and facilitated one of the first rallies within ASD, in Ankeny, Iowa, on about March 15th, 2008.”

    Haws recruited her mother and others into the scheme, according to the affidavit.

    Walter Clarence Busby Jr., a Georgia minister and Bowdoin’s alleged business partner in Golden Panda Ad Builder, identified Joyce Haws and her “spouse” in 2008 as “founders” of Golden Panda.

    In the same Busby affidavit, filed on Aug. 29, 2008, Busby identified Robyn Lynn as the person who introduced him to ASD.

    Curtis Richmond was an early mainstay in the ASD story. He has a contempt-of-court conviction for threatening federal judges, has been banned from the practice of law in Colorado even though he is not an attorney and has been sued successfully under the federal racketeering statute for harassing public officials and participating in schemes to place bogus financial judgments against them.

    Richmond, who proclaimed himself a sovereign being answerable only to God,  was a member of a Utah “Indian” tribe a federal judge ruled a “sham.” The “tribe” got its derisive name — the Arby’s Indians — because it once held a meeting in an Arby’s restaurant.

    The “tribe” also used the address of a Utah doughnut shop as the address of its “Supreme Court,” while threatening public officials with arrest and detention for carrying out their official duties.

  • OH, UTAH: SEC Alleges Business Executives Used Bogus Press Releases — And Disbarred Attorney — To Sanitize Precious Metals Fraud Scheme

    BULLETIN: The SEC has gone to federal court in Utah to seek penalties against a precious metals company and associated firms and individuals,  amid spectacular allegations that a PR firm sold the unregistered securities of its own corrupt penny-stock client and a disbarred attorney enabled the scam by issuing a bogus opinion letter.

    Utah has been identified by the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force as a hotbed of fraud, and the SEC’s allegations against Copper King Mining Corp. and its co-defendants read like a work of fiction — but the agency says they are true.

    Charged along with the company was its former President and Chief Executive Officer Mark D. Dotson, 52, of Milford. Also charged were Alexander Lindale LLC, a Salty Lake City PR firm; PR executive Wilford R. Blum, 58, of Salt Lake City, and Stephen G. Bennett, 52, of of Merrimack, New Hampshire.

    Bennett formerly was licensed to practice law in Utah, but was disbarred in November 2001 for commingling clients’ money with his personal bank accounts, the SEC said.

    Blum is the general manager of Alexander Lindale, the PR firm.

    Despite Bennett’s disbarment, he provided “stock tradability opinion letters to Copper King which stated Alexander Lindale could have unrestricted Rule 504 stock issued to it pursuant to a purported transactional exemption provided under Minnesota state securities law,” the SEC charged.

    Because of Bennett’s bogus opinion letter and manipulations by Dotson and Blum, the PR firm sold unregistered securities issued by Copper King and profited handsomely, the SEC charged.

    “Bennett’s stock tradability opinion letters were used as the legal authority that enabled Copper King’s stock transfer agent to issue and distribute the company’s stock pursuant to Blum’s instructions,” the SEC said.

    All in all, the SEC said, the PR firm and Blum raised more than $12.2 million in proceeds from Blum’s improper sales of Copper King stock from 2008 through 2010.

    Meeanwhile, “Blum provided Copper King with approximately $9,063,567 in cash or services while Alexander Lindale received approximately $3,291,352 from Blum’s sales of Copper King stock,” the SEC said.

    Among other things, the PR firm is accused by the SEC of improperly paying contractors with unrestricted Copper King stock and hiring “television celebrities to appear on radio talk shows and in infomercials endorsing and touting the merits of investing in the company.”

    The firm and Blum also “arranged for Copper King to be publicized on billboards throughout various Western states and to author and issue press releases that emphasized the purported value and quantity of precious metals that could be extracted and processed from Copper King’s mining and milling operations,” the SEC charged.

    Dotson was accused of posting “false and misleading” information on the copper company’s website and of providing false information to the PR firm, which allegedly regurgitated Dotson’s lies and made millions of dollars by hyping the company and selling its stock .

    Investors were misled by Dotson into believing the copper firm would be capable within five years of processing  2,500 tons of ore per day and extracting $1.21 billion in precious metal, including 230 million pounds of copper, 11.5 million ounces of silver and 115,100 ounces of gold, the SEC charged.

    As president and CEO, the SEC said, Dotson “knew that the mill had no operational history or process to extract copper, gold, and silver from the ore.

    “As a result, Dotson knew that it was misleading to assign recovery amounts and market values to these supposed recoveries,” the SEC charged. “In addition, Dotson knew the mill could not process 2,500 tons of ore per day as the mill did not have, among other things, a sufficient water supply to process the ore through the milling cycle.”

    Meanwhile, the SEC charged, Dotson also knew that “Copper King was permitted to mine only a single twenty acre parcel and that the productive life of the mine site was only two years, not ten as stated on the company’s Internet website.”

    Among the allegations against the PR company is that it issued issued false press releases, including one in which it was claimed that Copper King had found a single customer to purchase “all metals produced at the mine” for the life of the mine.

  • FTC: California Internet Marketer Duped Brits By Making Them Believe He Was Operating In United Kingdom; $500,000 Judgment Entered Against Jaivin Karnani And ‘Balls of Kryptonite’

    UPDATED 12:15 P.M. ET (U.S.A., FEB. 6, 2012) An Internet Marketer based in Calfornia used domains with “co.uk” extensions and duped British customers into believing they were doing business with a firm based in the United Kingdom, the Federal Trade Commison said.

    The actions of Jaivin Karnani and his associated firms, including a company known as “Balls of Kryptonite,” led to Brits being charged “unexpected import duties” while leaving them with worthless warranties.

    When customers tried to cancel their orders, they were hit with “draconian” cancellation and refund fees, the FTC charged.

    Karnani and his firms, which sold cameras, video games and other electronics, have been bit with a $500,000 court judgment. Under the terms of a settlement with the FTC in which the defendants neither admitted nor denied the allegations, the judgment was waived because of the defendants’ professed inability to pay.

    The settlement prohibits Karnani and the companies from engaging in deceptive business practices and from violating the Mail Order Rule. The FTC was assisted in its investigation by the U.K. Office of Fair Trading.

    U.S. investigators brought the action under provisions added to the FTC Act by the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006, the FTC said.

    “SAFE WEB confirmed the agency’s authority to sue U.S.-based wrongdoers who harm consumers abroad, as part of a strategy to prevent the United States from becoming a haven for fraud,” the agency said.

    Read the FTC’s amended complaint. The complaint alleges Karnani also operated a Belize company known as Intrigue Inc., which also did business from California.

    As part of the overall fraud, the FTC said, British customers often did not receive what they ordered — instead receiving undisclosed “substitutions” unintended for sale outside the United States and perhaps even inoperable in the United Kingdom, along with an explanation that the ordered merchandise was out of stock.

    The defendants, though operating from California, used pricing schemes and the name of the Royal Mail as pretexts to advance the scheme, the FTC charged.

  • CFTC Revokes Registrations Of 2 Texas Firms That Operated Forex Ponzi Scheme Targeted At Elderly Churchgoers And Others In At Least 4 States; Firms Used ‘Charts’ Showing Magnificent Earnings And Cherry-Picked Name Of Warren Buffett For Fraud Pitch

    SCREEN SHOT OF SECTION OF OCT. 25, 2010, FINDINGS OF FACT: M25 and M37 used a "chart" projecting magnificent earnings and encouraged investors to roll over their returns by plying them with a purported "renewal bonus." After 11 years, $100,000 would turn into $1 million, according to the firms' claims. The firms also claimed they outperformed legendary investor Warren Buffett, according to uncontested findings of fact by U.S. District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn. It is common in online fraud schemes for pitchmen to use charts and spreadsheets that promise spectacular returns. It also is common for scammers to trade on the name of Warren Buffett or other well-known business titans as a means showing off, sanitizing fraud schemes and gaining "legitimacy" by osmosis. (Red Emphasis added by PP Blog.)

    EDITOR’S NOTE: The cases against M25 Investments Inc. (M25) and M37 Investments LLC (M37) include elements that are common in online fraud schemes. For starters, the offers were targeted at senior citizens and people of faith. Moreover, the firms relied on PowerPoint presentations and charts that wowed victims with tales of fantastic earnings. The fraud schemes also traded on the name of a celebrity — in this case, famed investor Warren Buffett.

    Much of the information in the story below comes from uncontested findings of fact by a federal judge. Taken line by line, the CFTC’s allegations upon which the judicial findings were based paint a picture of the sort of fraudulent sales pitches that occur daily on the Ponzi forums and personal websites of hucksters. Spreadsheets that show fabulous earnings projections are in common use in the universe of fraudsters, for instance. So is the use of the name of a celebrity or famous company to sanitize a scheme and disarm skeptics.

    And appeals to faith are used daily online to separate Believers from their money.

    Even as this story is being published, members of Club Asteria are doing the sorts of things that led to a two-year legal quagmire for M25 and M37, a litigation nightmare the firms brought on themselves by relying on cheerleaders to drive business, engaging in affinity fraud and then trying to cover it up, according to court filings.

    Club Asteria members, for example, are using spreadsheets and earnings charts to lure prospects. Meanwhile, they’re trading on the name of the World Bank, citing guaranteed earnings, mixing in appeals to charity and using religious imagery to drive business to the Virginia-based firm . . .

    Two Texas firms that targeted a Forex Ponzi scheme at elderly people of faith and others in at least four states have had their registrations revoked by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

    The revocations against M25 Investments Inc. (M25) and M37 Investments LLC (M37) of Waxahachie mean that the firms no longer are registered Commodity Trading Advisors. CFTC’s issuance of the revocations follows on the heels of an administrative action the agency filed in February. The CFTC also sued the firms in federal court two years ago, gaining restitution and penalties of more than $16 million.

    An administrative law judge found the firms “unfit for registration” last month. Neither firm contested the administrative action.

    On Oct. 25, 2010, U.S. District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn found that the firms operated a Ponzi scheme that gained a head of steam by luring customers with promissory notes that guaranteed interest payments of 2 percent a month or 24 percent a year.

    Neither M25 nor M37 contested the findings. Both firms agreed to an issuance of a consent order with specified penalties and a demand for restitution. The firms neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

    Business was solicited online and through word-of-mouth, and clients often did not even know the difference between the two firms, Lynn ruled.

    “Some or all” of the firms’ customers were unqualified investors who did not have the required millions of dollars of assets to become an “eligible contract participant,” the judge ruled.

    Sales pitches for both firms claimed the ability to outperform famed investor Warren Buffett while making ancillary claims the companies could turn $100,000 into $1 million if customers stayed with them for 11 years and plowed their interest payments and annual renewal bonuses of 2 percent back into the companies.

    The scheme gathered about $8 million from about 213 customers, the judge ruled, noting that company “representatives” solicited business after church services and in customers’ homes.

    On March 31, 2009, according to the judge’s uncontested findings of fact, the firms owed customers $7.6 million but had only $3.9 million in total assets. Investors were shielded from the news and issued false account statements showing gains.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Club Asteria Promoters Blocked By CONSOB, Italian Equivalent Of SEC; Agency Issues Suspension Order; Is ‘Opportunity’ Described As ‘Passive’ Investment Being Targeted At Deaf?

    BULLETIN: UPDATED 7:35 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB), the Italian equivalent of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, is conducting a probe into claims made about Club Asteria and has issued a 90-day suspension order that bars promoters from trading in Italy.

    Club Asteria is based in Virginia. Members say it also conducts business from Hong Kong.

    Promoters in Italy positioned Club Asteria as an investment company that “guaranteed” returns, CONSOB said in preliminary findings.

    CONSOB’s action is detailed in Resolution No. 17790.

    “Asteria Corporation presents itself as a company that ‘started as a U.S. financial company, with the aim of offering . . . humanitarian, educational and financial support in the poorest countries in the world, proposing an investment program with the slogan: ‘How to Invest € 15 After a year and earn 1200 Euros a month and a half for ever!’” the Italian regulator said. (Italian-to-English conversion by Google Translate.)

    The translation uses the phrase “sign language,” giving rise to questions about whether Club Asteria members were targeting the deaf. Investors were encouraged to use PayPal to join.

    Club Asteria reported a problem with its PayPal account last month, claiming promoters had misrepresented the company. A website apparently operated by promoters in Italy appears to have been stripped of content.

    It was not immediately clear if CONSOB removed the content or caused it to be removed from a domain name that ended with an .it extension. The website now carries this message:

    “Il sito à momentaneamente chiuso” — or “The site is temporarily closed.”

    CONSOB said there also were “several” Italian forums in which Club Asteria and the possibility of getting “easy money” from monthly payments were discussed. Word about Club Asteria also was spreading through social-media sites such as Facebook, the regulator said.

    ClubAsteria has been promoted in English on the TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup forums, both of which are referenced in U.S. court filings as places from which Ponzi schemes are promoted.

    Scores of Club Asteria promoters — not just in Italy — have positioned the firm as a seller of a “passive” investment program that pays $400 a week based on a payment of $19.95 a month.

    Such claims also were made in Italy, CONSOB said.