Blog

  • AN HYIP PARANOIA-MAKER: Undercover Agent Listens To Alleged Bankrupt Fraudster’s Pitch In ‘Hooters’; SEC Files Emergency Action Alleging Christopher Love Blackwell At Helm Of Massive Fraud Scheme

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This developing story on the alleged actions of accused securities schemer Christopher Love Blackwell is apt to cause paranoia among HYIP and prime-bank fraudsters, including criminals who populate online forums such as TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup.

    It features the presence of a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) undercover operative who allegedly infiltrated Blackwell’s scheme and was so good at keeping his identity secret that Blackwell pitched him repeatedly over a period of months in a Hooters restaurant and bar as other agents worked to unmask the complex caper. The undercover agent eventually returned an “investment contract”  prepared by Blackwell and plunked down $1,000 of government money as a down payment on a purported $500,000 investment. Blackwell allegedly later contacted the undercover agent repeatedly via email and telephone to collect the outstanding “balance” of $499,000. Blackwell even left a voicemail on the agent’s phone, according to court filings.

    BULLETIN: The SEC has gone to federal court in Dallas and is seeking an emergency injunction to halt an alleged Ponzi scheme involving Christopher Love Blackwell of Euless, Texas, and Roswell, N.M., AV Bar Reg Inc. of Colleyville, Texas, and Millers A Game LLC of Chandler, Ariz.

    Blackwell, 31, and his companies initially came on the Feds’ radar screens last year when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was alerted that he was wiring large sums of money and conducting cash transactions that raised terrorism concerns, according to court records.

    In the end, the SEC dryly advised a federal judge, “it became clear to DHS that Blackwell was not a terrorist — just a thief.”

    Regardless, the SEC said, the fraud was ongoing and  Blackwell still appeared to be selling the scheme as recently as Jan. 19.

    DHS operatives kept Blackwell under surveillance, assembled documents, conducted interviews and “made video and audio recordings of meetings during which Blackwell offered investments to undercover agents,” the SEC said in court filings.

    Records show that Blackwell was on the receiving end of a default judgment of $24 million in a civil fraud case filed in July 2008 and sought Chapter 7 protection in U.S. Bankruptcy Court on Christmas Eve 2008.

    Despite the lawsuit, judgment and bankruptcy filing, Blackwell continued to operate what he described as a “Fixed Income Trading Program” that offered returns of up to 30 percent a month, according to the SEC.

    To pull off his Ponzi and fraud scheme, Blackwell bragged about his “academic pedigree,” falsely claiming to have Master’s and PhD degrees “from a prestigious university in Spain” and also falsely claiming once to have been employed by Goldman Sachs and the Bank of Madrid.

    In 2007, with the scheme unknown to law enforcement, Blackwell stole $750,000 from an investor. In 2008, according to court filings, he swindled $200,000 from another investor, returning $9,926 in bogus “profits” to the investor. This investor was introduced to Blackwell by “an intermediary who claimed to run a faith-based business and investment development firm,” according to the SEC complaint.

    The purported faith-based intermediary assured the investor that Blackwell’s program in “foreign bank instruments” was “totally safe,” the SEC alleged. Despite the assurance of the intermediary, Blackwell immediately began to distribute the $200,000 provided by the investor to other companies and people, including Blackwell’s former business partner and Blackwell’s father.

    By late 2008, according to the SEC, Blackwell was engineering a scheme to rip off a former football player for the Dallas Cowboys. The player had been introduced to Blackwell by another player, according to the complaint.

    Neither player was identified in the complaint. The former player, lured by the promise of safe returns from an experienced international trader, gave Blackwell $250,000 in the belief that he was purchasing an investment note from HSBC Bank, one of the largest financial firms in the world.

    Blackwell “never” purchased an HSBC note. Instead, according to the SEC, he instructed an attorney exercising control over the escrow account to which the former Cowboy had wired the funds to transfer nearly all of the $250,00 to a Phoenix company controlled by a friend of Blackwell.

    When confronted by the SEC, Blackwell allegedly told the agency that he had “earned” the money despite his assurances to the player that the sum would be used to purchase a safe bank note.

    Although Blackwell showed the former football player a document on HSBC letterhead as purported proof  he had purchased a bank note with the player’s money, “HSBC’s Security and Fraud Risk group has confirmed that the letter was fraudulent.

    “In other words,” the SEC said, “it was a forgery.”

    The former player appears to have been ripped off for the entire $250,000 investment, the SEC said.

  • TalkGold Ponzi And Criminals’ Forum Deletes ‘Sticky’ Thread On InstaForex; Firm Named Defendant In CFTC Sweep Used Payment Processor Whose Contact Person Is Referenced In International Money-Laundering And Narcotics Case

    The TalkGold Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forum has deleted a “sticky” thread reportedly paid for by InstaForex, a dubious company named a defendant in a registration sweep conducted by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission last month.

    The PP Blog reported two days ago that InstaForex was using TalkGold to promote a scheme by which participants who sent InstaForex at least 1,000  U.S. dollars could qualify to win a Lotus Elise valued at more than $50,000. Although sweepstakes that require a purchase are illegal in the United States, InstaForex bizarrely instructed investors that they could improve their odds of winning the car by opening up to 100 accounts each.

    Some of the InstaForex promoters used photographs of attractive women to promote the scheme. It was unclear whether the photos were actual pictures of the promoters or whether they were stage props designed to lure skeptical investors.

    Why any investor from any country would open a single account — let alone 100 accounts — with a firm that advertises on TalkGold was left to the imagination. TalkGold and similar sites such as MoneyMakerGroup are referenced in multiple filings in U.S. federal courts as places from which international Ponzi and fraud schemes are pushed.

    A separate ad for which InstaForex apparently paid TalkGold $95 remains operational on the forum. The ad shows an image of a red Lotus and claims the company is “THE BEST BROKER IN ASIA.” Directly below the ad is an ad for a company that claims to provide a return of 525 percent “After 1 Minute” and 9,860 percent “After 6 Hours.”

    Just four of the thousands of schemes pushed on TalkGold — Imperia Invest IBC, EMG/Finanzas Forex, Legisi and Pathway to Prosperity — created tens of thousands of victims globally while gathering hundreds of millions of dollars, according to court records.

    The precise time at which TalkGold deleted the paid “sticky” thread on InstaForex and the precise reason why the thread of at least 109 pages was deleted were unclear. Records suggest the thread was deleted in the past 24 hours. The once-massive thread now returns a “No Thread specified” error.

    Among other things, InstaForex advertised that it accepted payments through Perfect Money, a murky money-services business purportedly operating from Panama. Imperia Invest, which the SEC accused in October of stealing millions of dollars from thousands of participants, also used Perfect Money, according to court filings.

    Included among the Imperia Invest victims were thousands of Americans with hearing impairments, according to the SEC.

    Meanwhile, the name of Roger Alberto Santamaria del Cid — the purported contact person of Perfect Money — appears in federal court filings in the EMG/Finanzas Forex forfeiture case.

    A Florida-based task force that specializes in detecting and uncovering massive fraud schemes brought the EMG/Finanzas Forex case last year. Del Cid, Perfect Money’s purported contact person in Panama, is listed as EMG’s “Secretary” in court filings that allege that tens of millions of dollars seized in the probe were tied to the international narcotics trade.

    EMG/Finanzas Forex was so corrupt that some participants were told the only way they could get their money out was to recruit new investors, have the new investors pay them directly — and use the proceeds from the new investors to recover their initial outlays, according to court filings.

    The very first EMG post on the now-shuttered ASA Monitor Ponzi and criminals’ forum referenced yet-another widely promoted Ponzi scheme: 12DailyPro. The 12DailyPro case, brought by the SEC in February 2006, also is cited in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi prosecution brought by the U.S. Secret Service in August 2008. ASD also was promoted on TalkGold.

    Writing on ASA Monitor, an EMG/Finanzas Forex aficionado claimed to have learned the ropes from 12DailyPro.

    “I have been in internet business for 3 years now and in autosurf industry from 12dailypro,” the ASA poster began. He (or she) then proceeded to tell readers about how they could earn commissions by recruiting for EMG/Finanzas, which the Feds later described as an international menace with tentacles in Central America, South America and Europe.

    Court filings in the EMG/Finanzas case paint a picture of an incredibly elaborate maze of companies and bank accounts set up to confuse both investors and law enforcement. At least 59 bank accounts, 294 bars of gold and nine luxury vehicles were seized.

    The EMG allegations were explosive because they showcased the undeniable fact that people who promote programs such as HYIPs and autosurfs because such programs may pay “commissions” to recruit new members may be operating as fronts or conduits for international drug dealers and money-launderers.

  • SPECIAL REPORT: Forex Firms Named In CFTC Sweep Used Same Offshore Processor As Alleged Imperia Invest Fraud; Name Of Man Linked To ‘Perfect Money’ Appears In Ponzi Forfeiture Complaint In Which Feds Tied Cash To International Narcotics Trade

    InstaForex, a company accused by the CFTC last month of targeting U.S. customers to purchase unregistered offerings and paying through Perfect Money, says participants can win this Lotus — but they have to pay to play by depositing at least $1,000 USD. Sweepstakes that require a purchase by participants are illegal in the United States.

    SPECIAL REPORT: UPDATED 2:27 P.M. ET (U.S.A., FEB. 9) Federal court and web records show that at least three of the 14 purported Forex dealers named defendants in a major sweep of unregistered firms last month by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission advertised that they accepted funds from Perfect Money.

    Perfect Money is a murky money-services business purportedly based in Panama that allegedly was used by a company that defrauded thousands of deaf investors by promising Visa debit cards and returns of 1.2 percent per day, according to federal records. The name of a man purported to be Perfect Money’s contact person in Panama City is referenced in federal court filings that tie money from the alleged EMG/Finanzas Forex fraud scheme to an international narcotics probe that led to the seizure of at least 59 bank accounts in the United States and the companion seizure of 294 bars of gold and at least seven luxury vehicles.

    The number of purported Forex dealers that allegedly accepted Perfect Money and were named defendants in the CFTC sweep could be higher than three because not all of the defendants publicly disclosed the precise mechanisms by which they accepted payments from U.S. customers.

    According to court filings and web records, some of the companies also advertised that they accepted funds from Liberty Reserve, another murky offshore processor, and even PayPal. PayPal’s Acceptable Use Policy specifically bans the use of its services for “currency exchanges,” businesses that support Ponzi and pyramid schemes and businesses associated with “off-shore banking.”

    PayPal says it requires “pre-approval” for any businesses “selling stocks, bonds, securities, options, futures (forex) or an investment interest.” Whether any of the businesses named in the CFTC Forex complaints received approval from PayPal to either use its name in promos or use its services to collect money is unclear.

    Records show (see paragraph 17 of SEC complaint) that Perfect Money payments were accepted by Imperia Invest IBC, the mysterious offshore company accused by the SEC in October 2010 of pulling off a spectacular fraud that fleeced at least 14,000 people of millions of dollars. Included among the Imperia victims were thousands of Americans with hearing impairments, the SEC said.

    Imperia was promoted on Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forums such as TalkGold, which also promoted at least two of the companies named defendants in the CFTC’s Forex sweep. One of the companies — InstaTrade Corp., doing business as InstaForex — is advertising on TalkGold that participants will have a chance in the months ahead to win a Lotus Elise, a sports coupe that carries a price tag of more than $50,000.

    To win the expensive car, however, investors have to pay to play, according to InstaForex. Sweepstakes that require a purchase are illegal in the United States, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

    InstaForex investors can qualify to win the Lotus by replenishing “the real trading account in InstaForex Company with 1000 USD or more during [the] Campaign period,” the company says in stilted English.

    “Participant has a right to register in the Campaign more than 1 account and raise his/her chances for the victory,” InstaForex continues in stilted English. “However, in case contest administration detects more than 100 accounts registered by one person, it reserves the right to decrease the number of accounts till (sic) 100.”

    Meanwhile, the name of Roger Alberto Santamaria del Cid — the purported contact person of Perfect Money — appears in federal court filings in the EMG/Finanzas Forex forfeiture case. The EMG/Finanzas case was brought last year by a federal task force based in Florida and alleges that tens of millions of dollars seized in Arizona as part of the probe were linked to the international narcotics trade. (See Paragraph 10 of the federal affidavit for the reference to del Cid, who is identified as the “Secretary” of EMG. Del Cid is referenced in domain-registration data for PerfectMoney.com as the contact person for Perfect Money Finance Corp.)

    Elements of the prosecution against more than $100 million in assets linked to EMG/Finanzas were brought by members of the same task force that brought civil and criminal prosecutions against Florida-based AdSurfDaily. Some of the members of the task force have experience working with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the U.S. Secret Service, the IRS and other agencies to reverse-engineer fantastically complex financial crimes.

    At least one of the investigators, according to records, was instrumental in bringing the successful money-laundering conspiracy prosecution against the e-Gold payment processor in 2007. The e-Gold case was brought in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It resulted in guilty pleas announced on July 21, 2008.

    About two weeks later, the U.S. Secret Service raided ASD’s headquarters in Quincy, Fla. Federal prosecutors later alleged ASD was operating a Ponzi scheme that had gathered at least $110 million — and had ceased using e-Gold “shortly after” the e-Gold indictments were announced in April 2007.

    Federal prosecutors also alleged that 12DailyPro and PhoenixSurf — two autosurfs charged by the SEC with operating Ponzi schemes — also had used e-Gold. In December 2010, prosecutors said that ASD also had the ability to accept money from e-Bullion, yet-another processor accused of accepting and distributing Ponzi funds from various schemes.

    James Fayed, the operator of e-Bullion, was accused of arranging the July 2008 murder of Pamela Fayed, his estranged wife and potential witness against him. Pamela Fayed’s body was found in a California parking garage  just days before the ASD raid in Florida.

    Erma Seabaugh, known among ASD members as the “Web Room Lady,” used E-Bullion in November 2007 to transfer $10,510 to ASD, according to a forfeiture complaint filed in December 2010.

    On Jan. 26, the CFTC sued 14 purported Forex companies simultaneously, alleging that they were unregistered entities that were illegally targeting  U.S. residents. At least three of the companies — ForInvest (Perfect Money reference appears online), InstaTrade Corp. (see Paragraph 21 of CFTC complaint for the Perfect Money reference) and Kingdom Forex Trading and Futures Ltd. (see Paragraph 17 of CFTC complaint for the Perfect Money reference) — accepted Perfect Money, according to records.

    Two of the complaints — InstaTrade and Kingdom Forex — were brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the same venue in which the e-Gold case was brought in 2007. The case against ForInvest was brought in U.S. District Court from the Northern District of Illinois.

    Perfect Money advertised a relationship with at least two of the defendants named in the CFTC cases: InstaForex and FXOpen, according to web records.

    On its website, Perfect Money advertised its relationship with InstaForex and FXOpen, two companies accused by the CFTC of targeting Americans with unregistered Forex offerings. The FXOpen website now appears to be blocked from loading in the United States. It was not immediately clear if the site will load in other parts of the world.
  • EDITORIAL: On Club Asteria, FxPowerPro And DisasterClub — And What The U.S. State Department Could Do To Contain The Danger Posed By The Talk Gold Ponzi And Criminals’ Forum And Others Of Its Ilk Worldwide

    Let’s start with the chaos in Egypt this week. Protesters have streamed into the streets to demand that President Hosni Mubarak step down after three decades of autocratic rule. The government initially reacted by shutting down the Internet. As tensions rose, protesters, activists and journalists covering the events were beaten. Some of the protesters were killed.

    When a government shuts down the Internet and starts chilling its people and journalists, it’s for a reason: It does not want the world to witness events, and it wants journalists to know they’ll pay a price for trying to report anything other than the government line to the masses. State-run TV beamed images of tranquility, not images of unrest. When the chaos became impossible to sanitize or ignore, the government blamed events on impure thinkers and their media lackeys, planting the seed that “foreign agendas” were at work.

    It was the cue the loyalists needed to start threatening journalists with death by beheading. Fearing for their safety, the journalists abandoned the immediate turf — but not the story. They started reporting from “undisclosed locations.” The word was still getting out, just not the pictures in the degree desired.

    The immediate events in Egypt, of course, are much more serious than, say, the immediate events at the TalkGold Ponzi scheme and criminals’ forum. Even so, some of the parallels are striking.

    The Egyptian government, for example, is trying to control the message. So is the TalkGold forum, which wants the Ponzi shills and criminals who’ve involved the worldwide masses in one catastrophic fraud scheme after another to know they have a safe haven. TalkGold also wants the critics to know the Mods regard them as naysayers and trolls who can be “banned” without notice, rather like the Mubarak regime regards those muckraking reporters and their “foreign agendas.”

    It won’t work at TalkGold for the same reason it won’t work in Egypt: People still have eyes and ears and the ability to be discerning. There may be only one Tahrir Square in central Cairo to control, but “undisclosed locations,” voices, cell phones, cameras and reporters’ pads and tape recorders are in plentiful supply. They can’t be controlled.

    Egypt’s bid to control the message has resulted in a catastrophic PR problem on top of a political crisis. Meanwhile, TalkGold’s ineptitude, ham-handedness and arrogance has set the stage for its own PR disaster. You can read about it on RealScam.com, which sides with the afflicted masses, not the people who’d afflict the masses.

    While state-run TV in Egypt is airbrushing the dangers of autocratic rule and beaming images of tranquility as the country’s inhabitants try to figure out how they’ll get by for yet-another year on the wages of poverty, TalkGold is airbrushing the economic and security dangers of viral criminality and seeking to tranquilize (and recruit) the masses by using flowery language and even flattery to tell them that opening an account with an offshore payment processor and sending money to any one of hundreds of schemes is their ticket out of the ranks of hopelessness.

    Poster “Ken Russo,” for example, would have the people of Egypt — and the poverty-stricken people of the United States and other countries  — know that the latest “program” he is promoting is one of the “best” he has ever seen.

    One of “Ken Russo’s” current favorites is Club Asteria, which claims to “care” and contends that its “100,000 PLUS MEMBERS CAN’T BE WRONG.” Meanwhile, Club Asteria further claims to “Empower our Members” and to “help expatriates and immigrants to become more successful in their personal and professional lives and enable them to send money home to their loved ones.”

    Tugging at heartstrings, Club Asteria further claims that “[t]hrough our philanthropic efforts we make an immediate difference for struggling individuals, families and communities by focusing on improving nutrition, housing, health care and education.”

    That performing legitimate due diligence on Club Asteria is virtually impossible doesn’t seem to compute with “Ken Russo” and other affiliates. The mere fact the “program” is being promoted on TalkGold is reason enough to avoid it. Any business the company generates from TalkGold likely is radioactive. Club Asteria, for example, could find itself in possession of money that has flowed from fraud scheme to fraud scheme. Even if Club Asteria were legitimate, the fact it is being promoted on TalkGold puts it at one of the principal intersections of crime and fraud.

    About the only good thing about the Internet being down in Egypt this week while its people took to the streets was that “Ken Russo” and his fellow promoters couldn’t sell Club Asteria and other highly questionable “programs” to the disaffected Egyptian masses. (On a side note, one of the companies named in a Forex lawsuit by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission(CFTC)  just days ago announced on TalkGold that the shutdown of the Internet in Egypt had disrupted its ability to interact with Egyptian clients and other clients in the region. A poster purporting to represent FXOpen — under an underlined  heading of “Arabic Live Chat Disruption” — noted that “[o]ur hopes and prayers go out to the Egyptian people.”)

    And even as the Egyptian government is inciting violence against journalists — to the degree that the U.S. Department of State issued a special statement on the matter — the TalkGold forum is banning posters who speak ill of Ponzi and fraud schemes that are gathering untold sums of money, channeling cash to some of the darkest corners of the Internet and keeping people in financial bondage.

    Here is an idea for the Department of State and Secretary Hillary Clinton: Warn Americans — and other peoples of the world — about sites such as TalkGold. Mention them at a Congressional hearing. Instruct U.S. diplomats the world over to inform their host governments about the security and economic dangers posed by TalkGold and a sea of similar sites. Tell elected officials that the State Department is serious about monitoring sites that are keeping people in human bondage by spreading financial misery globally. Define Talk Gold as a global pariah, an enterprise without a state that would be proud to claim it. Inform the world regularly that the only form of diplomacy on TalkGold is robbery without a gun.

    TalkGold has been named repeatedly in court filings that identify it as a place from which fraud schemes are openly pushed. The ink on recent CFTC lawsuits that identify two of TalkGold’s paid Forex advertisers as the purveyors of unregistered offerings targeted at U.S. citizens is barely dry, and yet the unabashed cheerleading continues.

    The alleged AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme, which also was pushed from TalkGold, gathered at least $110 million. It caught the attention of the U.S. Secret Service and resulted in civil and criminal probes that could put people in prison for decades, and yet the unabashed cheerleading continues.

    All the autosurfs prominently touted on TalkGold are just recycled forms of ASD, which itself allegedly was a recycled form of 12DailyPro, which the SEC smashed five years ago this month.

    It’s the same thing with Pathway To Prosperity, yet-another alleged scheme promoted on TalkGold that gathered tens of millions of dollars and could put people in jail for decades. All of the HYIPs promoted on TalkGold are just recycled forms of Pathway to Prosperity, which was busted by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and Legisi, which was busted by the SEC after the U.S. Secret Service infiltrated its operations by using an undercover operative. The state of Michigan also used an undercover operative in the Legisi probe.

    The best way to deal with TalkGold and similar sites is to tell the world that they promote global criminality and rank illicit profits above human rights and common human decency.

    Like Egypt in its current state, TalkGold is not about freedom — financial or political. It is about the institutionalization of corruption. If TalkGold were an oncological hospital, its doctors would be cheerleading for the cancer to spread and its nurses would be rooting for the highest death rate because intervening to cure the disease and comfort the afflicted would be bad for institutional and personal profits.

    A purported Forex program known as FxPowerPro currently has a 20-page thread on TalkGold. Among other things, FxPowerPro is claiming that “YOUR STABILITY IS OUR PURPOSE.” Its website appears to come from an editable script kit used by hundreds of sites globally, and it says it will accept any sum between $5 and $20,000. FxPowerPro proudly displays a link the the TalkGold forum.

    A few days ago an eagle-eyed PP Blog reader passed along some information about yet-another incongruous program known as “Disaster Club.” Disaster Club appears to be a new wrinkle on cash-gifting schemes. It purports to arrange member-to-member “grants,” asking visitors if they’d like to turn a “One-Time $100 into $17,700.”

    Bizarrely, Disaster Club uses a presentation by which it names four hypothetical members: “Job,” and “Cain, Abel and Eve.”

    “After joining the Club you will receive the name of your assigned member, and each week on Monday you are to send a grant in the amount shown in the grant schedule directly to that assigned member,” Disaster Club says.

    “Should you join the Club between Tuesday and Sunday, send your grant as soon as you receive your assigned name, do not wait until Monday,” Disaster Club coaxes. “Every grant thereafter will be sent according to the Monday schedule. To create a cash explosion from your home three members will each be given your name to send their $100 grants to ($100 X 3 = $300) and each stage you will keep the stated amount shown from the amount you received from the 3 members $100 + $100 + $100 = $300 you keep $50. Then according to the grant schedule shown, you are to send your grant directly to the same member (Job), and the same three members (Cain, Abel and Eve) will each send their grants directly to you.”

    Disaster Club purports to be headquartered in Florida and claims to be a “club that allows like minded members to pool their resources together to help the hurting and homeless victims of any Disaster in any State, or even help others anywhere in the world.”

    The “opportunity” does not appear to have its own thread at TalkGold yet, but there are plenty of disasters already waiting there for its readers. Just don’t expect to get a warm reception if you have a “foreign agenda” — you know, like those muckraking enemies of the Mubarak regime in Egypt.

    Although it’s not likely you’ll be threatened with beheading at TalkGold, you might get deleted if you tangle with “Ken Russo” and others and challenge readers to use their heads for something other than a hat rack.

    There is nothing decent about Talk Gold and its cancer-spreading cousins worldwide. Only the broadest public-awareness campaign can succeed against the threats they pose to the governments of the world and billions of Internet users globally — and the U.S. State Department could make a difference by describing the criminal forums as places from which human rights are set up to be trampled 24/7/365.

    Any true diplomat from any country worldwide who spent so much as 15 minutes on TalkGold could see the danger to countries, governments and citizens worldwide. The world’s diplomatic corps are uniquely positioned to do something the world’s law-enforcement corps cannot do: be at all places at all times.

    A sustained effort by the world’s diplomats to identify and monitor the fraud sites — and openly share the information with the people of the world — could go a long way toward containing a plague that only will mushroom into a catastrophe if left alone.

  • BULLETIN: Florida — Again: Multiagency Probe Leads To Federal Criminal Charges Against 9 People In Interconnected Ponzi And Fraud Schemes

    BULLETIN: An investigation by the U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the Miami Police Department has led to criminal charges against nine defendants in three Florida fraud schemes that allegedly were interconnected.

    Seven of the defendants were indicted. Two others were charged via criminal information, and the investigation is ongoing. The probe demonstrates that, in an era of seemingly ceaseless white-collar crime, investigators are using leads uncovered in one case and following them to discover fraud schemes that perhaps would have gone undetected were it not for the discovery of an initial scheme.

    Charged with conspiracy to commit bank fraud connected to a Ponzi scheme were Maria Baksh, 50, of Hollywood; Juan Cardenas, 48, of Miami; Gabriel Cifuentes, 63, of Hialeah; Maureen Cifuentes, 35; of Hialeah, Lucia Garcia, 58, of Pembroke Pines; Roberto Hernandez, 66, of Miami; Maribel Roman, 47, of Hialeah; Reinaldo Roman Jr., 39, of Hialeah; and Roberto Rodriguez, 43, of Miami.

    The case is tied to the purported “jewelry” Ponzi scheme of Luis Felipe Perez, 38, of Fort Lauderdale. Lopez was charged both civilly (SEC) and criminally last year (Secret Service/ICE). He was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison after pleading guilty to securities fraud.

    Investigators said he pocketed $6 million from his Ponzi scheme, which gathered $40 million. Investors were told they were financing his purported jewelry business and pawn shops in New York, authorities said.

    Perez, investigators now say, recruited “many” of the new defendants and referred them to Berta Sanders, 61, of Miami Lakes. Sanders, a CPA, helped them secure $12 million in commercial lines of credit by preparing false tax returns and false income statements submitted to Wachovia Bank. Proceeds from the loans were diverted to the Perez Ponzi scheme.

    “When Perez’s Ponzi scheme ultimately collapsed in May 2009, most of the fraudulent loans obtained from Wachovia defaulted,” prosecutors said, noting that the scheme cost Wachovia $10 million.

    Sanders, who has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank fraud, is scheduled to be sentenced Feb. 22 by U.S. District Judge Paul C. Huck.

    Viewed as a whole, the case featured the Perez Ponzi scheme and a related bank-fraud scheme over which Sanders allegedly presided for a 10 percent cut of the bogus loans she engineered, prosecutors said.

    It also featured a conspiracy by which other defendants fleeced the bank by allowing Sanders to prepare fraudulent documents so they could get the money to plow into the Ponzi scheme, prosecutors said.

    The investigation was undertaken by elements of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.

    While investors were imagining “guaranteed annual returns of 18 percent to 120 percent through monthly interest payments,” the SEC said last year, Perez spent $3.2 million of their money on a home, $1 million on jewelry for himself and his wife, $400,000 to lease luxury cars, $300,000 on clothing for his wife, $300,000 for travel by private jet and $100,000 on artwork.

  • Judge Effectively Orders Treble Financial Penalty By Imposing $64.8 Civil Fine Against Ponzi Swindler Already Convicted In Criminal Case; Scammer Charles E. Hays Also Ordered To Disgorge $19.9 Million In Illicit Profits And Banned From Trade For Life

    UPDATED 2:37 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) If you’re a modern-day commodities fraudster and Ponzi schemer, be prepared to have massive criminal and civil exposure. The recent cases against Charles E. “Chuck” Hays of Minnesota tell a tale of significant prison time, a huge criminal restitution order and civil fines that effectively exposed him to treble damages while also holding him accountable for his ill-gotten gains. Indeed, his legal problems didn’t end even after he was sentenced to jail in May 2010.

    Here is some of the notable math from the criminal case against Hays, who pleaded guilty in April 2009 to running a commodity-pool Ponzi scheme.

    Jail sentence ordered by U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank: 117 months.

    Restitution ordered by Frank in criminal case: $21.6 million.

    The criminal case against Hays, who operated a company known as Crossfire Trading LLC, was brought by federal prosecutors and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

    Now, the math of the civil side of the Hays’ prosecution has been released:

    Civil fine against Hays ordered by Frank: nearly $64.8 million. (The amount was arrived at by totaling the proceeds of the Ponzi scheme ($40.4 million) and subtracting the Ponzi payments to victims ($18.8 million) to arrive at the figure of $21.6 million — and then trebling that number to determine the fine.)

    Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains ordered by Frank: $19.9 million. (The amount is a bit less than the $21.6 million figure noted above because Hays was given credit for slightly more than $1.6 million he lost while trading. Even so, the full amount of $21.6 million is due in the judgment in the criminal case.)

    Additional penalty imposed by Frank in civil case: lifetime ban from trading.

    Although Hays argued he didn’t deserve a lifetime ban after running a Ponzi scheme that gathered more than $40 million and issuing false statements to investors, the judge didn’t buy it.

    “Hays’ activities justify a permanent trading ban because Hays has shown himself to represent an inherent threat to the integrity of the futures market,” Frank wrote.

    The CFTC brought the civil case and persuaded Frank the steep fine and disgorgement order were warranted.

    “In light of the egregiousness and continuing nature of the fraud in this case, which spanned over eight years, such an assessment is appropriate,” Frank wrote. He also left the door open for victims to sue Hays, meaning that the orders in the federal cases did not bar private litigants from seeking their own remedies against Hays.

    Fraudsters could take a clue from the federal litigation and severe penalties against Hays, Frank suggested.

    “Given that Hays must repay his criminal penalty before turning to his civil penalty, the imposition of a civil monetary fine (or for that matter, disgorgement) is largely academic,” he noted in his order. “Nonetheless, the Court was persuaded by the CFTC’s comments at the motion hearing that this action is necessary to adequately address Defendants’ violations and deter against future violations while the events leading to this lawsuit are fresh in people’s minds.”

  • CFTC Alleges ‘Blatant Effort To Intimidate’ Investors Ripped Off In $50 Million Fraud; Asset Freeze Granted In Case Originally Filed Under Seal; Alleged Bid To Chill Customers Reminiscent Of Actions Taken By Some ASD Members

    UPDATED 12:21 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) In a case that outlines allegations of intimidation reminiscent of efforts undertaken by some members of AdSurfDaily to frighten investors, a Utah federal judge has frozen the assets of a Texas man and entered an order prohibiting the destruction of books and records.

    Robert J. Andres and an unincorporated firm known as Winsome Investment Trust of Houston have been accused of conducting a $50.2 million commodity-pool solicitation fraud and Ponzi scheme. CFTC originally filed the case under seal last week, alleging that the scheme affected at least 243 investors.

    “Recently, Andres personally contacted participants asking them to verify their investments purportedly as part of the process to return funds to participants,” the CFTC alleged. “In a blatant effort to intimidate, Andres is demanding that in order to obtain repayment, participants must acknowledge that they have not taken or assisted others in taking legal action against Winsome. If any participants indicate they have, the return of their funds would be ‘handled by an Attorney.’”

    Some members of AdSurfDaily, a Florida firm accused of operating a Ponzi scheme involving tens of millions of dollars, have sought in recent months to intimidate members who contemplated filing remissions claims with the claims administrator approved by the U.S. Department of Justice.

    An email received by some ASD members included a purported “legal opinion” and implied that ASD members who filed for restitution may face legal action from a “group” of ASD members.

    In the CFTC case, Andres also is accused of misappropriation and providing false statements to customers to cover up the fraud.

    Also accused with misappropriation and proving false statements to customers were Robert L. Holloway of San Diego, and a company known as US Ventures LC (USV) of Salt Lake City.

    Senior U.S. District Judge Bruce S. Jenkins has frozen the assets of all of the defendants in the case.

    Read the CFTC complaint.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Accused Fraudster Andy Bowdoin Enters Defense That Could Provide Legal Cover For Autosurf Ponzi Schemes If He Wins Case; ASD Operator Claims Business Model Stands Up To ‘Howey Test’ Scrutiny

    Andy Bowdoin

    BULLETIN: In an argument that almost certainly will give comfort to operators of some of the most corrupt and insidious businesses on the Internet, AdSurfDaily President Andy Bowdoin has advised a federal judge that his company and business practices are legitimate because they stand up to scrutiny when the “Howey Test” is applied.

    Bowdoin, 77, made the argument despite the fact the government claims that he signed a proffer letter at least two years ago in which he acknowledged ASD was operating illegally and that the prosecution’s material allegations were all true. In 2009, Bowdoin acknowledged in his own court filings that he had made statements against his interests over a period of at least four days in the hopes of avoiding a prison sentence by cooperating with investigators.

    But Bowdoin now says criminal charges of wire fraud, securities fraud and selling unregistered securities as investment contracts brought against him last year “must” be dismissed. It is believed that hundreds — if not thousands — of autosurfs are operating over the Internet at any given time.

    Separately, Bowdoin filed a motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of Florida’s Tallahassee Division from the District of Columbia, saying that trying the case in Florida was the fair and most cost-effective thing to do. The government is expected to oppose Bowdoin’s bid to move the case from Washington to Tallahassee.

    U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer, who was assigned the civil forfeiture case against Bowdoin’s assets after the U.S. Secret Service raided ASD in August 2008 and ordered $65.8 million found in Bowdoin’s personal bank accounts ceded to the government after nearly a year and a half of litigation, also was assigned the criminal case. Criminal charges against Bowdoin were announced in December 2010.

    Although Bowdoin previously claimed Collyer was biased against him and sought unsuccessfully to have her removed from the civil case, he has not raised the issue of bias so far in the criminal case. Instead, he petitioned Collyer for an order that would remove the case from her courtroom and put it in the hands of a federal judge in Florida, arguing that most of the witnesses in the case resided in Florida and that hearing the case in Collyer’s court would force unnecessary costs and transportation burdens on both Bowdoin and witnesses.

    An affidavit signed by Bowdoin requesting the transfer was filed yesterday. It appears to have been notarized by Judy Harris of Tallahassee, whom some ASD members said operated the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf with her husband, George Harris. George Harris is the son of Bowdoin’s wife, Edna Faye Bowdoin, and a Tallahassee home owned by the Harrises was seized in an ASD-related forfeiture complaint filed in December 2008.

    Both George and Judy Harris benefited from the ASD Ponzi scheme because a $157,000 mortgage on their house was retired with Ponzi proceeds, prosecutors said in December 2008.

    The Harrises also received a car valued at nearly $30,000 from the scheme, and the car also was paid for with Ponzi proceeds, prosecutors said.

    Florida records show that Judy Harris has been a licensed notary since at least October 2008. Why she would notarize a document for Andy Bowdoin when she, her husband and her mother-in-law were alleged to have been a beneficiaries of the ASD Ponzi scheme was not immediately clear.

    AVG, which purported to be headquartered in Uruguay and launched after the seizure of assets linked to Bowdoin and the Harrises, suspended payouts to members in June 2009. The surf blamed members’ greed for its problems. The name of Judy Harris also appears in a document filed in April 2009 with the Florida Department of State that canceled the fictitious registration of AVG, which also was known as the AV Global Association.

    Andy Bowdoin’s New Argument

    Prosecutors have not responded to Bowdoin’s new assertion filed yesterday that ASD can stand up to Howey Test scrutiny. A blistering response is expected in the days ahead because a ruling in Bowdoin’s favor to dismiss the case or an outright win by Bowdoin at trial could have grave economic and security implications for the United States.

    Autosurfs operate in the darkest corners of the Internet, fueled by corrupt promoters and scammers who position them as legitimate  “advertising” businesses that share revenue with participants. Untold sums of money — believed to be in the billions of dollars — have disappeared in recent years, and prosecutors say the enterprises operate as virtually pure Ponzi schemes.

    Purveyors almost certainly would view any win by Bowdoin as a mandate that legalized Internet-based Ponzi schemes and created a virtual license to collect vast sums of money and simply pocket it by claiming member payouts, which ASD called “rebates,” were not guaranteed.

    “[N]o guarantee or promise of any profits, any specific level of rebate payouts, or return on an alleged ‘investment’ occurred during the AdSurfDaily operation,” Bowdoin claimed. He also asserted that the allegations against him were Constitutionally vague and that none of the four civil cases brought against autosurfs — 12DailyPro, PhoenixSurf, CEP Holdings and the forfeiture case against ASD’s assets filed in 2008 — has clarified the legal issues.

    “As none of these actions has proceeded to final judgment, no judicial opinion has yet clarified whether payment of membership fees by advertisers into auto-surf businesses constitute unregistered sales of ‘securities,’ as alleged by the government,” Bowdoin claimed.

    The criminal charges “must be dismissed because the ad-surf business model employed by AdSurfDaily, Inc. and [Bowdoin’s] related businesses, as alleged in the indictment, cannot constitute an SEC-regulated ‘investment contract’ security as defined under the three-prong test established” by Howey, Bowdoin argued.

    The Howey Test is a threshold securities test and litigation benchmark from the 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision in S.E.C. v. W.J. Howey Co. The decision spoke to the issue of what constitutes an “investment contract.”

    Bowdoin now claims the entire case against him is fatally flawed because he never sold investment contracts as defined under Howey.

    “[T]he Howey test,” Bowdoin argued, “determines whether a particular instrument or transaction is a prohibited, unregistered ‘investment contract’ by searching for the presence of three factors: ‘(1) the investment of money (2) in a common enterprise (3) with an expectation of profits to be derived solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party.”

    ASD did not meet any of the three prongs of the Howey Test, Bowdoin argued.

    It was not an investment because ASD was an advertising company, not an investment company through which participants placed money at risk in anticipation of profit, Bowdoin argued. Therefore, he asserted, ASD did not meet the first Howey prong.

    Meanwhile, Bowdoin argued that ASD did not meet the second prong because participants did not place their money in a “common pool” put at risk in expectation of a profit.

    “[T]here was no ‘common enterprise’ at work here,” Bowdoin argued.

    And because ASD members had to click on ads and view them to get paid, they performed “actual efforts,” taking the third prong of the Howey Test out of play, Bowdoin claimed.

    “Here, the payment of both rebates and referral commissions were directly tied to the actual efforts of the advertisers,” Bowdoin argued.

    Prosecutors, though, asserted in the ASD forfeiture case that ASD told investors that rebates “will” be paid until investors received back 100 percent of the money they plowed into the scheme, plus a profit of 25 percent.

    Gerald Nehra, an attorney and expert witness for ASD in the forfeiture case, conceded under cross examination in 2008 that the ASD Terms of Service specified that rebates “will” be paid.

    Bowdoin’s most recent arguments also put him with odds with dozens of ASD members who claimed in court filings that the government had no “evidence” and no “witnesses.”

    In his filings yesterday, Bowdoin said he believed that the “vast majority” of the prosecution’s witnesses resided in Florida. He said he planned to counter them with witnesses of his own — as many as 136 — including George and Judy Harris, Rob Cefail of InTouch Marketing of Clearwater, and Tari Steward, who also provided Clearwater-based marketing services.

    At least 56 of ASD’s witnesses were ASD employees, Bowdoin said. The document was notarized by Judy Harris.

  • BULLETIN (UPDATE): Now, A Web-Based ‘Immigration’ Scam Tied To A Telemarketing Scam, FTC Charges; Fraudsters Posed As U.S. Government, Agency Says; 3 People Arrested

    BULLETIN: (UPDATED 3 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) The first experience some people seeking to become U.S. citizens had was to be duped by Americans, the Federal Trade Commission has alleged. After a probe involving multiple government agencies, the FTC has gone to federal court in Nevada to block what it described as an “immigration scam.”

    3 P.M. UPDATE: The alleged scheme also resulted in three arrests on criminal charges of Obtaining Money Under False Pretenses in the Course of a Technological Crime, six counts of Conspiracy and two counts of Criminal Racketeering.

    Charged criminally by the office of Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto were Charles Doucette, Deborah Stilson and Cybil Duran Berti, authorities said.

    The scammers posed as government agencies, used the symbols and language of government, used websites that mimicked government sites, used the American flag, the Statue of Liberty and answered phones by using the acronym of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS), a division of the Department of Homeland Security, the FTC alleged.

    Charged in the case were companies known as “Immigration Center,”  a nonprofit based in Colorado, and “Immigration Forms and Publications” of Missouri.

    A federal judge has frozen the assets of the companies and co-defendants, including Charles Doucette;  Deborah Stilson, also known as Deborah Malmstrom; Alfred Boyce; Thomas Strawbridge;  Robin Meredith; Thomas Laurence; and Elizabeth Meredith.

    Domains used by the fraudsters included www.uscis-ins.us and www.usgovernmenthelpline.com, the FTC said. The phrase “uscis-helpline” also was used in a domain name, the agency added.

    “The sites directed consumers to call a toll-free number that an automated voice answered, ‘Immigration Center,’” the FTC charged. “Consumers were then transferred to a live person who answered, ‘USCIS’ or ‘U.S. Immigration Center,’ and identified him or herself as an ‘agent,’ ‘immigration officer,’ or ‘caseworker.’”

    Consumers were duped into paying fees of up to $2,500, the FTC said, alleging that telemarketers were illegally conducting business by posing as immigration counselors.

    “[T]he defendants charged fees for application forms that were the same amount as the government processing fees, leading [customers] to believe the fees covered the cost of USCIS processing,” the FTC said. “Some consumers who applied for the forms were told to send checks by overnight mail to cover the costs. Others paid with checks or money orders on delivery.

    “Consumers ended up paying for applications that were never processed by the USCIS for failure to pay the official processing fee, or, in some cases, they were charged twice, once by the defendants and once by the government after the defendant forwarded their bank account information to USCIS,” the FTC said.

    Assisting in the case were the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; the Office of the Attorney General of Colorado; the Office of the Attorney General of Missouri; the Office of the Attorney General of Nevada; the Pettis County, Mo., Sheriff’s Office; the Department of Justice and Executive Office for Immigration Review; and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

    “These egregious actions by scammers who impersonate Federal employees and prey on innocent people who are trying to work within the system to achieve citizenship is particularly distressing,” said Cortez Masto.

  • Father, 3 Sons Plead Guilty In Massive Texas Fraud And Ponzi Swindle; Members Of The Tony Rand Family Potentially Face Decades In Prison

    Five people — including a father, three sons and a pitchman who doubled as an executive — have pleaded guilty to their roles in orchestrating a $68 million securities-fraud and Ponzi scheme involving fraudulent Texas oil-and-gas investments, federal prosecutors said.

    The father — William Anthony “Tony” Rand, 69, of Plano — is a recidivist felon who previously had spent nearly seven years in prison for money-laundering, bank fraud and other crimes, prosecutors said.

    Tony Rand was the financial manager and bookkeeper for Aspen Exploration Inc., which prosecutors described as corrupt from top to bottom. Sons Gregory Keith “Greg” Rand, William Nicholas “Bill” Rand and Mark Albert “Mark” Rand were Aspen’s owners and principals.

    Greg Rand, 46, pleaded guilty last week to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud and three counts of securities fraud. Under a plea agreement, he faces up to 216 months in prison.

    Bill Rand, 41, pleaded guilty to three counts of securities fraud. His plea agreement exposes him to up to 168 months in prison.

    Mark Rand, 45, pleaded guilty in October 2010. Details about his plea were not available immediately.

    Tony Rand, meanwhile, faces up to 78 months in prison after pleading guilty last week to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud and one count of securities fraud.

    A fifth Aspen employee — Joel William Petersen, 54, of Frisco — also faces up to 78 months in prison after pleading guilty last week to conspiracy to commit mail fraud and securities fraud and one count of securities fraud. Peterson was an Aspen vice president and pitchman.

    The Rands “will be required to forfeit substantial money judgments and property to the government, including real estate, boats and other personal water craft, luxury vehicles, artwork, including an original Picasso, furniture, antiques, musical instruments, jade, expensive jewelry and wine,” prosecutors said.

    Despite the fact Aspen was insolvent, investors were told “they could receive profits equal to the return of their cash investment within three years with potential production revenues lasting up to 20 years and multi-fold returns on their investment funds,” prosecutors said.

    The case was brought by elements of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.