Blog

  • BREAKING NEWS: California Man Expected To Enter Guilty Plea In Ponzi And Affinity-Fraud Scam; Kenneth Kenitzer May Face Up To 30 Years In Prison; Case Features Charge That A Vigilante Tried To Shake Down Business To Get Refunds For Investors

    UPDATED 6:51 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Kenneth Kenitzer of Pleasanton has become the most recent senior citizen to face significant jail time for his actions in a Ponzi and affinity fraud scheme. The California Ponzi fleeced investors and churchgoers out of at least $40 million, authorities said.

    Kenitzer, 66, is expected to plead guilty “in the near future”  to wire fraud and money-laundering for his role in the alleged Equity Investment Management and Trading Inc. (EIMT) scheme, federal prosecutors said.

    He faces up to 30 years in prison, but reportedly has agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, according to the Pleasanton Weekly News.

    Anthony Vassallo, a business partner of Kenitzer, was arrested in the case in March. Kenitzer was named in a civil complaint filed by the SEC, but was not immediately charged criminally.

    Vassallo is 29.

    Alleged Vigilante Seeking Refunds For Investors Charged

    The EIMT case is notable for a reason that went beyond allegations of Ponzi and affinity fraud: an alleged shakedown attempt by a vigilante group to retrieve money for victims.

    On March 18,  federal prosecutors filed charges against Michael David Sanders, also known as David Dennis Sanders, for posing as a federal agent and “attempting to extort monies in connection with recovering funds for EIMT,” the SEC said.

    Sanders, 41, of Fair Oaks, Calif., was charged with conspiracy, impersonating a federal agent and attempted extortion. The FBI described the alleged crime as an attempted shakedown after Sanders and others tried to force their will on two businessmen involved with EIMT.

    “Upon entering the office suite, Sanders and several others displayed guns and handcuffs on their belts and wore bulletproof vests, radio earpieces, and badges on chains around their necks,” the FBI said in March.

    “During the meeting, Sanders and the others with him falsely identified themselves as agents with the FBI, SEC, and the Attorney General and told the businessmen that ‘you can tell us to leave the office, but if we leave, you are leaving with us in handcuffs,’” the FBI said.

    “When asked for their names and law enforcement credentials, Sanders and the others told the attendees to shut up and not ask questions. During the meeting, one of the individuals working with Sanders spoke into his earpiece stating that ‘one of the units’ was ‘in place’ at the one of the businessmen’s personal residence where he lived with his wife and young child.

    “Sanders and the others told the attendees that they had until noon on Monday, March 9, 2009, to wire $378,300.16 to a bank account at Patelco Credit Union in the name of the ‘Spirit Foundation,’” the FBI continued. “Sanders threatened the individuals with ‘search and arrest warrants’ if they did not comply with the request.”

    Three others later were charged in the alleged extortion scheme: Craig Anderson, 39, of Chicago; Cassandra Moore, 26, of Beverly Hills, Calif.; and Sean Smartt, 41, of Sacramento,Calif.

    Read statement by U.S. Attorney Lawrence G. Brown of the Eastern District of California.

    Read the SEC complaint against Kenitzer, Vassallo and EIMT.

  • Will Donald Trump Regret Linkage Of Name To MLM?

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was prompted by a post we saw on Scam.com. The “lede” is deliberately buried in this article in favor of some background information.

    During the 1990s, I was sitting at home one evening just minding my own business. Back in those days I routinely had staggered newspaper deadlines beginning at 7 p.m. and lasting perhaps through 9 p.m. I often covered an event for more than one publication. I was tasked with the duty to write unique stories for each publisher from the same fact set.

    If I’d spent the day covering a murder trial, for example, I could not submit duplicate stories to the publishers. They wanted individual stories tailored to their readership — stories that required me to present the information in the in-house styles of the publications. One of my key responsibilities was to write different “ledes” for the stories, an opening sentence or paragraph unique to the audiences and designed to grab readers’ attention and not let go.

    Getting it right the first time — which is to say, “grabbing” readers, including all the key facts and adopting the “voice” of the newspapers throughout the story — was my responsbility. Not doing it meant I’d spend the evening fielding calls from editors to fill in details, instead of enjoying the time with my girlfriend. She didn’t like it when editors called and perhaps disrupted the movie we were watching.

    I didn’t like it, either. So, I worked hard to ensure I’d lighten the work load on my editors, while lightening the load on myself and freeing up time to kick back.

    Editors, though, were not the only ones who called — and this brings us back to something that happened one night when I was just kicking back at home after finishing my work day.

    People occasionally would call me with news tips from the mundane to the incendiary and all places in between. On this particular evening I got a call on what I’d initially thought might be one of those “in between” things, but it was worth checking out immediately because the unemployed woman who called me was really worked up.

    I agreed to meet her in a hotel lobby to listen to her story. I soon discovered she wasn’t the only person worked up in the lobby of this hotel, which was situated in a county experiencing high joblessness and economic decay because manufacturing had gone into the tank locally.

    “What’s going on?” I asked.

    Some of the most forlorn-looking people you’d ever want to see quickly told me they’d been duped into attending a job “interview” by a prospective employer that had placed an ad and created the expectation it would hire workers for jobs that paid $30 an hour.

    Naturally the employer had no trouble filling the room in a town experiencing hardship.

    Before long, though, the event turned into a grimace-fest. Attendees thought the advertiser was recruiting them to work at a hospital after they received training in an emerging science that had something to do with making sure healthcare ecosystems were maintained.

    In reality, it was a pitch for an MLM of some sort that apparently specialized in sucking dust from the atmosphere of homes across America to keep the owners safe from microscopic allergens and pathogens that silently were killing them.

    Yes, the promoter had come to the struggling town to try to recruit a team of vacuum-cleaner salespeople. The sky was the limit.

    Except it wasn’t.

    The attendees told the promoter it wasn’t — in no uncertain terms. Later I covered a similar incident involving hearing aids at the same hotel. The key, from the promoters’ perspective, was to draw a crowd by using words to trigger emotions and plant a false idea, and then try to sell the desperate few who remained on the dream of MLM riches.

    Need and greed. Marry the two  — and return in your fancy car to your fashionable home in time to set sail in your fancy boat. When you need to replenish cash, take out another ad to sell a vacuum cleaner by calling it an ecology system. Replace the money you spent on cocktails and martinis and restocking the bar on your boat, and then head back to your fashionable home in your fancy car to set sail again on your fancy boat.

    And this brings us to Donald Trump, whom MLMers say has lent his name to a business opportunity.

    Someone posted about it on Scam.com, pointing out that MLM purveyors were pushing it on craigslist by referring to Trump as a “Billionaire, Real Estate Developer from NYC” who is “Opening a New Metabolic Testing Company” near Atlanta.

    Let’s hope the “Metabolic Testing Company” being pitched on craigslist in Atlanta by referencing Trump without mentioning his name is not the equivalent of the ecologically pleasing vacuum cleaner pitched to people who thought they were going to get an exciting, new career in the healthcare field in America’s Rust Belt.

    I’m not hopeful: The craigslist ad suggests compensation of “$30 to $50 per hour.”

    The post at scam.com appears not to link to a working craigslist URL.  Here is the the link I believe to be correct.

    Sorry about burying the “lede.”

  • OCT. 28 PONZI NEWS AND NOTES: Tom Petters Trial To Open; Employee Of Sir Allen Stanford Purportedly Criticized, Ostracized, Fired For Being Too Honest

    NEWS: In the world of high finance, Tom Petters was Bernard Madoff before Bernard Madoff was Bernard Madoff — at least with respect to shocking headlines about Ponzi schemes.

    Jury selection is under way in Minnesota in the Petters case. The allegations that Petters presided over a $3.65 billion Ponzi were unfathomable in September 2008. The allegations dwarfed the August 2008 assertions by the U.S. Secret Service that Florida pitchman Andy Bowdoin of AdSurfDaily Inc. had operated a then-unfathomable $100 million Ponzi scheme.

    But with Madoff’s overnight ascent to the stratosphere of infamy in December 2008 amid allegations that he had operated a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, Petters faded from the headlines.

    Bowdoin would have faded, too, except he could not stop doing things such as comparing the Secret Service and federal prosecutors to the 9/11 terrorists; taking the 5th Amendment at a hearing his company requested to present evidence that it was not a Ponzi scheme, even as his supporters agreed he was “too honest” to testify; announcing a $200 million deal with a penny-stock company few people ever had heard of (while the penny-stock firm continued its practice of not publishing verifiable financial information and Bowdoin was awaiting a ruling on whether unaudited financial information he had supplied the court was reliable enough to make the Ponzi allegations go away); trying to sell members of AdSurfDaily VOIP telephone service after the Ponzi ruling went against him; negotiating with federal prosecutors; submitting to the forfeiture less than a month after prosecutors filed a second forfeiture complaint that asserted his wife and family had benefited from the illegal actions of his company and that Bowdoin had not reported a purported theft of $1 million by “Russian” hackers to authorities; and trying to get back in the case about six weeks later by saying he’d changed his mind, fired his attorneys and now was relying on a mysterious “group” of amateur attorneys to help him do his legal bidding.

    Not even Petters, who owned Polaroid and operated what prosecutors described as a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme involving a separate electronics company, could top Bowdoin in terms of relentless strangeness.

    Petters, however, easily topped Bowdoin in terms of the size of the alleged Ponzi he operated. And now the Petters trial is set to begin. One of the expected defenses in the case is a Bowdoin-like assertion that his hands were clean.

    Will it fly with jurors?

    Read pretrial Petters’ coverage by Reuters.

    Read this column by Jon Tevlin in the Star Tribune of Minneapolis/St. Paul. It includes comments from Barry Minkow, whose life once took a Ponzi turn.

    NOTE: Sir Allen Stanford now is accused of running a Ponzi that was larger than even the alleged Petters’ Ponzi. Stanford’s alleged crimes also are dwarfed by the Madoff Ponzi.

    Stanford was regarded as a sort of king of Caribbean banking, perhaps particularly on the island nation of Antigua.

    Federal prosecutors say ASD’s Bowdoin told the Secret Service that the company had $1 million in an account under a different name on Antigua. The claim was strange, considering that Bowdoin had told members in 2007 that he could not pay them because his purported advertising company had become insolvent after it overpaid members and was looted by the previously mentioned “Russian” hackers.

    The claim became Über Strange in 2008, when Bowdoin asked a federal judge to free up $2 million from the tens of millions of dollars seized because ASD could not pay its hosting bill or rent or employees and had no money to implement a compliance plan — while apparently forgetting he had told the Secret Service about the $1 million on deposit in Antigua.

    Some of Bowdoin’s friends and employees remained staunch allies, always willing to support the company, call the prosecutors Nazis, diss doubters and even work for free to demonstrate their loyalty to the boss.

    An employee of Allen Stanford had a different idea about how to behave when a company’s words could not be reconciled with its actions.

    Charles Satterfield, an investment adviser, couldn’t make sense of things in the months after he joined Stanford Financial Group in 2005 as managing director of fixed income.

    Stanford stressed sales of its CD, regardless of the profiles of its customers. Old ladies were to be sold CDs. Young mothers were to be sold CDs. All people in between were to be sold CDs — at the virtual exclusion of all other financial products that perhaps were better suited for the unique situations of individual customers.

    On a business trip? Sell the CD. Sitting down with Grandpa or Junior? Sell the CD.

    When Satterfield asked his bosses to reduce their instructions to writing, he was fired the next day.

    He told the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in 2007 that some strange things were going on inside Stanford Financial Group. The company said no — that Satterfield had gotten it all wrong, that he was incompetent and disgruntled.

    Satterfield was described as disloyal, incapable of recognizing that tremendous growth at companies causes problems and that the problems sort themselves out in the end.

    The experience of Charles Satterfield at Stanford will sound like a familiar refrain to many people who have followed the AdSurfDaily saga and observed a pattern of dissing critics as though they were simpletons, marginalizing their voices and authoring ad hominem attacks — before ostracizing them completely and banning them to the hinterlands.

    Read this column on Charles Satterfield by Al Lewis of Dow Jones Newswires, as it appears in the Denver Post. It is an eye-opener.

  • BREAKING NEWS: Bank Of America Named In New Lawsuit Amid Allegations It Aided And Abetted Alleged ‘Beau Diamond’ Ponzi Scheme In Florida; Lawyer Who Sued ASD President Andy Bowdoin For Racketeering Is Co-Counsel For Plaintiffs

    UPDATED 2:07 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Courthouse News Service is reporting that Bank of America has been named a defendant in a federal lawsuit filed in Florida that alleges it aided and abetted the Beau Diamond Ponzi scheme that fleeced investors out of millions of dollars.

    Bank of America also is named a defendant in a lawsuit against Florida-based AdSurfDaily Inc., which is implicated in an alleged $100 million Ponzi scheme. The lawsuit in the ASD case was filed as a racketeering complaint.

    The bank, which has denied wrongdoing, is not named a RICO defendant in the ASD case. Rather, it is accused of aiding and abetting a fraudulent scheme involving unnamed co-conspirators. The ASD case is on hold, pending the outcome of federal litigation against the autosurf firm.

    Attorneys for plaintiffs in the alleged Beau Diamond Ponzi scheme say the bank had “actual knowledge” of the scheme and “shares the responsibility for losses of $37 million,” according to the complaint.

    One of the attorneys in the Beau Diamond case is Steven Berk of Washington, DC. Berk also is a plaintiffs’ attorney in the ASD case. The other plaintiffs’ attorneys in the Beau Diamond case are Andre R. Perron and Randolph L. Smith of Brandenton, Fla.

    Beau Diamond operated Diamond Ventures LLC of Sarasota. He was arrested by the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office in September after a probe by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service led to federal charges of wire fraud and money-laundering.

    The case is being prosecuted by the office of U.S. Attorney A. Brian Albritton of the Middle District of Florida. Albritton also is leading a major federal operation designed to prosecute cases of mortgage fraud. Nine banks have failed in Florida this year.

    Separately, Diamond was sued by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in a complaint that alleged widespread fraud.

    Diamond’s actions cost investors at least $13.3 million, CFTC said.

    Diamond spent customers’ money on lavish personal expenses, including at least $850,000 for “luxury purchases and gambling,” CFTC said.

    Some of the allegations against Diamond read like discussions commonly seen on Internet forums when a scheme goes belly-up and the excuse-making by sponsors begins. Among the assertions by CFTC was that Diamond urged members not to call authorities because involving the government only would make matters worse.

    The Diamond Ventures HYIP enterprise quit paying in December 2008, telling some members they had not received checks because it took longer for the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail near the holidays, CFTC said.

    Other members were told Diamond had a problem with Bank of America and was transferring his accounts to JP Morgan Chase, CFTC said.

    By Jan. 7, Diamond was explaining to customers that a “serious situation” had emerged. On Jan 9, he told customers that “the funds have been lost” due to a downturn in the world economy and unprecedented volatility, CFTC said.

    What Diamond did not tell customers was that he had lost huge sums in forex trades, had sent customers bogus account statements showing they were money to the good — and blew as much as $1.1 million on gambling, air travel, jewelry and hotel accommodations, CFTC said.

    By Jan 22, CFTC said, Diamond was urging customers not to “initiate a federal investigation” because such an event would lead to a situation in which “no one will see a penny, and I most likely will be behind bars,” CFTC said.

    Read the CFTC complaint against Beau Diamond.

    Read the FBI criminal complaint against Diamond.

    Read today’s coverage of Diamond at Courthouse News Service. (There is a link to the lawsuit against Bank of America at the bottom of the story.)

  • UPDATE: Another Parallel To ASD/Golden Panda/AVG Emerges In Canadian Probe Of Manna Trading Corp. Ltd.

    Yesterday we reported that the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) ordered penalties and disgorgement totaling $42 million in the case against Legacy Capital Inc., Legacy Trust Inc., Manna Trading Corp Ltd. and Manna Humanitarian Foundation.

    We reported several parallels to the ongoing investigation in the United States into the business practices of AdSurfDaily/Golden Panda Ad Builder and the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf.

    Another parallel has emerged, and it is a significant one: Two of the principals in the Canadian scheme previously had been disciplined for banking or securities violations.

    Hal (Mick) Allan McLeod was disciplined by the British Columbia Superintendent of Financial Institutions in 2003 for violations of the Financial Institutions Act and ordered to “cease carrying on a trust or deposit business,” BCSC said.

    Citing the superintendent’s order, BCSC said two companies with which McLeod had served as a director — First Capital Trading & Financing Corp. and First Capital Credit Corp. — “took and kept funds from the public, and engaged in conduct that was deceptive and misleading.”

    David John Vaughan, meanwhile, “was disciplined by this Commission [in 1999] for engaging in an illegal distribution that had many features in common with the Manna scheme,” BCSC said. “Orders against him from that misconduct remain in force today.”

    In the 1990s, both ASD President Andy Bowdoin and Golden Panda Ad Builder President Clarence Busby had run-ins with securities regulators.

    Bowdoin pleaded guilty to felonies in Alabama and was sentenced to a year in prison. The sentence was suspended when he agreed to pay restitution. In August 2008, he sent his victims a restitution check for $100. One month earlier, in July 2008, nearly $50,000 in ASD funds were used to purchase a luxury Lincoln sedan registered in the name of Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises, prosecutors said.

    Florida now has revoked ASD’s corporate registration and dissolved the registration of Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises. Although both companies are involved in serious litigation that potentially affects thousands of people, neither company submitted required annual reports to maintain their corporate standing. Florida provided the companies a five-month buffer to file the required paperwork. Neither firm complied.

    In May 1998, a federal judge permanently enjoined Clarence Busby from violations of the Securities Act of 1993 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Busby was ordered to pay $15,000 in disgorgement for ill-gotten gains he had received “from sales of interests in three prime bank schemes,” the SEC said.

    The SEC waived the penalty because Busby certified he was unable to pay, the SEC said.

    Busby and Bowdoin went on a decade later to form Golden Panda Ad Builder after discussing the surf on a Georgia fishing lake in April 2008. In July 2008 — just prior to the seizure of tens of millions of dollars from the bank accounts of ASD and Golden Panda — Bowdoin distanced himself from Busby after Busby’s run-in with the SEC became known publicly.

    The “cause and effect” of Bowdoin’s actions with Golden Panda never has been clear. For example, was Bowdoin really too busy to run Golden Panda with Busby — as Bowdoin suggested — or did Bowdoin distance himself from Golden Panda because he learned about Busby’s alleged SEC violations and feared the allegations could lead to a probe of ASD?

    Golden Panda surrendered its claim to more than $14 million in the U.S. Secret Service probe. Busby now is listed as the “chief consultant” to BizAdSplash (BAS), another surf — one that purports to be operating offshore.

    BAS suspended payouts earlier this year, and then announced a relaunch. The firm, according to its website, now is selling tiered “charter memberships” for as much as $10,000.

    A “Presidential” charter membership is priced at $10,000; an “Executive” charter membership is priced at $5,000. Two other tiered charter memberships — “Visionary” and “Pioneer” — are sold at $2,500 and $1,000, respectively.

    BAS has not updated the news on its website since Oct. 7, nearly three weeks.

    Canadian officials say the whereabouts of three of the respondents in the Manna probe who were ordered to pay huge financial penalties is unknown. McLeod, Vaughan and Kenneth Robert McMordie (also known as Byrun Fox) “have fled the jurisdiction,” BCSC told The Globe and Mail, in a story published this morning.

    The Royal Canadian Mounted Police have opened a criminal investigation, BCSC said.

    Like ASD/Golden Panda, AVG and BizAdSplash, the Canadian Ponzi schemers pushed debit cards to offload profits, BCSC said.

    “Manna fraudulently used the investments of later investors to fund the promised returns to earlier investors, to pay commissions to the affiliates and consultants, to invest in an online gaming business, and to buy real estate in Costa Rica,” BCSC said.

    Other traits the Canadian scheme and the alleged U.S. scheme involving Bowdoin, Busby and offshoot companies had in common include:

    • Secrecy. AVG, for instance, did not identify its executives, morphed into a “private association” and advised members not to share information outside association walls.
    • False information. Some ASD members repeatedly have asserted that the U.S. government has admitted ASD was not a Ponzi scheme. Other members have sent emails that suggest participants should not cooperate with the U.S. Secret Service.
    • Offshore venues. Both AVG and BAS, for example, claim connections to South America and Central America, leading to fears that money could be hidden.
    • Use of ‘common law’ in various writings. Some ASD pro se litigants have cited common law in court filings in defense of the surf. One apparent argument of the litigants is that all commerce is legal as long as there is is contract between two parties. In the Canadian case, some purveyors of the scheme pushed what authorities described as a “private common law spiritual trust.”
    • Efforts that can be viewed as intimidation tactics. AVG, for example, threatened to sue members who shared information and to file abuse complaints with the Internet Service Providers of participants who complained on online forums.
    • Purported ties to charitable entities. AVG, for instance, advertised that it supported the World Rain Forest Movement. In Canada, Manna advertised the Manna Humanitarian Foundation.
    • An MLM-style sales structure. All of the Canadian and U.S. entities sold the programs as multilevel marketing opportunities.
    • Earnings “compounding.” Both the Canadian schemes and the alleged American schemes encouraged members to keep money in the systems and employ compounding strategies to maximize earnings.

  • HYIP/AUTOSURF SHOCKWAVES: Regulators Order Canadian Ponzi Schemers To Pay Penalties Totaling $26 Million And To Disgorge Illegal Profits Of $16 Million; Case Has Parallels To AdSurfDaily And AdViewGlobal

    The British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) has ordered four respondents in a civil action to pay penalties of $26 million for operating a Ponzi scheme and to surrender $16 million in illegal profits.

    In forceful findings that may echo throughout the HYIP and autosurfing universe, BCSC said the schemers tried to skirt securities laws by selling a fraudulent HYIP currency-trading program in Canada through an MLM-syle operation while hiding behind “non-disclosure” agreements and operating in an environment of secrecy.

    AdViewGlobal (AVG), an autosurf firm with close ties to the alleged AdSurfDaily (ASD) Ponzi scheme in the United States, created a similar structure in which participants were advised to keep news within “association” walls and not to disclose information to outsiders.

    BCSC also found that the companies named in the Canadian complaint disseminated false information and used intimidation tactics in a bid to prevent participants from cooperating with authorities.

    “Because of those [non-disclosure] agreements, and because of false but intimidating statements made to them by the respondents, many investors refused or were reluctant to cooperate with the Commission’s investigation,” BCSC said.

    In recent weeks, some ASD members have circulated emails that suggested participants should not cooperate with the U.S. Secret Service in the ASD probe. During the summer, AVG, which had suspended member cashouts, threatened to sue members for sharing information with outsiders and also threatened to contact the Internet Service Providers of participants who complained on a company forum.

    In yet another similarity to the ASD case, some of the purveyors of the Canadian scheme also pushed what Canadian authorities described as a “private common law spiritual trust.”

    Some of ASD’s and AVG’s most ardent supporters have used similar phrasing and referenced common law in defending the surfs.

    BCSC minced no words as it laid out the penalties against Hal (Mick) Allan McLeod, David John Vaughan, Kenneth Robert McMordie (also known as Byrun Fox) and Dianne Sharon Rosiek.

    BCSC pegged losses at $13 million, saying the respondents “fraudulently distributed securities and made misrepresentations” through Legacy Capital Inc., Legacy Trust Inc. and Manna Trading Corp Ltd.

    The Canadian respondents also cited a tie to an entity known as the Manna Humanitarian Foundation.

    AVG, in promotional material, cited a tie to the World Rain Forest Movement in what some observers saw as a bid to sanitize the AVG business by linking it to a worthwhile cause.

    “At AVGlobal Association we believe we should go beyond the basics of ethical business practices and embrace our responsibility to people and to the planet,” AVG said on its website. “We believe this brings sustained, collective value to our members, our employees, our customers and society.”

    AVG announced a suspension of payouts June 25. It is unclear if any worthwhile cause ever received money from the company.

    A BCSC panel fined McLeod $8 million. Vaughan, Rosiek and McMordie were dispensed penalties of $6 million each. The panel also ordered each respondent, including the companies, to disgorge the $16 million the scheme obtained from investors.

    The suggested payout percentages of the Canadian entities actually were significantly lower than the suggested payout percentages of both ASD and AVG.

    “Manna promised investors 7 [percent]  monthly returns (later reduced to 5 [percent]), sometimes compounded,” BCSC said.

    ASD and AVG both promoted compounding. Some ASD members promoted returns of 365 percent a year, claiming $100,000 in ASD returned $1,000 a day.

    Similar to ASD and AVG, investors who became “affiliates” or “consultants” of the Canadian companies could bring in new investors.

    “When they did so, they earned a commission on the amount invested and a continuing share of the return on the new investment,” BCSC said.

    The private, common-law spiritual trust “was a mechanism Fox concocted ostensibly to avoid the application of tax and securities laws to investments in the Manna scheme,” BCSC said.

    BCSC pegged losses in the Canadian scheme at $13 million, saying as many as 800 people lost money.

    “They created a multi-level marketing structure to maximize distribution of the Manna securities,” BCSC said.

    “The respondents knew exactly what they were doing when it came to dealing with securities laws,” a BCSC panel said. “They were well aware of the requirements of the Act, and of the role of the Commission in enforcing the Act. They took numerous actions calculated to escape detection. They attempted, unsuccessfully, to construct the Manna scheme in a form that would fit within a specific exemption in the Act.”

    Authorities said the scheme was inexcusable.

    “Nothing strikes more viciously at the integrity of our capital markets than fraud, and this case represents a particularly aggressive and flagrant assault on the public’s confidence in our markets,” BCSC said.

    BCSC’s announcement followed on the heels of announcements Oct. 15 by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission that they were targeting a Florida company that allegedly tried to hide behind a corporate registration in Panama.

    The actions by the SEC and CFTC expose the vulnerability of autosurfs that register as corporations offshore and arrange web-hosting overseas, but do not comply with securities laws of the United States and foreign countries in which they have a paper footprint or are not regulated in the foreign countries.

    The moves also demonstrate that U.S. securities regulators — no matter where a company arranges webhosting — intend to treat American owners who flout laws as issuers of unregistered securities, unregistered investment advisers and operators of unregistered foreign investment companies from inside the United States

    Named defendants in emergency actions filed Oct. 15 in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida were David F. Merrick, Traders International Return Network (TIRN), MS Inc., GTT Services Inc., MDD Consulting Inc. and Go ! Tourism Inc.

  • NO AUTOSURF ENVY: Newspaper Circulation Plunges; Top Publications Hemorrhage Print Readers As Industry Looks To Harness Power Of Internet Advertising

    EDITOR’S NOTE: If you’ve been approached by individuals or a downline “team” and invited to join an online “surfing” program that purports to be an “advertising” company, this column may be of some value to you. Extremely well-known publishing companies — companies that produce titles you know and love, and companies that know advertising and business inside and out and through and through — are having trouble keeping readers’ eyes glued to print publications. Many of the famous companies have experienced serious revenue declines. Almost all of them have experienced spectacular print circulation declines even as actual readership was increasing. These famous companies are struggling to find ways to compete online and monetize their hugely popular websites, almost all of which get tremendous traffic.

    And yet none of them has turned to the so called “autosurf” model — even though the companies could crush “advertising” firms such as Florida-based AdSurfDaily, which is confronting allegations that it engaged in wire-fraud and money-laundering while operating a $100 million Ponzi scheme.

    Despite the fact these famous publishing companies have professional talent, audited readership, audited financials and the economies of scale to destroy so-called “advertising” firms such as ASD or BizAdSplash or AdViewGlobal — and scores of others — these companies do not position themselves against the surfs.

    Some of the surfs are collecting millions of dollars — if not tens or hundreds of millions of dollars — during a time the traditional publishing/advertising business is awash in a sea of red ink. All of the traditional companies could use the money autosurf participants are throwing at the surfs.

    Autosurf promoters would have you believe traditional publishing/advertising companies are struggling because the famous brands don’t understand the autosurf business model. Surf promoters position people such as ASD President Andy Bowdoin as vastly misunderstood geniuses and visionaries being picked on by the government. The surfs are positioned as cash cows for both the operators and members, and the “new” way to advertise.

    Promoters would have you believe that these celebrated publishing/advertising companies just don’t “get it” — and that the people promoting autosurfs in the hyped-up style of MLMs are the modern-day Henry Fords and Thomas Edisons — people who do get it.

    Surf promoters are unable to explain rationally why famous companies that could crush the surfs and take away all of their business — while delivering content that gives people a nonfinancial reason to visit highly professional sites and later share in hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue — have not leveraged their marketplace advantages and enormous volume of website traffic to make the companies and their readers rich by opening an autosurf.

    The reason is simple: The model as practiced in the so-called autosurf advertising “industry” is plainly illegal. It flouts securities laws, wire-fraud laws, mail-fraud laws, racketeering laws, banking laws, money-services laws and other laws — and the surfs try to sanitize it all by saying “rebates aren’t guaranteed,” which is just a contractual disclaimer designed to legalize theft.

    When reading the story below, keep in mind that each of the companies mentioned has advantages none of the surfs can offer, including some of the most highly talented writers, editors, designers and advertising-sales executives in the world — people who can deliver millions of eyeballs to websites and produce good results for advertisers both in product sales and branding.

    And yet these companies have not turned to Andy Bowdoin of ASD or Clarence Busby of BizAdSplash for guidance.

    Now, after this lengthy introduction, the story . . .

    Circulation at USA Today plunged 17.15 percent in the six-month period ending in September, compared to the same period in 2008, according to figures released today by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC).

    Circulation losses experienced by the San Francisco Chronicle (-25.82 percent), the Star Ledger of Newark (-22.22 percent), the Dallas Morning News (-22.16 percent), the Boston Globe (-18.48 percent) and the New York Post (-18.77 percent) were even steeper, ABC reported.

    Elsewhere, the Houston Chronicle lost 14.24 percent of its print circulation during the period, and The Daily News (New York) lost 13.98 percent.

    Meanwhile, the Arizona Republic (-12.30 percent), the Cleveland Plain Dealer (-11.24 percent), the Los Angeles Times (-11.05 percent), the St. Petersburg (Florida) Times (-10.70 percent), the San Diego Union Tribune (-10.05 percent), the Chicago Tribune (-9.72 percent), the Detroit Free-Press (-9.56 percent) and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (-9.50 percent) also lost significant print circulation, ABC reported.

    The Post-Gazette explained today that much of its loss is attributable to an April decision to quit delivering the newspaper to certain outlying areas. The Post-Gazette says its website “remains the region’s most visited site.”

    Between the site and the print publication, the Post-Gazette reaches more than 1 million people every week, the newspaper reported.

    ABC’s numbers do not mean that actual readership of the publications is plunging. Many print-publishing companies have the dominant websites in their regions. And because the Internet has introduced the sort of immediacy once available only to TV and radio stations — and because print publications generally have larger news-gathering operations than their local competitors — the websites of newspapers and magazines have become enormously popular.

    What has not followed — at least not across the board — is an increase in revenues. Some famous print publications have declared bankruptcy, switched to an online-only model or a combination of online and print — or even folded.

    Print, in general, is struggling in every corner of the United States — and yet readership and reach never have been higher.

    Despite the advantages of readership, reach and talent pools autosurf companies only could dream about, there continues to be great stress in the worlds of publishing and advertising.

    No famous publishing house has adopted the autosurf model, even though promoters of the model would have would-be members/advertisers believe it is the magic cure.

  • BREAKING NEWS: Florida Revokes Corporate Registration Of Andy Bowdoin’s AdSurfDaily Inc.; Dissolves Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises Inc. On Same Date

    UPDATED 10:47 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The state of Florida has revoked the corporate registration of AdSurfDaily Inc.

    Meanwhile, the state has dissolved Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises Inc. Both actions were taken Sept. 25 by the Florida Department of State’s Division of Corporations because neither company filed required paperwork.

    ASD’s registration is marked “REVOKED FOR ANNUAL REPORT.” The registration for Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises is marked “ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT.” In each case, the required filings were nearly five months’ past due.

    Florida law requires all corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships and limited liability limited partnerships to file an annual report with the Division of Corporations between Jan. 1 and May 1 of each year.

    ASD is registered in Florida as a foreign corporation because the surf initially registered as a corporation native to Nevada. ASD’s Nevada registration is marked “default.”

    Ironically, Florida made the moves against the Bowdoin entities on the same date — Sept. 25 — a dramatic filing by federal prosecutors became public on the PACER U.S. Party Case Index. The federal filing accused ASD President Andy Bowdoin of trying to lie his way back into a civil-forfeiture case sparked by August 2008 allegations that ASD had engaged in wire fraud and money-laundering while operating a Ponzi scheme.

    In December 2008 — in a second forfeiture case filed against ASD’s assets — prosecutors said Bowdoin’s wife, Edna Faye Bowdoin, and her son, George Harris, opened a bank account at Capital City Bank on June 10, 2008, in the name of Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises Inc.

    The account was funded with an opening deposit of $177,900.12 from two ASD accounts at Bank of America. More than $157,000 of the sum was used to retire the mortgage on the home of George Harris and his wife, Judy Harris, prosecutors said.

    Prosecutors named the Harris home in the December forfeiture complaint, saying it had been acquired with illegal proceeds from ASD. The Capital City Bank account was opened less than two weeks after ASD concluded a rally in Las Vegas at which Andy Bowdoin exhorted the crowd to internalize the thought of acquiring large sums of money.

    Florida’s actions against ASD and Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises are potentially problematic for the companies and Bowdoin.

    Prosecutors could argue, for example, that no company claiming to be legitimate in court and encouraging members to continue to support it would fail to complete the minimal amount of paperwork required to keep its corporate registration intact.

    On Sept. 28 — three days after Florida revoked ASD’s corporate registration and dissolved the registration of Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises — federal prosecutors filed a U.S. Secret Service transcript of a conference call ASD had recorded Sept. 21.

    In the call, Bowdoin told members that the government had seized their money. In his court filings, however, Bowdoin claimed the money was his.

    Prosecutors said the recording was evidence that Bowdoin could not keep his stories straight, arguing that he had told members one story and a federal judge another.

    In December 2008, prosecutors said Andy Bowdoin and Edna Faye Bowdoin had set up Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises to conceal expenditures and assets from the government. In July 2008, according to court filings, a cashier’s check for $48,244.03 from Bowdoin/Harris Enterprises was used to purchase a 2008 Lincoln MKS luxury sedan.

    Prosecutors named the Lincoln in the forfeiture complaint, along with two other automobiles, a Cabana boat, jet skis and marine equipment. All of the purchases were made with ASD funds or ASD funds that had been funneled through Bowdoin/Harris, prosecutors said.

    Bowdoin has left behind a string of failed businesses, prosecutors said. Florida has dissolved at least seven of them — now including ASD — a company Bowdoin asked members to support in post-seizure testimonials and letter-writing campaigns.

  • Bowdoin’s New Lawyer Has Another Big Case; Feds Charge Florida Home-Builder Scott Fawcett In Multi-Agency Operation Dubbed ‘The Mortgage Fraud Surge’

    Michael R.N. McDonnell is the attorney for a Florida man charged Tuesday with obtaining $388,000 in a mortgage-fraud scheme, according to the Naples Daily News.

    McDonnell, a lawyer for nearly 40 years, recently was retained to represent AdSurfDaily President Andy Bowdoin in a civil-forfeiture case involving tens of millions of dollars seized from Bowdoin’s bank accounts by the U.S. Secret Service last year in a wire-fraud, money-laundering and Ponzi scheme probe.

    Scott Fawcett, McDonnell’s client in the mortgage-fraud case, was accused of saying he had an account balance of $353.209.09 at Bank United when he had only $13.57 in the account, according to an information filed by federal prosecutors.

    The charge against Fawcett is part of a federal law-enforcement operation known as “The Mortgage Fraud Surge,” a joint effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida, the FBI in Tampa and Jacksonville, “and numerous other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies,” prosecutors said.

    Foreclosures are piling up in Florida, which has experienced nine bank failures this year, including three yesterday. Florida trails only California in foreclosure volume. Bank United’s predecessor company — Bank United FSB — failed in May 2009, costing the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund an estimated $4.9 billion.

    The charge against Fawcett is filed in the Fort Myers Division of U.S. District Court for the Central District of Florida.

    Fawcett’s name is associated with more than a dozen foreclosure filings in Collier County, Fla., court records show. A person identified only as “H.F.” was named in the information as a co-applicant and co-owner of the account, but was not named a defendant.

    Fawcett is married to model Heather Fawcett, once listed as a member of the Miami Caliente of the upstart Lingerie Football League. Heather Fawcett’s listing on a website known as Model Mayhem includes a note that she was expecting a baby in September.

    Separately, Debra Landberg, a notary public, was indicted earlier in October — also in Fort Myers — on charges of fraud for helping “S.F.” and “H.F” get the loan that resulted in the charge against Scott Fawcett. The indictment against Landberg accuses her of helping “S.F.” get about $2.27 million in fraudulent loans by verifying fraudulent balances in accounts.

    Landberg was indicted on three counts of fraud and one count of lying to FBI agents. In the other fraudulent mortgage deals, according to the indictment, “S.F.” was said to have an account balance of $177,655.58, when the actual balance was $957.18, and an account balance of $146,264.77, when the actual balance was $1,774.50.

    Prosecutors are seeking forfeitures against Landberg and Scott Fawcett. The first fraudulent transaction involving Bank United occurred on July 19, 2006; the second transaction occurred April 17, 2007, according to court filings.

    The third — and largest fraudulent transaction — involved Citibank and the sum of $1.5 million, according to the indictment against Landberg.

  • Three Florida Banks, Four Elsewhere Fail Today, Pushing Bank Failure Total In 2009 To 106

    Seven banks failed in the United States today, including three in Florida, one in Georgia, one in Minnesota, one in Wisconsin and one in Illinois.

    Two of the failed Florida banks were in Naples. The third was in Bradenton, about 120 miles north of Naples. Both cities are situated in Gulf Coast counties. Two other Bradenton banks failed last year. Two banks in nearby Sarasota County, another Gulf Coast county, failed earlier this year.

    The three Florida banks that failed today were identified by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as Partners Bank of Naples, Hillcrest Bank Florida of Naples, and Flagship National Bank of Bradenton.

    Nine Florida banks have failed in 2009.

    The FDIC identified the other failed banks today as America United Bank of Lawrenceville, Ga; Riverview Community Bank of Otsego, Minn; Bank of Elmwood of Racine, Wisc; and First DuPage Bank of Westmont, Ill.

    Deposits in the banks are insured, and each of the banks will remain open with new ownership.

    Today’s bank failures pushed the U.S. total to 106 in 2009, up from 25 in 2008 and three in 2007.

  • ‘PROJECT CORONADO’: Feds Make 303 Arrests In Raid To Disrupt Mexican Cartel; Seize $3.4 Million In Cash, 109 Vehicles, 144 Weapons, 729 LB. Of Methamphetamine

    Display of some guns/drugs seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA.
    Display of some guns/drugs seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA.

    Federal agents, local police officers and prosecutors nationwide have carried out the largest action “ever undertaken against a Mexican drug cartel,” U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced.

    At least 303 individuals in 19 states were arrested in the past two days alone as part of Project Coronado. More than 3,000 agents and officers operated across the United States to make the arrests during the takedown, Holder said.

    During the two-day operation alone, $3.4 million in U.S. currency, 729 pounds of

    Display of methaamphetamine seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA
    Display of methamphetamine seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA

    methamphetamine, 62 kilograms of cocaine, 967 pounds of marijuana, 144 weapons and 109 vehicles were seized by law enforcement agents.

    Project Coronado has operated for 44 months, targeting the distribution network of a major Mexican drug-trafficking organization known as La Familia.

    La Familia is said to hold the belief that it is immoral to sell methamphetamine to Mexicans or for Mexicans to consume it, but it is acceptable to sell it to Americans for consumption. Mexican police say the cartel projects a “Robin Hood” image to locals, but engages in murderous rampages, including decapitations, to keep drug profits flowing.

    In July, the cartel reportedly killed 18 Mexican soliders or police officers, including 12 in a single attack. Corpses were left at a roadside to send a message.

    “The sheer level and depravity of violence that this cartel has exhibited far exceeds what we have, unfortunately, become accustomed to from other cartels,” Holder said. “La Familia operates primarily from the state of Michoacán, Mexico. However, as we’ve shown today, their operations stretch far into the United States. Indeed, while this cartel may operate from Mexico, the toxic reach of its operations extends to nearly every state in the country.”

    In Dallas, at least 77 arrests were made today as part of Operation Coronado. Arrests also were

    Display of money seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA.
    Display of money seized in Project Coronado: Source: DEA.

    reported in the regions of Seattle, Boston, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Tampa, Raleigh, Minneapolis, Chicago, Detroit, Tulsa, Las Vegas, Kansas City, St. Louis and about two dozen other U.S. cities.

    Here are some 44-month totals posted by law enforcement in Project Coronado:

    • Total arrests: 1,186
    • Kilograms of Cocaine Seized: 1,999
    • Pounds of Methamphetamine Seized: 2,710
    • Pounds of Heroin Seized: 29
    • Pounds of Marijuana Seized: 16,390
    • U.S. Currency Seized: $32,795,000
    • Number of Vehicles Seized: 269
    • Number of Weapons Seized: 389
    • Number of Maritime Vessels Seized: 2

    “This unprecedented, coordinated U.S. law enforcement action — the largest ever undertaken against a Mexican drug cartel — has dealt a significant blow to La Familia’s supply chain of illegal drugs, weapons and cash flowing between Mexico and the United States,” Holder said.

    “We will not allow these cartels to operate unfettered in our country, and with the increases in cooperation between U.S. and Mexican authorities in recent years, we are taking the fight to our adversaries. We will continue to stand strong with our partners in Mexico as we work to disrupt and dismantle cartel operations on both sides of the border,” Holder said.