PatrickPretty.com

Tag: Better Business Bureau

Alleged Bid To Gag Customers Leads To FTC Lawsuit Against Florida Seller Of ‘Unproven Weight-Loss Products’

Image from FTC complaint against Roca Labs of Sarasota, Fla.

Let’s say you’re a direct-seller and manage to persuade yourself that trying to threaten and intimidate your own customers is a good business practice.

How might you accomplish this?

Well, the FTC alleged today that Florida-based Roca Labs Inc. and Roca Labs Nutraceutical USA Inc. inserted “gag clause provisions” in purported customer agreements in a bid “to stop [consumers] from posting negative reviews and testimonials online.”

From an FTC statement dated today (italics added):

“In a complaint filed in federal court, the FTC alleges that Roca Labs, Inc.; Roca Labs Nutraceutical USA, Inc.; and their principals have sued and threatened to sue consumers who shared their negative experiences online or complained to the Better Business Bureau, stating that the consumers violated the non-disparagement provisions of the ‘Terms and Conditions’ they supposedly agreed to when they bought the products. The FTC alleges that these gag clause provisions, and the defendants’ related warnings, threats, and lawsuits, harm consumers by unfairly barring purchasers from sharing truthful, negative comments about the defendants and their products.”

Said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection:

“Roca Labs had an adversarial relationship with the truth. Not only did they make false or unsubstantiated weight-loss claims, they also attempted to intimidate their own customers from sharing truthful – and truly negative – reviews of their products.”

The FTC accuses Roca Labs of advertising its “Formula” and “Anti-Cravings” lines as “safe and effective alternatives to gastric bypass surgery.” In addition, the agency alleges, “[t]hey also claimed that users could lose as much as 21 pounds in one month, and that users have a 90 percent success rate in achieving substantial weight loss.”

Meanwhile, according to the FTC, “the defendants used testimonials and supposed ‘third-party’ reviews to illustrate the weight-loss success consumers achieved with their products. They solicited ‘Success Videos’ from purchasers by offering to pay 50 percent of the products’ price for providing positive reviews. In addition to threatening consumers who violated the gag clause provisions, the defendants claimed that consumers who posted negative reviews would owe the ‘full price’ for their products – hundreds of dollars more than advertised or actually paid, according to the complaint.”

Customers have directed at least $20 million to the firms for the powder products since 2010, the FTC alleges.

“The defendants sold the products starting at $480 for a three-to-four month supply, and have sold at least $20 million of the powder since 2010, according to the complaint.

In addition to the FTC’s unfairness charges based on the defendants’ gag clauses, the FTC alleges that the defendants’ weight-loss claims are false or unsubstantiated. The FTC also charges that the defendants failed to disclose that they compensated users who posted positive reviews. In addition, the FTC alleges that defendants violated consumers’ privacy by disclosing their personal health information in some cases to payment processors, banks, and in public court filings.”

Also named defendants were Don Juravin, also known as Don Adi Juravin and Don Karl Juravin, and George C. Whiting, also known as “Dr. George Whiting” and “George C. Whiting, Ph.D,” the FTC said.

Roca Labs implemented oppressive Terms and Conditions to stifle customers from complaining, the FTC charged. Here is one example, according to the complaint. (Italics and bolding added/light editing performed.)

A version of the Terms Defendants used prior to December 2014 . . . provided that Defendants, in the event a purchaser violated the Gag Clause, had the right to sue purchasers for an injunction, immediately bill them for $3500 in court costs and legal fees until they are determined in court, and immediately revoke all “discounts” that purchasers purportedly received. This version of the Terms further provided that Defendants could, after thirty days, report any such charge that remained unpaid to consumer reporting agencies, and forward the unpaid charges to a collection agency. This version of the terms also provided that Defendants could require purchasers who violated the Gag Clause to execute a notarized affidavit stating that their “disparaging remarks or review contained factually inaccurate material, was incorrect and breached [the Terms].” A version of the Terms used from approximately September 2012 into mid-2014 . . . provided that the purchaser further agreed that “any report of any kind on the web will constitute defamation/slander,” and agreed “to a predetermined compensation of $100,000. You agree and understand that you can not [sic] talk badly about the Formula because of any frustration you might have with the support department or your misunderstanding.”

In 2015, Public Citizen, a nonprofit group, sued Michigan-based KlearGear.com amid allegations the company effectively fined a Utah couple $3,500 after the wife posted a negative review of KlearGear at RipoffReport.com after her husband never received a desk toy and a keychain he’d ordered as Christmas gifts in 2008.

KlearGear also was accused in the lawsuit of causing a debt collector to go after the couple and of lying to credit-reporting agencies when asserting the debt was valid.

See Palmer v. KlearGear.com at Wikipedia.

Sep 28, 2015
EDITORIAL: Uber Isn’t MLM, But It Sure Acts Like It

From a letter by Sen. Al Franken to Uber. Franken, a Democrat, is a member of the powerful Senate Committee on the Judiciary. He also is chairman of the Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law.

We’ll begin by pointing out that Uber, the popular ride-sharing company and darling of venture capitalists, is not an MLM firm. But it sure is acting like one, even briefly vomiting one of MLM’s most familiar and reflexive responses to critics: HatersGonnaHate.

Can MLM enterprises and MLMers in general learn from Uber’s bizarre missteps?

You see, both Uber and MLM have a common problem: a certain internal recklessness coupled with a tin ear for PR, one that serves up one spectacular gaffe after another. Uber’s latest self-inflicted wound now has the attention of Sen. Al Franken, the Minnesota Democrat. Franken wants to know why “Uber’s Senior Vice-President of Business Emil Michael recently made statements suggesting that Uber might mine private information to target a journalist who had criticized the company.”

As BuzzFeedNews reported on Nov. 17 (italics/bolding added):

A senior executive at Uber suggested that the company should consider hiring a team of opposition researchers to dig up dirt on its critics in the media — and specifically to spread details of the personal life of a female journalist who has criticized the company.

Put another way: make the lady sweat that some skeleton might surface and lead to her demise should she dare continue to write pieces Uber found unflattering.

One Uber executive, BuzzFeed reported, planted the seed that Uber could prove “a particular and very specific claim about her personal life.”

The journalist is Sarah Lacy, the editor-in-chief at PandoDaily and a Mom. Here we’ll mention that, in addition to the Uber thuggishness, she’s also had to deal with the sidebar contention that Pando just might be funded by the CIA.

As a journalist who has been accused by MLMers of being on the CIA payroll and told by MLMers that my supposed secrets dealing with my supposed homosexuality and supposed porn addiction will be outed even as “sovereign citizens” threaten me with $500,000 fines for alleged trademark infringement, it will come as no surprise to PP Blog readers that I’m more than a little sympathetic to reporters who encounter thugs.

This sympathy extends whether the thugs are in the Ivory Tower or operating from the sewers.

The BuzzFeed Uber revelation set off a media firestorm now in its fourth day, putting Uber’s name in the papers for all the wrong reasons. Now, at least one reporter has come forward to claim that Uber tracked her without her permission as she rode in a Uber car. The device Uber uses to perform this tracking is known as “God View.”

In September, venture capitalist Peter Sims wrote that he’d been tracked by Uber without his permission. Sims says he was in a Uber car in New York City and that Uberites in Chicago were monitoring his movements. What this means, in essence, is that Uber was using him as a stage prop without his knowledge and consent from halfway across the country while also invading his privacy.

This reminds me of two crackpot MLM schemes making the rounds in 2010. These “programs” were known as NarcThatCar and Data Network Affiliates. Both schemes bizarrely reimagined mass invasions of privacy as exciting new products — and then wrapped pyramid schemes around their creations for good measure.

The schemes worked approximately like this: Armies of MLMers would hit neighborhoods across the land and write down the license-plate numbers of cars parked on streets and the addresses at which they were parked. They’d also hit the parking lots of grocery stores, big-box retailers, restaurant chains, pharmacies, doctors’ offices, bookstores, libraries, theaters, video-rental companies and universities.

All of this information would be entered in a database, purportedly to assist the AMBER Alert system of locating abducted children. AMBER Alert purportedly would get the data for free, but clientele purportedly including banks and companies in the business of repossessing cars during the height of the recession would pay for it.

MLM recruits were told to try not to attract too much attention while writing down all these plate numbers. They also were falsely told they were helping the U.S. Department of Homeland Security track terrorists.

Yes. MLM went in the spy business, using the pretext that it was one’s patriotic duty to monitor license plates and that enormous profits would flow from neighbors keeping track of automobiles in their neighborhoods. As the story was told, the database could tell the police what cars were parked at a fixed address at the time a child was snatched. This information then could be compared to the next sighting of the tag as entered in the database from a different fixed address, thus purportedly providing clues as to where the kidnapped child was being held.

If anyone had the temerity to raise a stink or even make a polite inquiry about why a stranger was recording their plate number in a parking lot, the recorders were trained to respond that no one had anything to fear if they hadn’t done anything wrong.

Both Narc and DNA were filled with such Orwellian outrageousness (and were such obvious pyramid schemes) that reporters began to hound both “programs.” The Better Business Bureau was subjected to bizarre attacks from the MLM sphere for raising questions about the “programs,” and some MLMers got the idea that the reporters, rather than the companies pulling off obvious scams, should be investigated.

Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels couldn’t have imagined greater allies than the MLM Stepfordians.

By 2012, MLMer and Zeek Rewards Ponzi-scheme figure Robert Craddock got the bright idea of putting himself in the opposition-research business — the opposition being reporters who wrote anything bad about Zeek. One of his targets was Zeek critic K. Chang, who briefly lost control over his HubPages site because Craddock had filed a complaint alleging copyright infringement, trademark infringement and libel.

K. Chang eventually prevailed, but not without experiencing downtime while the Zeek scheme was still gathering cash. The SEC eventually shut down Zeek, alleging that it was operating a fraud that had gathered $850 million.

Still sensing there was money to be made in the MLM cottage business of harassing reporters or soliciting dirt on them, Craddock eventually established a website known as “InternetClowns” that purportedly would serve all MLM firms. The supposed “clowns” included the PP Blog and BehindMLM.com, two sites that report on MLM frauds.

At the beginning of this column I noted that perhaps MLM could learn something from the experience of Uber in the subject area of tracking reporters and soliciting dirt on them. It strikes me now that maybe it should be the other way around: that Uber could learn from MLM.

One of the things Uber could learn is not to do anything MLMish if it wants to maintain its standing as a venture-capital darling.

By MLMish, we mean something crazy and outlandish such as tracking reporters, bringing in opposition-research teams to menace them and telling a group of people in the Second City that you’re using your “God Machine” to spy on a venture capitalist in the Big Apple.

And perhaps Uber also might want to avoid the most recent practice associated with “defenders” of outrageous MLM “programs” and HYIP schemes.

This would be the practice of trying to smear critics by using online forums to plant false stories about critics’ ties to Islamic terrorist groups and otherwise attacking human beings based on their Muslim faith.

Uber can read all about that one on RealScam.com, a site that concerns itself with international mass-marketing fraud. RealScam.com currently is being hectored by a person known as “Happy Customer” who is making outrageous claims against critics, filing bogus reports at RipoffReport and trying to keyword stuff the forum with words such as “Islamic Forum” and “haven for Islamic Terrorists !”

Happy Customer’s mind appears to be telling him (used presumptively) that, if only he can use the words “Islamic” and “Muslim” enough times — while mixing in words such as “terrorist” and “terrorism” — the eavesdropping and text-reading National Security Agency might just buzz by and turn off RealScam’s server.

Study the strange MLM circus, Uber. What you’ll learn should be more than enough to help make most unwanted headlines go away.

Nov 20, 2014
TelexFree, WCM777 (Etc.) — In Pictures

California-based WCM777, an MLM “program,” got booted out of Massachusetts in November 2013, amid allegations of securities fraud and affinity fraud targeted at the Brazilian community through hotel pitchfests. WCM777, purportedly operated by Ming Xu and recruiting affiliates to conduct business over the Internet, later got booted out of California. In addition to the Brazilian community, WCM777 targeted people who speak Spanish and people who speak Chinese, perhaps Christians in particular.

Massachusetts launched a probe into TelexFree, another MLM “program” associated with hotel pitchfests and affiliate recruitment over the Internet, at least by Feb. 28 of this year — probably sooner, given the nature of WCM777. TelexFree largely is targeting speakers of Portuguese and Spanish, perhaps Christians in particular. It also has an affiliate presence in India and Africa (at least).

Although the schemes do not appear to have common ownership, both WCM777 and TelexFree offered plans that encouraged recruits to buy in at higher levels to get higher “earnings.” Affiliates of each scheme appear to have engineered subschemes in which their recruits could buy in at higher levels than the “programs” themselves advertised, potentially introducing a second layer of fraud.

What this means, in essence, is that neither TelexFree nor WCM777 may know their real bottom lines and that the firms created an environment that encouraged back-alley, illegal sales of securities and secret deal-making among individual promoters. Individuals ostensibly acting as brokers for TelexFree and WCM777 could be cherry-picking cash and not even sending it to the “program” operators. In short, certain people could be creating personal and organizational underground economies and fleecing TelexFree and WCM777 even as they fleece their own marks and recruits.

Hidden members of both “programs” may be getting paid in cash by their upline sponsors or ostensible brokers, with no record of their participation — even if they supplied cash or an equivalent to join the “programs.”

The only safe assumption in HYIP Ponzi Land is that any system that can be abused will be abused. That’s why these “programs” necessarily must be viewed through the lens of national security.

Presented below are some screen shots that demonstrate promotional ties between TelexFree and WCM777. In certain instances, the websites pictured below are promoting not only TelexFree and WCM777, but also other “programs.” One of them, for instance, is promoting the almost indescribably insidious and bizarre Banners Broker “program.”

As always is the case in HYIP investigations, the concern is that banks locally, regionally, nationally and internationally are being used by corporate scammers first as warehouses to store illicit proceeds — and later, by individual promoters at potentially thousands and thousands of locations, as virtual ATMs that provide the service of offloading the “earnings” of the promoters.

The interconnectivity of these schemes endangers local, regional, state, provincial and national economies. In many cases, promoters engage in willful blindness and simply move to another MLM HYIP scam when the current “hot” one encounters regulatory intervention or craters on its own.

It’s often the case that promoters plant the seed that a scheme has been endorsed by a government or that a corporate registration is surefire “proof” that no scam exists. Social media invariably is used to help a scheme proliferate or achieve Internet virality.

One of the shots below is from a YouTube video in which a TelexFree promoter seeks to plant the seed that TelexFree is backed by the Better Business Bureau. The narrator’s words in the video suggest he sought to plant the same seed about WCM777 but had to backtrack when he discovered a BBB listing that referred to WCM777 as a Ponzi scheme.

“Today we’re going to compare two of the most dynamic companies out there taking over right now,” the narrator said.

After recording a search of the BBB site for a TelexFree listing and finding one, the narrator suggested that the listing alone was proof that TelexFree was not a scam. He thereafter performed a search for WCM777 and found a Ponzi reference, thus triggering what appeared to be backtracking from his earlier claims that TelexFree and WCM777 were “dynamic companies.”

It also could be the case, we suppose, that he already knew about the WCM777 Ponzi listing before performing the search and that the design all along was to get people to go with TelexFree because WCM777 was a scam. Even under that interpretation, however, the video still demonstrates the underhandedness within the HYIP sphere.

The HYIP sphere always screams incongruity. Keeping that in mind, we’ll point out that one of the screen shots below shows TelexFree executive James Merrill in the same affiliate-manufactured frame as Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin. It was a clear bid to suggest that because TelexFree was registered as a corporation in Massachusetts, the “program” couldn’t possibly be a scam.

That is hogwash, of course. Galvin did not endorse TelexFree when his office approved a corporate registration. Besides, Galvin — as Commonwealth Secretary — oversees both the Massachusetts Corporations Division and the Securities Division. The Securities Division is probing TelexFree and possibly can rely on various documents in the Corporations Division to help investigators connect dots.

Beyond that, the website from which the screen shot promoting TelexFree by marrying images of Merrill and Galvin was taken also is promoting WCM777. Also shown below is an image from the same site in which Merrill is shown posing beside a giant SUV. Contrast that image against the image of Merrill posing in front of a large Massachusetts building as though TelexFree were its only occupant. TelexFree promoters have used the same approach, planting that seed that TelexFree owns the building and has a large physical presence in the United States.

That’s hogwash, too. TelexFree was an occupant of Suite 200 at a Regus center in Marlborough, along with dozens of other companies.

Finally, before observing the shots below, recognize that MLM itself — never a stranger to scandal — may be on the verge of experiencing a PR and legal crisis of unprecedented proportions.

People have harshly criticized hedge-fund manager Bill Ackman for attacking Herbalife. Among his contentions is that Herbalife is a pyramid scheme that targets vulnerable populations. Say what you will about Ackman’s Herbalife claims, but it is crystal clear that affinity fraud and the viral looting of impoverished/disadvantaged people have existed in the MLM realm for a long time and continues to be seen. One might even be inclined to say a market-making fraud blueprint exists within MLM: mow down one affinity cluster or population group and then move to another.

At a minimum, “programs” such as TelexFree and WCM777, which clearly have positioned themselves as wealth recipes for immigrants and vulnerable populations, can help Ackman shape and inform his Herbalife hypothesis.

James Merrill is TelexFree’s president and thus an MLM executive. TelexFree and Merrill, to date, have played into virtually every MLM stereotype that exists — everything from private jets, monster SUVs and stretch limos to business registrations and mail drops in Nevada.

Most disturbingly, though, Merrill represents an American MLM company that has been banned in Rwanda, an African nation that is trying to reverse poverty and receives aid from the World Bank. It’s hard to conceive that MLM — particularly American MLM — could card a worse PR disaster. Regardless, one could be in the offing.

Picture Story

1.

A TelexFree promoter who also promoted WCM777 extends the myth that TelexFree has a large physical presence in the United States and plants the seed that Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin endorsed TelexFree. Galvin’s office is investigating TelexFree after previously booting WCM777 from the state.

2.

A promoter simultaneously pitches TelexFree and WCM777. This shot is from the same site described in the photo above. The site may be based in Ecuador.

3.

This shot is from the same two sites described in the captions above — and features TelexFree President James Merrill posing with a giant SUV.

4.

This shot was taken on the same site described in the three preceding captions above. In this fourth shot, a person promoting both TelexFree and WCM777 claims that the purported parent company of WCM777 provided a loan of $20 million to a restaurant chain that sells Mexican food. The PP Blog has deleted an image of the chain’s logo that appears in the WCM777 promo. The same site plants the seed that WCM has provided hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to jewels of American business.

5.

This site features promos for various purported “opportunities,” including TelexFree and WCM777. Though not shown in the photo, the site also is promoting the uber-bizarre Banners Broker “program.” The site may be based in Italy.

6.

This site also is simultaneously promoting TelexFree and WCM777.

7.

This YouTube site describes TelexFree and WCM777 as “dynamic companies” and plants the seed that TelexFree is endorsed by the Better Business Bureau.

Mar 22, 2014
FOR SPANISH-SPEAKERS: Telemundo 39 (Dallas) Report On WCM777

From a WCM777 pitchfest. Source: Telemundo (Dallas).

Here is a link to a Telemundo 39 (Dallas) report on the WCM777 “program.”

Link.

The unofficial total of jurisdictions or regulatory agencies filing actions or issuing Investor Alerts against WCM777 stands at seven: The country of Peru, the state of Massachusetts, the state of California, the state of Colorado, the state of Louisiana, the state of New Hampshire, the province of New Brunswick.

In addition, the Canadian Securities Administrators — an umbrella organization of 13 provinces/territories of Canada that is responsible for developing a harmonized approach to securities regulation across the country — has published the New Brunswick warning. The Better Business Bureau, meanwhile, has given WCM777 an “F,” its lowest score.

Despite the regulatory actions, WCM pitchfests are continuing online.

NOTE: Our thanks to a reader who let us know about the Telemundo report.

Feb 22, 2014
UPDATE: ‘YouGetPaidFast’ Pitchman Said To Be Casting Net At Unemployment Office For Gifting-Program Leads; Meanwhile, Scheme Takes A Phil Piccolo-Like Turn By Pointing To Alexa Rankings As Supposed Proof Of Legitimacy

YouGetPaidFast, a Texas-based “program” that plants the seed it has the blessing of the FBI, is benefiting from a pitchman who is handing out flyers at an “unemployment office,” according to a post from an apparent naysayer at the MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi forum.

The poster says his friend is the one handing out the flyers — and won’t listen to reason because he is desperate for money.

If the claim is true, it would follow an incendiary circumstance that surfaced in the Women’s Gifting Tables pyramid scheme in Connecticut that resulted in lengthy prison sentences for two pitchwomen.

In the Women’s Gifting Tables scheme, members of Alcoholics Anonymous were targeted, according to the trial testimony reported by the New Haven Register.

Such schemes typically target vulnerable populations. Similar schemes such as HYIP frauds have been known to target people facing mortgage foreclosures and recent job losses.

YouGetPaidFast is operated by Paul Darby, a Texan who claims he is friendly with FBI agents and has them on “speed dial.”

At least one FBI agent has vetted his “program,” Darby has claimed.

Unlike the Women’s Gifting Table scheme, which asked for $5,000 at a time, YouGetPaidFast appears to be seeking the much-smaller sum of $28. Participants reportedly are instructed to mail $7 to each of four names of individuals or entities that appear on a list and advised they are purchasing products.

Gifting and other fraud schemes that assert they sell inexpensive “products” appear somewhat regularly on the Internet. Such an approach is consistent with micro-fraud, a scam by which hucksters gather small sums from participants, rather than seeking large sums. The hope is that the small sums will add up to a large sum over time and investigators will perceive a micro “program” as less toxic than a jugular-vein fraud and won’t bother to look into it.

The JSSTripler/JustBeenPaid HYIP “program” purportedly operated by AdSurfDaily Ponzi pitchman and cash-gifter Frederick Mann was an example of micro fraud. Participants were told that JSS/JBP would give them $10 to get started in the “program.” After payout and other problems developed at JSS/JBP, the “program” started seeking “purchases” of tens of thousands of dollars at a time.

Claims that a “program” sells “products” and that participants make “purchases” long have been associated with bids to mask the true nature of the “program” — a gifting scam or HYIP fraud disguised as a merchant doing legitimate business, for example. Meanwhile, claims that the government or an important politician or business person have vetted or endorsed a “program” are common in the fraud sphere.

An earlier Darby “program” featured a knockoff of the Seal of the President of the United States and suggested that something called Net Millionaires Club was an “economic stimulus package.”

The marketing efforts of Net Millionaires Club were reminiscent of those of the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme exposed by the U.S. Secret Service in 2008. (ASD traded on the name of former U.S. President George W. Bush; Darby has traded on the name of President Obama.) In 2010, a Phil Piccolo-linked scam known as Data Network Affiliates planted the seed that it had been endorsed by Oprah Winfrey and Donald Trump.

Meaningless, Bizarre, Piccolo-Like Claims

YouGetPaidFast now screams it is “SETTING RECORDS WORLD WIDE,” pointing to an Alexa traffic ranking and “Video Views by You Tube 30 Days” as purported proof of legitimacy. Despite the claim it is setting records, however, YouGetPaidFast does not appear to specify precisely what records it is setting. Nor does it appear to say precisely what authority had certified the marks as “records.”

Such incongruities litter the cash-gifting and HYIP landscapes, which are lined with the carcasses of collapsed “programs.” Sometimes the “programs” come back with a new name or a name designed to instill new confidence such as XXX Scheme 2.0 XXX Scheme Web 3.0.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) warned in 2010 that fraud schemes were spreading online through social-media sites such as YouTube. A year earlier — in 2009 — the Better Business Bureau reported there were 22,974 cash-gifting videos on YouTube.

Those videos, the BBB said at the time, had garnered an “astounding 59,192,963 views.” (Also see June 2009 report on cash-gifting by KIII-TV. The report includes an interview with an official from the Better Business Bureau of Central Texas.)

Cash-gifting purveyors are “targeting people with some form of an affinity — such as as women’s clubs, community groups, church congregations, social clubs and special interest groups,” the BBB warned four years ago.

On Oct. 8, BehindMLM.com, citing a Darby claim, reported that one or more Christian pastors was encouraging Darby to sue his detractors.

Pointing to Alexa rankings and YouTube videos to sanitize frauds is one of the oldest tricks in the scammer’s playbook in the Information Age. Veteran online huckster Phil Piccolo, known for bizarre schemes such as Data Network Affiliates, OWOW and Text Cash Network, has been doing it for years.

Piccolo also has planted the seed he’ll sue his critics. In 2010, he planted the seed on Troy Dooly’s radio program that he could bring in leg-breakers if lawsuits didn’t work. Piccolo earlier had threatened to sue Dooly.

Oct 27, 2013
Notes/Analysis On TelexFree: A Little Like AdSurfDaily/AdViewGlobal, TextCashNetwork, Zeek Rewards, Profitable Sunrise And World Marketing Direct Selling

TelexFree affiliates have shared a photo of President James M. Merrill posing in front of an office building in Massachusetts. The photo, however, is not proof of TelexFree’s legitimacy and raises questions about whether the company was trying to plant the seed it had a massive physical presence in the United States.

UPDATED 10:22 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The purported TelexFree “opportunity” is under investigation by multiple agencies in Brazil, its purported base of operations despite competing claims the company is headquartered in the United States. The notes below concern TelexFree’s U.S. presence and positioning. They are presented in no particular order of importance. TelexFree says it is in the communications business.

TelexFree has a footprint in Massachusetts at 225 Cedar Hill Street, Suite 200, Marlborough. It is a shared office facility. Ads for the building suggest a conference room with video capabilities can be rented by the hour. One suggested use of the room is for attorneys to rent it to conduct depositions. Some attorneys practicing in the state and federal courts use the building as a business address.

Other lessees include the Massachusetts Library System (MLS), which describes itself as “state-supported collaborative” to foster “cooperation, communication, innovation, and sharing among member libraries of all types.” MLS uses Suite 229, according to its website.

TelexFree operates as an MLM. One of the problems in the MLM sphere is that purported “opportunities” and their promoters have been known to dupe participants by leasing virtual office space to create the illusion of scale or of a massive physical presence. Such was the case with a Florida entity associated with AdViewGlobal, an AdSurfDaily knockoff scam that purported to pay 1 percent a day. As the PP Blog reported on May 31, 2009 (italics added):

Research suggests a company with which AVG has a close association is headquartered in a modern office building in the United States. The building was constructed in 2003. Office functions and conferencing can be rented by the hour. Two large airports are nearby, and a major Interstate highway is situated one mile from the building.

It is a virtual certainty that AVG, which purported to operate from Uruguay, actually was operating from the U.S. states of Florida and Arizona and using a series of business entities to launder the proceeds of its fraud scheme. AVG disappeared mysteriously in June 2009.

On Dec. 14, 2011, the PP Blog reported that Text Cash Network (TCN) — another purported MLM “opportunity” — was using a virtual office in Boca Raton, Fla., in a bid to create the illusion of scale. TCN promoters published photos of a glistening building with TCN’s name affixed near the crown of the building. The Boca Raton Police Department, however, said the firm’s name did not appear on the building.

Although the PP Blog is unaware of any bids to Photoshop TelexFree’s name on a large office building, affiliates have shared photos of TelexFree President James M. Merrill posing in front of the large Massachusetts building. So there can be no confusion, TelexFree does not own the building. TelexFree affiliates/prospects should not rely on the photo of the building as proof of the legitimacy of the company. The photo itself raises questions about whether Merrill and TelexFree were trying to create the illusion of scale. Even though the answer could be no, the negative inferences that can be drawn from the photo contribute to MLM’s reputation for serial disingenuousness.

TelexFree also has a presence in the state of Nevada. Records show that an entity known as TelexFree LLC is listed as “Domestic Limited-Liability Company” situated in Las Vegas. Listed managers include Carlos N. Wanzeler, Carlos Costa and James M. Merrill. TelexFree operates in Massachusetts with an “Inc.” version of the name — i.e., TelexFree Inc., having undergone a name change in February 2012 from Common Cents Communications Inc. In Massachusetts, James Merrill is listed as the registered agent, president, secretary and director of the firm, with Carlos Wanzeler listed as treasuer and director. Unlike the Nevada “LLC” version of TelexFree, Carlos Costa appears not to hold a title in the Massachusetts “Inc.” entity.

The footprints in the United States are important in the sense that they establish a business presence in the country should TelexFree become the subject of U.S. investigations akin to what is happening now in Brazil, where pyramid-scheme and securities concerns have been raised. Along those lines, records of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) appear not to list TelexFree — despite the fact affiliates in the United States have claimed members acquire “stock” from TelexFree that can be sold through TelexFree and that affiliates purchase “contracts” from TelexFree.

One YouTube video viewed by the PP Blog shows a TelexFree affiliate purportedly cashing out his stock through his TelexFree back office. The affiliate appears to be speaking in U.S. English, citing the date as March 19, 2013. In the video, the affiliate describes his pitch as a “quick withdrawal video” — i.e., proof that TelexFree is legitimate because it pays.

“OK,” the narrator intones. “I’m going to sell all my stock.” The video shows a tab labeled “Stock” and a subtab styled “Repurchase” in the back office.

The narrator then clicks on a series of graphics styled “REPURCHASE” and tells the audience that he wants to show it all the “stock that I have that converts to actual money.” He then proceeds to a “Withdraw” subtab under a “Statement” tab. These actions eventually expose a screen that shows an “AVAILABLE BALANCE” of $927.61 for withdrawal.

For a brief moment, the acronym “BT&T” flashes on the screen, suggesting the TelexFree affiliate is seeking to have his earnings from stock sales relayed through North Carolina-based Branch Banking & Trust. The interesting thing about that is that the alleged $600 million Zeek Rewards Ponzi- and pyramid scheme claimed it had a banking relationship with BB&T.

In May 2012 — on Memorial Day — Zeek mysteriously announced it was ending its relationship with BB&T. It was unclear from the TelexFree affiliate’s video whether he was a BB&T customer or whether TelexFree was. What is clear is that the SEC moved against Zeek in August 2012, accusing the company of securities fraud and selling unregistered securities as investment contracts. The U.S. Secret Service said it also was investigating Zeek.

In this TelexFree promo running on YouTube, the acronym BB&T flashes on the screen in a TelexFree affiliate’s back office.

Among the problems with HYIP schemes is that banks can become conduits through which illicit proceeds are routed or stockpiled. Zeek used at least 15 domestic and foreign financial institutions to pull off its fraud, according to court filings.

Because HYIPs offer commissions to members who recruit other members along with “investment returns,” legitimate financial institutions can come into possession of money tainted by fraud.

Like Zeek (and AdViewGlobal and AdSurfDaily), TelexFree has a presence on well-known forums listed in U.S. court records as places from which Ponzi schemes are promoted.

TelexFree shares some of the characteristics of fraud schemes such as Zeek, AdViewGlobal, AdSurfDaily, Profitable Sunrise and others. ASD, AVG and Zeek, for instance, had a purported “advertising” element. So does TelexFree.

TelexFree affiliates claim they get paid for posting ads online for the purported “opportunity.” Zeek affiliates made the same claim.

It is highly likely that Zeek and TelexFree have promoters in common, a situation that potentially is problematic, given that some affiliates may have used money from Zeek to join TelexFree — and the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek case is pursuing clawbacks against “winners.” In short, some of the winnings could have been spent in TelexFree.

An online promo for Zeek in July 2012 claimed North Carolina-based Zeek had 100,000 affiliates in Brazil alone. TelexFree affiliates are claiming that their “opportunity” now has hundreds of thousands of affiliates, which suggests TelexFree has achieved Zeek-like scale. Whether it enjoys Zeek-like, money-pulling power on the order of $600 million is unclear.

What is clear is that TelexFree, like Zeek before it, is spreading in part through the posting of promos on classified-ad or similar sites across the United States. Profitable Sunrise, another HYIP, spread in similar fashion. Dozens of U.S. states issued Investor Alerts or cease-and-desist orders against Profitable Sunrise, which the SEC accused of fraud in April 2013.

To gain an early sense of the scale TelexFree may be achieving in the United States, the PP Blog typed into Google the term “TelexFree” and the names of several U.S. states known to have taken actions against Profitable Sunrise. This revealed URLs such as “TelexFreeOhio” and “telexfreetexas.blogspot.com,” for two examples. It also showcased classified-ad (or similar) sites on which TelexFree promos are running or have run.

Finally, the state of Massachussets was the venue from which the prosecutions of the infamous World Marketing Direct Selling (WMDS) and OneUniverseOnline (1UOL) pyramid-schemes were brought in federal court. Those fraud schemes were targeted at Cambodian-Americans. The state does not take kindly to affinity fraud. In March, Massachusetts securities regulators charged a man in an alleged fraud bid against the Kenyan community.

Among the claims of the MLM hucksters pitching WMDS and 1UOL was that members could purchase an income. Some TelexFree affiliates are making similar claims.

The WMDS and 1UOL frauds became infamous as the source of death threats, including one against a federal prosecutor.

Media outlets in Brazil have reported that death threats have surfaced over the TelexFree scheme.

For the reasons cited above and more, it would be surprising if things end well in the United States for TelexFree, which has Zeek and ASD-like signatures of MLM disasters waiting to happen.

Jul 4, 2013
Rumors Swirl About Banners Broker ‘Program’

This affiliate page for the purported Banners Broker “advertising” program claims members can double their money.

UPDATED 8:54 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) Rumors abound online that authorities in India have carried out some sort of action against the Banners Broker “advertising” program. As of the time of this post, the PP Blog has been unable to confirm the rumored action with a law-enforcement source.

“Advertising” scams long have been associated with the HYIP sphere. The $119 million AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme, for instance, was such a “program.” Such scams are associated with the unlawful sale of unregistered securities and claims by law enforcement of members’ money being siphoned by operators. “Winners” in such schemes can be sued for their ill-gotten gains. There also have been instances in which key pitchmen have been sued by regulatory agencies and even charged with crimes.

Several things the PP Blog has noticed:

A “welcome page” Banners Broker URL exists for the United States but is throwing this error message: “Unable to locate template file welcome_us.tpl.”

The nonworking US URL is http://www.bannersbroker.com/main/welcome_us. It is listed on an apparent Banners Broker affiliate’s website with a headline of “BANNERS BROKER INDIA.” The site also lists a U.S. address for the company in Ocala, Fla. Other addresses and welcome URLs for other countries appear on the same page. Welcome URLs for India, Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom appear to be working. Only the URL for the United States appears not to work.

Whether Banners Broker removed the U.S. “welcome” URL in a bid to distance itself from U.S. regulatory scrutiny is unclear.

Regardless, the Banners Brokers site is viewable in the United States from the URLs for other countries and by connecting directly to the Banners Broker dotcom address. Although Banners Broker lists the flags of several countries on its homepage, the American flag is not listed. (Or at least wasn’t viewable by the PP Blog from the United States.)

The Better Business Bureau has given Banners Broker an “F,” the BBB’s lowest grade.

At least one Banner’s Broker affiliate site is calling itself “Banners Broker Brief” and using the BBB acronym long associated with the Better Business Bureau. (A 2010 Phil Piccolo scam known as Data Network Affiliates arranged for one of its products to be called BBB. Such approaches sometimes are used to leech off of the Better Business Bureau’s famous acronym and to distort search-engine results and make “negative” information harder to find. It also is common in certain MLM schemes for affiliates to use the word “scam” when presenting the “opportunity” — and they then explain why it’s purportedly not a scam. This approach also may make it difficult to find “negative” information about a “program” because information can become buried in page after page of claims that the “program” is not a scam.)

Any number of affiliate YouTube videos exist for Banners Broker. Some are of the check-waving variety. Instead of featuring checks, however, they appear to feature screen shots of payments that purportedly originated at SolidTrustPay. SolidTrustPay has a reputation for doing business with scam after scam. Zeek Rewards, which the SEC described in August as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme, used SolidTrustPay.

Banners Broker appears to have been popular among Zeek promoters. One video exists in which a Banners Broker affiliate tells the audience about the SEC’s Zeek case, but the affiliate claims he believes Banners Broker is not a fraud scheme. Even so, he allows that it could be.

Banners Broker has a major presence on the Ponzi boards — again like Zeek. Some promoters race from scam to scam to scam.

There are claims about Banners Broker “doubling” money.

Jan 1, 2013
UNBELIEVABLE: Now, A Scam Known As ‘Her Majesty’s Credit Union’ That Duped Investors By Falsely Claiming To Be Insured By Lloyd’s Of London And Backed By The Government, SEC Says

The SEC’s complaint against “Her Majesty’s Credit Union” lists the URL for the purported CD business. This screen shot by the PP Blog was taken at the URL.

A scammer known by three names who’d earlier presided over an “insolvent” credit union in Georgia before being forced out of business in eight months went on to start a bogus credit union in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the SEC said.

The Virgins Islands enterprise was known as “Her Majesty’s Credit Union” (HMCU) and sold bogus CDs, duping investors by trading on the names of Lloyd’s of London and government entities to sanitize the fraud, the SEC said.

Charged in the alleged $532,000 caper was Stanley B. McDuffie of Denver. McDuffie formerly was known as Stanley Roberson and Stanley Battle, the SEC said.

“McDuffie and HMCU held out HMCU as a secure, legitimate, regulated credit union, promised to pay above-market interest rates, and assured investors that their deposits were insured by Lloyd’s of London or the U.S. Virgin Islands’ government,” the SEC said. “In reality, HMCU was an unregulated, illegitimate credit union that never held share insurance covering investor deposits, and McDuffie and HMCU misappropriated investors’ funds.”

The Better Business Bureau record for HMCU notes a 2010 action by the Colorado Division of Securities against “Stanley B. Roberson.”

Roberson “was sentenced to one year in jail after being found in contempt of a court order,” the BBB reported, citing Colorado authorities. “Mr. Roberson is the chief executive officer of Her Majesty’s Credit Union, a U.S. Virgin Island company with a servicing office in Denver.”

In 2010, Fred Joseph, the commissioner of Colorado’s Division of Securities, put it this way (italics added):

Mr. Roberson failed to produce documents pursuant to a lawful subpoena issued to him as part of our investigation of Her Majesty’s Credit Union. The Division of Securities then filed contempt proceedings in Denver District Court to compel production. Since its accounts are not federally insured, we are attempting to determine if Her Majesty’s Credit Union is offering only uninsured deposits or is engaging in the offer and sale of unregistered securities.

The SEC today charged McDuffie with selling unregistered securities, saying in its complaint that McDuffie “misappropriated the funds for personal and business expenses, causing investors to lose most of their principal, and rendering it impossible for HMCU to make required interest payments.”

McDuffie also allegedly clammed up to the SEC, the agency said. From the SEC complaint (italics added):

After a subpoena enforcement action resulted in McDuffie being ordered by the Court to comply with the SEC’s subpoenas, McDuffie refused to testify in the SEC’s investigation, citing his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to all substantive questions.

Named a defendant in the SEC’s action against McDuffie was Jilapuhn Inc., the apparent operator through McDuffie of “Her Majesty’s Credit Union.”

The defunct Georgia credit union was known as the “Jilapuhn Employees Federal Credit Union,” the SEC said.

“In August 2005, after JEFCU had operated for only eight months, the [National Credit Union Administration] determined that JEFCU was insolvent, and therefore it issued a Notice of Involuntary Liquidation and Revocation of Charter,” the SEC said.

Nov 8, 2012
‘Investor-Fraud Summits’ Set For 6 U.S. Cities: Stamford, Conn.; Nashville, Tenn.; San Francisco; Denver; Cleveland And Miami

What: Investor Fraud Summits.

Where/When: Stamford, Conn. (today from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. EDT at the University of Connecticut – Stamford Campus); Nashville, Tenn. (Oct. 4 from 8:45 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EDT at Vanderbilt University Law School’s Flynn Auditorium located at 131 21st Avenue South) ; San Francisco (Oct. 9, in Walnut Creek, Calif., from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. PDT at the Rossmoor Retirement Community – Gateway Complex located at 1001 Rain Road); Denver (Oct. 10 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. MDT at the Tivoli Building – Turnhalle Auditorium located at 900 Auraria Parkway, Suite 150); Cleveland (Oct. 11 in Beachwood, Ohio, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EDT at the Montefiore Senior Living Center located at 1 David Myers Parkway); and Miami (Oct. 12 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. EDT at the Miami Dade College – in the Chapman Conference Center, located at 245 N.E. Fourth Street, Bldg. 3, Room 3210).

Why: Investment fraud losses have been “staggering,” the Justice Department says.

Since the beginning of 2011, “the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and 85 U.S. Attorneys’ offices have reported that approximately 800 defendants have been charged, tried, pleaded or sentenced in approximately 500 federal prosecutions involving investor fraud. The total reported amount cheated from victims for this time period tops more than $20 billion.”

Summit Sponsors: Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys’ offices, the FBI, the SEC, the FTC, the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the CFTC, the Bankruptcy Trustees, FINRA, AARP and the Better Business Bureau.

Top law-enforcement officials will be on hand at each of the summits. See the Justice Department news release for details.

Oct 1, 2012
ZEEK: Part Of The Backstory — In Pictures
UPDATED 4:20 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Unsolved mysteries remain in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case. Among the unanswered questions are these:
- How many members did Zeek have in common with AdSurfDaily, a predecessor 1-percent-a-day scam to the Zeek scheme?
- Why do some Zeek “defenders” appear to be engaged in bizarre bids to harass and menace Zeek critics?
- Why did Zeek list certain ASD members or story figures as employees on its website — and why does some of the employee information published on Zeek’s website in June appear to be at odds with employee information contained in court filings by Zeek last week?
- How much connectivity did Zeek have with scams such as NarcThatCar, AdViewGlobal, OneX and JSSTripler/JustBeenPaid, a “program” that may have ties to the “sovereign citizens” movement?
On June 7, the PP Blog reported that a Zeek Rewards MLM “program” website was listing the names of 16 Zeek “employees,” including the name of Terralynn Hoy, a mainstay in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme story. Also included was the name of OH Brown, an executive at a company (USHBB Inc.) that produced ads for the NarcThatCar pyramid scheme. This information is reflected in screen shots Nos. 1 and 2. Notes by the PP Blog also are included.

Hoy participated in at least one conference call for Zeek, as did Brown. Zeek’s 1-percent-a-day-plus business model was very similar to the business model of ASD, which the U.S. Secret Service described in 2008 as a massive online Ponzi scheme that had gathered tens of millions of dollars. Zeek launched after the collapse of ASD and had members and/or figures in common with ASD and AdViewGlobal, a collapsed 1-percent-a-day “program” federal prosecutors linked in April 2012 to ASD.

1.

2.

ADDITIONAL NOTES: T. LeMont Silver, identified by Zeek in June as an employee, also was a pitchman for “OneX.” In April, federal prosecutors in the District of Columbia described OneX as a “fraudulent scheme” and “pyramid” that was recycling money in AdSurfDaily-like fashion. ASD was a $119 million Ponzi scheme operated by the now-jailed Andy Bowdoin, who also was a OneX pitchman.

Among Silver’s OneX claims was that OneX positions being given away were worth $5,000. Bowdoin declared OneX an excellent “program” for college students.

Even though Zeek claimed Silver, Hoy, Catherine Parker, Brown, Trudy Gilmond and Marie Young Cain as “employees” in June, they are not referenced as “EMPLOYEES, OTHER PERSONNEL, ATTORNEYS, ACCOUNTANTS & OTHER AGENTS/CONTRACTORS” in a Sept. 17 court filing by Rex Venture Group LLC/Zeek operator Paul R. Burks.

Also absent from Burks’ Sept. 17 list of Rex/Zeek employees/contractors is Robert Craddock, who identified himself in July as a Rex “consultant.” In July, prior to the SEC’s Ponzi allegations against Zeek, Craddock sought to disable the Hub of Zeek critic “K. Chang” by filing a complaint for purported copyright/trademark infringement and libel with HubPages.com. Craddock was successful briefly, but HubPages eventually restored the “K. Chang” Hub. Craddock later became involved in a purported effort to raise funds to “protect” Zeek affiliates from the SEC and/or the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Ponzi case.

Gilmond once pitched Regenesis2x2, a “program” that became the subject of a U.S. Secret Service investigation in 2009. The Secret Service also is investigating Zeek. The SEC described Zeek last month as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme.

Precisely how and when Rex/Zeek hired or replaced/dismissed employees is unclear. The names of a number of individuals listed by Zeek as employees in June do not appear on the list Burks filed in court last week.

NarcThatCar effectively collapsed in 2010, after coming under scrutiny by the Better Business Bureau and investigative reporters. Narc operated from Texas — and yet did part of its banking in North Carolina at one of the banks used by Zeek. Both Narc and Zeek used USHBB Inc. to produce ads for their respective “programs.” Both Narc and Zeek scored “F” grades with the BBB — and when the BBB published negative information about the respective “programs,” some affiliates of the respective “programs” claimed the BBB was a fraud.

Zeek ‘Defender’ Stalks PP Blog, Starts Disinformation Site After HubPages Restores ‘K. Chang’ Site Targeted By Craddock

The PP Blog is reporting today that, after the SEC described Zeek as a $600 million fraud and after HubPages restored the “K. Chang” Hub critical of Zeek and targeted by Craddock, a purported Zeek “defender” used the Internet repeatedly to send harassing communications to the PP Blog. Dated Aug. 28, one such communication was an announcement that the PP Blog and “K. Chang” had been targeted in a retaliation campaign for their respective reporting on Zeek.

3.

4.

The Blog’s stalker created more than a dozen bogus usernames and email addresses to send harassing (and bizarre) communications to the PP Blog.

Here is one from Aug. 31 (italics added):

Watch out for the Romney lover namely KSChang!!!! He was saw holding hands with Mitt, caressing the presidential candidate, while surfing PatrickP’s amazing, smart, funny, and romantic blog.

Mitt Romney is the Republican nominee for President of the United States.

For reasons that remain known only to the PP Blog’s cyberstalker, the individual also sent a one-word harassing communication — “Pussy” — to the thread below this Aug. 29 PP Blog guest column by Gregg Evans. Separately, the cyberstalker sent a communication that planted the seed Evans would get sued for his Aug. 29 PP Blog column.

“Are you willing go toe to toe with a lawyer on your claims and back up this article?” the cyberstalker wrote.

On Aug. 31, the cyberstalker — who’d been banned under multiple identities — sent this harassing communication to the PP Blog:

“What happened to your face dude, looks like you got ran over by an ugly truck.”
Sep 23, 2012
UPDATE: North Carolina Investigators Demanded Info From Zeek On July 6; State Says It Has Not Taken Shutdown Action

UPDATED 10:58 A.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Two new details have emerged in the mysterious shutdown yesterday of the office and websites of Zeekler/Zeek Rewards: The office of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper told the PP Blog this morning that it has taken no action to shut down Zeek, the operator of an MLM and a penny-auction site.

“We have not taken action to shut the company down and are currently working to get more information so we can pass that along to consumers who may be impacted by this,” said Noelle Talley, a spokeswoman for Cooper.

But Cooper’s office did say that it had issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to Zeek on July 6. That’s weeks earlier than initially believed and leads to questions about whether Zeek had known for five weeks that it had been under investigation and did not inform participants.

Without providing details, Zeek announced on its Blog yesterday that it had canceled its Aug. 22 “Red Carpet” event. By early evening, the Zeek Rewards and Zeekler sites began to publish this message: “Zeek Rewards is currently unavailable. More information will be available shortly on this website.”

Earlier in the week, Zeek announced that “there won’t be any training, recruitment or leadership calls for the next few days while planning is going on.”

With Zeek leaving affiliates in an information vacuum, many of them took to the Web. At least two petition drives appear to be under way demanding the government to reopen Zeek. As of the time of this post, the PP Blog has been unable to confirm that an action by any government agency — state or federal — was responsible for Zeek’s sudden absence.

The Blog still is in the process of trying to piece together events in what has emerged as a bizarre and fluid situation. Sensing Zeek affiliates were vulnerable, some MLM opportunists raced to various sites such as The Dispatch newspaper in North Carolina and YouTube with offers to join their “programs.”

Zeek fans on the MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi forum almost immediately blamed critics for Zeek’s problems, with one poster declaring he’d already mined his profits from Zeek and was confident they could not be attached by prosecutors in the United States.

The Better Business Bureau said this morning that it was aware of reports that the doors at Zeek’s office in Lexington, N.C., were closed. The BBB added that it would publish more information as it became available.

Zeek is a purported arm of Rex Venture Group LLC, led by Paul R. Burks.

Aug 17, 2012