PatrickPretty.com

Tag: Chuck Hays

  • Judge Effectively Orders Treble Financial Penalty By Imposing $64.8 Civil Fine Against Ponzi Swindler Already Convicted In Criminal Case; Scammer Charles E. Hays Also Ordered To Disgorge $19.9 Million In Illicit Profits And Banned From Trade For Life

    UPDATED 2:37 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) If you’re a modern-day commodities fraudster and Ponzi schemer, be prepared to have massive criminal and civil exposure. The recent cases against Charles E. “Chuck” Hays of Minnesota tell a tale of significant prison time, a huge criminal restitution order and civil fines that effectively exposed him to treble damages while also holding him accountable for his ill-gotten gains. Indeed, his legal problems didn’t end even after he was sentenced to jail in May 2010.

    Here is some of the notable math from the criminal case against Hays, who pleaded guilty in April 2009 to running a commodity-pool Ponzi scheme.

    Jail sentence ordered by U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank: 117 months.

    Restitution ordered by Frank in criminal case: $21.6 million.

    The criminal case against Hays, who operated a company known as Crossfire Trading LLC, was brought by federal prosecutors and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

    Now, the math of the civil side of the Hays’ prosecution has been released:

    Civil fine against Hays ordered by Frank: nearly $64.8 million. (The amount was arrived at by totaling the proceeds of the Ponzi scheme ($40.4 million) and subtracting the Ponzi payments to victims ($18.8 million) to arrive at the figure of $21.6 million — and then trebling that number to determine the fine.)

    Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains ordered by Frank: $19.9 million. (The amount is a bit less than the $21.6 million figure noted above because Hays was given credit for slightly more than $1.6 million he lost while trading. Even so, the full amount of $21.6 million is due in the judgment in the criminal case.)

    Additional penalty imposed by Frank in civil case: lifetime ban from trading.

    Although Hays argued he didn’t deserve a lifetime ban after running a Ponzi scheme that gathered more than $40 million and issuing false statements to investors, the judge didn’t buy it.

    “Hays’ activities justify a permanent trading ban because Hays has shown himself to represent an inherent threat to the integrity of the futures market,” Frank wrote.

    The CFTC brought the civil case and persuaded Frank the steep fine and disgorgement order were warranted.

    “In light of the egregiousness and continuing nature of the fraud in this case, which spanned over eight years, such an assessment is appropriate,” Frank wrote. He also left the door open for victims to sue Hays, meaning that the orders in the federal cases did not bar private litigants from seeking their own remedies against Hays.

    Fraudsters could take a clue from the federal litigation and severe penalties against Hays, Frank suggested.

    “Given that Hays must repay his criminal penalty before turning to his civil penalty, the imposition of a civil monetary fine (or for that matter, disgorgement) is largely academic,” he noted in his order. “Nonetheless, the Court was persuaded by the CFTC’s comments at the motion hearing that this action is necessary to adequately address Defendants’ violations and deter against future violations while the events leading to this lawsuit are fresh in people’s minds.”

  • PONZI NEWS/UPDATES: Fire Destroys ‘3 Hebrew Boys’ Ponzi Headquarters; Minnesota Man Gets Nearly 10 Years In Prison In Ponzi Case; California Man Gets 25

    Sign of the apocalypse? The headquarters of the “3 Hebrew Boys” Ponzi scheme in Columbia, S.C., was gutted in a fire Monday and Tuesday. Firefighters spent 19 hours over two days battling the blaze, but the “building and all contents . . . were completely destroyed,” according to Beattie B. Ashmore.

    Ashmore is the court-appointed receiver in the case. Proof-of-claim forms for victims of the $80 million Ponzi swindle became available April 15, only 11 days before the fire broke out. The cause of the fire is under investigation, and the building was an asset of the receivership estate.

    “All computers and documents have been stored off-site since the Receiver took possession of the building in October 2007,” Ashmore said. “The building was being managed by a reputable property management company, fully insured and continuously monitored by a security company. The Receiver will make a claim immediately with the Hartford Insurance Company for the full value of the building with the insurance proceeds going to the benefit of the victims.”

    The 3 Hebrew Boys case is one of the strangest in the United States, drawing comparisons to the alleged AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme owing to elements of affinity fraud and antigovernment rhetoric.

    Joseph Brunson, Tim McQueen and Tony Pough were convicted in November of swindling tens of millions of dollars in a bogus debt-relief “ministry.” The purported aim of the program was to free people from government “bondage,” and the investigation was referred to as “Satan’s handiwork.”

    In the earliest days of the 3 Hebrew Boys case, more than 100 people protested on behalf of the scheme at a rally in Columbia, saying the government did not understand the program, had overreached in its prosecutorial efforts, refused to deny it was wrong and had chosen to move forward with the case in a bid to save face.

    In an approach similar to one used by the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf, members were forced to agree to a confidentially clause that purportedly prohibited them from discussing the company outside the confines of meeting places. Participants were threatened with a $1 million penalty for sharing information.

    AVG, which has close ties to ASD, morphed into a “private association” in February 2009. Members were scolded for sharing information and calling the autosurf an “investment” program. As the company appeared to be collapsing in May and June, members were threatened with copyright-infringement lawsuits for sharing information published by the firm.

    Brunson, McQueen and Pough are jailed awaiting sentencing. After they were found guilty of 174 counts mail fraud, money-laundering and transporting stolen goods, the men filed documents accusing former U.S. Attorney Walt Wilkins of treason and committing acts of war by prosecuting them.

    The men became known as “3 Hebrew Boys” after operating a website with the same name, which is based on a biblical story of believers who escaped a furnace by relying on their faith. The Ponzi scheme operated under the name Capital Consortium Group LLC.

    Minnesota Ponzi Sentencing

    A Ponzi scheme operator in Rosemount, Minn., has been sentenced to 117 months in prison and ordered to pay $21.8 million in restitution to victims.

    Charles “Chuck” E. Hays, 56, has been detained since his arrest in February 2009. He pleaded guilty last year to one count of mail fraud, one count of wire fraud and one count of structuring transactions to avoid financial reporting requirements.

    Among the items seized in the case was a $3 million yacht acquired with investors’ money. Hays operated a firm known as Crossfire Trading LLC and bilked investors out of more than $20 million by operating a Ponzi scheme.

    “Hays told potential investors he was a day trader in stock index futures and other futures contracts,” federal prosecutors said.

    Investors plowed money into the scheme based on lies told by Hays, and he “admitted he diverted and converted those funds for his personal use and other unauthorized purposes,” prosecutors said.

    The sentencing judge in the case was U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank.

    California Ponzi Sentencing

    Milton Retana, 46, of Huntington Park, was sentenced to 25 years in prison for a $62 million Ponzi scheme that bilked mostly Spanish-speaking investors out of at least $33 million.

    The case became known as the “Best Diamond case.” Retana operated a purported real-estate investment company known as Best Diamond Funding. It was yet another instance another in which the name of a precious metal or mineral was used in a Ponzi scheme.

    Evidence of the fraud was hidden in the back of a religious bookstore operated by Retana’s wife, prosecutors said. When investigators searched the bookstore, they found millions of dollars in cash. Best Diamond was located next door to the bookstore.

    The scheme — like many other Ponzi schemes — featured an appeal to religion, prosecutors said.

    “Best Diamond Funding solicited money through advertisements in Spanish-language magazines, on the Internet, and during weekly investment seminars at locations across Los Angeles. The raucous investment seminars often had as many as 300 potential investors and incorporated religious messages,” prosecutors said.

    “Retana guaranteed returns as high as 84 percent each year, claiming that he would purchase properties in bulk at below-market prices and immediately sell them for a profit,” prosecutors said. “However, records obtained by federal investigators showed that Retana used only a tiny fraction of the victims’ money to purchase real estate and that his company was actually losing money.”

    The sentencing judge in the case was U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner.

  • Prosecutors Ask Judge For Order To Disqualify INetGlobal Attorney, Saying They May Wish To Cross-Examine Him As Witness In Ponzi Case

    UPDATED 11:31 A.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Federal prosecutors have filed a motion to disqualify attorney Mark Kallenbach as counsel for INetGlobal and related companies, claiming that Kallenbach is attempting to be both a witness in the case and a lawyer for multiple clients involved in a Ponzi scheme, wire fraud and money-laundering probe.

    Kallenbach, prosecutors said, has made himself a subject of cross-examination because of an affidavit he filed last month. They added that wearing two hats in the same case might create a conflict with the Minnesota Rules of Professional Responsibility, a local rule of U.S. District Court in Minnesota and the “Court’s inherent supervisory authority over its bar.”

    “Should Mr. Kallenbach testify, he will be cross-examined,” prosecutors said. “The Court will have to decide whether Mr. Kallenbach’s voluntary assumption of the role of witness works as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege on cross-examination, or whether the government’s cross-examination of Mr. Kallenbach will be limited, in ways it might not be limited if the witness was not counsel to several parties, in order to preserve the privilege.”

    On April 2 — a week ago yesterday — prosecutors said INetGlobal had no attorney of record in the autosurf Ponzi scheme litigation. Kallenbach filed a notice of appearance for the firm and several related companies on Monday, three days after the prosecution’s filing.

    On Wednesday, Kallenbach filed a second affidavit (see subhead below) labeled a supplement to an affidavit he filed March 25.

    Prosecutors responded by saying Kallenbach’s second affidavit “heightens the government’s concern about Mr. Kallenbach attempting to serve as both lawyer and witness” and that he should be disqualified as an attorney for “any of the individuals or companies involved” in the case.

    “This motion is brought because Mr. Kallenbach has made himself a necessary witness in this case,” prosecutors argued. “This is a case in which Mr. Kallenbach conducted his own
    investigation and then voluntarily drew up a lengthy affidavit setting forth his observations.”

    Their claim is based on a 20-page affidavit and 12 additional pages of exhibits Kallenbach filed March 25 — before he entered his notice of appearance as INetGlobal’s attorney in court.

    In his March 25 affidavit, Kallenbach said he conducted an “investigation” and concluded that “Inter-Mark and its subsidiary iNetGlobal and its other subsidiaries are clean, legitimate and profitable businesses.”

    Kallenbach, in the March 25 affidavit, attacked an affidavit for a search warrant by the U.S. Secret Service and also challenged assertions the government made about V-Local, a company related to INetGlobal.

    Prosecutors argued that the affidavit and conclusions Kallenbach described as “true facts” make him a witness. Some of the information was woven into a memorandum of law filed March 25 by Jon Hopeman on behalf of INetGlobal owner Steve Renner, prosecutors said.

    The prosecution motion was filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney John Docherty, one of the prosecutors who handled the Ponzi case against Tom Petters. Petters was sentenced this week to 50 years in prison for operating a $3.65 billion fraud.

    U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones of the District of Minnesota approved the filing of the disqualification motion. The main page on Jones’ website lists three major Ponzi probes the office has undertaken in recent months, including the Petters’ case, the case involving Minnesota Ponzi scheme figures Trevor Cook and Pat Kiley, and the investigation into the business practices of Renner at INetGlobal.

    Minnesota’s Ponzi Plague

    Ponzi schemes have plagued Minnesota. The Cook/Kiley case involves at least $190 million and investor losses of at least $139 million, according to court filings.

    Another big case in Minnesota involved Gerard Cellette Jr. Cellette was implicated in a $53 million Ponzi scheme last year by Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman.

    Meanwhile, Charles “Chuck” E. Hays pleaded guilty last year to charges in a $20 million Ponzi-scheme case in which the government seized a $3 million yacht.

    Separately, three members of a Minneapolis family were indicted last year on Ponzi and fraud charges. The case became known as the Kalin Thanh Dao case. Dao’s parents also were indicted.

    Dao and her parents pleaded guilty. Prosecutors said money was siphoned from the scheme to pay for gambling in Las Vegas.

    “Investors were promised that their money would be placed in investment programs targeted within specific markets and industries,” prosecutors said. “Investors were also told that Kalin Dao had a ‘partner’ who held a seat on the New York Stock Exchange, had contacts in the emerging Asian markets who had ‘inside’ information, and was associated with various Las Vegas casinos.”

    The Kalin Thanh Dao probe uncovered a web of deceit in which Dao’s father claimed nearly $3 million in losses for businesses owned by his daughter to eliminate his personal tax liabilities, and Dao’s mother claimed to be “single,” the “head of [a] household” — and also claimed a tax exemption for Dao.

    Kalin Thanh Dao was 32 years old and operated at least four companies, prosecutors said.

    “Instead of investing the investors’ funds as promised, Kalin Dao diverted substantial amounts of the funds for her own purposes, including gambling, lulling payments and personal expenses,” prosecutors said. “She also admitted that the fraud was between $2.5 and $7 million.”

    Also on the Ponzi front, AdSurfDaily, a Florida-based company implicated in a massive autosurf Ponzi scheme by the Secret Service in 2008, was popular in Minnesota. Some Minnesota members of ASD were among the staunchest defenders of ASD President Andy Bowdoin.

    The Secret Service referenced the ASD case in filings in the INetGlobal case, saying an undercover agent was introduced to INetGlobal by an ASD member who described the operation as a wink-nod enterprise.

    A federal judge in the District of Columbia has issued three orders of forfeiture totaling more than $80 million in the ASD case. Bowdoin is appealing. His appeal brief cites two other cases filed under seal and suggests that prosecutors subpoenaed at least two attorneys involved in the defense of ASD’s assets to appear at a grand-jury proceeding.

    It is unclear if the attorneys attempted to invoke attorney-client privilege. What is clear is that a federal judge ordered the attorneys to appear and that the order is being challenged in a federal appeals court.

    Kallenbach’s Second Affidavit

    Kallenbach filed a second affidavit April 7. The affidavit asserts that a Renner entity known as V-Media Marketing LLC “borrowed” all of the money that was placed in a bank account at Premier Bank Minnesota in early March, about a week after the Secret Service raid at INetGlobal’s offices in Minneapolis.

    Prosecutors, describing the INetGlobal case as a “major fraud and money laundering investigation,” said $47,400 was deposited into the account.

    “IMC Desperately Needs Working Capital To Pay Its Creditors,” Kallenbach said.

    He also described a webcast he attended April 5 that was “sponsored by one of IMC’s marketing consultants.”

    “At the April 5th Meeting, I learned, amongst other things, that many of iNetGlobal’s new customers have demanded refunds,” Kallenbach said. “The number of customers seeking refunds and the amount of such refunds is unknown. What is known is that as each and every day passes, without iNetGlobal being in business as usual, more of iNetGlobal’s customers will seek refunds.”

    He also asserted that “iNetGlobal’s marketing consultants are clamoring for commission payments that are legitimately due and owing to them,” according to the affidavit. “iNetGlobal has been unable to pay the commissions.”

    Kallenbach’s filing also suggested that, through negotiations, a little more than $1 million has been returned to INetGlobal and that the sum was now considered “unrestricted” cash. The affidavit did not disclose specific details about the negotiations

    In the March 25 affidavit,  Kallenbach argued that INetGlobal had no cash to operate.

    “At the time I signed my March 25, 2010 Declaration, I believed it to be true that iNetGlobal had no unrestricted cash meaning cash available for working capital. I have since learned that as a result of negotiations in which I was involved, on March 22, 2010 iNetGlobal netted approximately $220,000 from the return of restricted cash. As of the time my March 25, 2010 Declaration was prepared, I was unaware that this money had been returned to iNetGlobal.

    “After my Declaration was signed, approximately $795,000 of restricted cash was made available to iNetGlobel for working capital after close of business on March 25, 2010,” Kallenbach said. “As of today [April 7], iNetGlobal’s unrestricted cash is approximately $1,015,000. I arrive at this sum by adding $220,000 and $795,000 to reach $1,015,000.”

    Prosecutors said that, because Kallenbach has become an “essential witness” subject to cross-examination by the prosecution and direct examination by the INetGlobal side, there is a question about “whether Mr. Kallenbach’s clients can be provided constitutionally effective assistance.”

    “The government did not bring this situation about,” prosecutors contended. “[T]he government has not subpoenaed Mr. Kallenbach, or raised questions about whether he, and only he, can testify as to certain facts.

    “This is a case in which Mr. Kallenbach conducted his own investigation and then voluntarily drew up a lengthy affidavit setting forth his observations. Nor may Mr. Kallenbach, at this juncture, announce that he will henceforth act only as an advocate, because the choice to be a witness was made when the affidavit was filed.”