The prosecutions of the CKB/CKB168, WCM777 and TelexFree “programs” made the SEC’s highlight reel for fiscal year 2014, which began on Oct. 1, 2013 and ended on Sept. 30 of this year.
In a statement today, the SEC said “new investigative approaches and the innovative use of data and analytical tools contributed to a very strong year for enforcement marked by cases that spanned the securities industry.”
Noting the FY 2014 pyramid-scheme actions against the MLM or direct-sales firms included allegations that the “programs” used social media and targeted immigrant communities, the SEC said its work wasn’t done.
“The Enforcement Division will continue to root out pyramid and Ponzi schemes that prey on vulnerable investors,” the agency said.
Not specifically noted in the agency’s statement today were the actions against the eAdGear and Zhunrize “programs” announced just prior to the close of the 2014 fiscal year. The eAdGear case was announced on Sept. 26; the Zhunrize case was announced on Sept. 23.
Since the Zeek Rewards action in 2012, it has become clear that MLM HYIP schemes have tapped participants for spectacular sums. The Zeek scheme alone gathered on the order of $850 million. Filings suggest TelexFree may have gathered on the order of $1.2 billion.
CKB/CKB168 appears to have gathered at least $20 million. WCM777 gathered on the order of $80 million. Zhunrize gathered on the order of $105 million, and eAdGear gathered on the order of $129 million, according to court filings.
Zeek receiver Kenneth D. Bell, who is managing Zeek-related cases that involve hundreds of thousands of victims across the world, described Zeek this week as an attempt to put lipstick on a pig.
It’s a description that could apply across the MLM HYIP sphere. The cross-border, murky nature of the “programs” raise concerns about both economic security and national security.
On Sept. 21, the PP Blog reported that a small sampling of data from 95-self-identified victims of TelexFree shows they lost an average of $27,578 each. TelexFree potentially created 1 million victims or more.
The SEC has broad responsibilities across the securities industry and its sectors — from Wall Street to Main Street.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that in fiscal year 2014, new investigative approaches and the innovative use of data and analytical tools contributed to a very strong year for enforcement marked by cases that spanned the securities industry.
In the fiscal year that ended in September, the SEC filed a record 755 enforcement actions covering a wide range of misconduct, and obtained orders totaling $4.16 billion in disgorgement and penalties, according to preliminary figures. In FY 2013, the Commission filed 686 enforcement actions and obtained orders totaling $3.4 billion in disgorgement and penalties. In FY 2012, the Commission filed 734 enforcement actions and obtained orders totaling $3.1 billion in disgorgement and penalties.
The agency’s enforcement actions also included a number of first-ever cases, including actions involving the market access rule, the “pay-to-play” rule for investment advisers, an emergency action to halt a municipal bond offering, and an action for whistleblower retaliation.
“Aggressive enforcement against wrongdoers who harm investors and threaten our financial markets remains a top priority, and we brought and will continue to bring creative and important enforcement actions across a broad range of the securities markets,” said SEC Chair Mary Jo White. “The innovative use of technology – enhanced use of data and quantitative analysis – was instrumental in detecting misconduct and contributed to the Enforcement Division’s success in bringing quality actions that resulted in stiff monetary sanctions.”
“Time and again this past year, the Division’s staff applied its tremendous energy and talent, uncovered misconduct, and held accountable those who were responsible for wrongdoing,” said Andrew J. Ceresney, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “I am proud of our excellent record of success and look forward to another year filled with high-impact enforcement actions.”
In its role as a watchdog for consumers, the FTC has sued third-party companies and individuals who have published the logos of prominent news agencies and falsely traded on their trusted identities to sanitize a purported product or opportunity. (See screen shot of Evidence Exhibit from one FTC case below.)
In a new video promo announcing it somehow has gained 550,000 new American customers in less than a month during a probe into its business practices, TelexFree is publishing the logos of 18 prominent media firms, including logos of local-market affiliates of major American TV networks. In certain instances, the logos of the so-called “mother ships” — media parent firms or brand/content licensors of the local affiliates — appear in the TelexFree promo. This could prove to be an epic blunder.
The move by TelexFree occurs on heels of SEC allegations that a Ponzi/pyramid scam known as WCM777 traded on the names of famous brands outside of media.
On Feb. 28, the Massachusetts Securities Division confirmed it was investigating TelexFree. The agency earlier gave WCM777 the boot.
Hong Kong may be emerging as a hotbed of MLM fraud.
TelexFree goes to Hong Kong.
Does anyone in TelexFree’s MLM leadership have a clue — we mean, Freaking Clue One?
More . . .
__________________________________
UPDATED 10:51 A.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Be skeptical of “programs” that imply media ties or suggest media vetting or an endorsement by the media or a famous company in another discipline, including high finance. Brand-leeching “works,” which is why so many fraudulent companies adopt it as a strategy.
On the “we’ve-been-endorsed-by-the-media” fraud front, several instances of this have occurred. In both 2011 and 2012, the blood-sucking, $850 million Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme pretended that puff pieces about it that appeared in Network Marketing Business Journal constituted real news. Zeek’s court-appointed receiver later auctioned off the puff pieces and the impressive-looking plaques to which they’d been attached.
Zeek and many of its affiliates preferred fantasy constructions. Put another way, they weren’t all that keen on paying attention to actual news occurring in the direct-sales sphere. In April 2011, for example, the Federal Trade Commission brought actions against several alleged scammers pushing acai weight-loss products and making deceptive claims. Among other things, the FTC alleged that the Internet-based hucksters created fake news sites and often used “the names and logos of major media outlets” such as “ABC, Fox News, CBS, CNN, USA Today, and Consumer Reports” to plant the seed the products had the backing of the brands and had been vetted approvingly by reporters.
As the PP Blog wrote in an Editor’s Note at the time (italics added): If this federal and state action doesn’t get the attention of the out-of-control, direct-sales crowd that divines itself the right to plant the seed that an “offer” is endorsed by famous companies and people, well, perhaps nothing will. Even as this story is being written, affiliates of Club Asteria, a purported “passive” investment company, are planting the seed that the firm is endorsed by Google, Yahoo, MSN and America Online. Club Asteria promoters also routinely trade on the name of the World Bank. Club Asteria is being pitched on forums populated by serial Ponzi scheme promoters.
Club Asteria, which had a presence on the Ponzi boards and purportedly had a satellite operation in Hong Kong, had roots in the cash-gifting fraud sphere and planted the seed it provided a return of at least 3 percent a week. It stopped making weekly interest payments to affiliate-investors before 2011 had come to a close.
Flash forward to April 2014, three years to the month after the FTC brought the acai fraud cases against direct-selling companies and individuals using the names and logos of famous media brands. Indeed, on April 5, a new pitch by the TelexFree MLM “program” began appearing in video form online.
And indeed it uses the logos of a whopping 18 media companies famous in local markets. And because some of those locally famous brands also incorporate the logos of their even more famous parent brands or licensors, TelexFree potentially could be risking the wrath of the upstream mother ships, too.
Like Club Asteria, TelexFree has an affiliate presence on the Ponzi boards. Also like Club Asteria, TelexFree has wildly enthusiastic pitchmen who claim the “program” provides preposterous, “passive” returns. (The TelexFree promo referenced in this report by the PP Blog first was noted by a TelexFree skeptic and reader of BehindMLM.com, a site that covers emerging MLM schemes.)
From YouTube. As TelexFree executive Steve Labriola narrates a video, the logos of prominent media companies roll in the background. Red highlight by PP Blog.
At approximately the 4:55 mark in the April 5 TelexFree video, the logos of local television stations — including affiliates of Fox, NBC, ABC and CBS — begin rolling on the screen. (The logo of the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the biggest newspaper in Nevada, also rolls on the screen.)
Says TelexFree executive Steve Labriola, while continuing to narrate the video after complaining about Bloggers who are negative on the company:
“But let me tell you what is out there that you haven’t quite seen yet: media that’s talking positive about us. There are articles. There are things out there that you’re gonna have in your back office that you can print, you can read, you can use as a tool within the next few days. These are all media articles that are talking great things about your company. So, we’re excited about that. We’re excited that you can be excited about that. It’s all good news. It’s all reprinted. And it’s all available for you.”
From an FTC evidence exhibit in a 2011 case that alleged pitchmen used the logos of media companies to sanitize an online fraud scheme. Red highlights by PP Blog.
What are these “media articles” to which Labriola refers while logos of local affiliates of the major broadcast networks and the logo of a major American newspaper roll in the background?
Well, unless the media firms published any other “great things” about TelexFree, they’re puff pieces TelexFree itself submitted via one or more PR wires. In instances we observed, several local broadcast affiliates of the major networks republished TelexFree-authored content — but not before slapping on a disclaimer. To see an example of the disclaimer we observed, visit the website of News9.com (KWTV-DT as a broadcast channel), a CBS affiliate in Oklahoma City. From the station’s website (italics added):
Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. WorldNow and this Station make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you have any questions or comments about this page please contact [deleted by PP Blog]
SOURCE TelexFREE
You’ll see the same disclaimer at KTEN.com, the website of an NBC affiliate in Denison, Texas, that covers parts of Oklahoma. (KTEN’s logo, which incorporates NBC’s famous “peacock,” is the first to roll in the TelexFree promo.)
In yet another example, a disclaimer appears at the website of KTRE, an ABC affiliate in Pollok, Texas. Other channels or newspapers that might have published TelexFree’s PR talking points also likely added disclaimers or attributions to TelexFree, so readers would make a distinction between actual news content and verbatim PR puff.
Labriola doesn’t mention the disclaimers as famous logos roll in the background. The audience easily could conclude that each of the news outlets whose logos are reproduced had published objective reports about TelexFree and championed the company.
With all things possible in the HYIP sphere, we’re wondering if TelexFree affiliates soon will start whipping those republished PR releases into endorsements of TelexFree by major media firms locally and nationally. After all, some TelexFree affiliates have planted the seed the “program” is endorsed by the SEC and is backed by President Obama.
Earlier in the video, Labriola claimed, “Since March 9, since our compensation plan has changed, we have 550,000 new customers in [the] U.S.A. alone. And remember, we’re a global business.”
Whether those talking points later will end up in videos or print material that displays the logos of well-known media companies is, for now, unknown. The stage nevertheless has been set for disingenuous MLM constructions of all sorts, including hypothetical (as of now) constructions such as this one: “according to [Famous Media Company A], TelexFree is in a stunning growth phase that has seen more than 550,000 new American small-business customers enlist since March 9 alone. Because TelexFree is a worldwide phenomenon, tens of millions of customers are destined soon to be in the fold.”
And what about proof? Well, just wrap the logo of a famous media brand around the claim.
This won’t go well if this is TelexFree’s new media strategy.
Branding concerns aside, the practical reality remains that how TelexFree is defining “customers,” like Zeek before it, is far from clear. Beyond that, current TelexFree affiliates are complaining publicly about not getting paid after the company changed its compensation system.
Hong Kong
In the video promo with the media logos, Labriola goes on to note that “I just came back from a Hong Kong trip.” Whether that trip had anything to do with an asserted March 26 TelexFree “conference” in Hong Kong wasn’t explained.
Hong Kong may be emerging as a hotbed of MLM HYIP fraud. For instance, it is a venue in which Club Asteria claimed a presence and also a venue in which a “program” known as “Better-Living Global Marketing” purportedly conducts business. (See reference and related links here.)
In addition, Hong Kong is referenced in the SEC’s Ponzi- and pyramid case last month against WCM777, an alleged $65 million fraud scheme. Hong Kong also is referenced in the SEC’s fraud complaint last month against an entity known as “Mutual Wealth.”
In October 2013, the SEC alleged that enterprises known as CKB and CKB168 were “at the center” of a worldwide pyramid scheme that allegedly featured a purported office in Hong Kong and operations in Canada, the British Virgin Islands and the United States.
TelexFree, alleged in Brazil to be a pyramid scheme, is under investigation by the Massachusetts Securities Division. Some affiliates are deeply concerned about changes in the TelexFree compensation scheme that appear to have dried up or negated payments to them. These affiliates packed themselves like sardines into the “program’s” office in Greater Boston last week. Police were called to the scene.
Just four days after TelexFree affiliates jammed the TelexFree office, the Labriola video with rolling media logos, claims of hundreds of thousands of new customers and the reference to Hong Kong appeared on YouTube. Whether TelexFree has opened new can of worms remains to be seen.
What’s been clear for months is that TelexFree has no cohesive message and throws just about anything against the wall, including rants at prosecutors by a Brazil-based executive while investigations in that country are under way.
A maxim sometimes attributed to Mark Twain and often cited by PR companies and politicians goes like this: “Don’t pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrel.”
To that, we’ll add that it’s also not prudent to tempt fate with media companies that buy bandwidth by the terabyte and employ note-taking reporters and editors and videographers who take spectacularly detailed footage.
This Blog has grave doubts that any of the media firms whose logos appear in the TelexFree promo will be pleased. Their own names could be sullied. If those logos start appearing on marketing materials and plaques, well, hang on to them. They could become the same type of souvenirs the Zeek receiver sold to raise money for victims.
One of the issues in the SEC’s case against WCM777, of course, was the alleged republication of famous logos (nonmedia) and the namedropping of famous companies (nonmedia) to sanitize the alleged WCM777 fraud scheme.
Is any famous company, be it nonmedia or media, safe from MLM hucksters on the Internet? The answer is probably no, given that the vultures apparently think nothing of swiping the brands of government agencies and even of the President of the United States to advance their schemes.
Why TelexFree has ventured down the minefield-laden path of publishing logos of locally or nationally famous brands is truly baffling, especially given the nature of the allegations in the WCM777 case and the fact TelexFree itself already is under investigation.
This circumstance reminded us not only of the Zeek debacle and the SEC’s WCM777 case and the FTC’s acai-berry cases, but also of efforts by the AdViewGlobal Ponzi schemers in 2009 to use an in-house puff piece distributed on PR wires to plant the seed the 1-percent-a-day “program” was endorsed by Forbes magazine, the Washington Business Journal and The Business Review.
Prior to the filing of the SEC’s fraud complaint against WCM777, some apparent cheerleaders for the firm tried to plant the seed that the “program” had been vetted favorably by Yahoo Finance and the Wall Street Journal. One individual tried to drop both famous names at BehindMLM.com, a site that covers emerging MLM schemes.
BehindMLM’s negative coverage of WCM777 was “real non-sense,” the critic asserted on Oct. 11, 2013, pointing to a purported favorable story on WCM777 in the Wall Street Journal. That “story” proved to be a PR puff piece republished with a disclaimer at WSJ.com.
“The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content,” the disclaimer read.
But with the purported Wall Street Journal “story” in his hip pocket, the WCM777 “supporter” and BehindMLM critic asserted, “I will make the most of it to my enemies’ disgust!” (See this story and Comments thread at BehindMLM.com.)
The SEC was in federal court about five months later, alleging that WCM777 had targeted a massive fraud scheme at Asians and Latinos and had caused the logos of famous brands to be republished as part of a bid to sanitize the $65 million scam.
Honestly, does anyone in TelexFree’s MLM leadership these days have a clue — we mean, Freaking Clue One?
FLASH: The South China Morning Post is reporting that an American and four others have been detained in a pyramid-scheme investigation involving HK$750 million (about U.S. $96.7 million). The publication did not identify the detainees. Nor did it identify the company, which is said to promote “cloud-based internet productivity and communications applications” and to be headquartered in the United States.
The arrests occurred Wednesday in the Hong Kong area of Hung Hom, after a police raid, the SCMP reported, citing unidentified police sources. (NOTE: The PP Blog has established a tentative identification of the company, but is not publishing the name until it can be fully confirmed.)
Investors were lured with the promise of lucrative returns and told the company had investments in information technology in various countries and plans for a public listing, the source said. (Emphasis added by PP Blog.)
Initial investigations showed each of them was required to pay a HK$25,000 membership fee to join the company, which in return would give them lucrative dividends when the firm was listed on a stock market,” he said.
The American “is understood to be from another firm,” and authorities are seeking to determine if the firms are linked, the SCMP reported.
Schemes in which investors are recruited based on assertions that they’ll receive a handsome payout when a firm later “goes public” may be on the uptick.
In October, the SEC charged five companies, three executives and eight promoters in what it described as a “worldwide” pyramid scheme operating through entities from Hong Kong, Canada and the British Virgin Islands.
At the center of the scheme were entities known as CKB and CKB168, the SEC said. Investors were told they’d accumulate “profit rewards points” that could be converted “into shares of CKB stock when the company conducts an initial public offering (“IPO”) on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange sometime during 2014, the SEC said.
“Despite Defendants’ representations to the contrary, the Prpts are worthless and cannot be meaningfully traded, sold or exchanged. Nor has CKB taken required steps to prepare for the promised IPO and, in fact, does not meet the Hong Kong Exchange’s current listing requirements. Even if the IPO were to occur, CKB would have to go public as one of the world’s largest companies in order to honor conversions of the ever-expanding universe of Prpts,” the SEC said.
URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: 3RD UPDATE 5:46 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The SEC says it has gained an asset freeze and charged three executives and eight promoters of a worldwide pyramid scheme operating through five entities from Hong Kong, Canada and the British Virgin Islands.
Promoters of the scheme, which “purportedly” sells Internet-based children’s educational courses, gathered at least $20 million “from U.S. investors, and millions of dollars more from investors in Canada, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other countries in Asia, the agency charged.
Entities known as CKB and CKB168 are “at the center of the scheme,” the SEC said. The complaint, which was brought on an emergency basis and initially filed under seal, is filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. U.S. District Judge Roslynn Mauskopf has granted an asset freeze. The seal has been lifted in the case.
“CKB has little or no real-world retail consumer sales to generate the extraordinary returns promised to investors,” the SEC said. “In fact, CKB has no apparent source of revenue other than money received from new investors. Bank records show that the bulk of the money raised has been paid out to accounts controlled by CKB executives and as commissions to promoters of the pyramid scheme.”
Various investment schemes with apparent footprints in Hong Kong have been pushed by online hucksters since the SEC moved against U.S. based Zeek Rewards in 2012. On Oct. 14, BehindMLM.com reported that a scheme known as WCM777 operating from Hong Kong through an entity in the British Virgin Islands suddenly announced it was closing its U.S. operations.
Whether WCM777 had promoters in common with the CKB entities was not immediately clear. What is clear is that the SEC has taken action against three MLM or MLM-like “programs” that promised outsize returns since August of last year, amid allegations that were selling unregistered securities as investment contracts. (These are Zeek Rewards in August 2012; Profitable Sunrise in April 2013; and the “CKB” entities through an emergency action filed Oct. 9 and announced today, after the seal was lifted yesterday.)
Accompanying the CKB actions was the issuance today by the SEC of an Investor Alert “about the dangers of potential investment scams involving pyramid schemes posing as multi-level marketing programs,” the SEC said. The Zeek and CKB cases are referenced in the Alert.
“CKB’s operators and promoters profited by abusing relationships of trust within the Asian-American community and promising investors they can earn more money by recruiting other investors instead of selling actual products,” said Antonia Chion, an associate director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “What CKB really sells is the false promise of easy wealth.”
Here is how the SEC described the eight U.S. promoters charged:
Daliang (David) Guo is a China native and a resident of Coram, N.Y., who was among CKB’s first U.S. promoters. He currently sits atop an investment pyramid, and claims in a testimonial on the CKB website to have earned more than $1 million within eight months.
Yao Lin is a resident of Fresh Meadows, N.Y., who was among CKB’s first U.S. promoters. He currently sits atop an investment pyramid, and claims in a CKB website testimonial to have earned more than $300,000. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank and credit card accounts he controls have received approximately $450,000 from CKB investors.
Chih Hsuan (“Kiki”) Lin is a Taiwanese native and resident of Las Vegas who claims in a CKB website testimonial to have earned “one million USD” in her first two months of investing. She operates a website through which “CKB members” can log in to a password-protected area. She is within David Guo’s pyramid. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $1.8 million from CKB investors.
Wen Chen Hwang (“Wendy Lee”) is a Taiwanese native and resident of Rowland Heights, Calif., who claims in a CKB website testimonial to have made $53,000 within four months. She is within Yao Lin’s pyramid. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $2.2 million from CKB investors.
Toni Tong Chen is a resident of Hacienda Heights, Calif., and a certified public accountant who was formerly associated with a registered broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She and her husband claim to have earned six-digit commissions and in excess of a 100 percent return on their investment. They are connected to Wendy Lee and have made presentations at her weekly seminars in Los Angeles.
Cheongwha (“Heywood”) Chang is a Chinese native and the husband of Toni Tong Chen. He was formerly associated with a registered broker-dealer and held securities licenses. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts that he and his wife control have received approximately $2.1 million from CKB investors.
Joan Congyi Ma is a resident of Arcadia, Calif., who was formerly associated with a broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She is connected to Wendy Lee and has helped her organize seminars and other events in Los Angeles. In her CKB website testimonial, she references the day she met Yao Lin as her “lucky day.” The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $200,000 from CKB investors.
Heidi Mao Liu is a resident of Diamond Bar, Calif., who was formerly associated with a broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She is connected to Wendy Lee and has provided testimonials at her seminars in Los Angeles. She also operates her own website that promotes the CKB scheme. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $1.2 million from CKB investors.
YouTube video pitches and a claim that at least one promoter had acquired five properties in Las Vegas through the scheme were used to dupe the masses, the SEC said.
“Kiki Lin,” the SEC said, “exemplified the pitch in a videotaped recording posted to the Internet, telling potential investors that in the ‘pyramid triangle system, we spread it from one to ten, and ten to hundred, and hundred to thousand, thousand to ten thousand.’ Kiki Lin later added, ‘And for those who really want to make money, who are really hard working, in a short time you would all be like John,’ who she claimed ‘made money to buy five houses in Las Vegas.’”
The charged executives include:
Rayla Melchor Santos, whom the SEC said is a Philippines national “who is featured on the CKB website as its founder. Santos is known as “Teacher Sam” and “has traveled to New York and other areas of the U.S. to participate in meetings and seminars to promote CKB.”
Hung Wai (“Howard”) Shern, whom the SEC said is a Canadian citizen and resident of Hong Kong “who is featured on the CKB website as the director of CKB168 International Marketing.” And Shern “is one of the signatories to bank accounts used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, and has traveled to New York and other areas of the U.S. to participate in meetings and seminars to promote CKB.”
Rui Ling (“Florence”) Leung, whom the SEC said is a Hong Kong national “who is described on the CKB website as its chief financial officer. And Leung “is one of the signatories to bank accounts used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, and approximately $4.6 million has been transferred from CKB bank accounts to bank accounts in her name and the names of entities she controls. Leung portrays herself as a professional investment adviser who will assist CKB in its supposed future public offering.”
From the SEC complaint (italics added):
2. Through publicly available websites, promotional materials, seminars, and videos posted to the internet, as well as through other efforts intended to create the appearance of a legitimate enterprise, Defendants have falsely portrayed CKB as a profitable multi-level marketing company that sells web-based children’s educational courses.
3. What CKB really sells, however, is the false promise of easy wealth. Potential purchasers of CKB products must invest in CKB to get one of its courses. Defendants promise that those investors will earn exponential, risk-free returns. In addition to the course, each purchaser/investor receives “Profit Reward Points” (“Prpts”) with a purported value of $750.
Investors are told that they will eam “passive” returns in the form of Prpt dividends and 2-for-1 splits, and that they will be able to buy and sell their Prpts in an online exchange accessible through the CKB website. Investors also are promised that they will earn massive retums by converting their Prpts into shares of CKB stock when the company conducts an initial public offering (“IPO”) on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange sometime during 2014. Some Defendants allege that these returns can be achieved without any risk of loss.
4. Despite Defendants’ representations to the contrary, the Prpts are worthless and cannot be meaningfully traded, sold or exchanged. Nor has CKB taken required steps to prepare for the promised IPO and, in fact, does not meet the Hong Kong Exchange’s current listing requirements. Even if the IPO were to occur, CKB would have to go public as one of the world’s largest companies in order to honor conversions of the ever-expanding universe of Prpts.
Still, while essential to the scheme, Prpts are not its only incentive. The scheme’s ultimate goal is to tum investors into recruiters. CKB lures investors with the promise of even greater “active” returns, in the form of commissions and bonuses, for recruiting new, “downline” participants into the program. In contrast to Prpts, active recruitment is the only way to make actual significant money.
The CKB defendant entities include:
WIN168 Biz Solutions Limited (WIN168), which the SEC described as a “private Hong Kong company” that “maintained bank accounts at HSBC in Hong Kong that were used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors located in the United States and elsewhere. Those accounts received wire transfers from banks located in New York.”
CKB168 Biz Solution Inc., which the SEC described as a Canadian company in Toronto that “has maintained bank accounts at TD Bank in Canada that have been used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors.”
CKB 168 Limited, which the SEC said shares a business address with WIN168 and operated from Hong Kong. Its alleged “sole director is CKB168 Biz Solution Limited (“CKB168 Biz Ltd.”), a British Virgin Islands corporation with its office in Tortola,” the SEC said, further alleging that “CKB168 Ltd. maintained a bank account at HSBC in Hong Kong that was used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, including wires coming from New York.”
CKB 168 Holdings Limited, which the SEC described as sharing a business address with WIN168 and CKB168 Ltd. “Sample stock certificates shown to prospective investors indicate that CKB 168 Holdings is the entity whose shares have been offered to the public,” the SEC said.
Cyber Kids Best Education Limited, which the SEC described as the controller of “five bank accounts at Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. in Hong Kong, at least two of which were used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors located in the United States.”
“WIN168, CKB168 Biz, CKB168 Holdings, CKB168 Ltd., and CyberKids Best have never been registered with the Commission in any capacity and have never registered any offering of securities under the Securities Act or any class of securities under the Exchange Act,” the SEC charged.
The prosecutions of the CKB/CKB168, WCM777 and TelexFree “programs” made the SEC’s highlight reel for fiscal year 2014, which began on Oct. 1, 2013 and ended on Sept. 30 of this year.
