Dear Readers,
YouTube and Google apparently are unwilling to do anything about the cyberstalker “unclefesta26,” who appears to be harassing the PP Blog (and others) from an IP in the United Kingdom.
First, though, let me share some of reasons for this post.
The PP Blog is a Google AdSense publisher. On Nov. 17, Google invited me to participate in a beta test of a tool designed to give publishers more control over the AdSense ads that appear on their sites. I eagerly registered for the beta program on the day I received the invitation because I sensed a gathering storm.
Indeed, one of the reasons I quickly registered for the beta program was that “unclefesta26” had used YouTube as a platform from which to poison the Blog’s brand by planting the seed that it cannot be trusted because of some of the AdSense ads that have appeared here. Here is one example. Here is another. I saw the beta program as both a welcome tool and a means of minimizing harassment from “unclefesta26.”
The PP Blog has thousands of readers. I have received only a tiny number of complaints about AdSense ads. By “tiny,” I mean no more than three in the past two and a half years.
If you’ve never had a stalker, these matters perhaps will seem trivial to you. But I necessarily have to spend time and energy monitoring this situation, which is chilling my ability to publish and earn a living in an atmosphere free of extortion — emotional or financial.
It’s important to note that “unclefesta26,” who previously was banned from posting on the PP Blog, also has used the name “Pistol” and “Pistol’s Pal” online. Stalking never should be taken lightly, especially when one has used the name “Pistol.”
A search of YouTube associates “unclefesta26” with approximately 311 videos. Virtually all of them harass his targets in one way or another. YouTube is providing the stage, contrary to its own Community Guidelines.
In any event, the new AdSense tool has been helpful in blocking certain types of ads from appearing on the Blog. The tool, however, is not perfect. Owing to a large number of variables that may trigger ads, I am not certain any tool can do a perfect job. One of the biggest variables of all is taste. What some readers may view as objectionable could be perceived by others as something worthy of embrace. The PP Blog does not establish the rules by which Google accepts advertisers.
What “unclefesta26” is doing is at the edge of irrationality, another thing wholly consistent with stalking. His IP has appeared on the PP Blog hundreds of times in recent weeks, according to our database — this after I had banned an earlier IP. I detected the new IP only days ago. It has become clear that “unclefesta26” is persistently videotaping the Blog, narrating passages from the Blog, scraping content to which he adds provocative sexual innuendo and employing a keyword strategy to poison the brand of the Blog.
How bizarre have things gotten? Well, “unclefesta26” is using the keyword phrase “anal exam” to confuse the YouTube public about the PP Blog. He is taking the PP Blog’s content, changing it to suit his ends — and then publishing commentary attributed to the Blog on YouTube.
I offer no apologies for seeking to make a living in my profession — in an environment that is affecting operations large and small as publishers scramble to remain relevant and even to hang on in the Internet Age. I have used the tool — and a previous tool provided by Google — to try to minimize the publication of ads inconsistent with the aims of the PP Blog. I cannot make it perfect — and now I have to deal with “unclefesta26” poisoning the PP Blog’s brand on YouTube.
In one of his YouTube videos, “unclefesta26” videotaped headlines that scrolled across the top of the PP Blog. He used software to insert a bogus headline, changed the wording on the Blog’s “Breaking News” graphic — and added text that a reader of the Blog conducts “Anal” exams — “That’s Arsehole or Asshole To You And I,” he noted — “On Person Or Persons Unknown.”
Here are some questions YouTube and Google should contemplate: What if “unclefesta26” and others like him go after other AdSense publishers? What if he poisons the brands of other AdSense-participating journalists? Will publishers become reluctant to carry AdSense ads because the price of carrying them is to be pilloried on a stage that Google itself provides? How many small publishers such as the PP Blog will become discouraged when they come to realize that Google apparently is unwilling to act in the interests of its own publishers?
Among the ad categories I have blocked are “Get Rich Quick,” “Drugs & Supplements” and “Weight Loss.” I also have blocked “Brokerages & Day Trading,” “Securities,” “Retirement Investments,” “Spread Betting” and about 18 other categories pertaining to finance, investments and pharmaceuticals/healthcare. I cannot make the system fool proof. I do not believe that Google can, either.
“unclefesta26’s” stock-in-trade is to lie in wait until he sees an ad on the PP Blog that displeases him — and then to produce a video of the story in which the ad appears. His general allegation against the Blog is one of hypocrisy: If I write about a court case in which damages were ordered against a company in a false-advertising case — and if Google places an ad in the story from a company he perceives to be objectionable — “unclefesta26” races to YouTube to skewer the Blog. At the same time, he is using his YouTube site to ridicule actual living, breathing human beings who support the Blog’s editorial mission.
Yes, “unclefesta26” even is using YouTube to harass the Blog’s readers. Looking at it another way, not only is “unclefesta26” attacking an AdSense publisher, he also is attacking the very people the AdSense program is designed to attract: readers interested in buying things and comparing options.
What he is doing is wholly unnatural and disturbing — and I say this as a person who spent seven years in the law-enforcement trenches before embarking on my writing career more than two decades ago. I have seen great harm come to the objects of stalkers — both physical and emotional. Stalking is never to be taken lightly. There is no doubt — absolutely none — that the behavior of “unclefesta26” is consistent with an obsession to inflict distress. It also is consistent with a pattern of refusing to stop no matter what — and that makes it dangerous. It is vulgar, to be sure.
“unclefesta26” was banned from posting on the PP Blog in June 2009 for chronic harassment of the Blog and its readers. The very nature of his cyberstalking site on YouTube demands that YouTube and Google pay attention. If I were David Letterman — and if this harassment were occurring in or near my home — “unclefesta26” already would have a date with a judge. He then could explain to the judge why he believes it legal to lift a person’s image off the Internet and create an animated video that depicts the person as a breast-squeezing pole dancer wearing what appears to be a diaper when he isn’t dancing in the buff.
I contacted Google by phone at its corporate headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., Friday at 3:31 p.m. (PT) to file a cyberstalking complaint against “unclefesta26,” who has produced yet-another video designed to harass the Blog. It is possible — though not certain — that the video was made after “unclefesta26” made a fraudulent click on an AdSense ad that appeared on the Blog.
Even if the video “unclefesta26” produced did not use footage he accessed after making a fraudulent click, it still constitutes cyberstalking and harassment. I am not going to take it — especially not after the DDoS attacks by still-unknown parties against the Blog in 2010. They increased the Blog’s monthly costs tenfold.
Here, below, is “unclefesta26’s” most recent effort to harass. (The person depicted in the YouTube video is not “unclefesta26.” Rather, the person appears to be a Google advertiser whose ad appeared on the PP Blog):
Google No Help
You’ll note in the video above that “unclefesta26” took a screen shot of a story that appeared on the PP Blog Jan. 5. The screen shot includes a slice from an AdSense ad that appeared in the post. “unclefesta26” used the following keywords on YouTube to plant the seed that the Blog was engaging in illegal conduct: “patrick pretty hypocrite scammer ponzi scam fraud.”
In the past, “unclefesta26” has used a gmail address to email the Blog to nuisance it and to announce his latest YouTube efforts. Not only is he a cyberstalker, he also is proud of his efforts to use Google-owned properties to annoy and harass his targets. The part of the story that he does not tell is that he has been banned from multiple online sites for behavior consistent with cyberstalking and relentless hectoring.
Rather than hosting his own sites, “unclefesta26” relies on free services provided by Google. In the past, he used a free Ning.com website as a platform of harassment. He has a documented history of ignoring rules of decorum and of creating multiple identities to keep his nuisance campaigns intact. A moderator at one forum told me that “unclefesta26” created more than a dozen user identities in a single day. He created at least two user identities at the PP Blog and also appears to have the ability to use proxies to enter sites from which he has been banned.
My most unsatisfactory call to Google Friday lasted four minutes and 29 seconds. Google refused to transfer me to a person authorized to speak about security- and fraud-related matters and its AdSense program. Incredibly, Google explained there was no way to speak with a person who actually could listen to and field my complaint. In my frustration after hearing canned responses and after having had no luck in the past with getting YouTube to do anything, I voiced my displeasure, testily saying that I insisted on being transferred to someone in authority.
What I got was another canned response. It was like talking to a person who’d been programmed by geeks to say the same thing no matter what. It’s not a stretch to believe that the phone-answerer at Google would have told me to send an email had I called to report I’d just been mugged on the Mountain View campus or had seen a woman thrown forcibly into a car. The company seemed to care less that we had a common business problem.
I am not happy. The PP Blog produces revenue for Google and content that it eagerly indexes. The Blog is being harassed on Google-owned YouTube by a cyberstalker in no small measure because of its participation in Google’s AdSense program — and yet Google cannot or will not put me through to a person in authority.
“unclefesta26” apparently believes that any revenue the Blog receives is too much because Google sometimes delivers ads to the Blog that he deems objectionable — this while he uses phrases such as “blow job” and “flasher” and engages in bizarre sexual innuendo on his YouTube stalking site, which is equally unfriendly to women.
PP Blog Calls Police
At 3:42 p.m., after getting off the phone with Google, I called the Mountain View (Calif.) Police Department and asked to speak with a police officer. I identified myself and the location from which I was calling, providing a brief summary of what I sought to report. The woman who answered the phone did not identify herself as a police officer. Eventually I was placed on hold. The woman then came back on the line and told me the Mountain View department could not take my complaint, that I had to call my local police department.
So, at least for now, “unclefesta26” has demonstrated that people who wish to use YouTube to harass AdSense publishers and others have a safe haven. It will do absolutely no good to call my local police department in the United States. I had hoped that the Mountain View police would take a report and contact Google on my behalf to at least start the ball rolling — and that Google would call me back. It became next to impossible for me Friday night to think of Google as a company that cares.
At least temporarily, the Blog has removed the code that produces the AdSense ads. If Google is unable or unwilling to accept a phone call from an AdSense publisher who is being harassed on a Google-owned site, Google is not looking out for me. The run-around one gets when one seeks to speak with an actual human being in authority about legitimate issues of cyberstalking and fraud is unacceptable. At the same time, YouTube has permitted “unclefesta26” to create a stalking and hectoring site — one that not only is targeting this Blog, but also subjecting people who interact with the Blog to ridicule. One of his targets is a registered 501(c)3 corporation that works proactively with the U.S. Secret Service and other law-enforcement agencies to educate the public about scams.
I have sent three complaints about “unclefesta26” using the YouTube system of screens. The complaint system, which I first used months ago, is worthless in my view. I have never even received a response. The harassment has continued for well more than a year and even has been dialed up.
Given my background, I do not subscribe to the belief that the best thing to do about “unclefesta26” is to ignore him. He has been banned from multiple online forums for harassing behavior, which demonstrates a troubling pattern of persistence. The only other people ever banned from the PP Blog were “joe,” who threatened to start “fires” that Blog could not put out, and ASD mainstay Bob Guenther, who threatened to take measures to defeat the Blog’s security systems.
Given the DDoS attacks that were launched against the PP Blog in October and November — and a subsequent email it received that referenced “Doomsday” — the Blog has legitimate security concerns.
What “unclefesta26” is doing is both revolting and shameful.
And what Google and YouTube have done in response is equally revolting and shameful. They are permitting YouTube to be used as an agent of hurt. Both YouTube and Google have erected barriers that make it difficult for users to communicate with them in a meaningful way.
This, Readers, is what “unclefesta26” is doing to the chairman of a 501(c)3 corporation. The chairman proactively works with the U.S. Secret Service to combat fraud online:
YouTube and Google should be horrified. So should all advocates for safety on the Internet.
“Things like predatory behavior, stalking, threats, harassment, intimidation, invading privacy, revealing other people’s personal information, and inciting others to commit violent acts or to violate the Terms of Use are taken very seriously,” YouTube notes in its Community Guidelines.
Those words ring hollow to the PP Blog today.
Patrick