PatrickPretty.com

Tag: Howard N. Kaplan

  • EDITORIAL: On The War In Zeekland And HYIP Rabbit Holes

    From a promo for Zeek online in 2012.
    From a promo for Zeek online in 2012. The “program” operated through Rex Venture Group and later was charged by the SEC with selling unregistered securities as investment contracts.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: On Feb. 5, 2014, Zeek figures and alleged insiders Dawn Wright-Olivares and Daniel Olivares pleaded guilty to federal crimes. Wright-Olivares pleaded guilty to investment-fraud conspiracy and tax-fraud conspiracy. Olivares pleaded guilty to investment-fraud conspiracy. Federal prosecutors in the Western District of North Carolina are maintaining an information site here.

    Kenneth D. Bell, the court-appointed receiver in the SEC civil case, also is the special master in the criminal prosecution. The charging document in the criminal case references unnamed “co-conspirators” who are “known and unknown” to federal prosecutors.

    UPDATED 5:10 P.M. EDT U.S.A. In court filings apt to find favor in MLM HYIP Ponzi Land, some alleged “winners” in the Zeek Rewards “program” have tried to turn the tables on the court-appointed receiver by claiming he owes them “treble” damages for alleged violations of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

    Similar claims were made from the sidelines of the AdSurfDaily MLM Ponzi scheme in 2008. Some ASD members contended that then-Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum should be charged with Deceptive Trade Practices, apparently for having the temerity to bring a pyramid-scheme action against ASD.

    Other ASD members contended at the time that federal prosecutors and a U.S. Secret Service agent should be investigated and charged with crimes for their roles in the ASD Ponzi prosecution.

    Among the alleged winners in Zeek who’ve filed a counterclaim against receiver Kenneth D. Bell are Rhonda Gates of Nashville, an alleged winner of more than $1.425 million; Durant Brockett of Las Vegas, an alleged winner of more than $1.72 million; and Aaron and Shara Andrews of Lake Worth, Fla., alleged winners of more than $1 million through a Florida shell entity known as Innovation Marketing.

    In addition to claiming Bell owes them damages for Deceptive Trade Practices, the counterclaimants assert Bell interfered in contracts with payment processors such as Payza and NXPay and violated their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Bell sued them in late February, alleging in a clawback action that their gains were illicit because Zeek was illicit. He also sued several other Zeek alleged winners, including former ASD members Todd Disner of Miami and  Jerry Napier of Owosso, Mich. Disner allegedly received more than $1.875 million through Zeek; Napier allegedly received more than $1.745 million.

    Disner, in 2011, sought unsuccessfully to sue the United States for alleged violations of his Fourth Amendment rights in its prosecution of the ASD Ponzi case. His co-plaintiff in the case was Dwight Owen Schweitzer, whom filings by Bell described as a Zeek winner of more than $1,000. Several alleged Zeek winners ventured into the “program” after earlier stints at ASD, including Terralynn Hoy, a Florida MLMer who moderated a forum that called purported “sovereign” being Curtis Richmond a “hero” for his efforts to derail the civil-forfeiture action against ASD-related assets.

    Richmond, a Californian, was a member of a “sham” Utah “Indian” tribe that once sought to have U.S. Marshals serve bogus arrest warrants against federal judges. ASD figure Kenneth Wayne Leaming later was arrested by an FBI Terrorism Task Force, after allegedly harboring federal fugitives from a separate home-business caper, being a felon in possession of firearms and filing false liens against a judge and prosecutors involved in the ASD case.

    Other alleged Zeek winners sued by Bell in clawback litigation include Trudy Gilmond of St. Albans, Vt. (more than $1.75 million); Darren Miller of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho (more than $1.635 million); Michael Van Leeuwen, also known as “Coach Van” of Fayetteville, N.C. (more than $1.4 million); David Sorrells of Scottsdale, Az. (more than $1 million); T. Le Mont Silver Sr. of Orlando, Fla. (more than $773,000 under at least two user names, and more than $943,000 through a Florida shell entity known as Global Internet Formula Inc. with one or more Zeek user names); Karen Silver, Silver’s wife (more than $600,000); David and Mary Kettner of Peoria, Az. (more than $930,000 via one or more user names and shell companies known as Desert Oasis International Marketing LLC and Kettner & Associates LLC); and Lori Jean Weber of Land O’Lakes, Fla. (more than $1.94 million through a shell company known as P.A.W.S. Capital Management LLC.)

    Whether other alleged winners would join Gates, Brockett and Aaron and Shara Andrews in asserting claims for damages against Bell was not immediately clear.

    What is clear is that a legal war has broken out over Zeek, with alleged winners challenging Bell’s clawback claims by asserting Zeek wasn’t selling unregistered securities as alleged in 2012 by the SEC, that they worked for the money they received or were due, that the alleged winners were not investors, that the SEC’s case against Zeek cannot withstand scrutiny under the “Howey Test” for what constitutes a security, that the SEC had a duty to catch Zeek much earlier — and, in any event and if all else fails, attorneys Bell sued last week and Bell himself are to blame for the unpleasantness.

    On June 25, Bell sued MLM attorney Kevin Grimes and tax attorney Howard N. Kaplan, alleging they helped Zeek thrive while helping Zeek gain unwarranted credibility by lending their professional reputations to a fraud scheme.

    From Brockett’s June 30 “affirmative defenses” to the receiver’s clawback claims (italics added):

    The Receiver has filed suit against two attorneys who provided legal advice to [Zeek operator Rex Venture Group] and Affiliates, including Brockett. Brockett relied on that advice in concluding that RVG was a legitimate business and in committing over $100,000 in his personal resources to grow his now defunct business. Because Brockett’s damages were caused in part by the conduct of the two lawyers, Brockett is entitled in equity at and at law to a credit for all money the Receiver recovers from the two attorneys as a result of his claims against them.

    Also from Brockett’s “affirmative defenses” (italics added):

    On information and belief, the SEC knew or should have known of the RVG Ponzi scheme, but delayed unreasonably in its prosecution of claims against RVG. Alternatively, the SEC knew for some time that RVG was operating as a Ponzi scheme but intentionally delayed disclosing that information to Affiliates and to the public. That unreasonable delay has prejudiced Brockett because he has paid taxes on the money he earned working on behalf of RVG, contributed a significant portion of his earnings to his retirement plan, and has incurred business expenses as a part of his work on behalf of RVG. The Receiver in this action stands in the SEC’s shoes and also delayed to Brockett’s detriment and now seeks return of all monies Brockett earned in connection with RVG, with no credit for the taxes or business expenses that Brockett legitimately paid, but that could have been avoided had the SEC or the Receiver timely advised Brockett of RVG’s true nature or acted in a more expeditious manner.

    And from Brockett’s counterclaims against the receiver (italics added/editing for space performed):

    On information and belief, RVG was not involved in the sale or marketing of any securities, so the SEC was without jurisdiction and the Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over the SEC Action. Consequently, the appointment of the Receiver was void and of no effect, and all of the Receiver’s actions in his capacity as receiver for RVG have been unlawful and without justification . . .

    RVG’s and the Receiver’s conduct described above and in the Complaint constitutes unfair methods of competition, unfair trade practices, and deceptive trade practices in violation of the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, N.C. GEN. STAT. § 75-1.1, et seq.

    The conduct was illegal, offends public policy and is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, and deceptive.

    Bell, the Zeek receiver, is a former federal prosecutor who once received a prestigious award from the U.S. Department of Justice for his work prosecuting a Hezbollah terrorist cell operating in North Carolina.

    But some of the alleged Zeek winners now describe him with adjectives that could peel paint.

    And as they do this, they seek to gut or circumvent the SEC’s authority to prosecute HYIP schemes while contending the agency fumbled the ball in investigating and prosecuting Zeek — that is, if anything was worth investigating and prosecuting at all.

    It is a narrative apt to go over well in MLM HYIP Ponzi Land, the latest major expression of which  is TelexFree, a rabbit hole case if ever there was one.

    NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.

     

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Zeek Receiver Sues MLM Attorney Kevin Grimes For Sum In Excess Of $100 Million

    breakingnews72URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: (11th Update 9:43 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) The court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi- and pyramid case has sued MLM attorney Kevin Grimes and the Grimes & Reese law firm, alleging malpractice, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.

    In the Grimes action, the receiver is seeking “an amount in excess of $100 million.”

    In another action concerning a professional who worked for Zeek or was associated with purported “opportunity,” the receiver has sued attorney and tax consultant Howard N. Kaplan. Zeek operated an MLM “program” tied to a purported penny auction.

    As is the case in the Grimes action, the receiver is seeking a sum of more than $100 million against Kaplan for alleged damages.

    Both Kaplan and Grimes should have known better, but nevertheless helped Zeek thrive while helping Zeek gain unwarranted credibility by lending their professional reputations to a fraud scheme that gathered hundreds of millions of dollars, receiver Kenneth D. Bell alleged.

    “By virtue of his knowledge of [Zeek operator Rex Venture Group] and ZeekRewards and his legal expertise, Grimes knew or should have known that RVG was perpetrating an unlawful scheme which involved a pyramid scheme, an unregistered investment contract and/or a Ponzi scheme. Despite this knowledge, Grimes actively encouraged investors to participate in the scheme by creating a so-called ‘compliance’ program that provided a false façade of legality and legitimacy and knowingly allowed his name to be used to promote the scheme,” Bell said in the complaint against Grimes.

    Bell accused Grimes of turning a “blind eye” to markers of fraud at Zeek such as unusually consistent payout percentages.

    “This fake consistency should have, at a minimum, caused reasonably diligent legal counsel to inquire further about the validity of the alleged profits,” Bell alleged. “Indeed, the program publicly advertised historical average returns of 1.4% per day, which no legitimate investment could accomplish. But, Grimes deliberately turned a blind eye to these incredible claims and chose not to seek further information.”

    And Kaplan, Bell alleged, “knew or should have known that insufficient income from the penny auction business was being made to pay the daily ‘profit share’ promised by ZeekRewards.

    “Kaplan knew or should have known that the money used to fund ZeekRewards’ distributions to Affiliates came almost entirely from new participants rather than income from the Zeekler penny auctions,” Bell continued. “Further, Kaplan knew or should have known that the alleged ‘profit percentage’ was nothing more than a number made up by [Zeek operator Paul R.] Burks or one of the other  Insiders. Rather than reflecting the typical variances that might be expected in a company’s profits, the alleged profits paid in ZeekRewards were remarkably consistent, falling nearly always between 1% and 2% on Monday through Thursday and between .5% and 1% on the weekends, Friday through Sunday.”

    From Bell’s complaint against Kaplan (italics added):

    Instead of properly informing Affiliates of the different tax implications they would face if their Zeek payments were properly characterized as coming from an ‘investment’ rather than a ‘trade or business,’ Kaplan failed to inform Affiliates, either on the calls or in his FAQs, of the material fact that payments to Affiliates should be characterized as investment income for tax reporting purposes.

    For example, in the FAQs that he drafted and allowed ZeekRewards to post to its website, Kaplan advised that Affiliates should use IRS Schedule C (“Profit or Loss from Business”) to record their income, making no mention of the fact that they should use IRS Schedule D (“Capital Gains and Losses”) . . . If Kaplan had candidly disclosed the material fact that Affiliate income would be properly characterized by the IRS as capital gains, the obvious negative tax implications would have caused many Zeek Affiliates to remove their cash earnings from the program rather than reinvesting them, short-circuiting the scheme much earlier. Since he did not, Affiliates were placated in their misguided belief that ZeekRewards was a lawful program.

    It has been a remarkably awkward time for MLM attorneys. Gerald Nehra, Richard Waak and their law firm have been accused by plaintiffs in TelexFree-related litigation with racketeering and violations of the federal securities laws. TelexFree plaintiffs have asserted Nehra also counseled Zeek.

    From the Zeek receiver’s complaint against Grimes and Grimes & Reese (italics added):

    Defendants played an indispensable role in the scheme. Because of the lucrative, seemingly ‘too good to be true’ claims being made by RVG and ZeekRewards, many potential investors were skeptical of whether the scheme was legal and legitimate. So, RVG enlisted the aid of Grimes and other legal counsel to assist in promoting and legitimizing the scheme.

    Grimes helped in several ways. First, despite his knowledge that ZeekRewards was a fundamentally flawed and unlawful pyramid and/or Ponzi scheme and was selling unregistered securities, Grimes offered to create and did create a so-called
    ‘compliance course’ specifically designed to encourage investors and potential investors to believe that if they satisfied the course then it would be a lawful enterprise.

    Thus, Grimes knowingly allowed Zeek to portray a false appearance of legality through his bogus ‘compliance’ course.

    Grimes profited personally from the compliance courses while allowing ZeekRewards yet another source of investor money. Upon information and belief, Grimes received payments from ZeekRewards not only for his legal counsel, but also for sales of his compliance course to Affiliates. Upon information and belief, Grimes provided the compliance course to ZeekRewards for $5 per affiliate, while allowing ZeekRewards to charge affiliates $30 each for the course, personally profiting from it and allowing RVG yet another means of extracting money from unsuspecting Affiliates.

    Zeek collapsed in August 2012. The SEC and federal prosecutors now say the “program” gathered on the order of $850 million in less than two years. Two months after the collapse, two members of Zeek sent Senior U.S. District Judge Graham C. Mullen a copy of the “compliance” certification allegedly provided by Grimes (pictured below):

    zeekcomplianceBoth Grimes and Kaplan were aware that the Zeek “program” raised issues about the sale of unregistered securities, but nevertheless marched forward, Bell alleged.

    In February 2012, Bell said, Grimes emailed a Zeek adviser, saying, “I am still in the process of getting my arms around its program, but I have some SERIOUS concerns that it very likely meets the definition of an ‘investment contract.’ It may have other issues as well, but I’m still reviewing their documents.”

    By June 2012, according to Bell, a Zeek participant contacted Grimes, saying, “I have completed your compliance course with Zeek and really loved it. I am a great advocate of Zeek and have signed up 31 people whom I feel responsible for. . . . One of my downline is asking questions . . . there is a tremendous amount of income going into Zeek and he is concerned the profit share is coming from the new affiliates – which would make it a ponzi scheme. Can you direct me as to what is the best way to confirm this is not a ponzi scheme[?]”

    In response, Grimes emailed Zeek executive Dawn Wright-Olivares, stating, “Do you want me to forward these types of communications to you or anyone else, or would you prefer that I simply discard them? I get several of these each week.”

    Grimes, Bell alleged, appeared to have “no concern” about the affiliate’s email.

    The MLM lawyer “took advantage of the situation, creating and marketing a compliance training course as window dressing for this illegitimate scheme, allowing the course to be sold to the Affiliates for his own profit,” Bell alleged.

    NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.