Tag: Kerry Johnson

  • In Explosive New Allegations, Receiver Says Jeremy Johnson Associate Opened New Bank Account In November 2012 And That Firm Owned By Johnson’s Parents Wired $500,000 Into It — And That Almost All Of The Money Was Removed By Associate On Same Day In Cash

    From Feb. 6, 2013, filing by the receiver in the Jeremy Johnson/IWorks fraud case. (Redaction by PP Blog.)
    From Feb. 6, 2013, filing by the receiver in the Jeremy Johnson/IWorks fraud case. (Redaction by PP Blog.)

    EDITOR’S NOTE: Utah has been abuzz since the Salt Lake Tribune reported on Jan. 11 that a plea deal between Jeremy Johnson and the government had unraveled when prosecutors balked “at placing a list of people into the record that Johnson said prosecutors had promised not to indict if he entered a guilty plea.”

    “Included on that list were Johnson family members, business associates, friends — and Utah Attorney General John Swallow,” the newspaper reported. Johnson planted the seed that Swallow had been involved in a bribery scheme to make FTC civil allegations of fraud against Johnson go away in 2010. Swallow denied the allegations.

    Johnson has been engaged in a long-running media campaign to discredit the government. Among other things, he has claimed he had no money to mount a defense to the FTC charges brought in December 2010. But in an update to the court a year ago this month, the receiver in the FTC case raised allegations that some of Johnson’s family members and friends were helping him hide money through scores of business entities.

    Now, receiver Robb Evans has filed a new document (Feb. 6, 2013) that alleges a company owned by Johnson’s parents wired $500,000 to a new bank account opened by a Johnson business associate referenced in last year’s receivership report 10 months after the report was filed. The suspicious transactions involving Kerry and Barbara Johnson and Jason Vowell allegedly occurred in December 2012.

    Although the receiver’s Feb. 6 filing does not reference Johnson’s collapsed plea deal last month, it may lead to questions about the credibility of Johnson, his parents and certain of his business associates. Vowell, for example, is alleged to have withdrawn in cash nearly all of the money supplied by the firm owned by Johnson’s parents just a little more than a month before Johnson’s plea deal collapsed, reportedly in part because prosecutors refused to commit to not charging his parents and others.

    ** _______________________________ **

    The court-appointed receiver in the Jeremy Johnson/IWorks fraud case has advised a federal judge that KV Electric Inc., a company owned by Johnson’s parents, wired $500,000 on Dec. 6 into an account opened Nov. 28 through Johnson business associate Jason Vowell.

    In court filings, receiver Robb Evans said that bank records suggest Vowell removed $499,500 from the account on the same day the wire deposit was made. The withdrawal appears to have been made in cash. An evidence exhibit shows what appears to be a counter check drawn on The Village Bank. The check was filled out in longhand, with Vowell’s name in the “Pay to the order of” line. The words “Living Expenses” are written on the memo line of the check, and the name of Taggart Management LLC is written in longhand at the top of the check.

    Taggart Management, through Vowell, opened the account only days earlier with a deposit of $100, according to the receiver. On Dec. 6, $500,000 flowed into the account via wire from KV Electric, which is owned Johnson’s parents, Kerry and Barbara Johnson, according to the receiver.

    “The transfer of $500,000 to Taggart for the immediate withdrawal of $499,500 in cash by Jason Vowell has no discernible business purpose and is highly suspect under the circumstances,” the receiver said, noting that Taggart is part of the receivership’s investigation into Jeremy Johnson’s business affairs and that Kerry and Barbara Johnson are defendants in a receivership lawsuit to recover ill-gotten gains from their son’s alleged scam.

    Various suspicious transactions involving large sums of money and the Johnson family and other entities have occurred since the FTC sued Jeremy Johnson for fraud in December 2010, alleging a massive Internet-based scam that gathered hundreds of millions of dollars, the receiver alleged.

    On Jan. 3, 2013, the receivership issued a subpoena to The Village Bank, which provided records of the alleged Vowell/Taggart and KV Electric transactions during the previous month, according to court filings. In November, the receivership issued a subpoena to Chartway Federal Credit Union as part of a forensic investigation into the banking activities of Johnson’s parents and others individuals and entities involved with Johnson. Chartway provided sought-after information on Johnson’s parents on Dec. 4.

    On Feb. 8, U.S. District Judge Miranda M. Du authorized Evans in an order to continue the asset investigation of Johnson’s parents.

    Read Feb. 6, 2013, filing, including exhibits, by the receiver.

     

  • BULLETIN: FTC Asks Judge For Permission To Amend IWorks/Jeremy Johnson Fraud Complaint To Include Johnson’s Wife And Parents As Relief Defendants

    breakingnews72BULLETIN: (UPDATED 6:25 P.M. ET U.S.A.) The FTC has asked a Nevada federal judge for permission to amend the complaint in the 2010 IWorks Inc./Jeremy Johnson civil-fraud case to include Johnson’s wife, parents and five corporate entities as “relief defendants” — the alleged recipients of ill-gotten gains from Johnson’s alleged Internet fraud scheme involving hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Utah has been abuzz over Johnson news since the Salt Lake Tribune reported on Jan. 11 that Johnson asserted that Utah’s new Attorney General “helped broker a deal in 2010 in which Johnson believed he was to pay Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid $600,000 to make a federal investigation into Johnson’s company go away.”

    Attorney General John Swallow, who was a Deputy Attorney General under former Attorney General Mark Shurtleff when the alleged bribery bid occurred, has denied wrongdoing and has asked for an investigation by federal prosecutors in Utah. Sen. Reid, of Nevada, has issued a statement through his office that he “has no knowledge or involvement regarding Mr. Johnson’s case,” the Tribune reported.

    Swallow had been Attorney General only days before the Johnson allegations surfaced. Swallow is a Republican; Reid is a Democrat. Johnson effectively made the claim at a hearing during which he was expected to plead guilty to criminal charges earlier this month, triggering a media firestorm in the state.

    Johnson did not enter a guilty plea. He remains free on bond.

    The FTC, a longstanding target of Johnson’s ire, announced today that it wanted to amend the complaint.

    • Sharla Johnson, Johnson’s wife, “received at least $5 million in funds and property” from her husband’s scheme, “including a multi-million-dollar, 20,000-square-foot mansion in St. George, Utah, subsequently used to secure a $3.1 million home equity line of credit,” the FTC said.
    • Kerry Johnson, Johnson’s father, “received at least $1.6 million in funds and property, including about $1 million worth of silver coins and bars,” the FTC said.
    • Barbara Johnson, Johnson’s mother, received at least $77,500, the FTC said.

    Five other businesses with ties to Johnson and/or his family also received ill-gotten gains, the agency said. In all, the FTC is seeking $22 million from the prospective relief defendants.

    Johnson long has denied wrongdoing in a case that, at a minimum, has showcased the logistical nightmares government agencies and court-appointed receivers may confront when they tackle an alleged Internet-based fraud scheme with tentacles all over the world, including shell companies allegedly set up to carry out a fraud scheme. (See Jan. 9, 2012, PP Blog editorial. See Dec. 22, 2011, PP Blog editorial.)

    See the FTC’s proposed amended complaint.

    See Feb. 8, 2012, PP Blog report: Receiver In Jeremy Johnson/IWorks Fraud Case Issues Devastating Report; Incredible Number Of Firms Referenced In 79-Page Court Update; ‘Dozens Of Companies Used As Conduits To Re-Route Revenue And To Commingle And Hide Funds,’ Document Claims