UPDATED 5:25 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Alfred Gerebizza has been charged with mail fraud and tax crimes in a superseding indictment in the Daniel Spitzer Ponzi case, which alleged both domestic and offshore fraud. The SEC initially charged Spitzer civilly in June 2010, accusing him of “moving investor money through a complex network of foreign bank and brokerage accounts” and spending more than $900,000 “in cash at the Wynn Las Vegas Casino.”
Spitzer later was charged criminally after investigations by the FBI, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the IRS.
Gerebizza, 56, formerly resided in the Chicago suburb of Crystal Lake. A criminal indictment against him was unsealed last month, and Gerebizza surrendered in Atlanta, federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois said yesterday. He is in federal custody at a prison facility in Chicago, according to records.
The superseding indictment naming Gerebizza as a new criminal defendant with Spitzer alleges that Gerebizza was a pitchman who “held himself out as a trader for a dozen investment funds, known collectively as the ‘Kenzie Funds,’ purportedly operated by Kenzie Financial Management in the U.S. Virgin Islands.”
Spitzer was a Kenzie principal, prosecutors said. He has been charged with 10 counts of mail fraud.
Gerebizza faces 10 counts of mail fraud and six counts of filing bogus tax returns. Both men were named in forfeiture allegations that seek $34 million.
“Through sales agents and various marketing materials, they informed investors and potential investors that their investments would be used primarily in foreign currency trading, that the Kenzie Funds had never lost money, and had achieved profitable historical returns,” federal prosecutors said of Spitzer and Gerebizza. “The defendants had to continually raise funds through the solicitation of new investors in the Kenzie Funds to make payments on investments made by earlier investors, all of which they concealed and intentionally failed to disclose to both new and earlier investors. Ultimately, between 2004 and July 2010, the defendants allegedly raised approximately $105 million from investors, misappropriated a significant portion of those funds, and caused losses totaling approximately $34 million.”
On Sept. 12, 2010, the PP Blog received a communication purportedly from Gerebizza that threatened a lawsuit if the Blog did not remove Gerebizza’s name and/or alter or delete comments from readers.
“I will sue you personally as well as your web site for slander as well as other charges,” the communication read in part.
The Blog did not submit to the threat. Instead, the Blog reported on the threat.
It is somewhat common for the PP Blog to receive threatening communications related to its coverage of Ponzi probes.
EDITOR’S NOTE:First of two parts. Part Two will be published later tonight or tomorrow.
Even as AdSurfDaily President Andy Bowdoin was venturing to Washington in June 2008 to receive what his members and prospects were told was the “Medal of Distinction” from the President of the United States, he was harboring terrible secrets and knew full well his autosurf business was a Ponzi scheme that could collapse at any second and lay waste to thousands of investors, according to court records and an affidavit originally filed under seal by the U.S. Secret Service.
Much of the information from the affidavit, which was filed in February 2009, is being published today for the first time. Companion court documents in ASD-related litigation show that part of a third civil-forfeiture case brought in December 2010 against assets alleged to be owned by ASD and Bowdoin has been put on hold while Bowdoin is battling criminal allegations — and that some individual ASD members whose assets were targeted for forfeiture in the same case have not filed claims for money seized from their bank accounts. Although the forfeiture action against Bowdoin has been suspended, the cases against the assets of the individual ASD members remain active.
Just two months prior to his June 2008 Washington jaunt — in April 2008 — Bowdoin had flown at the prompting of a “North Carolina lawyer” to Panama and Costa Rica with his wife and the lawyer. The purpose of the trip, according to the affidavit, was to incorporate ASD Cash Generator and an entity known known as La Sorta Trading outside of U.S. jurisdiction to create wiggle room if U.S. regulators came knocking.
ASD Cash Generator was the replacement name for the original ASD autosurf business, which was known simply as AdSurfDaily. The first scheme collapsed in 2007, leaving Bowdoin’s first set of investors holding the bag, according to the affidavit. Bowdoin’s later investors were not told about the firm’s dubious history.
La Sorta Trading, whose purpose was not immediately clear, never before has been referenced in the ASD case. La Sorta is the name of a city in Honduras, another country in Central America. It is not known if the firm was named after the city.
Bowdoin also was exploring the possibility that he and his wife would move from the small town of Quincy, Fla., to Costa Rica, the Secret Service advised U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer.
“Bowdoin’s wife did not like Costa Rica, however, and his plans to move ASD’s operations off shore were shelved,” according to the affidavit.
The February 2009 affidavit paints Bowdoin, now 76, as a man experiencing pressure from multiple points of contact — and as a man who made one disastrous decision after another. One of the things allegedly pressuring Bowdoin was fear that the Ponzi could come tumbling down before enough new members were recruited to keep cash churning and the facade of a successful and lawful business in place. Yet-another was fear that insiders, ordinary members and even employees could turn on him. Still-another was fear that a government intervention could occur at any time, according to the affidavit.
Of the millions of dollars that had flowed into ASD, “less tha[n] $25,000 was derived from independent revenue,” according to the affidavit. The rest had come from members and was being recycled in classic Ponzi scheme fashion, with Bowdoin initially empowering himself and a “silent partner” to rake 10 percent of ASD’s “gross sales” and split it evenly: 5 percent each.
But even as he was in Washington in June 2008 to receive an award he positioned as a Presidential acknowledgment of his business acumen, Bowdoin knew that his silent partner posed a risk to him, according to the affidavit.
That silent partner, according to the affidavit, was Bowdoin’s “sponsor” in 12DailyPro, an autosurf the SEC accused of running a massive Ponzi scheme more than two years earlier.
Through his sponsor, Bowdoin had invested $100 in 12DailyPro. The money was lost quickly because the SEC shut down 12DailyPro soon after Bowdoin joined. But Neither Bowdoin nor his silent partner took the clue from the SEC’s action, according to the affidavit. Instead, they worked on ways to channel 12DailyPro-like revenue to themselves and disguise what they were doing.
“Based on his experience with 12daily Pro, and his review of the SEC’s filings against it, Bowdoin knew that a paid auto-surf program that promised returns of that magnitude and recycled member funds was a business model that was both unsustainable and illegal. He also knew that selling an unregistered investment opportunity to thousands of investors was illegal. Nevertheless, after the collapse of 12daily Pro, Bowdoin agreed with his 12daily Pro sponsor to start a similar autosurf program. Both individuals were aware that, before its collapse, 12daily Pro had taken in millions of dollars from its members.”
Under Bowdoin’s agreement with his silent partner, Bowdoin was responsible for managing ASD’s operations. The partner, meanwhile, was responsible for marketing ASD.
In December 2006, about a year and a half prior to Bowdoin’s June 2008 trip to Washington amid claims he was receiving a Presidential award for business smarts, Bowdoin arbitrarily slashed the silent partner’s cut of the upstart ASD business from 5 percent of the gross to 1 percent, according to the affidavit.
Despite the fact Bowdoin had been a 12DailyPro member recruited into that SEC-smashed Ponzi scheme by the same person who’d later emerge as his silent partner in ASD, Bowdoin explained to the silent partner that he — meaning Bowdoin — “was performing most of the work, and bearing most of the risk in operating ASD,” according to the affidavit.
With those words, Bowdoin imposed a pay cut on the silent partner, who later asserted Bowdoin had ripped him off, according to the affidavit.
In August 2008, during a search of Bowdoin’s home in Quincy less than two months after the Washington jaunt and the Presidential claims, the Secret Service found Bowdoin’s handwritten notes from December 2006 that “show his and his silent partner’s awareness of the risks of the auto-surf program they were conducting,” the Secret Service said in the affidavit.
“Bowdoin’s notes indicate that he told his silent partner that the partner should have made him better aware of those risks ‘knowing regulators were on the prowl for surfing sites,’” the Secret Service alleged.
It is known from other documents that the Secret Service opened the ASD probe after becoming aware of the company on July 3, 2008, about 17 days after Bowdoin had ventured to Washington amid claims he’d be be receiving a Presidential award and dining with President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.
One of the documents is a 57-page evidence exhibit that includes surveillance photos taken in Quincy prior to the seizure of tens of millions of dollars from Bowdoin’s 10 personal bank accounts, one of which allegedly contained more than $31.6 million. The Secret Service was alarmed as it began the process of peeling back layers of the onion, according to court records
Before July had come to a close, the agency — confronted with a murky fact set and trying to figure out how a man who claimed to have had a remarkable business career that had captured the attention of the President of the United States — had assigned multiple undercover agents to the ASD case.
One of the earliest puzzles to solve, according to court documents, was that Bowdoin had left behind a string of dissolved companies in Florida and professed to be wealthy — but had “earned no significant income from legal employment in the twenty years prior to his commencement of ASD’s operation.”
As the investigation progressed, according to court documents and the February 2009 affidavit, agents discovered that ASD had “special” members who provided Bowdoin start-up capital to varying degrees. These “special” members were grouped as members of ASD’s “President’s Circle,” “President’s Advisory Board” and “President’s Advisory Counsel,” and also knew about the 12Daily Pro Ponzi.
At least “some” of them, according to the affidavit, counseled Bowdoin not to use the name he initially contemplated in 2006 for the upstart enterprise: DailyProSurf.
Some of the special members, who were entitled to higher compensation than ordinary members, “complained” that DailyProSurf sounded too much like 12DailyPro. In response to the concerns, the enterprise abandoned the DailyProSurf name and used the name AdSurfDaily as a means of avoiding “law enforcement scrutiny,” according to the February 2009 affidavit.
The document did not name the “special” members. It was filed under seal on Feb. 26, 2009, during a period in which an autosurf known as AdViewGlobal (AVG) was launching. AVG may represent the fourth iteration of ASD, one launched months after the seizure of Bowdoin’s bank accounts by the Secret Service in August 2008.
AVG’s name is not referenced in the February 2009 affidavit. In June 2009, however, AVG’s name surfaced in a racketeering lawsuit brought against Bowdoin and North Carolina attorney Robert Garner. In September 2009, the government made a veiled reference to AVG in court filings.
Lawyers Referenced In Secret Service Affidavit As Bowdoin’s Partners In LaFuenteDinero, The ‘Spanish’ ASD
NOTE: The PP Blog became aware in 2010 that the government had subpoenaed at least three North Carolina attorneys, including Robert Garner, in the ASD case. The other two attorneys were husband and wife. The husband, who was sentenced to a year in federal prison in 2006 for lying to the FBI in a real-estate case, was disbarred in 2009. Bowdoin challenged the subpoenas, arguing that his communications with the lawyers were privileged. A federal judge ruled that the attorneys had to testify.
The Blog, which previously has published stories that reference Garner, is doing so again today. Garner is listed in Nevada records as a “director” of AdSurfDaily Inc., with Bowdoin as the president, secretary and treasurer. However, the Blog is choosing today not to publish the names of the husband-and-wife attorneys, but reserves its right to do so in the future.
Moving on . . .
One of the most stunning allegations in the February 2009 Secret Service affidavit, which became a public record when the seal was lifted in May 2009 and which the PP Blog is reporting on for the first time today, was that two of the North Carolina lawyers were proposed as Bowdoin’s business partners in LaFuenteDinero (LFD). LFD was ASD’s so-called Spanish autosurf. The proposal was made by one of the lawyers, who described the other lawyer as his “law partner.”
The section below is verbatim from the February 2009 Secret Service affidavit:
“In approximately September or October 2007, ASD’s North Carolina lawyer suggested to Bowdoin that they should start a new site that was in Spanish. In addition, the North Carolina lawyer suggested that the company associated with this site should be set up off shore because when these type of companies raise too much money the government comes in and shuts them down. The North Carolina lawyer recommended that he, his ‘law partner’ and Bowdoin would each share ownership of the Spanish site (as 1/3 share partners). In return for the others’ ownership interests, the North Carolina lawyer and his associate would handle the incorporation work and all of the work needed to move operations offshore.”
By early 2008, with nearly a year and a half of troubled operation under its belt and a Ponzi collapse that had caused ASD to cease operations for weeks in 2007 as it tooled up for a second try under the ASD Cash Generator brand, Bowdoin was growing “suspicious” of at least one of the North Carolina lawyers, according to the affidavit.
“In February 2008, Bowdoin, the North Carolina lawyer and an ‘Internet marketer’ discussed expanding ASD by beginning a new site in Chinese, which would be called Golden Panda Ad Builder,” according to the affidavit. “The North Carolina lawyer suggested a person that would be well suited to run the site offshore, but Bowdoin was beginning to get suspicious of the lawyer. Bowdoin decided, instead, to split the Chinese site with the Georgia minister. Bowdoin told the Georgia minister that ASD had no outside income sources and that ASD’s survival was depend[e]nt on an ever growing base of new contributors. The Georgia minister began working on developing the Chinese auto-surf site.”
‘Georgia Minister’ Allegedly Caught Stealing By ASD Employees; Bowdoin Allegedly Stays Silent About Theft
Bowdoin, according to the affidavit, confronted trouble from any number of fronts. One of his colleagues — the “silent partner” who had been Bowdoin’s 12DailyPro sponsor whose rake Bowdoin allegedly had slashed after they started ASD — told Bowdoin he believed he was owed $20,000 and threatened to expose ASD’s new operation.
“Bowdoin agreed to compensate the sponsor” after initially balking, according to the affidavit.
And Bowdoin also was under pressure from the “North Carolina lawyer” to move the ASD operation offshore — counsel Bowdoin earlier had resisted but agreed to explore in April 2008, despite his suspicions about the lawyer, according to the affidavit.
During the first half of 2008, with Golden Panda still not off the ground during a period in which the “Georgia minister” had access to ASD’s computer system, ASD employees began to complain that the minister was “padding” his ASD account by “secretly using his access to the computer system to increase his/relatives’ number of ad packages,” according to the affidavit.
Bowdoin personally investigated the complaints, comparing the “Georgia minister’s” account with banking records.
Bowdoin “confirmed for himself that the Georgia minister was in fact stealing money from ASD by creating free ad packages,” according to the affidavit. “When confronted, the Georgia minister denied the allegations and asserted that he had proof that the ad packages he created flowed from legitimate deposits of funds into ASD’s bank accounts. The Georgia minister never showed Bowdoin this proof, however, and each time Bowdoin or someone else inquired about the evidence of deposits, the Georgia minister created an excuse to explain why he did not then have it.”
Instead of firing the Georgia minister and ending the relationship, “Bowdoin did not pursue the matter,” according to the affidavit.
Things took a dramatic turn “in about June 2008,” when ASD employees discovered that “the Georgia minister had been permanently enjoined by a court from committing violations of the federal securities laws.
“When ASD employees disclosed this information to Bowdoin, they told him that ASD needed to distance itself from the minister,” according to the affidavit. “Bowdoin agreed to severe his ties to the Golden Panda operation after several ASD employees indicated that they were unwilling to work with the Georgia minister.”
Walter Clarence Busby Jr. of Acworth, Georgia, has been identified by the government in other court filings as Bowdoin’s Golden Panda partner. Separate court documents describe Busby as a minister and real-estate professional, and the SEC described Busby in 1997 as a prime-bank swindler.
In court filings in the ASD case, Busby advised Collyer that he had prevailed upon another minister to assist him in arranging a relaxing day of fishing with Bowdoin in April 2008. During that same month, according to the February 2009 Secret Service affidavit, Bowdoin ventured to Central America with his wife and a “North Carolina lawyer.”
The fishing excursion took place in Brunswick, Georgia, on April 11, 2008, according to court filings by Busby. Five days later, according to the February 2009 Secret Service affidavit, Bowdoin was in Panama and Costa Rica, discussing ASD business and the formation of the La Sorta Trading firm.
Coming later: Government moves against money in ASD-related bank accounts in Iowa and other states.
BULLETIN: John Neil Hirst has been charged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in the United Kingdom in a case that alleges he was at the helm of an international Ponzi scheme that targeted British, French and Americans through a company registered in Panama and Seychelles.
The company was known as Gilher Inc., the SFO said. Hirst operated from Mallorca, investigators said.
U.K. officials said Hirst, 59, appeared in Bradford Magistrates Court today to face charges of money-laundering and conspiracy to defraud. The scheme is believe to have gathered more than £10m (about $16.2 million U.S.), causing losses of about £6m (nearly $10 million U.S.).
Investigators said in November 2009 that Gilher hawked a “fund” that offered “a guaranteed return of 20% a year.”
It was the second major Ponzi case brought in Europe in recent weeks. German Cardona Soler was arrested in Spain last month in a case described as a $300 million Ponzi scheme that affected more than 100,000 investors globally.
The SFO investigation of Hirst “is still continuing in regards to the involvement of a number of additional individuals,” the SFO said today. Investigators did not name the other individuals or say how many others were under scrutiny.
“Gilher Inc was a Panama and Seychelles registered company, operated by Hirst, which invested funds on behalf of private clients who were mainly based in the UK and Spain,” SFO said. “The investigation started in November 2009 following complaints made to the SFO by investors and has been investigated with the assistance of West Yorkshire and Surrey Police and overseas law enforcement authorities.”
SFO did not identify the overseas authorities that assisted in the probe.
Cardona is a figure in the alleged EMG/Finanzas Forex Ponzi scheme, which has been tied to multiple fraud schemes in Florida and a narcotics probe in Arizona, according to U.S. court filings. Some of the U.S.-based legwork in the alleged caper was performed by members of the same Task Force that brought a $110 million Ponzi prosecution against AdSurfDaily President Andy Bowdoin of Quincy, Fla.
Cardona’s name also has surfaced in the George Theodule Ponzi scheme in Florida.
Both EMG/Finanzas and AdSurfDaily were promoted on Ponzi and criminals’ forums such as TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup.
Hirst was ordered to remain at his residence and not to contact prosecution witnesses. He also was ordered to surrender his passport, SFO said.
UPDATED 3:09 P.M. EST (U.S.A.) Talk about a message at odds with itself.
Yesterday AdViewGlobal, which does not identify its owners and claims it has no affiliation with AdSurfDaily Inc., revealed its chief executive officer also is or was an executive at ASD (emphasis added):
“Since Mr. [Gary] Talbert was and is the C.E.O. for both companies and had worked with the same web room company while at ASD, it would be very natural for him to choose and use many of the same venders (sic) that he had used before. So, the fact that ASD and AdView Global are using the same web room hosting company is no accident, in fact it is an operational coincidence,” AdViewGlobal said.
So, operational coincidence goes down in history as AdViewGlobal’s first contribution to the Alice-In-Wonderland world of autosurf PR. And, yes, the company actually announced that Talbert was chief executive officer of an alleged $100 million Ponzi scheme (ASD) and now has a role as chief executive officer of an offshore company that almost certainly is engaged in the sale of unregistered securities to U.S. residents and is a Ponzi scheme itself.
Normally companies don’t crow about this type of thing. What’s even stranger is that Juan Fernandez, not Talbert, is listed in court documents as chief executive officer of ASD. In a sworn court declaration recorded Aug. 18, Talbert identified himself as ASD’s “Human Resource Manager, Assistant CFO and Website Editor.â€
Perhaps ASD decided not to share the news of Talbert’s promotion to chief executive officer. Or perhaps the AdViewGlobal PR apparatus doesn’t have Clue One about what it is doing, guessed at or fabricated the title Talbert held at ASD and doesn’t read court documents that refute its own claim.
Even if Talbert no longer is an ASD executive and is singularly employed by AdViewGlobal as chief executive officer, it doesn’t undo the ASD stain no matter what title he held at the firm. AdViewGlobal’s purported offshore registration and refusal to identify its owners make it look even worse. There is no way to sanitize this business, which stinks to the high heavens.
Piling On The Absurdities
AdViewGlobal’s announcement painted the autosurf business as a wholesome enterprise that attracts highly skilled, highly discriminating companies and highly talented executives.
“When the management team in Uruguay was organizing AdView Global, they were looking for someone who was familiar with the U.S. market and the processes in which to make a surfing company successful,†AdViewGlobal said. “It was for this reason that AdView Global hired Mr. Gary Talbert as their C.E.O.â€
One is led to believe AdViewGlobal scored a coup in recruiting Talbert, in the same way Microsoft would score a coup if it lured Steve Jobs from Apple.
Odder yet is that AdViewGlobal engaged in bizarre speculation to explain acts by Talbert, saying the appearance of AdViewGlobal graphics on an ASD-controlled website “probably meant that he was called away in the middle of making the changes by another pressing matter.”
Are AdViewGlobal members supposed to believe that a company that guesses about the actions of its own chief executive officer is one to be taken seriously?
Yesterday’s announcement removed any doubts that ASD and AdViewGlobal have very close ties, despite AdViewGlobal’s preemptive disclaimer on its website. It came specifically in response to reports that its graphics were appearing on an ASD-controlled website.
Remember, now, AdViewGlobal claims to have no affiliation with ASD — and yet its graphics appeared on an ASD-controlled website and then suddenly disappeared after they became the subject of videos, forum discussions and Blog posts. One of the graphics listed the street address of ASD’s headquarters in Quincy, Fla., as AdViewGlobal’s street address.
The Descent Into Infamy
One of the things that accompanied ASD on its descent into infamy was a series of impossibly butchered PR announcements. The tradition continues at AdViewGlobal, which appears to have the same PR personnel in place as ASD.
ASD, awaiting a ruling on the Sept. 30-Oct. 1 evidentiary hearing, announced a pending $200 million deal with Praebius Communications, a penny-stock company. The statement on the ASD Breaking News website was the work of an amateur and was removed after members began to question it loudly in forums.
Praebius, a Pinksheet stock, does not publish financial information. Its executives weren’t quoted in the ASD release, and there was no way to verify the $200 million claim. The financial claim struck members as a number that had been pulled out of thin air to serve a dual purpose: keeping hope alive, and informing a federal judge who was deciding if the ASD business model was legal that the company was about to get a huge cash infusion.
ASD deleted the Praebius announcement after it became clear that members intended to do their own research, ask tough questions and not accept the company’s word at face value. Nothing in the announcement was consistent with professionalism. It only led to more questions, more criticism.
Slow on the uptake, ASD then followed up the Praebius announcement with an announcement members could buy VOIP service from a firm with which it had become affiliated. (Why any firm would permit itself to be associated with an alleged $100 million Ponzi scheme is a discussion for another day.)
Andy Bowdoin told a conference-call audience it could get special pricing, positioning the VOIP service as a gift to the membership. This led to even more bad press for ASD. ASD couldn’t deliver ads, couldn’t address members’ questions during conference calls, couldn’t persuade a federal judge it was not a Ponzi scheme — but still could flog a VOIP service for commissions.
Not a peep has been heard from Bowdoin since he surrendered claims last month to tens of millions of dollars seized as the proceeds of a criminal enterprise and Ponzi scheme. He could sell VOIP to the members, herald a purported $200 million deal, but when it came time to announce the surrender to forfeiture, members had to read about it in the newspaper or on Blogs and forums.
Bowdoin also didn’t tell members about a second forfeiture complaint that had been filed in December against assets tied to the firm. Prosecutors said hundreds of thousands of dollars were used to fuel personal spending by Bowdoin family members.
Flash forward to yesterday. AdViewGlobal appears to be trying to make a fine distinction that it has no corporate legal ties to ASD. But the announcement it made was at odds with itself in so many places that, at best, it’s just another absurdity. In no case can it be taken seriously.
None of ASD’s actions is compatible with credibility, and yet AdViewGlobal — by some tortured construction — is trying to leech credibility from ASD by telling the world that its chief executive officer was an important officer in ASD.
It wouldn’t matter if Talbert, the chief executive officer, and Chuck Osmin, an ASD employee who doubles as AdViewGlobal’s PR flak and issued yesterday’s announcement, both no longer were employed by ASD and repudiated their previous employment. The fact remains that ASD was an alleged $100 million Ponzi scheme that surrendered its claims to tens of millions of seized dollars and very well might become the subject of a criminal prosecution.
Both Talbert and Osmin were involved in the forfeiture litigation (not as defendants, but through Pro-ASD court filings or testimony), and now both are working for AdViewGlobal. The fact the company won’t reveal the names of its owners and purportedly came to life offshore in the aftermath of the ASD debacle tells you everything you need to know.
AdViewGlobal is not credible because ASD was not credible. If anything, AdViewGlobal is even less credible than ASD. If it were credible, it would submit its business model to U.S. authorities for testing and pay the costs of compliance. One of the reasons it won’t do that is the ASD litigation. Another reason is that it can’t offer payment processing in the United States and needs to find ways to circumvent U.S. money-laundering, wire-fraud and mail-fraud laws.
On parts of its website, AdViewGlobal is using U.S.-based gmail addresses to conduct customer service. One is hardpressed to imagine how U.S. customers will fund accounts and engage in correspondence without engaging in wire fraud themselves.
The Age of the Portable Ponzi has begun. Promoters have ignored the ASD August forfeiture complaint, the December forfeiture complaint, Bowdoin’s surrender of the assets, a RICO lawsuit that asserts Bowdoin was the head of a racketeering enterprise involved in multiple schemes boosted by unnamed co-conspirators, Bowdoin’s previous entanglements with securities regulators that resulted in felony charges, Bowdoin’s history of spinning lies to separate people from their money.
Incredibly, AdViewGlobal now is employing ASD personnel, sharing a common executive, not disclosing information customers would deem important when making purchasing decisions (such as disclosing all previous litigation that resulted in the dismantling of autosurfs, the implications of selling or purchasing unregistered securities if you’re a U.S. resident, the implications of wire fraud and money-laundering, and Judge Collyer’s ruling in the ASD case, for starters).
UPDATED 5:25 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) Alfred Gerebizza has been charged with mail fraud and tax crimes in a superseding indictment in the Daniel Spitzer Ponzi case, which alleged both domestic and offshore fraud. The SEC initially charged Spitzer civilly in June 2010, accusing him of “moving investor money through a complex network of foreign bank and brokerage accounts” and spending more than $900,000 “in cash at the Wynn Las Vegas Casino.”
