PatrickPretty.com

Tag: Robert Craddock

BULLETIN: SEC Accuses Faith Sloan Of Violating Asset Freeze In TelexFree Case By Sending Thousands To ‘Changes Worldwide LLC,’ Company That Lists Zeek Figure Robert Craddock As Copyright Enforcer

From an SEC filing today that alleges Faith Sloan violated the TelexFree asset freeze by sending money to a “program” known as Changes Worldwide LLC. Redactions by PP Blog.

BULLETIN: (4th Update 10:01 a.m. EDT June 13 U.S.A.) The SEC has accused Faith Sloan of violating the asset freeze imposed against her in the TelexFree pyramid- and Ponzi case by sending nearly $15,000 to Changes Worldwide LLC for the purchase of “business promo packs.” On its website, Changes Worldwide identifies Robert Craddock as its copyright agent. He also is believed to be an affiliate for Changes Worldwide.

Whether the SEC would seek return of the money from Changes Worldwide was not immediately clear. Recipients of ill-gotten gains can become relief defendants in SEC actions.

Craddock emerged as a figure in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case, with the SEC asserting in 2012 that he encouraged affiliates not to cooperate with the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek case. The receiver said at the time that he had obtained information “indicating that large sums of Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.”

While a purported consultant for Zeek in July 2012, Craddock, citing alleged trademark and copyright violations, sought to shut down a Hubpages site by K. Chang that questioned the Zeek program, which the SEC and federal prosecutors later described as an $850 million fraud. K. Chang publishes the MLM Skeptic site.

One of the assertions against Sloan today by the SEC is that she had the sole power of direction and was the sole beneficiary of a real-estate trust, but amended trust documents after the TelexFree freeze to transfer her interest to her mother — in violation of the asset freeze. Sending money to Changes Worldwide and a separate entity known as Changes Trading LLC also violated the freeze, the SEC alleged.

The SEC said that it had linked Sloan to three transactions with Changes Worldwide on April 25, eight days after Sloan learned of the asset freeze. Two of the transactions were for $5,000 each, and a third was for $4,854, the SEC asserted.

On April 28, 11 days after she learned about the freeze, Sloan sent $3,990 to Changes Trading, using two separate checks for $1,995 each, the SEC alleged.

Neither of the “Changes” entities nor Craddock has been accused of wrongdoing, but the alleged Sloan transactions lead to questions about whether MLM promoters accused of fraud are hiding money in other “programs” and abusing trusts in bids to avoid detection and keep their interests in schemes intact.

A crime known as structuring also could be occurring if the transactions are set up to evade bank-reporting requirements. In a civil action against TelexFree in April, the Massachusetts Securities Division raised the issue of structuring.

The SEC said today that Sloan had asserted her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination over a TelexFree related matter involving the asset freeze cited in a preliminary injunction. The injunction requires her to identify her assets. She has not been charged criminally, but it is known that a criminal probe is under way.

Read a November 2013 review of Changes Worldwide on BehindMLM.com.

NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.

Jun 12, 2014
Banners Broker Cultists Rip Play From Zeek, AdSurfDaily, AdViewGlobal HYIP Scambook

Banners Broker members who log into their accounts are seeing this pop-up message: Source: Graphic published at RealScam.com

Whoever is pulling the linguistic strings at the Banners Broker HYIP cult operating globally online now is channeling Zeek Rewards, AdSurfDaily and AdViewGlobal in their final days.

Zeek, an $850 million Ponzi- and pyramid fraud that once suggested participants should change their toilet-paper dispensing habits if instructed to do so, threatened to ban members who didn’t stick to the company’s insidious, Stepfordian chant. It also planted the seed that it would use the courts to gag doubting voices and sue credit unions that dared to speak ill about its “program” that averaged a payout of 1.5 percent a day. And through proxies, Zeek made sure that other MLM companies and executives who’d dare question its outrageous claims knew that the Zeek eye in the sky was watching them.

AdSurfDaily, a $119 million Ponzi scheme that promised to pay 1 percent a day, announced that it had filled a pot with $750,000 in cash and would sue critics for tens of millions of dollars. (The U.S. Feds were so moved by the claim that they made sure it was included in an evidence exhibit used to seize more than $80 million in ASD cash.) Prior to the seizure, ASD’s Stepfordian wing made sure that doubters knew their doubts would be reported by right-thinking loyalists to “ASD legal.” After the seizure, some of the ASDers planted the seed that any fellow member who filed a remissions claim through the U.S. Department of Justice would get sued by their fellow members.

In 2009, after forming itself from the carcass of ASD’s MLM fraud scheme and on the brink of collapse itself, AdViewGlobal threatened to sue critics for purported copyright infringement. (Zeek, through purported “consultant” Robert Craddock, later would work the “infringement” gambit into its arsenal while planting the seed one or more Zeek lawyers would go after critics.)

To cement its thuggery, AVG, a Zeek- and ASD-like 1-percent-a day “program” that gathered millions of dollars, said it was watching what members said about it online and planted the seed it would seek to have the Internet connections of in-house critics shut down. AVG bizarrely (and incongruously) did these things while purporting to have “protectors” in its ranks and while purporting to enjoy U.S. and Florida Constitutional speech and commerce protections from its purported base of operations in Uruguay.

Now comes word that Banners Broker, an almost indescribably bizarre “program” whose online steroidal puppeteers have been stringing people along and picking pockets since at least 2012, has accidentally announced that it, too, has become a factory from which MLM thuggery is manufactured. Not only is Banners Broker watching members, the “program” says, its members also are watching members. The news first appeared on the RealScam.com antiscam forum.

Banners Broker, of course, wants members of its cyberspace cult to remain in their Stepfordian trances and not to notice they’re being manipulated like robots, so it has given its strong-arm bid an innocuous (if not wholesome-sounding) name: “Community Watch.”

Ready to projectile vomit?

Given the monitoring policy, individual members who’ve posted negative content should remove it, the “program” instructs. And members who observe other members posting negative content should contact the doubters and provide a copy of the “program’s” policy that bans negativity and threatens management-led account seizures.

On Feb. 12, Banners Broker will begin to take “a firmer stance against people that are speaking badly against Banners Broker,” the “program” bizarrely bleats.

“Affiliates found to be contributing to the negativity on the Internet will have their accounts locked,” the “program” threatens. “[T]hey will be banned from participating in the Banners Broker system and they will forfeit all of their inventory and revenue.”

Banners Broker appears also to be trying to chill nonmember critics.

“If you know of a site with content that is negative towards Banners Broker, we ask that you report it to the Community Watch,” the “program” instructs.

In June 2012, the PP Blog reported that a website selling “customers” to Zeek recruiters also was directing traffic to double-your-money Banners Broker and the 2-percent-a-day (precompounding) JSSTripler/JustBeenPaid HYIP scam purportedly operated by Frederick Mann.

On Jan. 17, 2013, the PP Blog reported it was receiving menacing communications about Banners Broker.

For additional background on bids to chill reporters or program members who publish information about scams and highly questionable “opportunities,” see this Dec. 27, 2012, PP Blog post: Our Choice For The Most Important PP Blog Post Of 2012.

Feb 8, 2014
URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: SEC Charges 3 Executives, 8 Promoters Of Alleged ‘Worldwide’ Pyramid Scheme Operating From Hong Kong, Canada And British Virgin Islands; ‘CKB’ And ‘CKB168’ Fraudsters Allegedly Targeted Asian-American Community, Agency Says
URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: 3RD UPDATE 5:46 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) The SEC says it has gained an asset freeze and charged three executives and eight promoters of a worldwide pyramid scheme operating through five entities from Hong Kong, Canada and the British Virgin Islands.

Promoters of the scheme, which “purportedly” sells Internet-based children’s educational courses, gathered at least $20 million “from U.S. investors, and millions of dollars more from investors in Canada, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other countries in Asia, the agency charged.

Entities known as CKB and CKB168 are “at the center of the scheme,” the SEC said. The complaint, which was brought on an emergency basis and initially filed under seal, is filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. U.S. District Judge Roslynn Mauskopf has granted an asset freeze. The seal has been lifted in the case.

“CKB has little or no real-world retail consumer sales to generate the extraordinary returns promised to investors,” the SEC said. “In fact, CKB has no apparent source of revenue other than money received from new investors. Bank records show that the bulk of the money raised has been paid out to accounts controlled by CKB executives and as commissions to promoters of the pyramid scheme.”

Various investment schemes with apparent footprints in Hong Kong have been pushed by online hucksters since the SEC moved against U.S. based Zeek Rewards in 2012. On Oct. 14, BehindMLM.com reported that a scheme known as WCM777 operating from Hong Kong through an entity in the British Virgin Islands suddenly announced it was closing its U.S. operations.

Whether WCM777 had promoters in common with the CKB entities was not immediately clear. What is clear is that the SEC has taken action against three MLM or MLM-like “programs” that promised outsize returns since August of last year, amid allegations that were selling unregistered securities as investment contracts. (These are Zeek Rewards in August 2012; Profitable Sunrise in April 2013; and the “CKB” entities through an emergency action filed Oct. 9 and announced today, after the seal was lifted yesterday.)

Accompanying the CKB actions was the issuance today by the SEC of an Investor Alert “about the dangers of potential investment scams involving pyramid schemes posing as multi-level marketing programs,” the SEC said. The Zeek and CKB cases are referenced in the Alert.

“CKB’s operators and promoters profited by abusing relationships of trust within the Asian-American community and promising investors they can earn more money by recruiting other investors instead of selling actual products,” said Antonia Chion, an associate director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “What CKB really sells is the false promise of easy wealth.”

Here is how the SEC described the eight U.S. promoters charged:
- Daliang (David) Guo is a China native and a resident of Coram, N.Y., who was among CKB’s first U.S. promoters. He currently sits atop an investment pyramid, and claims in a testimonial on the CKB website to have earned more than $1 million within eight months.
- Yao Lin is a resident of Fresh Meadows, N.Y., who was among CKB’s first U.S. promoters. He currently sits atop an investment pyramid, and claims in a CKB website testimonial to have earned more than $300,000. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank and credit card accounts he controls have received approximately $450,000 from CKB investors.
- Chih Hsuan (“Kiki”) Lin is a Taiwanese native and resident of Las Vegas who claims in a CKB website testimonial to have earned “one million USD” in her first two months of investing. She operates a website through which “CKB members” can log in to a password-protected area. She is within David Guo’s pyramid. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $1.8 million from CKB investors.
- Wen Chen Hwang (“Wendy Lee”) is a Taiwanese native and resident of Rowland Heights, Calif., who claims in a CKB website testimonial to have made $53,000 within four months. She is within Yao Lin’s pyramid. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $2.2 million from CKB investors.
- Toni Tong Chen is a resident of Hacienda Heights, Calif., and a certified public accountant who was formerly associated with a registered broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She and her husband claim to have earned six-digit commissions and in excess of a 100 percent return on their investment. They are connected to Wendy Lee and have made presentations at her weekly seminars in Los Angeles.
- Cheongwha (“Heywood”) Chang is a Chinese native and the husband of Toni Tong Chen. He was formerly associated with a registered broker-dealer and held securities licenses. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts that he and his wife control have received approximately $2.1 million from CKB investors.
- Joan Congyi Ma is a resident of Arcadia, Calif., who was formerly associated with a broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She is connected to Wendy Lee and has helped her organize seminars and other events in Los Angeles. In her CKB website testimonial, she references the day she met Yao Lin as her “lucky day.” The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $200,000 from CKB investors.
- Heidi Mao Liu is a resident of Diamond Bar, Calif., who was formerly associated with a broker-dealer and held securities licenses. She is connected to Wendy Lee and has provided testimonials at her seminars in Los Angeles. She also operates her own website that promotes the CKB scheme. The SEC’s complaint alleges that bank accounts she controls have received approximately $1.2 million from CKB investors.
YouTube video pitches and a claim that at least one promoter had acquired five properties in Las Vegas through the scheme were used to dupe the masses, the SEC said.

“Kiki Lin,” the SEC said, “exemplified the pitch in a videotaped recording posted to the Internet, telling potential investors that in the ‘pyramid triangle system, we spread it from one to ten, and ten to hundred, and hundred to thousand, thousand to ten thousand.’ Kiki Lin later added, ‘And for those who really want to make money, who are really hard working, in a short time you would all be like John,’ who she claimed ‘made money to buy five houses in Las Vegas.’”

The charged executives include:
- Rayla Melchor Santos, whom the SEC said is a Philippines national “who is featured on the CKB website as its founder. Santos is known as “Teacher Sam” and “has traveled to New York and other areas of the U.S. to participate in meetings and seminars to promote CKB.”
- Hung Wai (“Howard”) Shern, whom the SEC said is a Canadian citizen and resident of Hong Kong “who is featured on the CKB website as the director of CKB168 International Marketing.” And Shern “is one of the signatories to bank accounts used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, and has traveled to New York and other areas of the U.S. to participate in meetings and seminars to promote CKB.”
- Rui Ling (“Florence”) Leung, whom the SEC said is a Hong Kong national “who is described on the CKB website as its chief financial officer. And Leung “is one of the signatories to bank accounts used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, and approximately $4.6 million has been transferred from CKB bank accounts to bank accounts in her name and the names of entities she controls. Leung portrays herself as a professional investment adviser who will assist CKB in its supposed future public offering.”
From the SEC complaint (italics added):

2. Through publicly available websites, promotional materials, seminars, and videos posted to the internet, as well as through other efforts intended to create the appearance of a legitimate enterprise, Defendants have falsely portrayed CKB as a profitable multi-level marketing company that sells web-based children’s educational courses.

3. What CKB really sells, however, is the false promise of easy wealth. Potential purchasers of CKB products must invest in CKB to get one of its courses. Defendants promise that those investors will earn exponential, risk-free returns. In addition to the course, each purchaser/investor receives “Profit Reward Points” (“Prpts”) with a purported value of $750.

Investors are told that they will eam “passive” returns in the form of Prpt dividends and 2-for-1 splits, and that they will be able to buy and sell their Prpts in an online exchange accessible through the CKB website. Investors also are promised that they will earn massive retums by converting their Prpts into shares of CKB stock when the company conducts an initial public offering (“IPO”) on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange sometime during 2014. Some Defendants allege that these returns can be achieved without any risk of loss.

4. Despite Defendants’ representations to the contrary, the Prpts are worthless and cannot be meaningfully traded, sold or exchanged. Nor has CKB taken required steps to prepare for the promised IPO and, in fact, does not meet the Hong Kong Exchange’s current listing requirements. Even if the IPO were to occur, CKB would have to go public as one of the world’s largest companies in order to honor conversions of the ever-expanding universe of Prpts.

Still, while essential to the scheme, Prpts are not its only incentive. The scheme’s ultimate goal is to tum investors into recruiters. CKB lures investors with the promise of even greater “active” returns, in the form of commissions and bonuses, for recruiting new, “downline” participants into the program. In contrast to Prpts, active recruitment is the only way to make actual significant money.

The CKB defendant entities include:
- WIN168 Biz Solutions Limited (WIN168), which the SEC described as a “private Hong Kong company” that “maintained bank accounts at HSBC in Hong Kong that were used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors located in the United States and elsewhere. Those accounts received wire transfers from banks located in New York.”
- CKB168 Biz Solution Inc., which the SEC described as a Canadian company in Toronto that “has maintained bank accounts at TD Bank in Canada that have been used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors.”
- CKB 168 Limited, which the SEC said shares a business address with WIN168 and operated from Hong Kong. Its alleged “sole director is CKB168 Biz Solution Limited (“CKB168 Biz Ltd.”), a British Virgin Islands corporation with its office in Tortola,” the SEC said, further alleging that “CKB168 Ltd. maintained a bank account at HSBC in Hong Kong that was used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors, including wires coming from New York.”
- CKB 168 Holdings Limited, which the SEC described as sharing a business address with WIN168 and CKB168 Ltd. “Sample stock certificates shown to prospective investors indicate that CKB 168 Holdings is the entity whose shares have been offered to the public,” the SEC said.
- Cyber Kids Best Education Limited, which the SEC described as the controller of “five bank accounts at Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. in Hong Kong, at least two of which were used to receive and transfer funds from CKB investors located in the United States.”
“WIN168, CKB168 Biz, CKB168 Holdings, CKB168 Ltd., and CyberKids Best have never been registered with the Commission in any capacity and have never registered any offering of securities under the Securities Act or any class of securities under the Exchange Act,” the SEC charged.
Oct 17, 2013
No Immediate Comment From Zeek Receiver On Third-Party Lawsuit That References Zeek Pitchman T. LeMont Silver And 100 ‘Does’; MLMers Sue Each Other — And Receiver’s Law Firm Represents Plaintiffs In One Of The Cases

UPDATED 8:48 A.M. EDT (MARCH 24, U.S.A.) Oz at BehindMLM broke the news that eAdGear Inc. and GoFunPlaces Inc. have sued Randal Williams and JubiMax LLC (and others) — and that Williams earlier had sued eAdGear and GoFunPlaces (and others).

You’ll see a reference to Randal Williams in this August 2011 PP Blog story about a scheme known as “Fast Profits Daily,” a cycler matrix pitched in part from the Ponzi boards. Fast Profits Daily had promoter ties to Jeff Long’s AutoXTen cycler matrix. Two of the infamous claims surrounding AutoXTen was that $10 could fetch $200,000 very quickly and that the “program” was suited for churches.

Long was fresh from the NarcThatCar and DataNetworkAffiliates MLM scams when AutoXTen was gaining a head of steam. (Memory Lane: DNA misspelled the name of its own departing CEO while at once claiming domain registration in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven.)

There is plenty of offshore intrigue in the developing stories about eAdGear/GoFunPlaces/Williams/JubiMax matters, too.

As for Fast Profits Daily? Well, it claimed that “ALL Purchases are FINAL and NO REFUNDS or CHARGEBACKS are allowed. Any attempts to acquire a refund or chargeback constitute theft and fraud, and are grounds for legal prosecution.”

Pardon us while we vomit as we remember recent MLM history and the interconnectivity of schemes and report on some new history in the making . . .

The stories by Behind MLM on the allegations flying between parties in the matters pertaining to eAdGear, GoFunPlaces, Williams and JubiMax aren’t apt to make the trade feel any better about itself, perhaps particularly since at least 30 regulatory agencies have issued cease-and-desist orders or Investor Alerts on the Profitable Sunrise scheme.

MLMers rushed to Profitable Sunrise, too. This they did both before and after after the August 2012 Ponzi complaint by the SEC against the Zeek Rewards “program.” And they did it after the attorney general of North Carolina issued a warning on “reload scams.”

The PP Blog yesterday sought comment from the Zeek Rewards receivership on the actions involving eAdGear, GoFunPlaces, Williams and JubiMax.

That’s because eAdGear once filed a lawsuit against ZeekRewards.com, amid some strange circumstances.

And it’s also because McGuireWoods, the law firm for the Zeek receivership, also is representing eAdGear and GoFunPlaces in their lawsuit against Williams and JubiMax and 100 “Does.” (It is not the Charlotte-based Zeek receivership suing Williams, JubiMax and the Does, it is Los Angeles-based attorneys from the same national law firm hired by the Zeek receiver.)

Whether Kenneth D. Bell, the receiver in the Zeek case, was aware of the McGuireWoods-managed lawsuits against Williams and JubiMax is unclear. The receivership did not immediately reply to emails seeking comment.

Also unclear is whether the lawsuits could pose any conflict for the receivership.

In the eAdGear/GoFunPlaces lawsuit against Williams/JubiMax, the firms raise the name of T. LeMont Silver in the body of the complaint.

Silver is a former Zeek pitchman who participated in a conference call with Zeek figure Robert Craddock to condemn the SEC and the receiver for their actions in the Zeek Ponzi case.

Silver recently has been musing about “asset protection things” — this after the Zeek receiver has publicly stated that he has “obtained information indicating that large sums of Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.”

Meanwhile, former Zeek pitchman Gregory Baker also participated in conference calls with Craddock. After Zeek, Baker became a pitchman for GoFunPlaces.

Mar 23, 2013
UPDATE: Craddock To Zeek Troops: Receiver Is Still Evil — And BOLO For Commies And Nazis

UPDATED 7:03 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) Zeek Rewards figure Robert Craddock told his conference-call audience last night that the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek case was still evil.

For good measure, Craddock pointed listeners to a video that planted the seed there is a Communist or budding Hitler behind every tree. (These evildoers, if our take on the video is correct, apparently are descendants of white-haired, briefcase-wielding evildoers first spotted in the Peoples Republic of California at Berkeley in 1992.)

Craddock further suggested that the PP Blog has backed away from Zeek, apparently because it has seen the evil of its ways after assessing all of the government evil Craddock and team have exposed and concluding that, yes, the U.S. government and the receiver are evil.

The PP Blog has made no such conclusion. (The Blog believes the SEC is correct in its take on matters and that the receiver is correct on his take on matters.)

In other news, Craddock apparently now has concluded that Blogger Troy Dooly is less evil than he was a couple of weeks ago and that the judge overseeing the Zeek Ponzi case is less of a political hack than he was several weeks ago.

Meanwhile, Craddock put out a casting call for a reporter interested in exposing all the government evil its Zeek case has exposed.

That is all.

(Background: See Dec. 3, 2012, PP Blog editorial: EDITORIAL: The ‘Zeek-Step,’ The Stepfordian Shuffle And The Stalinist HYIP.)

Jan 11, 2013
LETTER TO READERS: Our Choice For The Most Important PP Blog Post Of 2012

Dear Readers,

The PP Blog’s choice for the “Most Important” story to appear on the Blog in 2012 is this one, dated July 28: “Site Critical Of Zeek Goes Missing After HubPages Receives Trademark ‘Infringement’ Complaint Attributed To Rex Venture Group LLC — But North Carolina-Based Rex Not Listed As Trademark Owner; Florida Firm That IS Listed As Owner Says It Has ‘No Knowledge’ Of Complaint.”

The story tells the bizarre tale of how purported Zeek “consultant” Robert Craddock, beginning on July 22, tried to gag K. Chang, a Zeek critic.

Our reasoning for selecting the Craddock tale appears below . . .

** __________________________________ **

UPDATED 1:30 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) This Blog is well aware that some MLMers would have you believe that nothing that appears here is important. The “case” against the Blog normally involves ad hominem attacks, along with bids to change the subject or cloud issues. Some of the campaigns against the PP Blog have been almost comical, falling along lines such as these: ASD can’t be a Ponzi scheme because it rained on Tuesday. Your [sic] an idiot and looser [sic] !!!!!

Other campaigns have been much more menacing.

One of the least-appreciated aspects of the Zeek Rewards story is that Zeek launched after Bernard Madoff made the word “Ponzi” a part of the national (and international) consciousness. Setting aside Zeek’s epic legal problems, Zeek and its “defenders” have a PR problem from which they’ll never recover. In short, it is fatal. The reason that it’s fatal is that it creates a dynamic that is virtually unique to the MLM HYIP sphere: While the rest of the world rails against Ponzi schemes and Ponzi schemers, the MLM HYIP sphere defends them.

But it gets stranger than that. Certain inhabitants of the HYIP sphere in effect are lobbying for the legalization of Ponzi schemes to make their lives more convenient. To this group, the answer to Ponzi schemes is even more Ponzi schemes. Their message is remarkably similar to the message of the gun lobby, which appears to be arguing that the answer to gun violence is even more guns — in strategic locations, of course, perhaps in educational institutions at the grade-school level through college. (And maybe at movie theaters and at the scene of rural house fires, in case first responders such as firefighters and EMTs encounter an ambush.)

You’ve heard by now that the rural town of Webster, N.Y., turned into Israel last week, we’re sure.

In fairness to the gun lobby, it must be pointed out that HYIP “defenders” who are lobbying for more Ponzi schemes even as the gun lobby lobbies for more guns have less legal standing than the gun lobby. Guns already are legal. Ponzi schemes are not.

But, getting back to Zeek’s PR problem . . .

Madoff was exposed in 2008 as a Ponzi schemer, a financial criminal of unprecedented hubris. Not only did Zeek debut after Madoff, it came after Scott Rothstein was exposed (in 2009) as a racketeer/Ponzi schemer — and after AdSurfDaily, a purported MLM “advertising” company, was exposed (in 2008 and 2009) as the largest online Ponzi scheme ever and was sued by its own members amid allegations of racketeering.

For some Zeek promoters, this well-known fact set makes them vulnerable to charges they are nothing less than members of an organized mob of habitual criminals who thrive by choosing to be willfully blind.

But, incredibly, it gets even stranger . . .

Zeek had members in common with AdSurfDaily and, like AdSurfDaily, told members that a purported “advertising” function was central to its business model. Meanwhile, Zeek became popular in North Carolina, after the infamous Black Diamond Ponzi caper was exposed in that very state. (Among other things, the Back Diamond fraud led to criminal charges being filed against a bank.)

Along those lines, Zeek (in May) began to show signs that it was experiencing banking problems after it had become popular in a region known to have served up another colossal mess, this one in nearby South Carolina. (The South Carolina mess was known as the “3 Hebrew Boys” scheme. It resulted in the longest Ponzi scheme sentences in the history of the South Carolina federal courts and, like AdSurfDaily and Zeek, served up a heaping helping of the bizarre, including claims by “sovereign citizens” that prosecutors had no authority over them.)

Moreover, the Zeek scheme for which some “defenders” continue to cheer featured recruitment commissions on two levels (like AdSurfDaily) and an “RPP” payout (like ASD’s 1-percent-a-day “rebates”). Finally, the Zeek scheme came to the fore after the U.S. Secret Service described ASD as a “criminal enterprise” and after the Attorney General of the United States made a special public appearance in Florida — fertile recruitment grounds for schemes such as Zeek and the stomping grounds of Madoff and Rothstein — to announce that the Justice Department was serious about putting people in jail for ravaging the U.S. economy with their Ponzi schemes.

“Palm Beach is, in many respects, ground zero for the $65 billion Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard Madoff — the largest investor fraud case in our nation’s history,” Eric Holder said on Jan. 8, 2010, in southern Florida. “Before the house of cards Madoff built collapsed in 2008, before he was sentenced to 150 years in prison last June, before he became a notorious criminal on the cover of newspapers around the world, he was one of your neighbors.

“His former home sits just north of us,” Holder continued. “An 8,700-square-foot mansion that’s worth . . . well, we’ll know what its worth once the U.S. Marshals Service auctions it off and the proceeds are distributed to Madoff’s victims.”

Holder’s words are best viewed as a warning against willful blindness: Neither victim nor perpetrator be. There is unqualified pain and misery for both.

Despite Holder’s appearance in Florida — despite his reference to Madoff’s “house of cards” — AdSurfDaily promoters Todd Disner and Dwight Owen Schweitzer later sued the United States, claiming that its Ponzi case against ASD was a “house of cards.” Naturally they made this claim even as they were promoting Zeek.

And from what region were they promoting Zeek? Why, Southern Florida, of course, the same region Holder visited in 2010 to throw down the gauntlet against Ponzi schemers and their enablers.

Amid the historical circumstances cited above, Zeek Rewards began to encounter some heat from the media and from its own members. Some of the members did not understand why things at Zeek appeared to be so circuitous and why they were being asked to use payment processors such as AlertPay and SolidTrustPay that had been associated with fraud scheme after fraud scheme operating online, including ASD.

What to do if you’re Zeek?

Well, according to Florida resident Robert Craddock, a self-described Zeek consultant, you hire, well, Robert Craddock — and you use Robert Craddock to go after Zeek critics such as K. Chang.

The Most Important Story Of 2012

In the PP Blog’s view, the most important story to appear on the Blog in 2012 is this one, titled, “Site Critical Of Zeek Goes Missing After HubPages Receives Trademark ‘Infringement’ Complaint Attributed To Rex Venture Group LLC — But North Carolina-Based Rex Not Listed As Trademark Owner; Florida Firm That IS Listed As Owner Says It Has ‘No Knowledge’ Of Complaint.”

The story details efforts in July by Craddock to have K. Chang’s Zeek “Hub” at HubPages removed from the Internet just weeks before the SEC accused Zeek of being a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid fraud. By early estimates, the alleged Zeek fraud was about five times larger than ASD in pure dollar volume ($600 million compared to $120 million) and perhaps 20 times larger in terms of the membership base (2 million compared to 100,000).

Incredibly, Craddock went after K. Chang after Deputy Attorney James Cole, speaking in Mexico, said that international fraud schemes have been known to “bring frivolous libel cases against individuals who expose their criminal activities.” And Cole also pointed out that fraudsters have a means of “exploit[ing] legitimate actors” and may rely on shell companies and offshore bank accounts to launder criminal proceeds.

If ever a company exploited legitimate actors, it was Zeek. Kenneth D. Bell, the court-appointed receiver, says there were approximately 840,000 Zeek losers who funded the ill-gotten gains of 77,000 winners. And Bell also says he has “obtained information indicating that large sums of Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.”

There can be no doubt that some of those winners are longtime residents of the woeful valley of willful blindness. Not only do they “play” HYIP Ponzis for profit, they now publicly announce their intent to keep their winnings. Zeek has exposed the epicenter of willful blindness, the criminal underworld of the Internet. It is easy enough to view Craddock’s efforts as a means of institutionalizing willful blindness, first by seeking to chill speech and, second, by scrubbing the web of information that encourages readers to be discriminating so they won’t be duped by a Ponzi fraudster.

Bizarrely, it appears as though someone inside of Zeek believed it prudent to hire Craddock to go after K. Chang. If that weren’t enough, only days later Zeek used its Blog to plant the seed that unnamed “North Carolina Credit Unions” were committing slander against Zeek.

After the SEC brought the Zeek Ponzi complaint in August, Craddock quickly went in to fundraising mode. As incredible as it sounds, ASD’s Todd Disner — also of Zeek — was on the line with him.

What Craddock did was deplorable. It was as though he slept through the past four years of Ponzi history, all the cases that showcase the markers of fraud schemes and all the government warnings to be cautious. (Nongovernment/quasigovernment entities such as FINRA also publish such warnings, like this one on HYIP fraud schemes outlined by the PP Blog.)

The FINRA warning was published in 2010, prior to Zeek but after the Legisi, Pathway To Prosperity and ASD schemes were exposed. Legisi operator Gregory McKnight potentially faces 15 years in federal prison. He was charged both civilly (SEC) and criminally (U.S. Secret Service) — and Legisi pitchmen Matthew John Gagnon also was charged civilly and criminally by the same agencies. The SEC called Gagnon a “threat to the investing public.”

Any number of Zeek promoters pose a similar threat. They are at least equally willfully blind.

It is clear that some Zeek promoters also were promoting JSSTripler/JustBeenPaid, the debacle-in-waiting purportedly organized by Frederick Mann, a former ASD promoter. JSS/JBP has morphed into “ProfitClicking” amid reports of the “retirement” of Mann. Now, ProfitClicking “defenders” are threatening lawsuits against critics.

Naturally the stories advanced by ProfitClicking “defenders” are being improved by “defenders” of other obvious fraud schemes such as BannersBroker. A BannersBroker “defender” is over at RealScam.com — an antiscam site — suggesting that RealScam is a terrorist organization.

My God.

These claims are being made just days after Zeek figure Robert Craddock suggested he had contacts in law enforcement who were going to charge Blogger Troy Dooly with cyber harassment.

It wouldn’t sell as fiction.

Craddock’s bid to gag K. Chang easily was the most important story on the PP Blog in 2012. It’s the one that signaled that things are destined only to get crazier in MLM La-La Land and that the threat to U.S. national security only will grow.

Dec 27, 2012
Florida Man Who Hosts Zeek Calls Featuring Robert Craddock Was Winner In Botfly LLC Ponzi Scheme

UPDATED 3:57 P.M. ET (U.S.A.) Gregory Baker, a Florida man who hosts calls featuring Robert Craddock in the aftermath of the SEC’s Ponzi-scheme case against Zeek Rewards, is listed as a winner in the Botfly LLC Ponzi scheme case, one of the Sunshine State’s ugliest fraud schemes.

Prosecutors said that David Lewalski, Botfly’s now-imprisoned operator, tried to dupe investors into not cooperating with investigators and to coach investors on their testimony. The SEC last week accused Craddock of encouraging Zeek affiliates “not to cooperate” with Kenneth D. Bell, the court appointed receiver.

No charges have been brought against Craddock.

Court records show that Baker, who has used an address in the Tampa suburb of Valrico, was sued for his Botfly winnings by Michael E. Moecker, the court-appointed receiver in the Botfly case. Other records show that Baker presided over a now-defunct Florida entity known as Integrity Currency Traders LLC.

Integrity was formed on March 15, 2010. Less than three weeks later — on April 1, 2010 — then-Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum alleged that Botfly was a massive Ponzi scheme that affected at least 550 investors, gathered tens of millions of dollars and got its name from “an insect whose larvae burrow under the skin of mammals and eat their flesh until they mature into an adult fly.”

Bell asserted last week that he had “obtained information indicating that large sums of [Zeek] Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.” The receiver did not identify winners who may be hiding assets.

Moecker sued Baker in December 2011, alleging that Baker had received $8,580 in ill-gotten gains from Botfly, a purported Forex company prosecutors said promised a return on “promissory notes” of 10 percent a month. Under the terms of a settlement with the receiver, Baker agreed on Jan. 31, 2012 — only weeks after being sued — to pay the Botfly receivership estate $7,722, according to court filings. The sum represented a discount of $858 from Baker’s alleged winnings.

Zeek planted the seed that it provided a return of 1.5 percent a day.

Whether Baker was a member of Zeek when he paid back his Botfly winnings is unclear. In August 2012, the SEC described Zeek as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme that potentially had defrauded more than 1 million people. Baker now is listed on a website styled gofunplaces.info as a member of the “Top Team” and a leader of Go Fun Places, a nascent MLM program.

Lewalski operated Botfly in part from the Florida home of his 82-year-old mother, according to prosecutors.

After McCollum sued Lewalski/Botfly, Lewalski chartered a private Gulfstream IV jet at a cost of $172,744 to fly from the United States to Belgium, prosecutors said. He eventually became the target of a federal criminal probe and, in November 2011, was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison. Moecker, the receiver, sued Baker a month later.

Lewalski became infamous for wretched conduct before, during and after the Botfly probe. He directed conspiracy theories at investigators, complaining about “recent ‘Orwellian’ totalitarian tactics” allegedly employed by U.S. investigators in Ponzi scheme cases. He described a female attorney working for the receiver as a “c[$%!]” and a “Nazi,” and further described a female investigator for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) as “nuts” and a “bitch” — all while seeking to obstruct the Botfly probe, according to prosecutors.

After the SEC brought the Zeek Ponzi prosecution, Craddock dropped the name of McCollum in a conference call, describing the former Attorney General now in private practice at the SNR Denton law firm as a good friend. Craddock’s efforts to secure counsel through SNR Denton for a purportedly “protected” group of Zeek affiliates upset by the actions of the SEC and the appointment of a receiver in the Zeek case ultimately failed.

On the line with Craddock in one of his Zeek-related conference calls was Todd Disner, a Zeek pitchman and a figure in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme story. McCollum sued ASD in 2008. His office later provided the names of ASD victims to the Feds as part of remissions program by which ASD members received compensation as crime victims from proceeds seized by the U.S. Secret Service in 2008. In November 2011, Disner sued Rust Consulting Inc., the remissions administrator. A federal judge eventually tossed Disner’s claim against Rust. That claim was brought in the same case in which Disner sued the United States, alleging that ASD was a legitimate enterprise and that the government had violated his Constitutional rights by seizing ASD’s database and business records.

A judge tossed Disner’s claims against the government, too. He is now appealing. Disner’s co-plaintiff in the case was fellow ASD and Zeek pitchman Dwight Owen Schweitzer, a former attorney whose license was suspended in Connecticut.

On the line with Craddock in another Zeek conference call was T. LeMont Silver. Like ASD’s Andy Bowdoin, Silver was a pitchman for a scheme known as OneX. In April, about four months before the SEC’s Zeek action, federal prosecutors described OneX as a “fraudulent scheme” and pyramid that was recycling money in ASD-like fashion. ASD was a Ponzi scheme that gathered at least $119 million, according to prosecutors.

Zeek appears not to have been Silver’s first encounter with an alleged Ponzi scheme. During the call with Craddock, Silver identified himself as a victim of a separate Ponzi scheme he did not name. He complained bitterly during the call about the purported lack of action by an unnamed receiver in the second scheme.

Craddock has been leading a chorus of boos against the SEC and the receiver in the Zeek case, planting seeds of doubt that Zeek was a Ponzi scheme. Court filings suggest that Zeek winners potentially have tens of millions of dollars in clawback exposure in the Zeek case.

When Baker was sued by the receiver in the Botfly case, the lawsuit effectively was filed on the same theory the Zeek receiver is using: that proceeds from a Ponzi scheme are ill-gotten gains. Whether Baker has exposure as a Zeek winner is unclear.

What is clear is that Craddock says reporters are spreading misinformation about Zeek. In a call last week, Craddock said he intended to file a police report against Blogger Troy Dooly after hearing from Zeek members who complained about how Dooly is covering the Zeek fallout on his MLMHelpDesk Blog.

Dooly once was a fan of Zeek and has acknowledged he was reimbursed for certain expenses by Zeek while covering Zeek. His reports on the scheme apparently have become too negative for Craddock, who once spoke positively of Dooly.

“I am always looking for a new Epic Adventure, so this should be fun to experience,” Dooly said on his Blog on Friday, in response to Craddock’s claims that he’ll use police contacts against Dooly.

As was the case when he dropped McCollum’s name while collecting funds to challenge the actions of the SEC and the receiver in the Zeek case, Craddock last week dropped the name of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement in his remarks about the police action he has planned against Dooly.

Dooly, Craddock ventured, needed to be charged with cyber harassment and gotten “rid of” by law enforcement.

Whether FDLE would take kindly to Craddock’s dropping of its name was not immediately clear.

In the 2010 Botfly case, McCollum’s office said this (italics added):

The order to freeze assets and the injunction were obtained yesterday after an investigation by a dedicated team in the Attorney General’s Office that works under the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act, a new law championed last year by the Attorney General and bill sponsors Representative Tom Grady and Senator Garrett Richter. The law provides the Attorney General’s Office with greater authority to pursue investment and securities fraud.

Dec 24, 2012
BULLETIN: Zeek Receiver Says ‘Large Sums . . . May Have Been Transferred By Net Winners To Other Entities In Order To Hide Or Shelter Those Assets’

BULLETIN: (UPDATED 2:34 P.M. ET U.S.A.) The court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case has advised a federal judge that he “has obtained information indicating that large sums of Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.”

The dramatic assertion by receiver Kenneth D. Bell that Zeek winners may have hidden cash appeared in a motion to Senior U.S. District Judge Graham C. Mullen to compel certain alleged Zeek “winners” to produce documents in advance of anticipated clawback actions.

Bell’s move may send shudders across the HYIP sphere because it signals an effort to unmask bids by willfully blind hucksters and professional Ponzi players — known derisively as “pimps” — to benefit from serial scamming on a national and international scale. It is known, for instance, that some Zeek participants also pitched AdSurfDaily, which the U.S. Secret Service described in 2008 — at least two years before the launch of Zeek — as an international Ponzi scheme that had gathered tens of millions of dollars.

ASD operator Andy Bowdoin pleaded guilty to wire fraud in May. In August, he was sentenced to 78 months in federal prison.

HYIP schemes thrive in part because serial scammers race from scheme to scheme to scheme while turning blind eyes to obvious markers of fraud, including purported returns that dwarf the marketplace and are unusually consistent. Zeek planted the seed that it provided a daily return of between 1 percent and 2 percent. In August, the SEC said Zeek’s payout “consistently has averaged approximately 1.5% per day.”

Zeek operator Paul R. Burks, the SEC charged, “unilaterally and arbitrarily” determined the daily dividend rate to give “investors the false impression that the business is profitable.”

In 2009, the U.S. Secret Service effectively accused Bowdoin of doing the same thing. ASD purported to pay 1 percent a day. In August 2012, the Secret Service said it also was investigating Zeek. Court filings in the ASD case show that some members of ASD established entities through which to receive proceeds from ASD. One was described as a “ministry of giving,” for instance. Another was described as a nonprofit religious entity.

The Secret Service described ASD as a “criminal enterprise” that directed tainted proceeds potentially to thousands and thousands of participants while scamming the very people it purported to be helping earn money through its 1-percent-a-day revenue-sharing “program.”

Zeek also described itself as a revenue-sharing program and, like ASD, preemptively denied that anything untoward was occurring. Burks did not contest the SEC’s case against his firm, neither admitting nor denying wrongdoing. ASD’s Bowdoin eventually acknowledged that he was at the helm of a massive Ponzi scheme and that ASD had never operated lawfully from its inception in 2006 through it collapse in 2008.

Bell also revealed in the filing that he had filed paperwork in “all” 94 U.S. federal court districts to inform judges and court officials that he was presiding over the receivership ordered by Mullen in August after the SEC described Zeek as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme operated through Rex Venture Group LLC (RVG) and Burks. The move was designed to consolidate jurisdiction over clawback actions in a single place: Mullen’s courtroom in the Western District of North Carolina, the home base of Zeek.

Among other things, Bell is seeking “All documents constituting or relating to any communication involving or related to RVG.”

“The Receiver has asked for these documents to learn more about how the recipient was involved in Zeek, portrayed the scheme to others, solicited others, and otherwise conducted activities related to Zeek,” Bell said in court filings.

Meanwhile, Bell is seeking “All documents constituting or related to any communication to any affiliate, vendor, customer or client of RVG related to RVG.” At the same time, he is seeking “Documents sufficient to show all user names, passwords, email addresses and accounts used . . . in connection with RVG.”

That information is needed because many “individuals used multiple user names, and this information will clarify which user names a given net winner used,” Bell advised Mullen. “In addition, the account information will help to allow the Receiver to verify the financial figures calculated from RVG’s records.”

Bell’s motion to compel specifically references Zeek affiliates Robert Craddock, David Sorrells, David Kettner and Mary Kettner as the recipients of subpoenas from the receivership. In October, Bell mailed a first wave of subpoenas to about 1,200 Zeek affiliates. He effectively is seeking the same information from them that he is seeking from Craddock, the Kettners and Sorrells.

Craddock, the Kettners and Sorrells “have failed to produce any of the documents requested by the Receiver despite multiple requests,” Bell advised Mullen. “Therefore, the Receiver has filed a motion to compel production of a portion of the documents originally requested by the Receiver.”

The Kettner and Sorrells potentially have nearly $2 million in combined clawback exposure, according to court filings. Craddock’s exposure is unclear. He has referred to himself as a Zeek “consultant.”

One of the authorities Bell pointed to in advance of Zeek clawback actions and in his motion to compel the production of documents is a case involving Michael Quilling, an attorney for Craddock, the Kettners and Sorrells. Quilling himself has presided over SEC receiverships.

Bell pointed out to Mullen that Quilling once sued the estate of a a deceased individual who’d received proceeds from the Frederick J. Gilliland Ponzi scheme in 2002. That lawsuit was filed on the same legal theory Bell is pursuing in the Zeek case: that recipients of fraudulent proceeds from a Ponzi scheme are not entitled to keep them.

See post on ASDUpdates.

Dec 20, 2012
URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: SEC Files Motion In Zeek Case To Oppose Appointment Of Examiner; In Blistering Memo, Agency Accuses Robert Craddock Of Encouraging Affiliates ‘Not To Cooperate With The Receiver’

URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: (UPDATED 11:58 A.M. ET (U.S.A.) The SEC has gone to federal court in the Western District of North Carolina to oppose a motion by Zeek “winners” to appoint an “examiner” over all Zeek affiliates. In a blistering, 12-page memo, the agency accused Zeek figure Robert Craddock of encouraging Zeek affiliates “not to cooperate” with Kenneth D. Bell, the court appointed receiver.

“Moreover,” the SEC claimed, “Craddock has asserted (incorrectly) that the SEC has acknowledged to his lawyers that the SEC has doubts or concerns about its case and is looking for ways to ‘back out’ in order to allow ZeekRewards to re-start its operations. Another Quilling client, David Kettner has repeated assertions similar to those made by Craddock in written communications to former ZeekRewards affiliates.”

The agency also confirmed in its filing that its Zeek investigation was ongoing. The “confidential nature” of the probe, the agency said, potentially could make it difficult to respond to motions filed by opposition attorneys.

There could come a time, the SEC said, that it would ask “to provide the Court with additional information under seal or in a closed hearing.”

The SEC’s filing was dated yesterday — the same day Bell also asked Senior U.S. District Judge not to approve the sought-after appointment of Dallas attorney Michael J. Quilling as examiner. Quilling, Bell said, had an obvious conflict of interest. The SEC argued along the same lines.

Quilling, the SEC said, is representing “certain significant net ‘winners’ in the ZeekRewards Ponzi scheme alleged in the Complaint” and seeks “to have himself appointed ‘Representative for Affiliates,’ provided with counsel, and compensated out of the Receivership Estate.”

From the SEC’s motion (italics added):

The Quilling Motion suffers from several obvious flaws:

(1) The Motion offers no compelling factual or legal basis for the Court to consider appointing a “Representative for Affiliates” – the Commission continues to work closely with and monitor the Receiver to ensure that as much money as possible is returned to injured investors in the most efficient manner possible;

(2) Appointment of a “Representative for Affiliates” would serve only to complicate this already complex matter, obstruct the Receiver’s ability to efficiently marshal Receivership Assets, and significantly and unnecessarily deplete the pool of assets available to be distributed to injured investors (given that Quilling and [Charlotte attorney Rodney E.] Alexander seek to be compensated from Receivership Assets); and

(3) The interests of Quilling and Alexander’s current clients – significant net “winners” in the Ponzi scheme alleged in the Complaint – are diametrically opposed to the vast majority of ZeekRewards investors that were net “losers” in the Ponzi scheme.

One of the potential issues is whether Craddock — through his Florida-based entity Fun Club USA — gathered money from Zeek losers and used it to bolster the aims of Zeek winners in the early days after the SEC’s Aug. 17 Ponzi complaint. Such an act potentially could have put losers in opposition to their own best interests, given that Bell intends to file clawback lawsuits against winners to help fund the receivership estate.

In its motion, the SEC said that Fun Club USA appears to have been formed 11 days after the SEC’s actions and that it and other nonparties had “yet to explain why an entity formed after the Court froze ZeekRewards assets and appointed the Receiver should be heard on the subject matter” of the motion to appoint an examiner.

Read the SEC motion.

Dec 18, 2012
BULLETIN: Zeek Receiver Opposes Appointment Of ‘Examiner’; Zeek Cheerleaders, ZTeamBiz Missives Get A Mention; Let Them ‘Employ Counsel At Their Own Expense,’ Bell Urges Judge

“The ZeekRewards scheme has claimed hundreds of thousands of victims who lost hundreds of millions of dollars at the hands of the scheme’s winners who solicited their participation. Now, apparently not appreciating the irony, the lawyer for hundreds of the largest net winners asks the Court to pay him to be an ‘examiner’ or ‘representative for the affiliates,’ yet again at the expense of the scheme’s victims. The requested appointment is unnecessary and ill-advised because it would duplicate and complicate this Court’s, the Receiver’s, and the SEC’s efforts to compensate the victims, not to mention directly reduce the Receivership Assets available to pay them. Furthermore, the individual whom the net winners recommend for appointment (or more correctly who recommends his own appointment) ignores the inherent conflict of interest in seeking to somehow represent both the scheme’s ‘winners’ and ‘losers,’ two groups with irreconcilably adverse interests.” — Zeek receiver Kenneth D. Bell, Dec. 17, 2012

Section from an email received by the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case. The note asks the receiver to oppose efforts by Zeek winners to intervene in the case. Source: federal court files.

Shortly after the SEC described Zeek Rewards on Aug. 17 as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme, Zeek figure Robert Craddock solicited donations purportedly to hire an attorney and form a “protected” group of affiliates. Whether Zeek losers gave to the effort conducted at ZTeamBiz through Fun Club USA, Craddock’s Florida-based entity, remains unclear.

On Aug. 29, PP Blog guest columnist Gregg Evans questioned how Zeek winners and losers ever could be on the same side.

Today the court-appointed receiver effectively was asking the same question. His conclusion was that they could not — and he asked Senior U.S. District Judge Graham C. Mullen to reject a contention by certain Zeek “winners” that they could.

“The net winners have already been put on notice that they will be asked to return their winnings to the Receiver for reimbursement to the net losers,” Bell said in court filings. “On the other hand, the net losers hope that they can recoup some of their losses from the gains of the scheme’s net winners . . . Thus, the winners and losers are plainly opposed in their respective interests regarding the winners’ efforts to keep their winnings.”

Presumptive Zeek clawback targets Dave Kettner, Mary Kettner and David Sorrells asked Mullen last month to appoint Dallas attorney Michael Quilling as “examiner” over all Zeek affiliates. That should not be permitted to happen, Bell contended, because Quilling “has appeared in this case already as an attorney for Fun Club USA and represents the interests of those net winners.”

In a bid to bolster his claim, Bell cited Craddock ties to Dave Kettner through ZTeamBiz and quoted from a letter attributed to Kettner.

“In a similar vein, Mr. Kettner sent a letter seeking donations from affiliates that stated, “The SEC has tried to make us all believe that Zeek Rewards was an ‘investment’ and a Ponzi scheme. All the pages that were submitted by the SEC indictment [sic] has [sic] all been one sided and what we believe to be a misrepresentation of the truth and facts of what Zeek Rewards was as a viable and legal business,” Bell advised the judge in a footnote that included the URL to ZTeamBiz.

Beyond that, Bell argued, the Craddock entity, the Kettners and Sorrells had no standing in the case brought by the SEC.

And Bell said he has heard from Zeek members who want him to oppose the appointment of Quilling as examiner.

Here, according to Bell, is a passage from one such Zeek member who contacted Bell after learning about the “examiner motion”:

As one of the many losers in Zeek Rewards I wish to encourage you to do whatever is possible to block the motion filed on behalf of Fun Club USA (Robert Craddock) David & Mary Kettner and David Sorrells, asking that their personal attorney Michael J Quilling be appointed as the Examiner to oversee and represent the interest of ALL former Zeek Rewards affiliates.

To many of us this is just another way for another attorney firm to slow up your process of recovery and to diminish the amount of funds to be returned to those of us who are in hopes of being able to recover some of our losses.

Personally I feel that their agenda is also to help block your efforts to recover funds from the 1200 who received subpoenas.

The Kettners and Sorrells potentially have exposure of nearly $2 million in receivership clawback litigation, Bell said.

At least two apparent Zeek winners represented by attorney Ira Lee Sorkin also oppose the appointment of Quilling as examiner, according to filings last week.

Todd Disner, a Zeek affiliate and figure in the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme story, once was on a conference call with Craddock.

In recent remarks, Craddock said Disner was in Hong Kong with a “lost” passport.

Reports now have surfaced that Craddock is pitching a “program” known as Offer Hubb that uses a Wyoming mail drop as its address. Disner’s name was listed on the Offer Hubb pitch, according to BehindMLM.com.

Dec 17, 2012
Potential Zeek Clawback Target Pitched Collapsed Regenesis 2X2 Cycler: ‘Giddy Up. Get Involved. [It’ll] Be The Best Decision You Ever Made’

UPDATED 7:55 A.M. ET (DEC. 23, U.S.A.) In May 2009, before the launch of the alleged Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme, a Zeek promoter who has hired famed attorney Ira Lee Sorkin appeared in a check-waving video for an “opportunity” known as Regenesis 2X2.

Check-waving is used as a form of “proof” that an “opportunity” that “pays” is not a scam.

“Giddy up,” intoned Trudy Gilmond of Vermont. “Get involved. [It’ll] be the best decision you ever made.”

Gilmond, according to the video she narrated while waving two checks from Regenesis 2X2 totaling $1,200, sent by Priority Mail and drawn on Bank of America, was “fired up.”

She’d been in Regenesis 2X2 only since May 1, and already had received a nice payout, Gilmond explained.

“Knew this company would work,” she said, before alluding to a Biblical tale of an apostle who insisted on proof of the resurrection of Jesus.

“A lot of people are nonbelievers, doubting Thomases, didn’t believe it,” Gilmond said. She then presented checks as a form of proof that Regenesis 2X2 paid.

About two months later — in July 2009 — the U.S. Secret Service applied for search warrants in federal court in Washington state, the purported home of Regenesis 2X2. From a PP Blog story on Aug. 3, 2009 (italics added):

Agents, according to court filings, observed complaint letters directed at the firm being discarded into a Dumpster that was kept under constant surveillance. Also found in the Dumpster were copies of checks sent in by customers, other documents that included customers’ names and information to identify them personally, complaint faxes sent by customers and a letter from a law firm complaining about false, misleading and deceptive advertising.

In one case in which agents were observing one of the adult principals in the case, they observed a youth described as a teenager exiting a vehicle and “struggling with a large arm full of opened business and UPS Priority Mail envelopes,” the Secret Service said in court filings.

The juvenile entered a building and “then immediately came back outside and discarded the materials into an alley [D]umpster,” agents said.

Agents identified the adult under surveillance as a person “arrested by the Internal Revenue Service out of Las Vegas, Nevada[,] for felony violations related to Illegal Money Laundering from Securities Fraud and Wire Fraud” in a previous case.

How the Regenesis 2X2 probe proceeded is unclear.

What is clear is that Zeek eventually came to the fore. In court filings, Sorkin has noted that Gilmond has potential clawback exposure of more than $1.364 million from the court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case.

Gilmond once was listed on a Zeek website as both an “Employee” and “Official Rep.” So, too, was Zeek pitchman OH Brown of USHBB Inc., which produced ads for both Zeek and the collapsed Narc That Car pyramid scheme. For a while, at least, Zeek and Narc That Car appear to have used the same North Carolina-based bank: NewBridge.

Checks displaying the name of NewBridge showed up in independent affiliate promotions on YouTube in 2010. After one Narc affiliate quit the program, he moved to another one. The check-waving for the new “program” began at the one-second mark. Literally.

BehindMLM reported yesterday that Brown may have a tie to a burgeoning “opportunity” known as Offer Hubb. AdSurfDaily and Zeek promoters Todd Disner and Jerry Napier also appear to be in the communication chain of Offer Hubb. The U.S. Secret Service has described ASD as a “criminal enterprise.” The U.S. Department of Justice has described ASD as “insidious.”

A source told the PP Blog last week that Zeek figure Robert Craddock now was pitching Offer Hubb. Craddock is a purported Zeek “consultant” raising money to contest elements of the SEC’s Ponzi-scheme complaint and the court-appointed receivership. In July, Craddock sought to have the website of Zeek critic K. Chang removed from the Internet. Craddock was successful briefly, but the “K. Chang” Hub at HubPages returned.

By Aug. 4 — just 13 days prior to the filing of a emergency action by the SEC alleging that Zeek was a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme — Zeek used its Blog to blast unspecified “North Carolina Credit Unions” for raising questions about the “program.”

For years, questions have been raised about whether fraud schemes within the MLM sphere were recycling money between and among schemes and putting banks and other financial-service companies in possession of tainted funds. Purported “Wiring Instructions” of Offer Hubb imply that the Wyoming-based entity is soliciting sums of up to $10,099 from prospects and is using City National Bank.

From a section of the BehindMLM report that describes an address used by Offer Hubb (italics added):

As mentioned in the introduction of this review, “1712 Pioneer Avenue” is the headquarters of “Corporations Today”. The address is apparently so well-known in tax haven circles that Reuters used the 1712 Pioneer Avenue building itself for a 2011 article on corporate secrecy in the United States.

Dec 17, 2012