EDITOR’S NOTE: This story, which easily could be titled “What NOT To Do In MLM,” summarizes a few of the witnesses and exhibits the U.S. government may use against TelexFree’s James Merrill when his trial gets under way Oct. 24 in Massachusetts. The background provided below is based on research by the PP Blog. Prosecutors filed their witness/exhibit lists on Sept. 26 in U.S. District Court. For our Brazilian readers, we’ll note here that the United States is expected to call at least one member of the Brazilian Federal Police to testify. U.S. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman is presiding. In total, dozens of witnesses may testify, including some who have been sued by the SEC, TelexFree Trustee Stephen B. Darr or private attorneys. There are hundreds of government exhibits, some collected by the Massachusetts Securities Division and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
**______________________**
EXHIBIT: The government may introduce a document filed by TelexFree with the Alabama Public Service Commission in March 2014.
BACKGROUND: This document potentially could be used to demonstrate Merrill lied to regulators and business consultants. It was filed on March 20, 2014, and asserts TelexFree was “financially qualified” to operate in the state as a telecom company and that its “current financials Show considerable net worth.”
Less than a month later, however, TelexFree filed for bankruptcy, raising questions about the truthfulness of its telecom applications in various states. The document, which the PP Blog published before TelexFree’s bankruptcy filing, also ties Merrill to Indiana MLM accountant Joe Craft, a former interim TelexFree executive listed Sept. 26 by the government as a witness. Craft was sued alongside Merrill and others by the SEC in April 2014. He later filed a pleading in which he said he had concluded TelexFree was a Ponzi scheme selling unregistered securities and that he had been misled by TelexFree insiders.
Joseph Isaacs, a Florida-based consultant for TelexFree, helped prepare TelexFree’s telecom filing in Alabama and other states. Isaacs also now is listed as a government witness. Filings in Missouri say Isaacs told regulators there that Merrill had not been truthful when submitting an affidavit.
EXHIBIT: The government may introduce a photo of Merrill posing with a Hummer vehicle in TelexFree promos.
BACKGROUND: Ponzi/pyramid schemes and flashy rides are virtually inseparable.
In 2014, a federal judge ordered TelexFree pitchman Santiago De La Rosa — an SEC defendant — to sell two BMWs and a Land Rover Range Rover. De La Rosa now is listed as a government witness.
EXHIBIT: The government may introduce a September 2013 email that shows Merrill was aware of a criminal indictment and prison term imposed against AdSurfDaily President Andy Bowdoin in a Ponzi case with remarkable similarities to TelexFree.
BACKGROUND: The email described above allegedly was sent to Merrill by MLM attorney Jeffrey Babener. Babener now is listed as a government witness. Darr, the bankruptcy trustee, has said Babener informed TelexFree in August 2013 that it was operating a pyramid scheme, but TelexFree nevertheless continued to gather money.
EXHIBIT: A video by Thomas More of Newport Beach, Calif.
BACKGROUND: The SEC has warned for years that scams spread on social media. More, now listed as a government witness, was a TelexFree pitchman who was listed as a “winner” in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi- and pyramid scheme. Nehra once was a speaker at a TelexFree event in Newport Beach.
EXHIBIT: Records from various banks and financial vendors for Merrill or TelexFree.
Let’s begin by pointing out that Daniil Shoyfer and Scott Miller have not been charged by the SEC in its 2014 TelexFree action. There are asset freezes aplenty in that government-brought case, including freezes against alleged promoters Sann Rodrigues, Faith Sloan, Randy Crosby and Santiago De La Rosa.
The asset restraints imposed yesterday by U.S. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman against Shoyfer (of New York) and Miller (of Indiana) flow from an altogether different case: a proposed class-action brought by plaintiffs last year.
Indeed, private plaintiffs represented by private attorneys — as opposed to government plaintiffs represented by government attorneys — have now managed to persuade a judge to block the flow of funds alleged to be tainted by fraud.
This is horrible news if you’re a serial promoter of MLM fraud schemes or Ponzi-board “programs” because it demonstrates that the government no longer is your singular worry. Put another way, even if the SEC or some other agency “misses” you, aggressive class-action attorneys may not.
They even may be tracking you as you move from scheme to scheme — and, of course, agencies such as the SEC follow court filings in related actions closely.
Even though the private lawyers did not get everything they sought in yesterday’s order by Hillman, they got enough to seriously complicate the lives of their targets. Although the judge did not restrain assets with no nexus to the alleged $3 billion TelexFree Ponzi- and pyramid scheme, both Shoyfer and Miller now must make monthly financial reports to the court.
From the order:
“Each Individual Defendant shall file a statement of accounting with the Court, under seal, on the last day of each month by 5:00 p.m. EST, setting forth all monetary expenditures and the sale and/or transfer of all assets made in the prior month . . . To the extent that any Individual Defendant seeks to expend money or to sell, transfer dissipate, assign, pledge, alienate, encumber, diminish in value, or otherwise dispose of any funds or other assets which they would not be permitted to do under the terms of this Order, such defendant may file a motion with the Court setting forth, in detail the nature of the transaction.”
And, the judge continued, “The Individual Defendants may petition the Court to exempt from this Order any fund or other assets in any bank, brokerage or other financial institution accounts and any other assets held by of for the benefit of such defendant on the grounds that such assets are not traceable to monies received by him in connection with his involvement with TelexFree. The Individual Defendants shall submit detailed financial statements and/or other documentary evidence to establish the funds held or assets in question are funds or assets were acquired independently. The Individual Defendants shall also submit an accompanying affidavit signed under the pains and penalties of perjury attesting to the authenticity and truth of the evidence submitted in support of their motion to exempt. All filings made pursuant to this section shall be filed under seal. After reviewing the filing, the Court will determine whether notice to the Plaintiffs, discovery and/or a hearing will be required.”
So, under the terms of the order, it would appear that, if Shoyfer wants to keep any MAPS income that flowed to him on the grounds it did not originate with TelexFree, he would have to petition the court to do so.
Miller, known for telling a “Carlos Danger” joke to a TelexFree audience and pitching the program to Americans while it was under investigation in Brazil amid reports of threats against a judge and prosecutor, was part of an effort to solicit sums as high as $15,125 from TelexFree prospects. Viewers were told their $15,125 would return at least $1,100 a week for a year.
In restraining the assets of Miller and Shoyfer, Hillman found that the plaintiffs likely would prevail on the merits. Unlike Shoyfer. Miller did not seek to block the preliminary injunction.
But Hillman also cautioned the plaintiffs that more work was needed and that the “depiction of Shoyfer as a ‘Top Level Promoter’ who swindled TelexFree victims out of millions of dollars is, on the current record, nothing more than unsupported rhetoric.”
EDITOR’S NOTE: Certain reports by the PP Blog that are available to any person with an Internet connection are referenced in a consolidated, amended prospective class-action complaint that makes claims against various defendants with an alleged association with TelexFree. Information from other publicly available sites, including BehindMLM.com, RealScam.com and others, also is referenced.
The purpose of the PP Blog is to make information available to a wide audience interested in Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes, securities-fraud schemes and concerns about the interconnectivity of such schemes. The Blog was not consulted about the inclusion of its links or quoted material from the Blog. Nor was the Blog compensated. The PP Blog has no association with the class-action attorneys, who obviously are readers of the Blog and the other online publications.
**__________________________**
Still promoting MLM HYIP schemes in the face of evidence they cause intractable financial, legal and emotional pain that sometimes mushrooms to involve hundreds of thousands of people?
On March 9, 2015, the PP Blog reported that the name of “MyAdvertisingPays” was referenced in a TelexFree-related proposed class-action lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in December 2014.
The filing appeared to mark the first time MyAdvertisingPays, known in shorthand as MAPS, was referenced in a federal-court filing.
History shows that such references are closely watched by law enforcement. Indeed, they sometimes serve as unofficial triggering actions and presage federal regulatory action by civil authorities such as the SEC and even actions by agencies empowered to enforce criminal laws.
When the California Department of Business Oversight was investigating the WCM777 scam in 2013, for instance, TelexFree’s name popped up in the context of the cross-promotion of MLM HYIP schemes.
This was months before it became known that the SEC and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security were investigating TelexFree, alleged to have gathered at least $1.6 billion in a combined pyramid- and Ponzi scheme.
Instead, the complaint alleged that TelexFree huckster Daniil Shoyfer was “the largest single Promoter” of TelexFree “in the greater New York area.” Web records showed that Shoyfer also was promoting MAPS alongside MAPS colleagues such as U.K. hucksters Simon Stepsys and Shaun Smith.
Willfully blind and supremely disingenuous MLM HYIP promoters moving from one cross-border fraud scheme to another has been a longtime problem. Such promoters may have little of their own money invested, but contribute to a condition under which banks and payment processors become warehouses for fraudulent proceeds cycling between and among scams.
New York is the financial center of the United States. The filing of the proposed TelexFree class action there contributed to questions about whether MAPS soon would be on the U.S. regulatory and enforcement radar.
The answer to that question remains unclear. What is clear is that the New York complaint was transferred to Massachusetts, the U.S. home base of TelexFree. And it’s also clear that Shoyfer has been named a defendant in an amended TelexFree class-action complaint filed April 30 in Massachusetts federal court.
Among the allegations against Shoyfer (italics added/light editing performed/formatting not precise):
TelexFree changed its compensation plan on or about March 9, 2014, much to the fury of affiliates, noted below. Shoyfer, however, continued to promote it unremittingly, sending group text messages to his network with such as the following:
Hey..my team Telexfree! ! And here we go again..Come to check out and learn about new compensation plan TF 2.0.. and how to grow it even faster and MUCH more aggressively and efficiently than the one we had before.…Here is this week’s schedule. . Monday 03/24 at Salon Delacqua (2027 86 str) at 8.00 pm (in English) ..Wednesday 03/26 at SOHO launch(2213 65th street) at 7.45 pm ( in Russian) and Thursday 03/27 at 7.30 pm at 63-112 Woodhaven Blvd in a real estate office. In my case, since I have started from absulute zero during this passed week Mon 03/17- Sun 03/23/14 I booked 11,500 from new one and 21,600 still coming from old plan..A total of 31,100 in 7 short days… Go Telex!!!
After the institution of the new TelexFree compensation plan in March 2014, Shoyfer took part in a closed meeting with TelexFree’s directors and owners in Marlborough, Massachusetts, at which Shoyfer was instructed not to discuss the new TelexFree compensation plan with others and non-insiders, as the new compensation plan was detrimental to Promoters and was adopted to forestall [TelexFree] filing bankruptcy.
So, a man who allegedly promoted TelexFree and had inside information detrimental to ordinary TelexFree affiliates allegedly kept it to himself, continued to promote the scheme — and then moved on to MAPS. This naturally leads to questions about whether Shoyfer has kept information from ordinary MAPS members.
Purpose Of The Amended TelexFree Class Action
The complaint is an effort to consolidate for the sake of efficiency various TelexFree-related class actions filed in various courts. Such actions were filed in multiple U.S. states.
But that’s not the only news: The amended complaint also names TelexFree pitchman Scott Miller a defendant alongside Shoyfer and HYIP huckster Faith Sloan. In documents prepared by Zeek receiver Kenneth D. Bell, Miller’s name appears as an alleged winner in the $897 million Zeek scheme.
In 2013, Miller promoted TelexFree through a publication known as Home Business Advertiser. Another advertiser promoted a cash-gifting scheme. A columnist described Jesus Christ as the person who inspired modern network marketers through his recruitment of 12 disciples.
A Semacon cash-counting machine appeared as a stage prop in a cash-gifting video advertised in Home Business Advertiser. The promos appeared after two women in Connecticut were sentenced to federal prison for their roles in a cash-gifting scheme and tax fraud.
Also named promoter-defendants in the amended TelexFree class action are Sanderley Rodrigues de Vasconcelos (Sann Rodrigues), a two-time SEC defendant in pyramid-scheme cases who allegedly also claimed his actions were inspired by a deity; Santiago de la Rosa; and Randy N. Crosby.
How the promoter-defendants will pay for their defenses in the amended class action is an open question. One of the risks of promoting such schemes is to be left totally on your own if the government or class-action attorneys file lawsuits.
Another open question is whether other shoes will drop in the government actions. The government probes are ongoing. Some of the class-action defendants conceivably could become defendants in amended or new actions filed by the SEC or agencies that have criminal enforcement power.
The amended TelexFree class action asserts fraud claims under Massachusetts law against a slew of defendants, including financial vendors and MLM attorney Gerald Nehra, also a figure in the the Zeek scheme and the AdSurfDaily Ponzi-scheme story. ASD was a $119 million Ponzi scheme broken up by the U.S. Secret Service in 2008. ASD operator Andy Bowdoin was sentenced to federal prison in 2012, after authorities tied him to at least two other cross-border fraud schemes: OneX and AdViewGlobal.
ASD’s name is referenced repeatedly in the amended TelexFree complaint, as is the name of Zeek. When the complaint will be heard is anyone’s guess. That’s because there are unresolved criminal matters against alleged TelexFree principals James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler, both of whom are named defendants in the amended complaint and also are among the subjects of the SEC complaint.
Katia Wanzeler, Wanzeler’s wife, also is named a defendant in the amended complaint. So is TelexFree figure Joe Craft, another defendant in the SEC action. Brazilian TelexFree figure Carlos Costa also is named a defendant in the amended class action.
Also named a defendant in the amended class action is Jason “Jay” Borromei of Laguna Niguel, Calif. Along with a company known as Opt3, he is accused of “intentionally, knowingly, unfairly and deceptively set[ting] up TelexFree’s United States-based servers in Brazil with the intent of directly furthering, aiding or abetting their unlawful and fraudulent operation, including facilitating the placement of evidence of the Pyramid Scheme beyond the jurisdiction of the United States’ courts.”
With TelexFree itself in bankruptcy court, the class-action plaintiffs contend that “Opt3 and Borromei have a history of providing technical services within the multilevel marketing industry and hold themselves out as having related specialized knowledge. For example, Borromei previously served as chief information officer of Joystar, Inc., later renamed Travelstar, a multilevel marketing company that collapsed in approximately late 2008, and subsequently entered involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy.”
Though not named a defendant in the amended class action, TelexFree and Zeek figure Tom More also is referenced in the 200-page complaint.
‘Private Jet’ Gets A Mention
On March 9, 2014, the PP Blog reported that a person who took the stage at a TelexFree rah-rah fest in Massachusetts asserted that TelexFree had access to a “private jet” that recently had ventured to the Dominican Republic and Haiti.
The “private jet” also was referenced in the class-action complaint. Details about it remain unclear.
At the moment, the April 30, 2015, amended and consolidated complaint is posted here at the website of class-action attorney Robert Bonsignore.
“Because that’s where the money is.” — Classic rejoinder attributed to Brooklyn-born criminal Willie Sutton, reportedly after he was asked why he robbed banks. The often-quoted line may or may not be apocryphal. (Also see “Sutton’s Law” on the need to consider the obvious and “When you hear hoofbeats, think of horses not zebras.”)
UPDATED 5:26 P.M. EDT U.S.A. If you had the means to throw down $140 for “Chocolate Body Therapy” or $260 to get the “Prince or Princess for a Day” treatment, would you also have the means to direct some cash to an MLM “program” purported to double or triple your money?
Daniil Shoyfer of Staten Island perhaps thought so. In a proposed class-action lawsuit against various TelexFree figures, the plaintiffs accuse Shoyfer of holding TelexFree pitchfests at Salon Delacqua, a beauty shop that offers moderately priced and upscale services on 86th Street in Brooklyn. The meetings appear to have occurred at 8 p.m., near or at the shop’s published closing time.
These pitches included promises of “fabulous wealth,” according to the plaintiffs. The salon also advertises a “Brazilian Karatine” hair-strengthening treatment that takes three hours and begins at $250.
And when Shoyfer wasn’t at the salon, he allegedly was at the Marriott Hotel Grand Ballroom at 102-05 Ditmars Blvd. in the Queens neighborhood of East Elmhust near LaGuardia Airport, pitching the “program” in a room that hotel says on its website can be configured to seat 400.
The demographics from the neighborhood (2010) suggest that 30 percent of its residents were born outside of the United States, with a Latino population on the rise. TelexFree was accused last year by the SEC of targeting immigrants.
Shoyfer pitchfests also were hosted elsewhere in the Greater New York City region, and allegedly were conducted in English and Russian. The sites included the SOHO Lounge in Brooklyn and a real-estate office in the Rego Park neighborhood of Queens.
Accused TelexFree executive Steve Labriola was a co-host at a Shoyfer Marriott pitchfest, dubbed a “Superweekend in NY,” according to the plaintiffs.
Shoyfer allegedly took his marching orders from Labriola and other TelexFree “founders,” including accused Ponzi schemers James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler and Carlos Costa. Also within the alleged den of financial impropriety were accused TelexFree securities fraudster Joe Craft, an accountant, and Katia Wanzeler, the wife of Carlos Wanzeler.
Along for the ride in the TelexFree swindle, according to the plaintiffs, were Sann Rodrigues, Faith Sloan, Randy Crosby and Santiago de la Rosa, all four of whom were accused by the SEC last year of securities fraud and named defendants in the proposed class action. It is one of several tied to the alleged TelexFree Ponzi- and pyramid scheme.
“Defendant Shoyfer was the creator and leader of a large network of TelexFree Promoters based primarily in New York City, but extending into other states as well, including Massachusetts, and he is believed to have been the largest single Promoter in the greater New York area,” the plaintiffs alleged. “Under any view, Shoyfer funneled a portion of his ill-gotten gain up the food chain to TelexFree, its masterminds and other Defendants.”
The complaint includes alleged passages from Shoyfer text messages to his TelexFree group. These suggest he was gathering cashier’s checks from his downline, and included a claim that he had made “$142,320 in a single week in February 2014” from TelexFree.
According to the complaint, in December 2013, prior to TelexFree’s Sunday night bankruptcy filing in April 2014, Shoyfer told his group this on behalf of himself and TelexFree “founders” (italics added):
From my upper line “Happy New Year everyone!!! 2014 is gonna be the best year for Telexfree$$$! TelexMobil is about to be launched in January! ! And, on Thursday January 23rd at 6.30 pm I will be doing my first Telexfree Superweekend in NY with Steve Labriola (director of international marketing TF) at Marriott Hotel Grand Ballroom by La Guardia Airport at 102-05 Dimars Blvd, Flushing NY 11369 (parking available). Now is the time to meet with top corporate representative..and my top leaders in my rapidly growing team.. You MUST invite your people (forward this msg to them), especially those who r still sitting on sidelines, debating about legibility [sic] and future of this company. .Trust me after this event, all negativity will disappear. .and you will double and triple you earnings in this busine$$ venture in 2014…”
On Feb. 26, 2014, about two days before the Massachusetts Securities Division made public the news that TelexFree was under investigation, Shoyfer allegedly told his group this on behalf of himself and TelexFree “founders” (italics added):
I just received checks from everyone but will wait for u to bring it until 2 p.m… then I’m going to FedEx.
Bring me certified checks now I will send them to ewallet by federal express and they will post it immediately.
TelexFree is alleged to have changed its compensation plan on March 9, 2014, much to the fury of affiliates. Shoyfer, however, continued to promote it, according to the plaintiffs (italics added):
Hey..my team Telexfree! ! And here we go again..Come to check out and learn about new compensation plan TF 2.0.. and how to grow it even faster and MUCH more aggressively and efficiently than the one we had before.…Here is this week’s schedule. . Monday 03/24 at Salon Delacqua (2027 86 str) at 8.00 pm (in English) ..Wednesday 03/26 at SOHO launch(2213 65th street) at 7.45 pm ( in Russian) and Thursday 03/27 at 7.30 pm at 63-112 Woodhaven Blvd in a real estate office. In my case, since I havestarted from absulute zero during this passed week Mon 03/17- Sun 03/23/14 I booked 11,500 from new one and 21,600 still coming from old plan..A total of 31,100 in 7 short days… Go Telex!!!”
The import of this, according to the plaintiffs, is that [a]fter the institution of the new TelexFree compensation plan in March of 2014, Shoyfer took part in a closed meeting with TelexFree’s Directors and Owners in Marlborough, Massachusetts, at which Shoyfer was instructed not to discuss the new TelexFree compensation plan with other, non-insiders, as the new compensation plan was detrimental to Promoters and was adopted to forestall filing bankruptcy.”
In short, the plaintiffs accuse Shoyfer of working in concert with TelexFree management to dupe people into enrolling “right up until TelexFree’s bankruptcy filing.”
Filings in the TelexFree bankruptcy case suggest Shoyfer received nearly $88,000 from TelexFree in two separate payments just prior to the April 13 bankruptcy filing. The first, for $9,902.37, occurred on March 21, and the second, for $78,037.33, occurred on March 28.
NOTE: Part 2 of this two-part PP Blog series on the class-action lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, will be published later. Part 2 will cover other allegations from the complaint, filed Dec. 12. A copy of the complaint is available through TruthInAdvertising.org. (Link to complaint temporarily disabled by PP Blog at 9 p.m. EDT March 9, 2015.)
UPDATED 10:48 P.M. EDT U.S.A. A plaintiff bringing a prospective class-action lawsuit in Massachusetts federal court has accused 10 TelexFree figures of committing crimes and — as a group — committing racketeering violations through an “association-in-fact enterprise.”
Unlike other prospective TelexFree-related class-actions, this one names neither attorneys nor banks nor TelexFree itself defendants. Rather, it pins the onus of the conduct exclusively on James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler, Steve Labriola, Joe Craft, Fabio Wanzeler, Sann Rodrigues, Santiago De La Rosa, Randy Crosby, Faith Sloan and Carlos Costa.
Costa, a Brazil-based TelexFree figure, is described in the complaint as the “mastermind of the TelexFree pyramid scheme of fraud.” The complaint further asserts Costa conducted business in Massachusetts, where TelexFree operated an entity known as TelexFree Inc.
Olavo F. Magalhaes of Milford, Mass., is the plaintiff. The complaint says Magalhaes invested more than $209,000 in TelexFree LLC, the Las Vegas-based TelexFree business that operated in a Massachusetts office suite.
The crimes alleged against the defendants include fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy. Violations of civil law also are alleged.
On the racketeering front, the complaint alleged, the members of the “association-in-fact enterprise” associated together between January 2012 and April 15, 2014, “for the purpose of conducting an illegal pyramid scheme and wrongfully enriched themselves” at the expense of Magalhaes and others.
“Each member of the enterprise played a role in the targeting of victims, advertising and working together to make the TelexFree enterprise work,” the complaint alleged.
Fabio Wanzeler is the brother of Carlos Wanzeler, an alleged international fugitive accused criminally by federal prosecutors of wire-fraud conspiracy in the United States. Carlos Wanzeler is believed to be in Brazil.
Fabio Wanzeler, formerly of Worcester, Mass., is believed also to be in Brazil, according to the Magalhaes complaint.
In other TelexFree news, a federal judge has denied a motion by Faith Sloan to make more than $15,000 available to her.
MLM attorney Gerald Nehra, his law partner Richard Waak and their law firm are now lawyered up in the TelexFree bankruptcy case.
Groups of TelexFree members have sued them in bankruptcy court, alleging violations of the federal racketeering (RICO) statute and violations of federal securities laws. TelexFree filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on a Sunday evening in April, just prior to fraud actions filed by securities regulators.
Attorneys Christopher F. Robertson and William J. Hanlon, partners in the Boston office of Seyfarth Shaw LLP, entered appearance notices for Nehra, Waak and the firm yesterday.
Also named defendants in some or all of the actions are TelexFree, alleged officers or executives James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler, Carlos Costa, Steve Labriola and Joe Craft, alleged promoters Sann Rodrigues, Randy Crosby, Santiago De La Rosa and Faith Sloan, and several alleged financial vendors or service-providers.
In a complaint filed May 3, 2014, plaintiffs accused Nehra of counseling TelexFree “on methods to evade United States securities laws that were intended to offer, in part, protection from pyramid Ponzi schemes; all to enrich himself financially and serve his own selfish interests.”
He further was accused of encouraging unknowing TelexFree members to “participate in the evasion of federal and state securities laws.”
Sloan, in response to fraud allegations against her filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said she “believed what [SEC Co-] Defendants Carlos Wanzeler, James Merrill, Steve Labriola and their attorney, Gerald Nehra, had told her, until TelexFree continued to miss the deadlines for the launch of its new products.”
Nehra, Waak and the law firm are not defendants in the SEC action. Nor are they defendants in a TelexFree-related securities action by the Massachusetts Securities Division. Sloan, who later was accused by the SEC of violating the asset freeze against her in the SEC case by sending thousands of dollars to another “program” and transferring her interest in a real-estate trust to her mother, is a longtime HYIP huckster.
In a separate criminal case that alleges wire-fraud conspiracy against Merrill and Wanzeler, Merrill has signaled that he intends to use a defense of reliance on Nehra’s lawyering. The Massachusetts Securities Division has described TelexFree as a “financial pariah” and a combined pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that had gathered more than $1.2 billion. The SEC likewise has accused TelexFree of hatching a billion-dollar pyramid-and Ponzi scheme, saying it was aimed largely at Brazilians and Dominicans.
Nehra, according to plaintiffs suing him in in at least one of the TelexFree-related actions in bankruptcy court, advised at least two other “programs” regulators accused of operating massive pyramid or Ponzi schemes: Zeek Rewards (2012/$850 million) and AdSurfDaily (2008/$119 million).
Sloan is known to have promoted Zeek Rewards. Some HYIP promoters move from scheme to scheme to scheme, piling up purported “earnings” alleged to be fraudulent along the way.
“Attorney Nehra’s extensive experience in multi-level marketing, and particularly his involvement with the Ponzi schemes involving Ad SurfDaily and Zeek Rewards, armed him with the knowledge of what constitutes violations of United States securities law,” plaintiffs alleged. “Indeed, Attorney Nehra was well aware that the use of semantics and obscured phraseology to obfuscate securities laws fails to legitimize TelexFree’s illegal Pyramid Ponzi Scheme.”
Zeek-related actions still are winding their way through the courts. The Zeek “program” was back in the news yesterday, with the court-appointed receiver alleging that an affiliate who appears to have invested $10 filed a claim for $30 million and that a vendor alleged to have aided Zeek wanted nearly $15 million.
The Nevada Public Utilities Commission has rejected TelexFree’s telecom application. Image source: PUC document. Red highlight by PP Blog.
Nevada, the state in which TelexFree operated an alleged $1.2 billion pyramid- and Ponzi scheme through a mailbox and filed its initial Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, has rejected the company’s application to become a telecom provider.
The Nevada Public Utilities Commission denied the application in an order dated June 2. The staff of the PUC pressed for the denial last month, noting that TelexFree filed for the license on April 1 but then declared bankruptcy only 12 days later. The staff also said it was aware TelexFree had been charged civilly with fraud by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and that its assets had been frozen. At the same time, the staff said it was aware TelexFree also is the subject of state-level civil action by the Massachusetts Securities Division.
Former TelexFree President James Merrill currently is jailed on a criminal charge of wire-fraud conspiracy. That charge was filed May 9. Merrill continues to seek his release on bail. Carlos Wanzeler, Merrill’s TelexFree business partner, also was charged criminally with wire-fraud conspiracy last month. U.S. federal prosecutors have described him as an international fugitive.
TelexFree faces challenges to its license in other states. The firm says on its website that it “has suspended all business activity.”
A U.S. Bankruptcy Judge in Nevada transferred the TelexFree petition to Massachusetts last month, after the SEC argued the state was TelexFree’s nerve center. Litigation against the firm is centered in Massachusetts, although a prospective class-action lawsuit against TelexFree and alleged managers, promoters and vendors also has been filed in federal court in the Eastern District of North Carolina.
At least two civil actions against TelexFree, including the one in North Carolina, allege violations of the federal racketeering (RICO) statute. There also is active TelexFree-related litigation in Brazil. An alleged promoter of TelexFree was arrested in Uganda last month and paraded in front of TV cameras.
In the United States, the SEC has referred to a number of TelexFree-related promos on YouTube. HYIP schemes are notorious for using social media to gain a head of steam. The actions by various governments and private litigants show that promoters are not insulated from prosecution and can become defendants in cases that allege fraud.
With its assets frozen, whether TelexFree has the resources to address lawsuits and licensing challenges in multiple jurisdictions remains an open question. Individual promoters named in complaints could rack up high legal bills, with the company unable or unwilling to provide assistance.
Because some of the actions name “Doe” defendants, it is possible that other TelexFree promoters will find themselves with the need to hire attorneys at their own expense. Named promoters so far include Faith Sloan, Sann Rodrigues, Randy Crosby and Santiago De La Rosa.
It is known that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security opened an undercover probe into TelexFree by at least October 2013.
One TelexFree huckster, according to court records, told an undercover agent that “he [the huckster] had earned $1,600,000 as a TelexFree promoter, without selling a TelexFree product.”
Precisely how many TelexFree promoters interacted with undercover agents is unclear.
The 2008 AdSurfDaily Ponzi probe began as an undercover operation. Such techniques also have been used in penny-stock cases and cases involving “carding.”
BULLETIN: (8th update 9:10 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) In an amended complaint in the SEC’s pyramid- and Ponzi case against TelexFree, the agency says alleged TelexFree fugitive Carlos Wanzeler was using investors’ money to build a “small real estate empire” that consisted of 34 properties in Massachusetts and Florida.
Wanzeler, 45, also allegedly acquired a 40-foot yacht for “$273,878 in cash,” along with two other boats and “a fleet of fancy automobiles.”
“He paid $192,868 for two Ferrari F340 Spiders in March 2013 and $56,610 for a Porsche in February 2013. He also bought three BMW’s and a Toyota Highlander,” the SEC charged.
TelexFree purported to be a VOIP firm branching out into apps, cell phones and credit repair.
On the real-estate front, the SEC charged, Wanzeler went through at least $6.3 million — mostly in cash — to acquire the 34 properties, including $950,000 for the home he shared with his wife in Massachusetts and $450,000 for a home for his son in Florida.
From the SEC’s complaint (italics added)
“He made most of the acquisitions using companies under his control including: (i) JC Real Estate Management Company LLC, a Nevada limited liability company that was formed in July 2012 with Wanzeler and [James] Merrill as managers; (ii) Above & Beyond the Limit, LLC (“Above & Beyond”), a New Mexico limited liability company that [Joe] Craft formed for Wanzeler in September 2012, (iii) CNW Realty State, LLC, a Nevis corporation that was formed in October 2012 with Above & Beyond as manager; (iv) KC Realty State LLC, a Florida limited liability company that Craft formed in October 2012 with Katia Wanzeler as manager; (v) Acceris Realty Estate, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company that Craft formed in February 2013 with Katia Wanzeler as manager; and (vi) Makeover Investments LLC, a Florida limited liability company that was formed in July 2013 with Marilza Wanzeler, Wanzeler’s 65-year-old mother, as a manager.”
James Merrill is TelexFree’s alleged co-owner with Carlos Wanzeler. Joe Craft is TelexFree’s former CFO. All three men are accused of fraud at TelexFree and receiving millions of dollars from the company.
Nevis is an island in the Caribbean.
Steve Labriola, another TelexFree executive accused of fraud, received $46,600 through the New Mexico entity in 2013 and only $8,500 from TelexFree, according to a preliminary analysis by the SEC.
TelexFree filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States on April 13, with Wanzeler and Merrill effectively appointing Craft to the TelexFree CFO post, according to court filings. It’s almost certainly the case that TelexFree members at large did not know about the network of other companies associated in one way or another with the Wanzeler family, Merrill and Craft.
In its bankruptcy filing, TelexFree sought to reject its contracts with members. The SEC has described the TelexFree “program” as a massive pyramid- and Ponzi swindle. A U.S. Bankruptcy Judge intends to appoint a trustee in the TelexFree case, the Wall Street Journal reported late this afternoon.
“The information available to date indicates that, between November 2012 and February 2014, Wanzeler and members of his family received almost $13.7 million from TelexFree,” the SEC charged.
Investor funds were used to make the real-estate acquisitions and to purchase the cars, yacht and boats, the SEC charged.
Today’s amended complaint also alleges that TelexFree promoter Santiago De La Rosa used investor cash to support his lifestyle, including “$501,000 in cash for a house in Lynn, Massachusetts” and money spent on a BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
Accused promoter Randy Crosby, meanwhile, “paid $70,000 in cash for a Porsche in September 2013 and $99,000 in cash for another Porsche in December 2013, the SEC charged, citing information available to date.
At the same time, the SEC charged while citing information available to date, accused promoter Faith Sloan “received more than $160,400 from TelexFree investors and $51,000 from TelexFree itself.”
Accused promoter Sanderley Rodrigues (a/k/a Sann Rodrigues) received $317,220 from TelexFree between September 2012 and March 2013 through entities known as WWW Global Business Inc. and VICSS Inc., the SEC charged, again citing information available to date.
The SEC further alleged that Rodrigues had claimed to have made $3 million through TelexFree.
“Rodrigues used investor funds to buy expensive automobiles, including a Lamborghini, a Ferrari, and two Mercedes Benz,” the SEC charged.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. TelexFree, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-11858-DJC (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)
United States v. Carlos Nataniel Wanzeler and James Matthew Merrill, Case No. 14-MJ-4172-DHH (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)
Criminal Charges Filed Against Two Principals of Massachusetts-Based Telexfree
On Friday, May 9, 2014, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts charged James M. Merrill, of Ashland, Massachusetts, and Carlos N. Wanzeler, of Northborough, Massachusetts, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with the alleged TelexFree pyramid scheme previously charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Federal authorities arrested Merrill on Friday, and an arrest warrant was issued for Wanzeler, who the Department of Justice announced is a fugitive. The Department of Justice also announced it has executed 37 seizure warrants seizing assets relating to the fraudulent pyramid scheme.
The criminal charges against Merrill and Wanzeler related to the same conduct charged in a civil enforcement action filed by the SEC on Tuesday, April 15, 2014, against Merrill, Wanzeler, and others. Those charges were filed under seal, in connection with the Commission’s request for an immediate asset freeze. That asset freeze, which the U.S. District Court in Boston ordered on Wednesday, April 16, secured millions of dollars of funds and prevented the potential dissipation of investor assets. After the SEC staff implemented the asset freeze, at the SEC’s request the Court lifted the seal on April 17. On April 30, 2014, the Court entered preliminary injunctions extending the asset freeze as to defendants Santiago De La Rosa, of Lynn, Massachusetts, and Randy N. Crosby, of Alpharetta, Georgia. On May 8 and 9, the Court entered preliminary injunctions extending the asset freeze as to all the remaining defendants (Merrill, Wanzeler, TelexFree, Inc., TelexFree, LLC, Joseph H. Craft, of Boonville, Indiana, Steve Labriola, of Northbridge, Massachusetts, Faith R. Sloan, of Chicago, Illinois, and relief defendants (TelexFree Financial, Inc., TelexElectric, LLLP, and Telex Mobile Holdings, Inc.).
The SEC alleges that TelexFree, Inc. and TelexFree, LLC claim to run a multilevel marketing company that sells telephone service based on “voice over Internet” (VoIP) technology but actually are operating an elaborate pyramid scheme. In addition to charging the company, the SEC charged several TelexFree officers and promoters, and named several entities related to TelexFree as relief defendants based on their receipt of investor funds. According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Massachusetts, the defendants sold securities in the form of TelexFree “memberships” that promised annual returns of 200 percent or more for those who promoted TelexFree by recruiting new members and placing TelexFree advertisements on free Internet ad sites. The SEC complaint alleges that TelexFree’s VoIP sales revenues of approximately $1.3 million from August 2012 through March 2014 are barely one percent of the more than $1.1 billion needed to cover its promised payments to its promoters. As a result, in classic pyramid scheme fashion, TelexFree was paying earlier investors, not with revenue from selling its VoIP product but with money received from newer investors.
In related proceedings, on May 6, 2014, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the District of Nevada granted the SEC’s motion to transfer venue of those proceedings from Nevada to Massachusetts. The SEC had contended that the TelexFree entities hastily filed for bankruptcy in Nevada on Sunday night, April 13, 2014, in a transparent attempt to avoid Massachusetts. The SEC had noted that TelexFree does virtually no business in Nevada but rather was headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts. The SEC also argued that TelexFree did not have a legitimate business capable of reorganization under the bankruptcy code. The bankruptcy case will be transferred to Massachusetts for all further proceedings.
Santiago De La Rosa at a TelexFree pitchfest. Source: YouTube.
(UPDATED 8:05 A.M. EDT U.S.A.) Alleged TelexFree promoter and securities fraudster Santiago De La Rosa has been ordered by the federal judge presiding over the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Ponzi- and pyramid case to sell two BMWs and a Land Rover Range Rover “back to the dealership” and to “repatriate all funds located outside the United States.”
De La Rosa resides in Massachusetts.
U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton of the District of Massachusetts issued the order. The automobiles were described as a 2014 BMW X5 XDrive, a 2010 BMW X5 XDrive and a 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE. Precise details of the models were not available. A quick pricing search suggests De La Rosa was captaining roughly $150,000 worth of high-end rides.
There may be hundreds of thousands of victims of TelexFree’s excess, according to court filings.
TelexFree also had access to a “private jet,” a pitchman said in Boston two months ago.
News of Gorton’s order first appeared on BehindMLM.com, which also reported on the conditions imposed in an injunction against accused TelexFree promoter Randy N. Crosby of Georgia.
On April 15, the PP Blog reported that the office of Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin had uncovered a check with a memo line that read, “Cars for Extravaganza . . .” Galvin oversees the Massachusetts Securities Division (MSD).
MSD alleged the check was associated with more than $100,000 in TelexFree-related purchases at a Mercedes-Benz dealership in Orlando, Fla. TelexFree held an event in Orlando in May 2013. The firm filed for bankruptcy protection in Nevada on April 13, 2014.
Gorton was appointed to the federal bench by President George H.W. Bush in 1992.
Accused TelexFree promoter Sann Rodrigues captains a Ferrari.
From PonziTracker’s April 18 story (italics added):
. . . a casual read of the Motion makes clear that the company accused by regulators of being an “egregious” pyramid scheme seeks now to use the Bankruptcy Court’s power to eliminate the obligation to pay accrued compensation likely totaling hundreds of millions of dollars to “promoters” – under the theory that elimination of these obligations will allow the company to “ultimately prove successful and profitable.” Ironically, one of the chief concerns cited by TelexFree related to questions “raised as to whether the Original Comp Plan is compliant with law, which jeopardized the Debtors’ business.
On the same day, the PP Blog reported that TelexFree was the top story in Thursday’s infrastructure report by the Department of Homeland Security. Meanwhile, the Blog reported that TelexFree is calling the actions by Massachusetts and the SEC “precipitous and unnecessary.”
The Blog noted that some TelexFree members appear errantly to believe that the company already has been cleared of the Ponzi and pyramid charges. Uplines could be feeding them misinformation. Separately, BehindMLM.com reported that the federal judge in the SEC action has granted a Temporary Restraining Order against TelexFree.
As BehindMLM noted in its coverage, quoting the judge (italics added):
the Commission has shown that
1. It is reasonably likely to establish that TelexFree and the individual defendants James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler, Steven Labriola, Joseph Craft, Sanderly Rodrigues de Vasconcelos, Santiago De La Rosa, Randy Crosby and Faith Sloan have directly or indirectly engaged in the violations alleged in the complaint . . .
At the moment, major civil litigation against TelexFree in the United States is occurring on at least two fronts. The number could rise, given that TelexFree allegedly operated in at least 20 U.S. states. And because the SEC has described a “search warrant” that was executed in Massachusetts, it is almost certain a criminal probe by at least two U.S. agencies is under way.
TelexFree also is under investigation in Brazil.
To hear some TelexFree members tell it, however, none of these things seem to matter or can be regarded as ordinary events.
At least two petition drives in support of TelexFree have started in recent hours. One of them asks a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge to “Bail out Telexfree.” Another appears not to petition a specific judicial officer. Rather, it appears to ask TelexFree members to support the firm’s bankruptcy filing because TelexFree “has meant a real opportunity to bring sustenance to each of our homes.”
Similar petitions popped up after the SEC alleged in 2012 that the Zeek Rewards “program” was a Ponzi- and pyramid scheme that had gathered $600 million. Further investigation now puts that number at between $845 and $897 million. In the interim, two Zeek insiders have been charged with federal crimes and the court-appointed receiver in the case is pursuing clawback claims from thousands of alleged Zeek winners.
In the 2008 AdSurfDaily MLM Ponzi-scheme case, petitions to support ASD also popped up. The Ponzi dollar figure in that case mushroomed from $53 million to $119 million over the course of the probe. Like Zeek, the ASD case started as a civil prosecution with a parallel criminal investigation. ASD President Andy Bowdoin has been in prison since mid-2012. He was sentenced to serve 78 months.
The Zeek and ASD proceeds combined total at least $969 million. If the $1.2 billion asserted in the Massachusetts complaint proves accurate, it means that TelexFree not only fetched more than Zeek and ASD combined, but also may end up holding the title of the largest MLM HYIP Ponzi- and pyramid scheme in history.
There is no doubt that Zeek and ASD members helped fuel the TelexFree machine.
EXHIBIT: The government may introduce a photo of Merrill posing with a Hummer vehicle in TelexFree promos.
Let’s begin by pointing out that Daniil Shoyfer and Scott Miller have not been charged by the SEC in its 
