Tag: SEC

  • SEC Declines To Comment On New Claims Attributed To Zeek Figure Robert Craddock

    ponziglareUPDATED 8:30 P.M. EDT U.S.A. The SEC this afternoon declined to comment on a confounding claim attributed to Zeek Rewards figure Robert Craddock that Zeek took in $1 billion in 12 months and that the U.S. government should have modeled a “stimulus program” after Zeek instead of shutting it down in 2012.

    News that Craddock apparently had authored a book on Zeek and was making new claims first appeared on BehindMLM.com early today. In 2012, the SEC described Zeek as a massive Ponzi- and pyramid scheme and described Craddock as an obstructionist who was encouraging victims not to cooperate with Kenneth D. Bell, the court-appointed receiver in the agency’s civil case. Craddock has not been been charged with wrongdoing.

    Titled “The Zeek Phenomenon: Zero to $1 Billion in 12 Months,” the book in which Craddock is listed as the author is advertised on Amazon.com as a paperback “Out of Print” and with “Limited Availability.” Sept. 29 of this year is the asserted publication date.

    The office of U.S. Attorney Anne M. Tompkins of the Western District of North Carolina did not respond immediately to a request for comment on the claims. Tompkins’ office brought successful criminal prosecutions against Zeek figures Dawn Wright-Olivares (investment-fraud conspiracy and tax-fraud conspiracy) and Daniel Olivares (investment-fraud conspiracy) in late 2013.

    Wright-Olivares, 45, and Olivares, 31, her stepson,  pleaded guilty to the respective criminal charges against them in February 2014. Earlier, in December 2013, they settled SEC civil charges against them by agreeing to pay millions of dollars each, “the entirety of their ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest,” the SEC said at the time.

    In July 2014, Bell said in court filings that Wright-Olivares, Olivares and alleged Zeek operator Paul Burks had agreed to a consent judgment of $600 million “to be satisfied with substantially all of their assets.”

    Other court filings by Bell say a criminal investigation into Burks remains open. Bell also is special master in the criminal case.

    The Confounding Claims

    Craddock’s apparent claim that Zeek took in $1 billion in a year appears to be at odds with court filings by federal prosecutors in December 2013 that claim Zeek gathered a maximum sum of $897 million before collapsing in August 2012. If, as the claim suggests, Zeek took in $1 billion, there may exist a discrepancy of at least $103 million between the claim attributed to Craddock and the government’s account.

    How Craddock apparently arrived at the $1 billion figure was not immediately clear. Such a discrepancy, though, potentially could cause both the SEC and federal prosecutors to revisit the Zeek numbers. The assertions attributed to Craddock suggest that Zeek’s haul could have been much larger and occurred in the narrower time frame of 12 months, not the nearly 20 months cited by the SEC.

    In short, could an undisclosed, unrecovered pile of Zeek cash exist elsewhere?

    According to marketing copy on Amazon.com for the book attributed to Craddock, the government messed up big time by taking down Zeek.

    Here’s a snippet (italics added):

    In 2012, if the present Administration wanted to build a successful stimulus program, it should have used Zeek Rewards as a guide. This pioneering venture went from zero to one billion dollars in just 12 months, paid over 400 million dollars to more than 20,000 people earning an average of $20,000, created 10 people who made over one million dollars, and caused several thousand people to earn incomes in excess of one hundred thousand dollars. This unparalleled example would have been a phenomenal feat for our US Government during a period when our very financial existence was threatened.

    The words “Ponzi” and “pyramid” appear nowhere in the marketing copy on Amazon.com. Whether Zeek “paid”  is immaterial in the context of Ponzi schemes. So is the issue of how much it paid. Bernard Madoff “paid.” All successful Ponzi schemes “pay.” Zeek launched after the collapse of Madoff’s epic fraud, leading to questions about whether Zeek, its insiders and key promoters simply divorced themselves from reality.

    Moreover, Zeek launched after the collapse of AdSurfDaily, a Zeek-like scam that promoted a return of 1 percent a day. Zeek’s purported daily payout averaged 1.5 percent, a percentage grossly superior to Madoff and significantly better than ASD.

    In 2012, less than a month prior to the SEC’s Zeek action, Craddock temporarily succeeded in taking down a HubPages site operated by Zeek critic “K. Chang” by accusing him of copyright and trademark infringement.

    K. Chang ultimately prevailed, but the site experienced downtime.

    As the PP Blog reported at the time, Zeek appeared not to own the trademarks Craddock complained about, purportedly with the authority of North Carolina-based Zeek operator Rex Venture Group. Rather, the trademarks were listed in the name of Ebon Research Systems LLC, a Florida business.

    A business known as Ebon Research Systems Publishing LLC is listed as Craddock’s publisher for the new book on Zeek, according to the Amazon.com listing.

    Florida records suggest that Ebon Research Systems Publishing is managed by Dr. Florence Alexander, the same person behind Ebon Research Systems LLC when the HubPages flap played out more than two years ago.

    The PP Blog spoke with Alexander in 2012. She said she “certainly” knew of Zeek, but said she had “no knowledge” of any trademark or copyright complaint filed at HubPages against K. Chang.

    Although Craddock claimed to be a Zeek “consultant” while filing the claim against K. Chang prior to the SEC action in 2012, Zeek itself did not list him as one after the action, according to court records maintained by the ASD Updates Blog. (See Zeek filing from September 2012 here.)

     

  • NEW ENGLAND PUBLIC RADIO: Secretary Galvin Talks TelexFree, Sann Rodrigues And ‘IFreeX,’ Tells Station Accused Huckster’s ‘Current Whereabouts . . . Unknown’

    sannrodriguesUPDATED 8 A.M. EDT U.S.A. New England Public Radio has a minute-long audio report on TelexFree, iFreeX and Sann Rodrigues, including comments from Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin.

    An NEPR text report is available here. Look under the byline of Kari Njiiri for a link to the audio report.

    Rodrigues, accused in April 2014 by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of fraud over his alleged role in TelexFree, earlier (in 2006) was accused of fraud by the SEC in a separate alleged pyramid scheme involving phone products. iFreeX may constitute at least his third dance in securities- and affinity-fraud schemes involving communications products.

    Galvin reportedly told the station that the “current whereabouts” of Rodrigues is unknown. The charged pitchman hails from Brazil, once resided in Massachusetts and also has lived in Florida.

    Rodrigues, according to the SEC, has claimed that “God” started MLM and “binary” MLM “programs.”

    On Dec. 19, 2013, the PP Blog reported that TelexFree puff pieces were appearing in a publication that featured a columnist who asserted Jesus Christ was the person who inspired modern network marketers through his recruitment of 12 disciples.

    Ads for an apparent cash-gifting scheme appeared in the same publication.

    SEC case filings alleged that, on March 15, Rodrigues’ co-defendant Faith Sloan claimed on her website that the TelexFree compensation plan was changing and was not in final form — “[b]ut is Getting BETTER as Jesus said.”

    Regulators have described TelexFree as a billion-dollar pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that operated across national borders.

    Claims of divine authority or inspiration are not unusual in MLM HYIP frauds. In the 2008 AdSurfDaily case, for instance, accused operator Andy Bowdoin claimed God was on his side and compared the U.S. Secret Service to “Satan” and the 9/11 terrorists. Bowoin later was sentenced to federal prison for his $119 million Ponzi scheme.

    Promos showed Bowdoin asserting from a stage in Las Vegas that he was a Christian “money magnet” and that cash would “flow” back to people who gave him tens of thousands of dollars at a time.

    Affinity fraud may occur in many contexts: appeals to religious faith, appeals to common interests, appeals to common heritage, appeals to common political interests and more.

  • Did iFreeX ‘Program’ Pirate T-Mobile’s Branding Material?

    From a YouTube promo for iFreeX. Masking by PP Blog.
    From a YouTube promo for iFreeX. Masking by PP Blog.

    T-Mobile told the PP Blog today that it was looking into a situation in which images of Carly Foulkes appear to have made their way into a promo for iFreeX, an emerging “program” that became the subject of a scam warning by Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin yesterday.

    Foulkes, a Canadian model, is known colloquially as “the T-Mobile Girl.” Millions of television viewers were charmed by Foulkes, who helped T-Mobile build its brand and also is known colloquially  as “the girl in pink.”

    In 2013, Business Insider called Foulkes “one of the most recognizable brand spokespeople out there right now.”

    A promo for iFreeX appears to show Foulkes in full T-Mobile wardrobe regalia, clad in her traditional pink summer dress and displaying a cell phone. A logo for iFreeX appears just below her image.

    T-Mobile said this afternoon that it “will look into it.”

    It is not unusual for MLM “programs” to engage in brand-leeching. Most of the recent HYIP schemes taken down by the SEC have traded on the names, reputations and imagery of famous companies.

    “iFreex appears to be nothing more than a rebranded TelexFREE fraud for mobile phones,” Galvin said yesterday. “Everyone, but especially those in the Brazilian and other immigrant communities that are the target of these pitches, need to be skeptical of any scheme that offers guaranteed returns with little or no effort. Unfortunately, we have seen an increase in these pyramid schemes in the past year.”

    TelexFree is alleged to have operated a billion-dollar, cross border pyramid and Ponzi scheme. Reload scams typically pop up to replace cratered “programs.”

    “IFREEX PRE LAUNCH / PRÉ LANCEMENT/ PRÉ LANÇAMENTO!” the text section of an IFreeX promo on YouTube screams.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Massachusetts Issues Warning On ‘IFreeX’ Scheme; ‘iFreex Appears To Be Nothing More Than A Rebranded TelexFREE Fraud For Mobile Phones’

    Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin.
    Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin.

    URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Massachusetts Commonwealth Secretary William Galvin has issued a warning on an emerging scheme known as “IFreeX.”

    Like TelexFree before it, IFreeX is being pitched by two-time SEC pyramid-scheme defendant Sann Rodrigues and is being targeted at the Brazilian community.

    Rodrigues also is known as Sanderley Rodrigues de Vasconcelos, and individuals already have filed complaints about his promotion of IFreeX, Galvin’s office said. The headline on a state news release is, “SECRETARY GALVIN WARNS OF NEW PHONE SCAM TARGETING BRAZILIAN COMMUNITY.”

    This is the entire statement issued by the Massachusetts Securities Division a short time ago (italics/logo graphic added by PP Blog):

    Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin today warned investors, especially persons in the Brazilian community, about iFreex, a phone service app promising lucrative returns with minimal effort. It appears to be much like TelexFREE, a scam that targeted the Brazilian and other minority communities.

    According to complaints made to the Securities Division, Sanderley Rodrigues de Vasconcelos, also known as Sann Rodrigues, who was once a top TelexFREE promoter, is now promoting iFreex, enticing investors to pre-register with promises of a new iPhone.

    On his Facebook page, Rodrigues, a former Revere resident, even claimed that iFreex would be the new TelexFREE. TelexFREE was charged by the Massachusetts Securities Division and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year with fraud in operating a pyramid scheme. It is now in bankruptcy.

    “iFreex appears to be nothing more than a rebranded TelexFREE fraud for mobile phones,” Secretary Galvin said. “Everyone, but especially those in the Brazilian and other immigrant communities that are the target of these pitches, need to be skeptical of any scheme that offers guaranteed returns with little or no effort. Unfortunately, we have seen an increase in these pyramid schemes in the past year.”

    ifreexRodrigues, who was charged by the SEC in the TelexFREE case, was charged in 2006 with a similar telecommunications scheme . . . and barred from securities dealings in Massachusetts. That scheme, too, targeted the Brazilian community.

    iFreex appears to have many of the same characteristics as other pyramid schemes the Securities Division has recently brought actions against, including Wings, TelexFREE and WCM777.

    While there is little information available about the iFreex operations, management, and headquarters, it is scheduled to go live in early November and is currently accepting preregistrations with the promise to investors of a new iPhone.

    Those who have information about iFreex are encouraged to call the Securities Division at the toll-free 1-800-269-5428.

  • BehindMLM.com Offline

    From Google cache earlier today for BehindMLM.com.
    From Google cache earlier today for BehindMLM.com.

    UPDATED 3:21 A.M. EDT SEPT. 30 U.S.A. The PP Blog is aware that BehindMLM.com, the popular review site that covers multilevel marketing and fraud schemes within the sphere, is offline. The precise reason why is unclear at this time.

    BehindMLM.com reported Sept. 26 that it had received a DMCA takedown notice from Faith Sloan, an MLM HYIP huckster and figure in the TelexFree Ponzi- and pyramid-scheme story. In April 2014, Sloan was charged with securities fraud by the SEC for her alleged role in TelexFree, described by regulators as a billion-dollar fraud that crossed national borders.

    In the takedown action, Sloan complained about certain photographs that have appeared on BehindMLM.com. Sloan claims to own the copyrights and that Behind MLM’s use of the photographs was unauthorized.

    BehindMLM has called Sloan’s claims “bogus”  and has said an outage was possible as the situation evolved.

    Content from BehindMLM.com has been cited in court filings by TelexFree members who alleged that racketeering violations occurred within TelexFree. More than 1 million TelexFree victims may exist around the world.

    Analysis by the PP Blog of a small subset of data from 95 self-identified victims of TelexFree shows that the group of 95 lost a whopping average of $27,578 each and that claimed losses ranged from a low of $900 to a high of $427,500.

     

     

  • SPECIAL REPORT: eAdGear ‘Program’ Allegedly Traded Falsely On Names Of Famous Companies And Brands; SEC Contacted Google, Yahoo, Target, Victoria’s Secret (And More) To Refute Claims; Separately, ‘Bossteam’ Enterprise In Canada Operated In Similar Fashion, Records Show

    From an SEC exhibit filed last week in the SEC's case against eAdgear, an alleged international pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that gathered $129 million said largely to have targeted Asian communities.
    From an SEC exhibit filed last week in the SEC’s case against eAdGear, an alleged international pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that gathered $129 million. Redactions by PP Blog.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: eAdGear, which had entities in California and Hong Kong, “primarily” targeted “investors in the U.S., China, and Taiwan” and gathered $129 million in a combined pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that engaged in brand-leeching, the SEC alleged last week. An MLM scam known as WCM777, which allegedly gathered more than $80 million, also engaged in brand-leeching while targeting Asian communities, according to court filings. The SEC sued WCM777 in March 2014. Among the SEC’s alarming allegations against WCM777 was that it planted a false seed that it had partnerships “with more than 700 major companies such as Siemens, Denny’s, and Goldman Sachs.”

    ** ______________________**

    UPDATED 3:14 P.M. EDT SEPT 29 U.S.A. Irrespective of their primary target audiences and whether their promos are in English, Chinese or another language, HYIPs and investment-fraud schemes often trade fraudulently on the names of famous companies and engage in brand-leeching to create a veneer of legitimacy. In 2008, for example, the purported AdSurfDaily advertising “program” falsely traded on the names of then-U.S. President George W. Bush, Google, Kodak, Pepsi, Macy’s, USA Today, NBC and many more.

    “This new approach to Internet advertising has businesses of all sizes, from small home based businesses to large corporations such as Google, Starbucks, Kodak, etc., joining ASD,” a 2008 promo for ASD read. “Not only are there over 75,000 small businesses advertising with ASD, but now major corporations are as well. Remember, a part of the daily rebate comes from the revenue corporations pay to advertise with ASD.”

    It was all a crock. The U.S. Secret Service, which opened an undercover probe in July 2008, went on describe ASD as a “criminal enterprise.” ASD President Andy Bowdoin was convicted of wire fraud in the ASD Ponzi case. He is serving a lengthy term in federal prison.

    Even while it was operating, ASD talked about a nascent “Chinese” arm known as Golden Panda Ad Builder. In retrospect, it now appears that plans to involve Asian populations in HYIP schemes were well under way at least by 2008 and since have evolved into frauds that were even larger than ASD. (ASD gathered $119 million and has been eclipsed in dollar volume by at least three Internet-based investment scams since then: TelexFree (possibly $1.2 billion); Zeek Rewards (c. $850 million); and eAdGear ($129 million). Falling just short of making this list were Zhunrize (allegedly $105 million) and WCM777 (allegedly $80 million). It is clear from court filings that Zeek also had a presence in Asian communities.)

    There also was a tertiary scam inside the ASD scam. Indeed, promos for an entity known as ASD Offer Universe encouraged members to click on Google ads so ASD would earn fees of up to $5 a click. Here’s now that promo began (italics added):

    “ASD ENTERS INTO AGREEMENT WITH GOOGLE FOR NEW CONSUMER SITE. Months ahead of schedule, Google and ASD Offer Universe are now teaming up to show Google ads on the site. Google, after seeing all of the major advertisers already being shown on ASD Offer Universe agreed to enter into a relationship with ASD.”

    Brand-leeching is a form of  “reputation parasitism.”

    Did the eAdGear “program” channel long-ago events at ASD to help its massive pyramid scheme grow?

    ASD was a purported “advertising” firm that operated a “rotator.”

    Let’s compare what happened at ASD in 2008 to what the SEC now says happened at eAdGear, accused by the agency last week of operating a $129 million pyramid- and Ponzi scheme and positioning itself as an advertising company and an SEO firm.

    By at least March 2014, the SEC says in court filings, investigators learned of a promo for eAdGear that read, “Google and Yahoo are partnering up with eAdGear for SEO services!!”

    In the land of serial promoters of MLM or direct-sales HYIP scams, it’s as though the ASD case never happened.

    The name-dropping and toxic disingenuousness associated with eAdGear hardly were limited to the abuse of the names of Google and Yahoo, according to SEC exhibits filed in the eAdGear case. It appears there were at least 253 incidents of brand-leeching associated with eAdGear. Indeed, eAdGear appears to have planned its ascent to the upper echelon of the fraud sphere by deliberately placing bogus ads for famous companies into its ad “rotator” to create a false sense that its “program” was legitimate.

    Target Corp., the famous retailer, had its brand leeched, the SEC alleged. So did Lbrands, the Columbus, Ohio-based company that owns Victoria’s Secret

    Now, let’s look at some of the behind-the-scenes investigative work performed by the SEC. Court filings by the agency show that, on July 1, 2014, the SEC issued a subpoena to Yahoo to check on the eAdGear-associated claims.

    Yahoo responded on July 10 by advising the SEC that it had “identified no contracts or agreements with eAdGear[].”

    Meanwhile, according to court filings, the SEC made an inquiry at Google on June 30. Google responded on July 22, advising the agency that it “is not aware of any commercial relationship between [eAdGear] and Google.”

    Because ads for famous companies, including Target, Gap Inc. and Victoria’s Secret, had appeared in the eAdGear “rotator,” the SEC contacted those companies. (The response by L Brands Inc., owners of Victoria’s Secret, is shown above.)

    Target responded by searching its database of vendors to which it had issued payments. No records surfaced for eAdGear, according to the SEC. Gap, similarly, informed the SEC that it had no record of doing business with eAdGear.

    What else does the SEC have? Well, according to court records, it has internal eAdGear email correspondence that shows an employee was instructed to place 253 links to famous companies in its rotator.

    These companies included Avon, Sears, Nordstrom, eBay, QVC, HSN, J.C. Penney, Banana Republic, Dillard’s, Kohl’s, Macy’s, Amazon.com, Men’s Wearhouse, Kmart, New York magazine and more.

    Finally, let’s compare the SEC allegations to the August 2014 findings of the British Columbia Securities Commission concerning a “program” known as “Bossteam” that became the subject of a 2012 Ponzi warning in Canada.

    These are among BCSC’s  assertions — under a subheading titled “False impression of paid advertisements and advertising revenue”:

    • Bossteam described itself on its websites, in documents and in presentations as an online advertising business having huge growth potential and ready to become a leading global online advertising company. It referred to well-known online businesses such as Google, Amazon and eBay, and to the fast-growing advertising revenues of these businesses.
    • Although hundreds of “ads” appeared on the advertising platforms, the majority of the ads posted on Bossteam’s websites were associated with Bossteam’s own administrative accounts (accounts accessible by those controlling its systems) and not to accounts for advertisers or members who had paid to post links to their websites on Bossteam’s websites.
    • Ads associated with Bossteam’s administrative accounts included webpages for well-known local and international businesses.
    • Local businesses whose webpages appeared on Bossteam’s websites included a restaurant, a security systems company, a heating company and a private career college. Websites of well-known businesses and personalities included World Wrestling Entertainment, Miriam Webster and Britney Spears.
    • Posting the websites of local and international businesses on Bossteam’s websites without payment created a false impression that such businesses were advertising on Bossteam’s websites and paying Bossteam to do so.

    Because Bossteam and eAdgear were similar businesses and appear largely to have targeted members of the Asian community, one has to wonder whether the schemes had promoters in common. For now, at least, the answer is unclear. What is clear is that some promoters simply move from one fraud scheme to an another when the “program” of the moment craters or encounters regulatory scrutiny.

    Serial HYIP huckster and Zeek figure T. LeMont Silver currently is in name-dropping overdrive for BitClub Network, one of his latest “programs.” Silver’s name has surfaced in private lawsuits involving eAdGear and an interconnected enterprise known as Go Fun Places, which is referenced in the SEC’s eAdGear case. (For one instance, see the reference to Go Fun Places within the letter from L Brands to the SEC in the graphic above.)

    NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: SEC Charges eAdGear, Alleging $129 Million Pyramid- And Ponzi Scheme

    breakingnews72URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: (12th Update 1:28 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) The SEC has gone to federal court in San Francisco, alleging that the eAdGear “program” was a pyramid- and Ponzi scheme that gathered $129 million. The action against eAdGear is the second major pyramid-scheme prosecution announced by the SEC this week.

    The SEC has identified eAdGear’s operators as Charles S. Wang, 52, and Qian Cathy Zhang, 52, of Warren, N.J., and Francis Y. Yuen, 53, of Dublin, Calif. They have been charged with fraud and an asset freeze has been imposed, the SEC said.

    Zhang is Wang’s wife, the SEC said, alleging the couple was part of a “ruse” that positioned Zhang as an ordinary “member” who “became hugely successful.”

    “During sworn testimony before the staff of the Commission in the investigation preceding the filing of this case, Zhang asserted her privilege against self-incrimination rather than answer questions about her role at eAdGear,” the SEC said in its complaint.

    The eAdGear “opportunity” itself, according to the SEC, was a “fiction.”

    “eAdGear and its operators falsely claimed that they were running a profitable Internet marketing company when in reality, they were operating a Ponzi and pyramid scheme that preyed on Chinese communities and caused investors to lose millions of dollars,” said Jina L. Choi, director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office.

    Though not named a defendant in the eAdGear complaint, Zeek Rewards figure and alleged Zeek “winner” T. LeMont Silver may find himself at the center of yet another Ponzi- and pyramid storm. That’s because eAdGear once tried to sue ZeekRewards.com, amid claims of cyberpiracy, unfair competition and benefiting from copyright infringement.

    And it’s also because Silver’s name surfaced in fraud lawsuits between and among eAdGear Inc., GoFunPlaces Inc., Randal Williams and JubiMax LLC.

    From an SEC statement on the eAdGear prosecution (italics added):

    . . . even though eAdGear claimed to be a successful Internet marketing company, nearly all of its revenue was generated by investors, not its products or services.

    The complaint alleges that eAdGear’s operators used money from new investors to pay earlier investors as well as to repay a personal loan and purchase million-dollar homes for themselves. It alleges the operators concealed and perpetuated the scheme by displaying sham websites on eAdGear’s own site to make it appear as if it had real, paying customers and manipulated revenue distributions to investors to appear profitable.

    eAdGear began operating in December 2010 and grew to include 66,000 accounts held by “tens of thousands of investors” mostly of Chinese descent, the SEC said.

    Corporate defendants include eAdGear Inc of Pleasanton, Calif., and eAdGear Holdings Limited of Hong Kong. The “program” sold “so-called ‘memberships’ or ‘business packages,’” the SEC said.

    From the SEC complaint (italics added):

    Defendants market eAdGear as a successful internet marketing and advertising company that uses search engine optimization (“SEO”) technology they claimed to have developed to help paying clients increase the page rankings of their websites on various search engines. Defendants claim to share 70% of the revenue generated daily by this business with investors.

    In reality, eAdGear’s purported business is a ruse. Instead, well over 99% of the funds eAdGear has received have come from its investors, and eAdGear simply uses new investor money to make payments to — or to credit the accounts of — existing members in classic Ponzi scheme fashion.

    Wang, Yuen, and Zhang have perpetrated this fraud by, among other things: installing Wang as chief executive officer, and Yuen as chief financial officer and chief operating officer of eAdGear, Inc., while portraying Wang’s wife, Zhang, as an ordinary “member” who became hugely successful; creating a fiction of a business that has paying customers when it does not; and manipulating daily revenue distributions to credit investors’ accounts, to make it appear as though eAdGear is operating profitably.

    Earlier this week, the SEC announced charges against a “program” known as Zhunrize, describing it as pyramid scheme that had gathered $105 million.

    Zhunrize presented itself as a “Plan B,” a core fraud signature in the HYIP world. T. LeMont Silver, among others, is a “Plan B” pitchman.

    Zeek receiver Kenneth D. Bell has said that MLM may have a problem with “serial” promoters of fraud schemes.

  • TelexFree Website Will Not Load

    The website of TelexFree will not load this afternoon. Whether this signals a development in the TelexFree Ponzi, pyramid and bankruptcy cases was not immediately clear.
    The website of TelexFree will not load this afternoon. Whether this signals a development in the TelexFree Ponzi, pyramid and bankruptcy cases was not immediately clear.

    EDITOR’S NOTE ADDED 1:32 P.M. EDT SEPT. 28 U.S.A. TelexFree.com appears to be back online. At this time, why the landing page wouldn’t load remains a mystery. Our earlier story is below . . .

    The website of TelexFree, alleged in April by the SEC and the Massachusetts Securities Division to have operated a billion-dollar pyramid and Ponzi scheme across state and national borders, will not load. Nor will the domain return a ping.

    This condition appears to have surfaced in recent hours. The site previously included TelexFree-authored words written in April or May that suggested TelexFree somehow could emerge from bankruptcy. Stephen B. Darr, a court-appointed trustee, is now administering TelexFree. He has said he has no intention of reorganizing or reactivating the company.

    Websites involved in Ponzi schemes sometimes are seized by court order or voluntarily surrendered by the operators. Receivers and trustees later sometimes use the URLs for the domains to publish news that concerns investors.

    Why TelexFree.com won’t load is unclear. The office of U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, which is leading the criminal prosecutions of TelexFree figures James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Merrill and Wanzeler have been charged with wire fraud and wire-fraud conspiracy.  U.S. prosecutors have called Wanzeler a fugitive who ducked out of the United States through Canada under cover of darkness — and later flew to Brazil.

    Like their U.S. counterparts in April, Brazilian federal police conducted TelexFree-related raids in July.

    The SEC yesterday filed a pyramid-scheme action against a “program” known as Zhunrize that also allegedly operated across state and national borders.

  • ANOTHER MLM PR DISASTER: Zhunrize, Alleged Worldwide Pyramid Scheme That Gathered $105 Million, Was Presented As A ‘Plan B’

    From a Zhunrize slide as viewed through Open Office. Red highlight by PP Blog.
    From a Zhunrize slide as viewed through Open Office. Red highlight by PP Blog.

    2ND UPDATE 5:25 P.M. EDT U.S.A. Purported “Plans B” are one of the core signatures of the the MLM HYIP sphere, which is known for incredibly toxic global frauds such as Zeek Rewards and AdSurfDaily. In 2009, an ASD reload scam known as AdViewGlobal was positioned as a “Plan B.”

    The individual schemes of Zeek and ASD took in a combined sum of at least $969 million. AdViewGlobal appears to have disappeared with millions of dollars — after targeting ASD victims for a second time.

    In 2012, Zeek and ASD figure Keith Laggos pushed the Lyoness “program” as a “Plan B.”

    Laggos’ listeners were told that, if things went south at Zeek, Lyoness would be an excellent hedge through which $10,000 directed at the scheme might return “a quarter-million dollars.”

    Lyoness is now under investigation in Australia, amid pyramid-scheme allegations.

    “Plan B” also is known as “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.” HYIP prospects often are told to join more than one scheme or to quickly get in another if something goes wrong with the current scheme, sometimes known as “Plan A.”

    Plan B schemes typically are a means by which prospects are lured into a continuous cycle of MLM frauds. Zeek and OneX promoter T. LeMont Silver later went on to “Plan B” schemes such as GoFunPlaces/GoFunRewards and JubiMax/JubiRev. Those schemes cratered or encountered difficulties. Silver now is pushing the exceptionally murky BitClub Network “opportunity” as a Plan B.

    MLM HYIP schemes may switch forms. They may appear as straight-line investment-fraud schemes such as Legisi, which collapsed after an SEC intervention in 2008. ASD was an “autosurf advertising” scheme that collapsed in 2008 after an intervention by the U.S. Secret Service. Zeek, a purported “penny auction” company, collapsed in 2012 after an SEC intervention.

    WCM777, meanwhile, collapsed in March 2014 after interventions by the SEC and state-level securities regulators. WCM777 purportedly was a “cloud computing” company  that allegedly gathered more than $80 million. In April 2014, another MLM HYIP scheme — TelexFree — collapsed. The SEC and the Massachusetts Securities Division said it was conducting a billion-dollar, cross-border securities swindle. TelexFree positioned itself as a “VOIP” company that also was in the apps, cellphone and credit-repair businesses.

    The trend now appears to be to wrap traditional products such as cosmetics and diet shakes into murky and confusing schemes that pay recruitment commissions. No specific payout may be mentioned.

    The SEC yesterday announced fraud charges against the Zhunrize MLM scheme, accusing it of selling unregistered securities and operating a massive international pyramid scheme.

    The phrase “Plan B” even appears in promo material for Zhunrize. The material also references Plan A. Based on this information, it appears as though Zhunrize was touting itself as both a “Plan A” and “Plan B” scheme.

    “Do you know anyone who would like to develop a plan ‘A’ Or plan ‘B’?” the Zhunrize promo queries.

    In the promo, Zhunrize prospects are told they can earn “thousands each month by helping others to save time, gas, money and avoiding crowds.”

    One of the problems in this bizarre sphere of MLM is that tainted money from earlier scams may flow into emerging scams, in effect making banks and payment vendors warehouses for a continuous stream of fraud proceeds that flow between and among pyramid schemes and Ponzi schemes.

    Like Lyoness, Zhunrize is involved in the shopping-portal business. Like Zeek and other “programs,” Zhunrize also was positioned as a “profit-sharing” or “revenue-sharing” opportunity.

    In court filings, Zeek receiver Kenneth D. Bell has suggested that MLM may have a problem with “serial” participants in fraud schemes who tout purported “revenue-sharing” plans.

    Case files associated with various recent HYIP/revenue-sharing schemes put losses in the billions of dollars. Because some promoters simply move from one scam to another, they are eviscerating wealth on a global scale.

    If someone pitches you on an MLM “Plan B,” run like the wind.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: SEC Calls Zhunrize MLM Company Worldwide ‘Pyramid Scheme’ That Gathered More Than $100 Million

    breakingnews72URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: (8th Update 6:56 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) The SEC has gone to federal court in the Northern District of Georgia, alleging that the Atlanta-based “Zhunrize” MLM program is a pyramid scheme that operates globally and has gathered $105 million from 77,000 investors.

    The Zhunrize “program” has been charged with fraud. It is at least the third MLM targeted by the SEC since March. The agency filed charges against WCM777 in March. In April, it filed charges against TelexFree.

    Zhunrize CEO Jeff Pan, 52, of Suwanee, Ga., also has been charged with fraud, the SEC said. A federal judge has issued an asset-freeze order.

    All three of the MLM schemes operated online and allegedly affected tens and tens of thousands of people.

    Zhunrize has been operating since 2012, the same year the SEC took down the Zeek Rewards MLM scheme, alleging a fraud that had gathered hundreds of millions of dollars.

    From a statement by the SEC on the Zhunrize case (italics added):

    According to the Commission’s complaint, Zhunrize purports to be a legitimate multi-level marketing business by which members purchase online stores and then sell merchandise through them, while earning commissions on products purchased by their customers and through store sales to other members and hosting fees paid by those members. In fact, the company is operating as a pyramid scheme because its commission structure is based on the continual recruitment of new members, with the most lucrative returns dependent on the downline recruitment of other members through store sales irrespective of any product sales. To date, the company has taken in approximately $105 million from approximately 77,000 investors since 2012.

    The Commission’s complaint further alleges that in its promotional materials, Zhunrize touts the ability to earn commissions from the sale of products, both through the owner’s store and through downstream owners’ stores. For example, a Zhunrize promotional video differentiates Zhunrize from other on-line multi-level marketing plans, claiming that Zhunrize has “sustainability.” According to the video, the Zhunrize “model will sustain itself because we will have millions more customers than distributors.” Later, the narrator in the video claims “we have the Vendor Relationships, the Logistics, the Payment Gateways to reach millions of new customers each month.”

    The Commission’s complaint also alleges that Zhunrize does not disclose, however, that to date substantially all of its revenue has comes from the sale of memberships (referred to as stores) and the corresponding monthly internet hosting fees associated with operating those stores, rather than the sale of products. Indeed, both Pan and a Zhunrize vice-president testified that the company currently derives 80-90% of its revenue from selling online stores and the monthly internet hosting fees for them, as opposed to actual products from these stores. Thus, contrary to the representations to potential investors, Zhunrize is actually a fraudulent pyramid scheme.

    Like other MLM schemes before it, Zhunrize appears to have traded on the names of famous companies outside the MLM realm. The PP Blog today, for instance, observed a promo for Zhunrize in Spanish that referenced an “online store” known as “ZHunCity” and dropped the names of Ebay, Amazon, Wal-Mart, Target and Best Buy.

    It is common for fraud schemes to drop the names of famous companies as a means of sanitizing the purported MLM ‘opportunities.” Offering materials for WCM 777, which allegedly gathered tens of millions of dollars, dropped the names of hundreds of famous brands while also dropping the names of famous businesspeople and famous politicians.

    WCM appears to have taken in on the order of $80 million, according to court records in the case. The Massachusetts Securities Division has alleged that TelexFree may have gathered more than $1.2 billion in a little better than two years.  WCM77 made its $80 million haul in about one year.

    TelexFree and WCM both engaged in affinity fraud by targeting specific population groups, according to court filings. There may be promos for Zhunrize in languages other than Spanish and English. The PP Blog observed a Zhunrize promo today that was simply labeled “Brazil,” which may mean Portuguese-speaking populations were targeted.

    That was the case with both WCM777 and TelexFree.

  • Small Sampling Of TelexFree ‘Net Losers’ Paints Picture Of Massive Cash Losses And Potentially Horrifying Loss Of Future Purchasing Power

    TelexFree pitchman Sann Rodrigues, one of four promoters accused by the SEC of fraud. Rodrigues has ties to Massachusetts, Florida and Brazil.
    TelexFree pitchman Sann Rodrigues, one of four promoters accused by the SEC of fraud. Rodrigues, a defendant in an earlier SEC case that alleged pyramid-scheming and affinity fraud,  has ties to Massachusetts, Florida and Brazil.

    UPDATED 3:33 P.M. EDT SEPT. 22 U.S.A. A small subset of data from 95 self-identified “net losers” in the TelexFree MLM scheme shows that they lost a whopping average of $27,578 each, according to an analysis by the PP Blog of court filings in the TelexFree bankruptcy case.

    The average could be higher because investment sums for four of the 95 were not immediately available. Particularly concerning is a claim from the 95 losers that there may be “1,000,000 or more victims” of TelexFree’s fraud.

    Viewed in microcosm, the data from the 95 losers paint a picture of an incredible loss of purchasing power across U.S. states and across the Atlantic Ocean into Italy — all from an association with TelexFree. At a minimum, the data suggest that TelexFree could cause certain U.S. investors to lose their nest eggs or even slip deeper into poverty.

    When compared to the U.S. poverty guidelines as published by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services earlier this year, TelexFree eviscerated wealth among the TelexFree group of 95 at better than two times the U.S. poverty wage of $11,600 for one-person households in 2014. With average TelexFree losses among the group of 95 at $27,578, the 2014 poverty-wage of $27,910 for a five-member household nearly was matched. (The poverty guidelines referenced in this story are for the 48 contiguous U.S. states and the District of Columbia.)

    What this means, in essence, is that certain TelexFree members who perhaps were living in poverty or had a meager standard of living before they encountered TelexFree have lost capital at a rate that further tightens their economic shackles. Lost purchasing power means a lower standard of living for many Americans already living on tight budgets and may translate into things such as automobile repossessions and mortgage foreclosures.

    The bitter irony is that TelexFree — like many HYIP schemes — was positioned as the remedy for economic ills, perhaps particularly the ills of people already at the edge of individual and family disaster. In a bizarre sales strategy, TelexFree appears to have targeted the impoverished people of Haiti to sell a purported credit-repair program to impoverished people in the United States and elsewhere.

    Some purported TelexFree “leaders” appear to have had access to a “private jet” that traveled from nation to nation to line up marks.

    In many cases, according to the group of 95, the losses eroded or eviscerated the “life savings” of TelexFree members.

    Some TelexFree members were lured into the scheme by promises that $289 would return $1,040 in a year, $1,375 would return $5,200 and $15,125 would return $57,200. (Investors at the $1,375 level appear later to have been pitched to buy in at $1,425. Investors at the $289 level appear later to haven been pitched to buy in at $299. See story below for a reference to buy-ins at the $1,375 and  $1,425 levels among the group of 95. Many TelexFree members bought in at much higher levels.)

    “Everybody gets paid” was a common theme. The “program” even reached into other nations with severe economic challenges such as Peru and Rwanda.

    Of the group of 95, about 38 listed addresses in Massachusetts, TelexFree’s U.S. base. One individual in Everett, Mass., listed a loss of $427,500. Another person in Saugus, Mass., listed a loss of $345,000. Two other individuals with the same address in Revere, Mass., listed combined losses of $350,000 — $175,000 each. A person in Woburn, Mass., listed a loss of $72,800. Another person in Chelmsford, Mass., listed a loss of more than $58,777.

    In nearby Connecticut, a person in Stratford listed a loss of $42,000. A person in Monroe listed a loss of $35,625.  At the same time, a person in Trumbull listed a loss of $19,950. Also in the New England region, a person in Nashua, N.H., listed a loss of $16,000.

    To the south of Massachusetts, an individual in Waleska, Ga., listed a loss of more than $109,465. A person in Raleigh, N.C. listed a loss of more than $81,889. To the west, two persons with different addresses in Las Vegas listed losses of $50,000 — $25,000 each. Another person with a Las Vegas address listed a loss of $26,800. Yet another person in Las Vegas listed a loss of $17,175.

    In April 2014 — after bringing an emergency action against TelexFree and alleging it was conducting a massive Ponzi- and pyramid scheme — the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that the “program” mainly was targeted at “Dominican and Brazilian immigrants in the U.S.”

    The SEC’s action occurred after authorities in Brazil — a Portuguese-speaking country — alleged that a TelexFree arm known as Ympactus was targeting investors there in a pyramid scheme.

    The group of 95 now says that TelexFree also targeted the “Nigerian and Russian” communities, in addition to the Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking communities.

    “. . . many Promoters do not speak English fluently,” the group of 95 says, adding that “creditor victims here are also undocumented immigrants residing in the United States, and may be thus extremely reluctant to directly participate in any formal proceedings, and also extremely reluctant to deal with a bankruptcy trustee or other official representative with duties other than solely to creditors. The bulk of the Debtors’ unsecured creditors cannot engage with these Chapter 11 Cases in any meaningful way.”

    Court filings by the group of 95 now show that TelexFree also had a presence among people who speak Italian and have addresses in Italy. Several addresses in Italy proper appear in a document filed by the group of 95, including the address of a person said to have lost $21,375, a person said to have lost $11,400 and another person said to have lost more than $8,699.

    Many others across the spectrum of the group of 95 suffered smaller losses that may be equally painful. The smallest sum lost by member of the group appears to be $900 — by a person in Deltona, Fla.  Another person in Deltona is said to have lost $1,645.

    Other “small” sums lost by members of the group of 95 include $1,375 by a person in Bologna, Italy; $1,425 by a person in Las Vegas; another $1,425 lost by a different person in Las Vegas; $1,425 by a person in New Bedford, Mass; and $1,425 by a person in Weymouth, Mass.

    Buy-in dollar sums from the low thousands to the multiple tens of thousands were common among the group of 95, which is seeking to form an official committee of unsecured creditors in the TelexFree bankruptcy case.