Tag: TelexFree Inc

  • BULLETIN: Zeek-Like Situation Surfaces In TelexFree Case — Dishonored Cashier’s Checks; Trustee Seeks Authority To Subpoena Banks, Including Bank In Puerto Rico

    newtelexfreelogoBULLETIN: The court-appointed trustee in the TelexFree bankruptcy case is seeking authority to issue subpoenas and obtain information from eight financial institutions, including Puerto Rico-based Oriental Bank.

    The other seven are Digital Federal Credit Union, based in TelexFree’s headquarters city of Marlborough, Mass., Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citizens Bank, Santander, TD Bank and Wells Fargo.

    All of the banks ended up in the TelexFree stream of commerce, but precise details of the relationships are not known publicly. What is known is that some TelexFree bank accounts were seized in criminal or civil forfeiture actions and that a cascading avalanche of litigation continues to roar down the mountain.

    Why MLM firms continually tempt this ruinous fate is one of the great business mysteries of current times.

    In the instances of Bank of America and TD Bank, it is known that TelexFree affiliates were given instructions to make walk-in deposits at the banks, some in the name of TelexFree Inc., others in the name of TelexFree LLC. Those instructions were highly similar to instructions given to members of the $119 million AdSurfDaily MLM Ponzi scheme in 2008.

    Court filings by Trustee Stephen B. Darr say he is trying to get to the heart of TelexFree-related money flow and communications involving the banks. Notably, one of the concerns is that all eight of the banks allegedly issued TelexFree-related cashier’s checks prior to the firm’s April 2014 bankruptcy filing, and later dishonored some of the checks.

    Cashier’s checks also were an issue in the ASD case. At the time of the ASD related actions in 2008, the enterprise was the largest known MLM HYIP Ponzi scheme. It since has been surpassed by Zeek Rewards, TelexFree and others.

    Dishonored cashier’s checks became one of the earliest issues in the $850 million Zeek Rewards MLM scheme in 2012. Citing the Uniform Commercial Code, Zeek’s receiver and lawyers have been been pursuing remedies from the banks for more than two years — at a cost of money and time.

    Kenneth D. Bell, the Zeek receiver, has said that “[i]f a bank refuses to pay a cashier’s check or teller’s check presented by the Receiver, it may be required to pay for the Receiver’s expenses and loss of interest resulting from the nonpayment, as well as consequential damages.”

    In the Zeek case, the Virginia Bankers Association provided guidance to member institutions that “the court’s order relied on the Uniform Commercial Code to establish that the uncashed cashier’s checks in the receiver’s possession were receivership assets, and that the receiver was required to present those cashier’s checks for payment and had no discretion not to.”

    Now, the TelexFree trustee appears to be wading into the same or highly similar MLM waters. Among the information Darr is seeking is “information respecting the remitters of the cashiers’ checks and the reasons for the dishonor of such checks.”

    Because MLM Ponzi- and pyramid schemes spread virally, have common promoters and often rely on cashier’s checks, it is conceivable that some promoters might have bought their way into both “programs” with cashier’s checks, possibly even with cashier’s checks recruits paid to their upline sponsors, rather than to the “programs” themselves.

    In the case of Zeek, tens of millions of dollars in checks allegedly had backed up at Zeek’s office in North Carolina in the weeks prior to the SEC’s August 2012 Ponzi- and pyramid action.

    The TelexFree case may add a new wrinkle. Indeed, nearly $38 million in cashier’s checks from Wells Fargo allegedly were found in TelexFree’s Marborough office in the possession of Joseph Craft two days after TelexFree’s April 13 bankruptcy filing. Craft, who has denied wrongdoing, was a TelexFree executive. He has been charged civilly with securities fraud.

    In April, the SEC said that a check dated April 3 in Craft’s possession was “remitted to” TelexFree principal Carlos Wanzeler and made out to “TelexFree Dominicana SRL in the amount of $10,398,000.”

    One check for more than $2 million in Craft’s possession was made out to Katia B. Wanzeler, Wanzeler’s wife. She later was arrested at JFK Airport in New York and detained for more than a week as a material witness.

    The SEC alleged that Carlos Wanzeler was amassing a small-real estate empire in Massachusetts and Florida. He is alleged to have ducked out of the United States via Canada in April, ultimately flying to his native country of Brazil. The United States describes him as an international fugitive.

    Darr now is seeking not only information about the cashier’s checks, but also information on communications between the banks and TelexFree or its principals James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler, and information on any TelexFree-related investigations conducted by the banks, including “information related to ‘Know Your Customer’” rules and regulations.

    In addtion, Darr is seeking bank statements, canceled checks, deposit slips, wire-transfer communications and remittances, documentation concerning fees and contracts, minutes from bank board meetings at which TelexFree matters were discussed, documentation on why the banks ended relationships with TelexFree, documentation on communications the banks had with the SEC and state regulatory bodies, documentation the banks may have on the Massachusetts Securities Division TelexFree investigation and documentation “concerning whether the remitters have been refunded any amounts advanced to purchase” the dishonored checks.

  • Judicial Panel Of United States Moves TelexFree-Related Lawsuits To Massachusetts

    Carlos Wanzeler. From YouTube.
    Carlos Wanzeler. From YouTube.

    The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has moved TelexFree-related litigation pending in federal courts in other states to Massachusetts. A directive ordering the transfers for the sake of judicial efficiency was issued on Oct. 21.

    Some plaintiffs from outside of Massachusetts sued TelexFree and other defendants in federal courts in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. The order moves all of these cases to federal court in Massachusetts and puts them in the hands of U.S. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman, who is presiding over the criminal cases against TelexFree figures James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler.

    Wanzeler has been deemed an international fugitive by U.S. federal prosecutors. He was born in Brazil, a country that has its own TelexFree-related investigations at both the state and federal levels.

    The U.S. Judicial Panel order provides yet another example of how cross-border MLM HYIP schemes that involve hundreds of thousands of people can lead to severe economic fallout and tidal waves of litigation that strain the resources of all parties involved. There are at two government actions against TelexFree and at least six private actions, all occurring while a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee for TelexFree is conducting an investigation.

    The great irony of the cases is that TelexFree, while operating, was presented as a means of making lives easier, a rising tide that would lift all boats. Serial promoters of fraud schemes continue to push similar “programs,” often using appeals to religious faith and lost economic opportunity as a lure

    From the order (italics added):

    On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that the actions listed on Schedule A involve common questions of fact, and that centralization in the District of Massachusetts will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation.

    These actions share factual questions relating to the allegation that the TelexFree companies operated a Ponzi pyramid scheme involving the recruitment of investors in marketing TelexFree’s telephone service plan and that defendants directly participated in or aided and abetted the alleged scheme. Centralization will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, especially with respect to class certification; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.

    Weighing all factors, we are persuaded that the District of Massachusetts is the most appropriate location for this litigation. The events giving rise to the alleged claims primarily occurred in Massachusetts, which is the principal place of business of the TelexFree companies. The federal and state enforcement actions against TelexFree and affiliated individuals are pending there. Thus, the primary witnesses and other evidence likely will be located in Massachusetts. Additionally, transfer of actions to this district will facilitate coordination with the TelexFree bankruptcy cases, which also are pending in this district. The Honorable Timothy S. Hillman, to whom we assign this litigation, presides over the related criminal action and thus is familiar with the factual and legal issues presented by these actions. We are confident he will steer this litigation on a prudent course.

    Current cases listed in Schedule A that began outside of Massachusetts and now have been moved there include:

    GUEVARA v. MERRILL, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14-22405 (Southern District of Florida).

    COOK v. TELEXELECTRIC, LLLP, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:14-00134 (Northern District of Georgia).

    Cases already residing in Massachusetts include:

    GITHERE, ET AL. v. TELEXELECTRIC, LLLP, ET AL., C.A. No. 1:14-12825.

    MARTIN, ET AL. v. TELEXFREE, INC., ET AL., Bky. Adv. No. 4:14-04044.

    CELLUCCI, ET AL. v. TELEXFREE, INC., ET AL., Bky. Adv. No. 4:14-04057.

    FERGUSON, ET AL. v. TELEXELECTRIC, LLLP, ET AL., C.A. No. 4:14-40138 (transferred from the Eastern District of North Carolina).

  • Citing Missing Affidavit And Inconsistencies, Indiana Rejected TelexFree Telecom Application

    newtelexfreelogoUPDATED 6:20 P.M. EDT U.S.A. The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission rejected TelexFree’s telecom application on June 11, 2014, according to records in the state.

    TelexFree filed the application on March 24, requesting “CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT OF THE FINANCIALS OF TELEXFREE, LLC,” according to records.

    On April 13, TelexFree filed for bankruptcy protection in Nevada. On April 29, Indiana informed TelexFree via a docket entry that information it had submitted in March was “Missing [an] affidavit to support the March 24, 2014, request for confidential treatment of certain financial, technical, and/or managerial information.”

    The state also noted that TelexFree had provided “Inconsistent descriptions of the services Applicant proposes to offer in Indiana.”

    Indiana gave TelexFree until May 15 to correct the deficiencies. No corrections were received, according to the state.

    The state formally rejected TelexFree’s application on June 11.

    One of the issues with TelexFree is whether it supplied false, misleading or inconsistent information to various state regulators during the process of applying for telecom registrations.

    In March  [April], the Massachusetts Securities Division alleged that TelexFree’s financial filings with the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission were at odds with information TelexFree had provided investigators in Massachusetts.

    Certain regulatory filings by TelexFree in early 2014 suggest it was financially capable of delivering telecom services and even strong enough to provide intracompany loans to other TelexFree-related businesses. But by April 13, TelexFree was in bankruptcy court seeking to reject its contracts with promoters — this after adopting a new compensation plan on March 9.

    On April 17, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission publicly accused former TelexFree President James Merrill of making false statements about how long TelexFree had been in the VOIP business.

    The SEC also accused Merrill and other TelexFree defendants of not disclosing that “several banks and at least one payment processor stopped doing business with TelexFree, apparently due to concerns about the legality of its multilevel marketing program.”

    Certain financial documents prepared by former TelexFree accountant Joe Craft referenced asserted loans TelexFree made to other TelexFree enterprises, according to the SEC.

    After assuring state telecom regulators that it was healthy, records show, TelexFree went to bankruptcy court only weeks later.

    “. . . defendants TelexFree, Inc. and TelexFree, LLC and relief defendant TelexFree Financial Inc. filed for bankruptcy in Nevada under Chapter 11,” the SEC alleged in April. “The three companies claimed to have liabilities of as much as $600 million but assets of no more than $120 million.”

    In seeking to have the SEC’s fraud charges against him dismissed, Craft has said in court filings that he concluded in March 2014 that TelexFree was a Ponzi scheme selling unregistered securities. He further contends he had been “misinformed about the company’s activities and material information was withheld by company officers.”

    In a filing on the docket of the TelexFree bankruptcy case, Craft contends that TelexFree plaintiffs who assert they are owed money have “fully recovered their ‘investments’ through benefits received from the TelexFree entities and are not owed anything.”

    TelexFree managers or executives James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler were indicted last month on criminal charges of wire-fraud and wire-fraud conspiracy.

    In telecom filings docketed in Alabama on March 20, TelexFree asserted it was “financially qualified” to operate in the state and that its “current financials Show considerable net worth.” A hearing was scheduled for April 10. Prior to that date, however, TelexFree asked for a postponement for a month, listing unspecified “scheduling conflicts” as the reason.

    With the April 10 Alabama hearing postponed, TelexFree was in bankruptcy court just three days later.

     

  • Trustee Confirms TelexFree Did Not Own Building

    Despite worldwide promos implying otherwise, TelexFree was neither the sole occupant nor owner of this Massachusetts building.
    Despite worldwide promos implying otherwise, TelexFree was neither the sole occupant nor the owner of this Massachusetts building.

    One of TelexFree’s alleged reality-distortion fields has been formally exposed.

    Perhaps you saw the recruitment promos (both corporate and affiliate) that planted the seed TelexFree was the sole occupant of a large building in Marlborough, Mass.

    Former President James Merrill was shown posing in front of the structure. A caption on TelexFree’s website read, “The Company HQ: United States.”

    Using the building as a backdrop, one or more affiliates taped promos from the parking lot, creating the impression that TelexFree had a large physical presence in the United States.

    And perhaps you noticed that the SEC viewed those promos as “materially false and misleading” because, as the agency put it in a May 2014 amended complaint (italics added):

    (a) TelexFree, Inc. does not own or occupy the entire building; (b) TelexFree, Inc. originally shared a single suite (consisting of a receptionist, conference rooms, and cubicles) with many other companies; (c) only in December 2013 did TelexFree, Inc. move into its own suite in a portion of the first floor; and (d) TelexFree, LLC has no physical office at all, just a mailing address in Nevada. Despite being the company’s president, Merrill failed to take effective action to prevent or correct the misstatements.

    In court filings in the TelexFree bankruptcy case today, the trustee confirmed that, in November 2013, TelexFree leased a first-floor office in the building (Suite 118) for $5,944 a month. The lease officially began on Jan. 1, 2014, and was set to run through March 2015.

    Other records show TelexFree shared a second-floor office (Suite 200) in the same building with multiple companies. How much it paid for that office was not immediately clear.

    What is clear is that Stephen B. Darr, the trustee, has negotiated the termination of the lease of the first-floor office, concluding he “has no continuing need for the Premise” and thus potentially saving the estate tens of thousands of dollars. The landlord has agreed to settle for a retention of a security deposit and certain furnishings and fixtures — and to let the trustee out of the lease.

    As for the overall TelexFree morass?

    “I’ve been involved in a lot of interesting cases,” Darr told the Wall Street Journal, in a Law Blog article published Aug. 11. “TelexFree is number one.”

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: TelexFree’s James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler Indicted

    Carlos Wanzeler. From: YouTube.
    Carlos Wanzeler. From: YouTube.

    URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: 10th Update 9:18 p.m. EDT U.S.A.) TelexFree figures James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler have been indicted by a federal grand jury.

    The indictment, dated today, includes eight criminal counts of wire fraud and one criminal count of wire-fraud conspiracy.

    Among other things, the indictment alleged that Merrill and Wanzeler conspired with each other and with “others known and unknown to the Grand Jury” to fleece TelexFree members.

    The indictment describes wire transfers involving Merrill and Wanzeler that began on the day after Christmas in 2013 and continued on Dec. 27.

    Here are the alleged wire transfers:

    Merrill: Dec. 26. $136,200 from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Merrill.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 26. $500,000  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 26. $136,200  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 26. $158,900  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 26. $22,700  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Merrill: Dec. 27. $3 million  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Waddell & Reed Inc., to Merrill.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 27. $3 million  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Wanzeler: Dec. 27. $3.5 million  from TelexFree Inc. account at Fidelity Co-operative Bank to Wanzeler.

    Prosecutors from the office of U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz of the District of Massachusetts said in a statement early this evening that assets seized in the case so far total about $140 million.

    From a statement by prosecutors (italics added):

    The indictment also specifies approximately 70 assets to be forfeited as proceeds of the alleged fraud scheme, or assets traceable to such proceeds, including approximately $140,000,000 seized from TelexFree’s accounts and various real assets, such as homes, condominiums, cars and two boats.

    Also from prosecutors (italics/bolding/carriage returns added):

    According to the indictment, TelexFree, Inc., and TelexFree LLC (collectively, “TelexFree”) provided “voice-over-internet-protocol” (“VOIP”) telephone services that allowed customers to use the Internet to make phone calls. The indictment alleges, however, that TelexFree actually operated as a pyramid scheme, in which its ongoing operations were supported, not by actually selling TelexFree’s VOIP product, but by bringing in a constant stream of new investor dollars.

    Between early 2012 and March 2014, TelexFree purported to aggressively market its VOIP service by recruiting thousands of “promoters” to post ads for the product on the Internet. Each promoter was required to “buy in” to TelexFree at a certain price, after which they were compensated by TelexFree, under a complex compensation structure, on a weekly basis so long as they posted ads for TelexFree’s VOIP service.

    It is further alleged that over the course of the fraud TelexFree derived only a fraction of its revenue from sales of VOIP service and the vast majority of it from new people buying into the scheme, and so TelexFree was able to pay the returns it had promised to its existing promoters only by bringing in money from newly-recruited promoters. The indictment includes eight charges of wire fraud, based on Merrill, in December 2013, wiring about $10,000,000 in TelexFree funds to personal accounts belonging to him and Wanzeler.

    Also see May 27 PP Blog story on SEC allegations about how some of the TelexFree money was dissipated.

    Read the Grand Jury indictment (courtesy of the ASD Updates Blog.)

  • DEVELOPING STORY: The TelexFree Rabbit Hole, Exposed

    UPDATED 11:16 P.M. EDT U.S.A. We now may have an answer to some or all of these questions: What happens when you’re Massachusetts-based TelexFree — and apparently so out of touch that Sann Rodrigues, a former SEC defendant in a pyramid-scheme and affinity-fraud case, becomes one of the most recognizable public faces of your company and tells the troops (on video) that he’s made “$3 million?”

    What happens when, on your home turf, you’re effectively targeting the same population group (Brazilian immigrants who speak Portuguese) Rodrigues was accused of targeting in his earlier scam, a scam that operated in part from Massachusetts? What happens when you’re also targeting Dominicans who speak Spanish?

    And what happens when Rodrigues becomes one of the most recognizable public faces of your company after a federal judge — years earlier — had permanently enjoined him from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws?

    Further, what happens when other promoters are going around telling recruits that $15,125 sent to TelexFree will return a guaranteed payout of $1,100 a week for a year and you don’t have to sell a single product to triple or quadruple your money? Further yet, what happens when Rodrigues plants the seed that all is well because an award-worthy American MLM lawyer is aboard the ship?

    What happens when, say, serial MLM HYIP huckster Faith Sloan, fresh off the Zeek Rewards and Profitable Sunrise scams, also emerges as one of your top promoters?

    Moreover, what happens when promoters are going around saying things such as TelexFree has gained “SEC approval” and publishing claims such as this?

    “With the authorization from the attorney general to launch in the US, many predict we’ll see extraordinary growth in the United States in 2013.”  From promos for TelexFree in 2013

    What happens when, say, the claim that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has vetted TelexFree appears on a Facebook site purportedly operated by “TELEXFREE TEAM NIGERIA.”

    Think you might gain the attention of, say, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security? Think that attention might increase after promoters suggest that President Obama had your back? Think it might further intensify if it turns out that Brazilians and Dominicans in Massachusetts weren’t enough, that you’d also reached into communities in South America, Hispaniola, Europe, Africa and Asia?

    What if you plant the seed that the memory of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan is the inspiration behind your business — this after you’ve also targeted the people of Haiti and Rwanda?

    Might the attention you’re receiving intensify after you’re suddenly filing bankruptcy on a Sunday night when, during the two previous months, you’d been telling Public Utilities Commissions in one state after another that you’re flush with cash — so much so, that you even can lend millions of it out?

    What happens when, say, one of the states you assured of your financial clout played host to the “2012 Cybercrime Conference” hosted by the U.S. Department of Justice at which one of the top national-security advisers to the President of the United States observed that cybercriminals bent on poking holes in banks may be responsible for “the greatest transfer of wealth in history?”

    What if President’s Obama’s national-security adviser had said something such as this at the conference?

    “Outside the public eye, a slow hemorrhaging is occurring; a range of cyber activities is incrementally diminishing our security and siphoning off valuable economic assets”  — Lisa Monaco, Assistant Attorney General for National Security, Oct. 25, 2012. NOTE: Monaco now holds the title of Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.

    What if you’ve used U.S. banks and payment systems to help you gather more than $1.2 billion and then declared bankruptcy just a little more than two years after you launched your “program” in cyberspace? What happens when, just days earlier, you’d been telling Public Utilities Commissions that you were so flush with cash you could lend millions to entities of your creation or choosing, but now are claiming to to have liabilities of as much as $600 million and assets of only approximately $100 million?

    What if your bankruptcy filing and program compensation tweaks occurred under conditions that strongly suggested you were trying to beat regulators to the courthouse? What if, only days later, it became known that undercover federal agents had the lay of the land inside your operation before you even went to bankruptcy court?

    Think the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee might use the term “rabbit hole” to describe your operation and push for the appointment of a trustee to burrow down that hole and gain a deep understanding about TelexFree?

    Think that federal criminal prosecutors might get the idea that your operation “has a disturbingly cult-like quality?”

    And do you think — do you just think — the SEC might be inclined to file something such as this? (Italics added.)

    The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) hereby moves, and defendants TelexFree, Inc., TelexFree, LLC, and relief defendant TelexFree Financial, LLC (collectively “the Debtors”) hereby assent, to modify the May 9, 2014 consent order (docket no. 100) to allow Stephen B. Darr, as Chapter 11 Trustee of TelexFree (the “Trustee”), to maintain bank accounts at RaboBank, NA in the name of the Debtors, as well as permit the Trustee to pursue claims and recover all property of the respective Debtors apart from those assets seized or restrained now or in the future by the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts or its agents.

    The SEC filed the motion above yesterday.

    Darr is now running things at TelexFree. He said in court filings yesterday that has “no intention of reorganizing or reactivating their businesses.”

    It seems very much as though Darr’s plan is to go very deep into the rabbit hole of TelexFree.

    NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog. Also see “TelexFree business reorganization dead in the water” at BehindMLM.com.

    From a July 16 motion by the SEC.
    From a July 16 motion by the SEC.

     

  • Plaintiff To TelexFree Crew: You’re All Crooks And Racketeers — And Carlos Costa Is The ‘Mastermind’

    Carlos Costa
    Carlos Costa

    UPDATED 10:48 P.M. EDT U.S.A. A plaintiff bringing a prospective class-action lawsuit in Massachusetts federal court has accused 10 TelexFree figures of committing crimes and — as a group — committing racketeering violations through an “association-in-fact enterprise.”

    Unlike other prospective TelexFree-related class-actions, this one names neither attorneys nor banks nor TelexFree itself defendants. Rather, it pins the onus of the conduct exclusively on James Merrill, Carlos Wanzeler, Steve Labriola, Joe Craft, Fabio Wanzeler, Sann Rodrigues, Santiago De La Rosa, Randy Crosby, Faith Sloan and Carlos Costa.

    Costa, a Brazil-based TelexFree figure, is described in the complaint as the “mastermind of the TelexFree pyramid scheme of fraud.” The complaint further asserts Costa conducted business in Massachusetts, where TelexFree operated an entity known as TelexFree Inc.

    Olavo F. Magalhaes of Milford, Mass., is the plaintiff. The complaint says Magalhaes invested more than $209,000 in TelexFree LLC, the Las Vegas-based TelexFree business that operated in a Massachusetts office suite.

    The crimes alleged against the defendants include fraud, securities fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy. Violations of civil law also are alleged.

    On the racketeering front, the complaint alleged, the members of the “association-in-fact enterprise” associated together between January 2012 and April 15, 2014, “for the purpose of conducting an illegal pyramid scheme and wrongfully enriched themselves” at the expense of Magalhaes and others.

    “Each member of the enterprise played a role in the targeting of victims, advertising and working together to make the TelexFree enterprise work,” the complaint alleged.

    Fabio Wanzeler is the brother of Carlos Wanzeler, an alleged international fugitive accused criminally by federal prosecutors of wire-fraud conspiracy in the United States. Carlos Wanzeler is believed to be in Brazil.

    Fabio Wanzeler, formerly of Worcester, Mass., is believed also to be in Brazil, according to the Magalhaes complaint.

    In other TelexFree news, a federal judge has denied a motion by Faith Sloan to make more than $15,000 available to her.

    The SEC has accused Sloan of violating the asset freeze imposed against her in the case.

    NOTE: Our thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.

     

  • Realty Firm Linked To Carlos And Katia Wanzeler Also Linked To Former TelexFree CFO Joe Craft

    (2nd Update 2:12 P.M. EDT U.S.A.) Acceris Realty Estate LLC, a Massachusetts company that listed Katia Wanzeler as its registered agent, was formed by Joe H. Craft in February 2013, according to corporation records in Massachusetts.

    Craft, accused by the SEC last month of securities fraud at TelexFree, is TelexFree’s former CFO. The appearance of Craft’s name in the Acceris document raises new questions about the length and breadth of his ties to TelexFree. It also raises questions about his knowledge of ancillary businesses with ties to TelexFree and his objectivity when appointed TelexFree CFO on April 13 in what effectively was a board meeting conducted by  co-owners Carlos Wanzeler and James Merrill.

    Both Carlos Wanzeler and Merrill now are accused of felonies in the operation of TelexFree, with federal prosecutors alleging they engaged in a wire-fraud conspiracy. Merrill was arrested and jailed on May 9. Carlos Wanzeler has been labeled a fugitive. Records show both men also are under criminal investigation for securities fraud and money laundering.

    Massachusetts resident Katia Wanzeler, the wife of Carlos Wanzeler, was arrested last week on a material-witness warrant at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Court papers link her name to Acceris and say she sought to board a plane bound for Brazil.

    The extent of her knowledge about TelexFree, Acceris and her husband’s business activities is unclear. A court document in the material-witness case signed by Katia Wanzeler asserts her husband “owns [a] real estate company” and that “some houses” may be in the name of Katia Wanzeler.

    The document further asserts that Katia Wanzeler received an “unknown” amount of compensation from a real-estate business and had $3,000 in cash on her person when arrested in New York. The source of the cash and how she had traveled to JFK Airport are unclear in court filings.

    Carlos Wanzeler ducked into Canada and flew to Brazil after raids on TelexFree’s office in Marlborough (Mass.) and his home in Northborough (Mass.) in April, according to prosecution filings.

    Records in Worcester, Mass., link Acceris to at least four properties: two on Coburn Avenue, and one each on Barnard Road and Mount Avenue. The $162,600 Barnard Road property lists “WANZEIER, CARLOS” as the assessed owner, apparently misspelling the TelexFree co-owner’s last name. “WANZELER, CARLOS” is listed as the assessed owner of the $120,300 property on Mount Avenue. The two Coburn Avenue properties list Aurora Loan Services LLC, a Colorado firm in the mortgage-lending and servicing business, as the assessed owner. The properties have an estimated combined value of $337,100. Aurora appears to have no ties to TelexFree.

    The Craft link to Acceris may suggest that TelexFree money was diverted to acquire real estate, not for operational purposes at TelexFree, which says it is a VOIP company. A TelexFree-related entity in Brazil (Ympactus) linked to Carlos Wanzeler and TelexFree figure Carlos Costa also purportedly was in the real-estate development business, perhaps using funds from TelexFree members to fund a purported project involving Best Western Hotels.

    “The representation and other suggestions that TelexFree has a business relationship with Best Western is false,” the SEC alleged last month.

    It is somewhat common in the HYIP sphere for “programs” to plant the seed they have ties to major companies as a means of leeching off famous brands and sanitizing purported opportunities. It also is common for “programs” quietly to divert resources and plow them into investments or acquisitions external to the “opportunities.”

    Much to the surprise of members of the AdSurfDaily “advertising program” taken down by the U.S. Secret Service, now-jailed ASD operator Andy Bowdoin suddenly announced at a 2008 “rally” in Florida that ASD had a real-estate division. ASD later was alleged to have peeled off money from members to retire the mortgage on a Florida home occupied by Bowdoin’s stepson and the stepson’s wife, both of whom later emerged as alleged players in an ASD reload scheme known as AdViewGlobal.

    Other ASD money allegedly was peeled off to purchase a building and a lakefront property in Florida equipped with a Cabana boat, jet skis and other marine equipment. The Feds seized the properties and equipment as fraudulent proceeds of ASD’s $119 million scam.

    It is believed that AdViewGlobal’s start-up capital consisted at least in part of money not seized in the Secret Service probe of ASD because Bowdoin and others had hidden it to avoid capture by law enforcement. AdViewGlobal, for instance, appears to have had at least one bank account in Switzerland, along with access to cash held by offshore processors such as AlertPay and SolidTrustPay. Both AlertPay and SolidTrustPay later were linked to the $850 million Zeek Rewards Ponzi- and pyramid scheme.

    Acceris marks at least the second possible TelexFree offshoot linked to Craft. In April, the SEC said Craft incorporated an entity known as TelexFree Financial Inc. of Coconut Creek, Fla. TelexFree Financial, TelexFree Inc. of Massachusetts and TelexFree LLC of Nevada filed for bankruptcy two days before the SEC brought its fraud action.

    When federal agents raided TelexFree’s Marlborough (Mass.) headquarters on April 15, they allegedly found Craft in possession of 10 TelexFree-related cashier’s checks, including one made out to Katia Wanzeler for more than $2 million.

    New TelexFree CEO Stuart MacMillan said in bankruptcy court that he did not believe that “Mr. Craft was attempting to divert any of the Debtors’ cash or other resources.”

    Both MacMillan (as CEO) and Craft (as CFO) were appointed to their TelexFree positions by Carlos Wanzeler and James Merrill during what effectively was an emergency board meeting in the hours immediately before TelexFree’s April 13 bankruptcy filing.

    The Acceris corporation record in Massachusetts that identifies both Katia Wanzeler and Craft was filed 14 months before Craft was appointed TelexFree CFO and raises questions not only about his objectivity when appointed, but also whether he knew TelexFree had planned to divert resources into real estate.

    Under certain conditions, such diversions can constitute securities fraud and embezzlement.

    MacMillan said during the bankruptcy proceeding earlier this month that Craft resigned as CFO on April 17.

    NOTE: Thanks to the ASD Updates Blog.

  • Full Statement By SEC On U.S. Justice Department’s Filing Last Week Of Criminal Charges Against TelexFree Figures

    U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

    Litigation Release No. 22992 / May 13, 2014

    Securities and Exchange Commission v. TelexFree, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-11858-DJC (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)

    United States v. Carlos Nataniel Wanzeler and James Matthew Merrill, Case No. 14-MJ-4172-DHH (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)

    Criminal Charges Filed Against Two Principals of Massachusetts-Based Telexfree

    On Friday, May 9, 2014, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts charged James M. Merrill, of Ashland, Massachusetts, and Carlos N. Wanzeler, of Northborough, Massachusetts, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with the alleged TelexFree pyramid scheme previously charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Federal authorities arrested Merrill on Friday, and an arrest warrant was issued for Wanzeler, who the Department of Justice announced is a fugitive. The Department of Justice also announced it has executed 37 seizure warrants seizing assets relating to the fraudulent pyramid scheme.

    The criminal charges against Merrill and Wanzeler related to the same conduct charged in a civil enforcement action filed by the SEC on Tuesday, April 15, 2014, against Merrill, Wanzeler, and others. Those charges were filed under seal, in connection with the Commission’s request for an immediate asset freeze. That asset freeze, which the U.S. District Court in Boston ordered on Wednesday, April 16, secured millions of dollars of funds and prevented the potential dissipation of investor assets. After the SEC staff implemented the asset freeze, at the SEC’s request the Court lifted the seal on April 17. On April 30, 2014, the Court entered preliminary injunctions extending the asset freeze as to defendants Santiago De La Rosa, of Lynn, Massachusetts, and Randy N. Crosby, of Alpharetta, Georgia. On May 8 and 9, the Court entered preliminary injunctions extending the asset freeze as to all the remaining defendants (Merrill, Wanzeler, TelexFree, Inc., TelexFree, LLC, Joseph H. Craft, of Boonville, Indiana, Steve Labriola, of Northbridge, Massachusetts, Faith R. Sloan, of Chicago, Illinois, and relief defendants (TelexFree Financial, Inc., TelexElectric, LLLP, and Telex Mobile Holdings, Inc.).

    The SEC alleges that TelexFree, Inc. and TelexFree, LLC claim to run a multilevel marketing company that sells telephone service based on “voice over Internet” (VoIP) technology but actually are operating an elaborate pyramid scheme. In addition to charging the company, the SEC charged several TelexFree officers and promoters, and named several entities related to TelexFree as relief defendants based on their receipt of investor funds. According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Massachusetts, the defendants sold securities in the form of TelexFree “memberships” that promised annual returns of 200 percent or more for those who promoted TelexFree by recruiting new members and placing TelexFree advertisements on free Internet ad sites. The SEC complaint alleges that TelexFree’s VoIP sales revenues of approximately $1.3 million from August 2012 through March 2014 are barely one percent of the more than $1.1 billion needed to cover its promised payments to its promoters. As a result, in classic pyramid scheme fashion, TelexFree was paying earlier investors, not with revenue from selling its VoIP product but with money received from newer investors.

    In related proceedings, on May 6, 2014, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the District of Nevada granted the SEC’s motion to transfer venue of those proceedings from Nevada to Massachusetts. The SEC had contended that the TelexFree entities hastily filed for bankruptcy in Nevada on Sunday night, April 13, 2014, in a transparent attempt to avoid Massachusetts. The SEC had noted that TelexFree does virtually no business in Nevada but rather was headquartered in Marlborough, Massachusetts. The SEC also argued that TelexFree did not have a legitimate business capable of reorganization under the bankruptcy code. The bankruptcy case will be transferred to Massachusetts for all further proceedings.

    Source: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2014/lr22992.htm

  • EDITORIAL: TelexFree’s La-La Land Leaves Trail Of Missed Signals, Willful Blindness And MLM Arson

    MLM attorney Gerald Nehra at a TelexFree rah-rah event in California last year.
    MLM attorney Gerald Nehra at a TelexFree rah-rah event in California last year. Source: YouTube.

    In case you missed the big news yesterday, TelexFree figures James Merrill and Carlos Wanzeler were charged criminally.

    Unofficially this brings the number of charged MLM HYIP “programs” (or clients) with links to MLM attorney Gerald Nehra to three in recent years. Nehra was an “expert witness” for AdSurfDaily in 2008. He testified that ASD, a 1-percent-a-day “program,” was a legitimate business and not a Ponzi scheme.

    ASD operator Andy Bowdoin, who compared the men and women who guard the President of the United States to “Satan” and the 9/11 terrorists and clucked that “God” * was on his side, later was charged criminally and sentenced to a lengthy term in federal prison.

    Nehra was brought in for marquee value and as an adviser to Zeek Rewards, Zeek operator Paul Burks said in late 2011 or early 2012.  Zeek executives Dawn Wright-Olivares and Daniel Olivares later were charged criminally.  Zeek was a 1.5-percent-a-day “program.”

    At some point in 2012 or 2013, Nehra began to advise TelexFree. TelexFree executive Steve Labriola, like Zeek’s Burks before him, also saw marquee value in Nehra, according to Labriola’s comments in a TelexFree promo on YouTube. Now, Merrill and Wanzeler face the prospect of jail. Because the investigation is ongoing, others may, too.

    TelexFree’s bogus returns were not tied to sales of its VOIP product and computed to more than 200 percent a year, making the “program” a classic Ponzi- and pyramid swindle, according to court filings. Some promoters claimed $15,125 returned $57,200. One promoter allegedly told an undercover federal agent that he’d scored $1.6 million in TelexFree “without selling a TelexFree product.”

    News of the TelexFree criminal charges broke on an otherwise ordinary day in MLM La-La Land. Some “supporters” of TelexFree were petitioning the federal judge overseeing the SEC’s major civil action filed last month to “bail out” the “program,” for example. This occurred after TelexFree “supporters” earlier had petitioned a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for a similar “bail out,” despite the fact TelexFree was trying to “reject” its contracts with promoters.

    This is a column about willful blindness and feigned obtuseness. (Think Faith Sloan.) It’s also a column about missed signals, whether they’re missed purposely or otherwise. (Think: Why would TelexFree hire Nehra after ASD and Zeek — and why would Nehra ever accept the work, which was bound to lead to racketeering allegations? Put another way, if you’re at the scene of too many highly suspicious fires, you shouldn’t be surprised if serious people start to believe you’re the arsonist or the arsonist’s helper. Even assuming Nehra is no MLM arsonist or racketeer, accepting the TelexFree work potentially put him in the position of being extorted or otherwise abused by the trade’s arsonists and racketeers.)

    Spot any common themes or information roadmaps in the quoted material below?

    AdSurfDaily “is not” a Ponzi scheme. “It is a legally structured, direct selling business model with multilevel compensation.”Gerald Nehra, MLM attorney, Aug. 18, 2008. (Context: Nehra’s submitted testimony as defense witness in civil forfeiture action in the $119 million AdSurfDaily MLM HYIP Ponzi case. **)

    “[AdViewGlobal] is the next iteration of the Ponzi scheme auto-surf programs, which [are] staffed with former [AdSurfDaily] executives and Bowdoin disciples.”Class-action attorneys suing AdSurfDaily operator Andy Bowdoin and AdSurfDaily attorney Robert Garner of North Carolina, June 30, 2009. (Context: Motion in member-filed lawsuit against Bowdoin and Garner that alleged RICO (racketeering) violations.)

    “With all of our efforts to punish and deter this criminal enterprise, the rights of innocent parties are protected and will subsequently be returned.”A.T. Smith, assistant director, U.S. Secret Service Office of Investigations, Sept. 26, 2011. (Context: Successful forfeiture actions and remission (restitution) in AdSurfDaily MLM HYIP Ponzi case.)

    “We will continue to use every tool at our disposal to bring justice to the citizens defrauded by these insidious schemes.”Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Sept. 26, 2011. (Context: Successful forfeiture actions and remission (restitution) in AdSurfDaily MLM HYIP Ponzi case.)

    “Just having him on retainer and having him on our team, it goes a long way from keeping anybody from launching an attack. Because generally when Gerry Nehra is involved, the Feds know that he’s cleaned up the act really well.”Paul Burks, Zeek Rewards operator, c. December 2011. (Context: Burks’ remarks to early Zeek members that MLM attorney Nehra was on board.)

    “I am pleading guilty because I am in fact guilty of the offense(s) identified in this Plea Agreement.”Andy Bowdoin, AdSurfDaily operator, May 2012. (Context: Plea agreement to wire fraud in which Bowdoin disagreed with MLM attorney Nehra and acknowledged AdSurfDaily was a Ponzi scheme.)

    “Capitalizing on the strength of our financial task force partnerships, we aggressively pursue criminals using computer experts, forensic specialists, investigative experts and intelligence analysts.”Dennis Ramos Martinez, special agent in charge, U.S. Secret Service Orlando Office, Aug. 29, 2012. (Context: Prison sentence imposed on AdSurfDaily operator Andy Bowdoin.)

    “While [Gregory] McKnight himself referred to Legisi as a “loan” program, and demanded that “members” not refer to their “loan” and an “investment,” Legisi was, in reality, an investment contract, which is considered a security and therefore regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This semantic obfuscation was quite obviously an attempt to sidestep the securities laws.”Office of U.S. Attorney Barbara L. McQuade, Eastern District of Michigan, September 2012. (Context: Sentencing memo against Gregory McKnight in Legisi $72 million HYIP swindle.)

    “I’m not sure how many of you have heard the name ‘Gerry Nehra.’ But it is a very big name in this industry.”Steve Labriola, TelexFree executive, Newport Beach, Calif., July 2013. (Context: Labriola introducing Nehra to TelexFree members at “Super Weekend” MLM rah-rah fest.)

    “ZeekRewards used the enormous power of the Internet to rip off $850 million from hundreds of thousands of victims in less than two years. We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to take down greedy scam artists who think nothing of stealing the savings of hard working people.”U.S. Attorney Anne M. Tompkins, Western District of North Carolina, Dec. 20, 2013. (Context: The filing of criminal charges in the Zeek Rewards MLM/HYIP case.)

    “The Massachusetts Securities Division charged TelexFREE Inc., with running a Ponzi scheme targeting Brazilian-Americans that has raised over $90 million from Massachusetts residents and around $1 billion globally.”U.S. Department of Homeland Security, April 17, 2014. (Context: U.S. financial infrastructure protection. Sourced from DHS Daily Open Source Infrastructure Report.)

    “At this [TelexFree] ‘super weekend’ event, Attorney Nehra spoke at length to attending investors, assuring them of the legality of TelexFree’s operation stating: ‘It is legally designed . . . you are on very solid legal ground.’”Class-action attorneys, May 3, 2014. (Context: The filing of a prospective class-action against TelexFree and Nehra that alleged RICO (racketeering) violations.)

    “Attorney Nehra’s extensive experience in multi-level marketing, and particularly his involvement with the Ponzi schemes involving AdSurfDaily and Zeek Rewards, armed him with the knowledge of what constitutes violations of United States securities law. Indeed, Attorney Nehra was well aware that the use of semantics and obscured phraseology to obfuscate securities laws fails to legitimize TelexFree’s illegal Pyramid Ponzi Scheme.”Class-action attorneys, May 3, 2014. (Context: The filing of a prospective class-action against TelexFree and Nehra that alleged RICO (racketeering) violations.)

    “Investigating the flow of illicit money across U.S. borders and the criminal enterprises behind that money is one of our top priorities.”Bruce Foucart, special agent in charge, Homeland Security Investigations, May 9, 2014. (Context: Comment on the filing of criminal charges in the TelexFree Ponzi- and pyramid case.)

    “As alleged, these defendants devised a scheme which reaped hundreds of millions of dollars from hard working people around the globe.”U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz, District of Massachusetts, May 9, 2014. (Context: Comment on the filing of criminal charges in the TelexFree Ponzi- and pyramid case.)

    SOURCES USED IN THIS COLUMN:

    • U.S. government filings and statements.
    • Court filings from private RICO actions.
    • Original reporting at ASD Updates.
    • Original reporting at BehindMLM.com.
    • Original reporting at the PP Blog.

    * Like jailed AdSurfDaily operator Andy Bowdoin, TelexFree figure Carlos Costa contends God is on his side. While Bowdoin talked of “Satan,” one TelexFree promoter has called a prosecutor in Brazil a “blonde she-devil.”

    ** Two members of AdSurfDaily who went on to become members of Zeek Rewards liked Nehra’s opinion so much they used it in a failed lawsuit (2011) against the U.S. government. The members, Todd Disner and Dwight Owen Schweitzer, both are listed as “winners” in the $850 million Zeek Rewards’ scheme. Disner’s Zeek haul was alleged to be more than $1.875 million.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: TelexFree, Gerald Nehra MLM Law Firm, Banks, Processors Sued In Prospective Class Action That Alleges RICO Violations

    breakingnews72URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: (18th update 3:49 P.M. EDT U.S.A.) TelexFree, MLM attorney Gerald Nehra, “Doe” insiders and several banks have been sued in a prospective class-action that alleges fraud and violations of the federal RICO (racketeering) statute.

    “Certain Defendants share joint and severable liability, including the Doe Inside Promoters, the licensed professionals such as the RLP Defendants, including certified public accountants and lawyers that specialized in sheltering so-called Multi-Level Marketing schemes having aided and abetted TelexFree’s Pyramid Ponzi Scheme by providing TelexFree with legal and financial advice and assistance during the course of the fraud, despite knowledge of the fraudulent nature of TelexFree’s operation,” the complaint alleges.

    Among other things, Nehra was accused in the complaint of turning a blind eye to securities issues at TelexFree, encouraging others to conceal those issues and engaging in other misconduct.

    Nehra, according to the complaint, was not merely providing zealous representation to TelexFree, he counseled “TelexFree on methods to evade United States securities laws that were intended to offer, in part, protection from pyramid Ponzi schemes; all to enrich himself financially and serve his own selfish interests.”

    With Nehra understanding that “his legal opinions and representations would be used by TelexFree as a marketing tool to further and advance their business model,” his “opinions were packaged and promoted as part of TelexFree’s total ‘post Brazilian shut down package’ to the members of the putative class,” according to the complaint.

    The complaint further alleges that Nehra’s actions in misrepresenting TelexFree as a legitimate business encouraged TelexFree members “unknowingly” to “participate in the evasion of federal and state securities laws.”

    Named defendants included TelexFree LLC, TelexFree Inc., “Paralegal Doe [who] served as TelexFree, LLC’s agent, servant or employee,” TelexFree Financial Inc., TelexElectric LLLP, Telex Mobile Holdings Inc., James M. Merrill, Carlos N. Wanzeler, Steven M. Labriola, Joseph H. Craft, Craft Financial Solutions LLC, Carlos Costa, Gerald P. Nehra, Gerald P. Nehra, Attorney at Law PLLC, Richard W. Waak (Nehra law partner), Law Offices of Nehra and Waak, Richard W. Waak Attorney at Law PLLC, TD Bank NA, Citizens Financial Group Inc., Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, Fidelity Co-Operative Bank, Middlesex Savings Bank, Global Payroll Gateway Inc., International Payout Systems Inc. (I-Payout), ProPay Inc., “Banks Doe,”  “Doe Inside Promoters” and “Credit Processors Doe.”

    Merrill, Wanzeler, Labriola and Craft are former TelexFree managers or executives. The Massachusetts Securities Division has described TelexFree as a combined Ponzi- and pyramid scheme that gathered more than $1.2 billion and crossed national borders. The SEC also has charged TelexFree, Merrill, Wanzeler, Labriola and Craft with fraud, alleging that the firm conducted business in at least 20 U.S. states and mainly targeted Brazilian and Dominican immigrants.

    Plaintiffs are identified as Waldemara Martins and Leandro Valentim.

    The complaint alleges that Craft incorporated TelexFree Financial and that the entity “was fraudulently set up for the purpose of sheltering funds rightfully belonging to the putative class.”

    Among the contentions in the complaint (italics added):

    On March 9, 2014, TelexFree changed its compensation plan, thereby requiring Promoters to sell its VoIP product to qualify for the payments that TelexFree had previously promised to pay them.

    TelexFree’s former officers or employees stated to the TelexFree transition team that under the Pre March 2014 standard form contract TelexFree owes its promoters over $5 billion dollars.

    The rule change generated a storm of protests from Promoters who were unable to
    recover their money. On April 1, 2014, dozens of Promoters descended upon TelexFree’s Marlborough, Massachusetts office to protest this change and attempt to regain access to their money.

    Reporting on TelexFree-related matters by BehindMLM.com, a publication that reports on evolving MLM frauds, is referenced in the complaint.

    In addition, according to the complaint, “TelexFree mailed fraudulent and inaccurate 1099 (Miscellaneous Income) forms to investors, possibly to create the illusion that they had made payments to investors.”

    HYIP schemes in recent years have advised participants to avoid calling the “program” an “investment program.” Here is what the complaint alleges on this subject:

    “TelexFree’s Contract at Section 2.6.5 (m) mandates that Promoters are not to use the term investment with respect to the registration costs . . . Co-Defendant and Company Counsel Attorney Gerald P. Nehra, through his affiliated companies (Law Offices of Nehra and Waak , Gerald P. Nehra, Attorney at Law, PLLC, and Richard W. Waak, Attorney at Law, PLLC), and under the direct supervision of Co-Defendants Richard W. Waak and Richard W. Waak Attorney at Law, PLLC provided this deceitful advice for the purpose of furthering perpetuating Defendants unlawful Pyramid Ponzi Scheme.”

    In the complaint, the plaintiffs further asserted that “Attorney Nehra’s extensive experience in multi-level marketing, and particularly his involvement with the Ponzi schemes involving Ad SurfDaily and Zeek Rewards, armed him with the knowledge of what constitutes violations of United States securities law. Indeed, Attorney Nehra was well aware that the use of semantics and obscured phraseology to obfuscate securities laws fails to legitimize TelexFree’s illegal Pyramid Ponzi Scheme.”

    Craft was accused in the complaint of “Overseeing TelexFree’s creation of falsified accounting records,” “Fraudulently certifying TelexFree’s business operations and accounting practices as good and lawful, despite actual knowledge of their unlawful and illegitimate nature” and “Concealing the fact that the AdCentral Packages purveyed by TelexFree were actually securities.”

    At the same time, Craft was accused of “Concealing and absconding with investor assets.”

    Costa, a TelexFree figure in Brazil, was accused of publicly supporting “TelexFree’s illegal and corrupt activities.”

    The banks and processors were accused of aiding and abetting a fraud scheme.