Tag: Texas

  • SEC Moves Against Triton Financial After Woman With Gun Showed Up At Firm’s Texas Office To Demand Refund; Alleged Fraud Scheme Embarrasses NFL, Heisman Trophy Winners, PGA Champions Tour

    A case in Texas may provide the clearest sign yet that securities fraud in the United States is separating people from their senses — not that law enforcement missed the important clues provided by an earlier case in California in which investors who were purportedly fleeced allegedly posed as federal agents and attempted an armed coup at the company that allegedly ripped them off.

    Now comes word that fleeced Texas investor Christine Cayton became so angry at being hoodwinked out of her retirement savings that she got drunk on wine earlier this month, took an unloaded gun to the headquarters of Triton Financial LLC and demanded a refund from Triton principal Kurt B. Barton.

    Visit KXAN to watch Christine Cayton video

    Cayton did not shoot anyone, but was said to be fumbling for bullets in her purse. She was arrested on a felony weapons charge, and since has posted bond. She explained her state of mind to NBC affiliate KXAN. (See KXAN video. )

    Triton, according to Sports Illustrated, initially responded to Cayton’s arrest by issuing a brief statement questioning her mental health,  but now the SEC and the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) — both of which had been investigating Triton and Barton — have filed actions that raise troubling concerns about Triton’s corporate mental health and whether professional athletes will push any product for a fee.

    First, the answer to the question PP readers may have about why Triton became fodder for a Sports Illustrated story is that Triton used former National Football League players and former Heisman Trophy winners in sales and marketing promotions, and also sponsored a golf event on the PGA Champions Tour.

    None of the athletes has been accused of wrongdoing.

    Triton appears to have defaulted on its PGA contract during the very first year — at the same time the golf world finds itself suddenly confronting a PR disaster caused by the Tiger Woods scandal and residual fallout from a PR disaster caused by alleged Ponzi schemer Allen Stanford, whose company sponsored a signature PGA Tour event.

    Questions about Triton’s corporate mental health came to the fore when investigators discovered the company was promoting investment returns as high as 32 percent and a complex scheme that involved an insurance company, a diverted offering, promissory notes and the unauthorized pooling of funds.

    “Since at least 2004, Triton has sponsored more than 40 limited partnerships and limited liability companies, raising over $50 million for these ventures,” the SEC said.

    An entity known as Triton Insurance issued a Confidential Investment Memorandum (CIM) that outlined a $12 million offering of 240 investor units at $50,000 per unit. The offering pertained to yet another Triton company — Triton Holdings — whose purpose “was to acquire and turn around underperforming insurance companies,” the SEC said.

    Triton identified National States Insurance Co. (NSIC) as a company it intended to acquire through the offering, the SEC said.

    But unbeknown to Triton Insurance investors, “Barton had put the NSIC acquisition on indefinite hold around October 2008” and Triton “did not return the funds raised to investors or hold them for future acquisitions.

    “Instead, Barton and Triton Insurance misapplied the funds to pay the expenses and obligations of Triton and its affiliates,” the SEC said.

    Proceeds gathered from investors for the NSIC acquisition were combined with proceeds from other Triton entities and promissory notes to acquire a Nebraska company known as Axis Capital, an equipment-leasing firm, contrary to the purpose of the Triton Insurance offering, the SEC said.

    “After the Axis acquisition, Defendants continued to sell Triton Insurance investor units, raising over $2 million, using the Original CIM,” the SEC said. “The CIM nowhere disclosed the Axis purchase, but instead described only the NSIC acquisition. Investors also were not told that Triton continued to divert offering proceeds.”

    One former NFL player purportedly sent an email “to numerous NFL alumni ‘updating’ them on Triton’s activities and touting Triton’s returns on its investments,” the SEC said in fraud allegations filed against Triton and Barton yesterday.

    The word “Ponzi” has not been used yet, but some of the behavior attributed to Triton by the SEC and the TSSB is creating plenty of bad press for the NFL and the PGA Tour.

    Professional sports has been no stranger to headlines about financial fraud in recent months. In November, former Denver Broncos quarterback John Elway, a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, got some embarrassing ink for speaking at events hosted by Speed of Wealth LLC, which was implicated  in an alleged $30 million Ponzi scheme.

    In February, PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem found himself in the position of having to tackle his first sudden PR nightmare of the year: the Ponzi allegations against Allen Stanford, sponsor of the Stanford St. Jude Championship, which raises millions of dollars for the St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.

    Stanford is jailed in Texas, awaiting trial. So ruinous was Stanford’s name — and so important was the tournament to the hospital, the Memphis region in general and the PGA’s rich history — that the PGA Tour proceeded with the event despite having no title sponsor.

    After Triton got up a head of PR steam by recruiting famous football players such as Tony Dorsett, Jeff Blake, Ty Detmer and Chris Weinke as pitchmen, providers of testimonials or employees, it then expanded into sponsoring a PGA Champions Tour event in Texas, sucking the golf world into its alleged scheme.

    Sports Illustrated broke the Triton story in March, but it gained little media attention elsewhere. Yesterday, however, both the SEC and the TSSB announced dramatic legal actions — and those actions put both the NFL and the Champions Tour in the difficult position of seeing their famous brands associated with a large-scale fraud scheme.

    Read the SEC complaint.

    Read a TSSB filing that alleges Triton tried to thwart a state investigation into its business practices by providing bogus and altered documents.

  • Jacks Arons Purportedly Sued By Larry Friedman

    UPDATED 12:40 P.M. EST (U.S.A.) A person posting as “Bob Guenther” at the ASD-Biz forum reports Jack Arons, a mainstay in the AdSurfDaily case and a driving force behind an effort to get the ASD Members Business Association (ASDMBA) to provide a verifiable accounting of association spending, has been sued by Larry Friedman for slander and libel.

    Arons also was accused of defamation, business disparagement and tortious interference. Arons said he had not yet been served. The case was filed in Texas, Friedman’s home. Arons lives in Florida.

    The claim was made under a headline titled “Jack Arons Sued, Served and Shut Up, Finally . . .” The purported author was Bob Guenther, known for a lack of decorum.

    Some ASDMBA members have been encouraging others to file complaints against Friedman with the Texas Bar for his handling of ASDMBA’s affairs. Others have suggested that complaints should be filed with the office of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott.

    Friedman is an attorney for ASDMBA, which is not associated with AdSurfDaily Inc. ASDMBA was formed in August in the aftermath of the seizure of tens of millions of dollars from ASD amid allegations of wire fraud, money-laundering, selling unregistered securities and running a $100 million Ponzi scheme.

    Some ASDMBA members have demanded Bob Guenther provide a straightforward accounting of how the association spends its money. Members said they believed Friedman would file a lawsuit to protect their interests, but no lawsuit has been filed to date.

    Guenther has served as a spokesman for ASDMBA, sometimes catching the ire of ASDMBA members for what they describe as his use of menacing or threatening language and refusal to provide a detailed accounting of how ASDMBA spends its money.

    “Anyone involved with his illegal activities or false accusations may suffer the same consequences,” the poster claiming to be Guenther said. Arons was referred to as “Rookie” in a separate post.

    The lawsuit described Arons as a felon and a vigilante and a menace who has damaged Friedman’s reputation.

    Why ASDMBA has not produced the type of accounting that would ease members’ concerns is unclear. Also unclear is why litigation ASDMBA members said they were expecting hasn’t been filed. The dispute has been raging for weeks.

    ASDMBA has been collecting money for months. At least one member who contributed funds went on to file his own motion in the ASD case — a motion not related to ASDMBA, but one that used the Curtis Richmond litigation blueprint. Richmond is associated with a sham Utah “Indian” tribe known for filing vexatious litigation.

    Months after ASDMBA began collecting money — and while it still was collecting money — a prominent Washington, D.C., law firm brought a class-action lawsuit against AdSurfDaily, accusing it of racketeering. Three ASD members were named the original plaintiffs.

    ASDMBA members who’d been wondering since August when the association litigation would be filed once again complained about being left on the sidelines. They cite confusion over how ASDMBA money is being spent and the association’s litigation plan.

    In what some ASDMBA members described as a bid to chill speech and undermine their efforts to have authorities investigate Friedman and ASDMBA, the lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order. Among other things, the complaint seeks to restrain parties from “filing false complaints with state agencies against F&F [Friedman & Feiger] and encouraging or duping ASDMBA investors to file false complaints to state agencies or other entities.”

    A judge purportedly has granted the restraining order.

    It is illegal to file false complaints, and people can be charged criminally and sued civilly for doing so. It’s hard to imagine any jurisdiction that discourages or bans the filing of truthful complaints.