Tag: U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh

  • BULLETIN: SEC Backs Legisi Receiver’s Bid To Pursue E-Bullion Cash

    breakingnews72BULLETIN: The SEC has asked a federal judge to permit the receiver in the Legisi HYIP Ponzi-scheme case  to pursue funds tied up after the arrest of James Fayed, the operator of the e-Bullion payment processor. Fayed was convicted in 2011 of ordering the murder of his wife, a potential witness against him. Pamela Fayed was slashed to death in a Greater Los Angeles parking garage in July 2008. The SEC brought the Legisi fraud prosecution in May 2008, just two months before Pamela was killed.

    E-bullion has been linked to several Ponzi schemes. In court filings on June 6, receiver Robert D. Gordon said more than 85 percent of the $72.6 million directed at Legisi had flowed through the defunct processor. Gordon asked Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan for an order “to receive and collect any remission or restoration of funds recoverable or payable to Legisi investors pursuant to forfeiture actions brought by the United States” in federal court in Los Angeles.

    The SEC now says Steeh should issue the order because Gordon’s efforts could “lead to the recovery of millions of dollars for the Receivership Estate, funds which ultimately could be distributed to victims pursuant to a Court-approved formula.”

    Under Gordon’s plan, the SEC said, Legisi’s “winning investors” would be provided a process to dispute claims for the e-Bullion money.

    “As a result,” the SEC said, “any investors who assert that they are entitled to money claimed by the Receiver would have an opportunity to have their arguments heard and decided by the Court. No moneys would be disbursed until after the Court hears and decides such disputed claims.”

    The agency also said that Gordon earlier had successfully claimed $1.7 million from e-Gold, an e-Bullion rival charged in a 2007 money-laundering case. In May 2013, federal prosecutors in New York charged Liberty Reserve — yet another payment processor linked to online fraud schemes and other crime — in an alleged $6 billion money-laundering conspiracy.

    With a take of $72 million, Legisi was a “program” pitched on Ponzi-scheme forums such as TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup — forums from which “programs” such as AdSurfDaily ($119 million), Zeek Rewards ($600 million), Pathway To Prosperity ($70 million) and Profitable Sunrise also were pitched. The combined scams gathered at least $861 million, according to federal court records. The number could be significantly higher because the final take of Profitable Sunrise — estimated in the tens of millions of dollars — is unknown. If Profitable Sunrise gathered $140 million, it would mean that the take of the five scams combined exceeded $1 billion.

    Similar scams continue to be promoted on the Ponzi boards by commission-based hucksters. The condition is comparable to “whack-a-mole” in the sense that one scam rises to replace another. The “offers” frequently are targeted at victims of previous schemes and positioned as a means investors can “earn” back funds lost in the earlier scams.

    Federal court records show that prosecutors asserted an AdSurfDaily pitchwoman funded her ASD account through e-Bullion, which also has been tied to mysterious scams such as Gold Quest International, the “Alpha Project” and Flat Electronic Data Interchange, known as FEDI. FEDI’s operator, Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari, also known as “Michael Mixon,” was convicted in September 2009 of financing terror and fleecing investors in the FEDI scheme.

    Cash associated with the ASD Ponzi scheme was seized on Aug. 1, 2008, about four days after Pamela Fayed was murdered in Los Angeles. Erma Seabaugh, the ASD promoter who funded her account with e-Bullion, also pitched a scam known as StreamlineGold, according to federal records.

    In November 2007, a MoneyMakerGroup poster claimed this about StreamLineGold (italics added):

    StreamLine Gold is literally what it says. [I]t can provide you with an unlimited income through the combination of Precious Metals and Cash with a business model whose time has come PLUS the most advanced and lucrative pay plan ever devised.

    Seabaugh, according to records, was promoting ASD through an entity known as Carpe Diem, a purported “religious” nonprofit firm in Oregon.

    Separately, the receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi case has said that he has “obtained information indicating that large sums of Receivership Assets may have been transferred by net winners to other entities in order to hide or shelter those assets.”

    An evidence exhibit in the Legisi case shows that investors had to affirm they were not an “informant” for government agencies such as the CIA, FBI, SEC, “Her Majesty’s Police,” the Intelligence Services of Great Britain and the Serious Fraud Office, among others.

     

  • BULLETIN: Legisi Receiver Goes After E-Bullion Assets Tied Up After Grisly California Murder; Robert D. Gordon Says More Than 85 Percent Of Funds Directed At HYIP Flowed Through Shuttered Processor

    This Legisi "Quick Start Manual" showed investors how to open payment accounts at E-bullion and e-Gold, both of which provided services to HYIP scams and both of which were implicated in money-laundering schemes. e-Bullion operator James Fayed was convicted in 2011 of arranging the grisly murder of his wife.
    This Legisi “Quick Start Manual” showed investors how to open payment accounts at e-Bullion and e-Gold, both of which provided services to HYIP scams and both of which were implicated in international fraud schemes. e-Bullion operator James Fayed was convicted in 2011 of arranging the grisly murder of his wife, a potential witness against him. (Source: federal court files.)

    UPDATED 5:08 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) How dangerous and bereft is HYIP Ponzi Land? More than 85 percent of the $72.6 million directed at the Legisi HYIP Ponzi scheme before its May 2008 collapse flowed through the now-shuttered e-Bullion payment processor operated by convicted murderer James Michael Fayed, according to the court-appointed receiver in the Legisi case.

    Receiver Robert D. Gordon — noting he has consulted with federal prosecutors — now is asking a federal judge in Michigan for an order that would authorize him “to receive and collect any remission or restoration of funds recoverable or payable to Legisi investors pursuant to forfeiture actions brought by the United States” in federal court in Los Angeles.

    Fayed is sitting on California’s Death Row after his May 2011 conviction for ordering the brutal contract slaying of Pamela Fayed, his wife and a potential witness against him. Pamela Fayed was stabbed 13 times in a Greater Los Angeles parking garage on July 28, 2008. The Los Angeles Times reported her husband was seated on a nearby park bench “texting” on his cell phone while his alleged accomplices carried out the slaying.

    Gordon asked Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan for the order on June 6. About two weeks earlier, federal prosecutors in New York brought criminal charges against the Liberty Reserve payment processor, alleging that it had orchestrated a $6 billion money-laundering conspiracy. Both Liberty Reserve and E-Bullion were popular with HYIP scammers and other criminals.

    Legisi was a “program” promoted on Ponzi-scheme forums such as TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup. The “program” resulted in both criminal and civil charges being filed against operator Gregory N. McKnight and online pitchman Matthew John Gagnon of Mazu.com. In 2010, the SEC described Gagnon as a serial pithman for fraud schemes and a “danger to the investing public.”

    Sentencing for Gagnon had been scheduled for yesterday. It now has been moved to July 9. McKnight, whom prosecutors said engaged in “semantic obfuscation” to raise millions of dollars in his HYIP fraud scheme, is scheduled to be sentenced Aug. 6.

    In his June 6 filing, Gordon alleged that McKnight “used e-Bullion as the vehicle to hold, receive and distribute funds from and to Legisi investors” and that McKnight used investor funds to invest in “various High-Yield Investment Programs.” He further alleged that Gagnon was a “prolific” user of e-Bullion and that “Mazu and Gagnon published on the mazu.com website how-to instructions for prospective Legisi investors to fund their accounts by opening an e-Bullion account.”

    From the receiver’s June 6 filing (italics added):

    The Department of Justice has established a remission process in the Central District of California to administer claims of former accountholders of e-Bullion a/k/a “Goldfinger Coin & Bullion.” McKnight, Legisi, and the majority of Legisi investors held accounts with e-Bullion. Mr. Gordon has made claims against the seized funds for the benefit of the Estates. In addition to direct claims on behalf of the Legisi-related entities, Mr. Gordon seeks to recover funds relative to Legisi investor accounts. To authorize such claims, officials at the Department of Justice have suggested an order from the Receivership Court stating: “Receiver is authorized to receive and collect any remission or restoration of forfeited funds recoverable by or payable to [Legisi Investors] pursuant to any civil or criminal forfeiture action brought by the United States in any federal jurisdiction.” Such an order would assist Mr. Gordon in recovering funds owed by net winner investors and in compensating victims of the Legisi scheme.

    E-bullion has been linked to multiple Ponzi schemes, including AdSurfDaily, Legisi, Gold Quest International and FEDI. The FEDI scheme has been linked to Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari, also known as Michael Mixon. Ali Alishtari pleaded guilty in 2009 to financing terrorism and fleecing investors in the FEDI scheme.

    When a jury sentenced Fayed to death in 2011, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Kathleen Kennedy described him as “one cold, calculating human being.”

    Here is how the U.S. Department of Justice is describing e-Bullion. (Note: this is reproduced verbatim from Gordon’s June 6 filing — with italics/bolding added):

    e-Bullion was a web-based money transmitting business operated by James Michael Fayed. e-Bullion allowed individuals to deposit money and purchase virtual “e-currency” that was purportedly backed by precious metal reserves maintained by Fayed’s companies in the United States and Australia. Accountholders could use e-currency to trade in goods and services with other accountholders. Federal investigators determined that many operators of fraudulent investment schemes used e-Bullion to collect millions of dollars from victims, much of which was wired to overseas accounts.

    In May 2011, Fayed was convicted of murdering his wife and is currently awaiting execution on California’s death row. On July 30, 2012, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California obtained a judgment in federal district court that resulted in the forfeiture of approximately $3.6 million in bank funds and $5.4 million worth of gold, silver, and platinum seized from two entities formerly controlled by Fayed – Goldfinger Coin and Bullion (GCB) and Goldfinger Bullion Reserve Corp (GBRC). In a related matter, the Australian Federal Police obtained a judgment resulting in the forfeiture of approximately $13 million in precious metals that were purchased and stored by Fayed in the Perth Mint in Australia. The funds forfeited in the Australia matter are also expected to be distributed to qualified e-Bullion accountholders through this remission process.

     

  • Day After SEC Announces Judgments Totaling $4.2 Million Against Serial HYIP Pitchman, Another Serial Pitchman — ‘Ken Russo’ — Makes ‘I Got Paid’ Post On TalkGold For JSS Tripler/JustBeenPaid; Separately, McAfee’s ‘Site Advisor’ Declares JBP Pages ‘Dangerous’

    In a 29-page court order announced yesterday by the SEC, U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan laid out the case of willful blindness against serial HYIP pitchman Matthew John Gagnon.

    That case now has resulted in court-ordered judgments of more than $4.2 million against Gagnon, who also was named in a criminal complaint by the U.S. Secret Service in November 2011.

    But in the HYIP sphere, which FINRA described in 2010 as a “bizarre substratum of the Internet,” not even the huge judgment against Gagnon announced yesterday appeared to unnerve the serial scammers on the TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi forums.

    Posting as “DRdave” on TalkGold, huckster “Ken Russo” announced he’d received a new payment of $482.08 from JSS Tripler/JustBeenPaid, a “program” whose purported daily payout rate of 2 percent dwarfs the purported payout rate of Legisi, one of the “programs” that led to Gagnon’s demise.

    In a March 15 conference call, Frederick Mann, the purported operator of JSS/JBP, told members that the company was making the payouts from money sent in by “new members.” Paying “old” members with money from “new” members is the central element of a Ponzi scheme.

    Even as “Ken Russo” was making the announcement, the online security company McAfee was publishing a “Warning: Dangerous Site” message about the JustBeenPaid website.

    “We tested this site and found it’s risky to visit,” McAfee’s Site Advisor reported.

    In 2010, the SEC declared Gagnon a “danger to the investing public” for his serial promotion of scams. (See paragraph 11 of May 2010 SEC complaint.)

    Assessing Gagnon more than $4.2 million in disgorgement, prejudgment interest and penalties, Steeh found that:

    • Gagnon promoted the Legisi HYIP online, through emails and through a forum.
    • Even though Gagnon promoted the program, he was not associated with a registered broker-dealer and had never been registered with the SEC in any capacity.
    • Gagnon understood HYIP frauds and Ponzi schemes, and yet gleaned about $3.6 million from Legisi operator Gregory McKnight and did not disclose details of his agreement with McKnight to solicit investors for Legisi.
    • Gagnon helped orchestrate the “massive” Legisi Ponzi scheme and initially had come into contact with McKnight after Gagnon had recruited McKnight into an MLM business that sold dietary supplements.
    • Legisi was selling unregistered securities.
    • Gagnon was selling unregistered securities.
    • Gagnon did not qualify investors in any way. (In essence, the only necessary qualification was to have money to send to Legisi.)
    • Gagnon performed no “due diligence” on the profitability of the Legisi program. He did not retain or review trading records, bank or brokerage accounts statements or e-currency account records.
    • Gagnon knew or “recklessly disregarded” warnings that Legisi was a scam, did not know where McKnight was keeping the money or how McKnight was calculating profits and losses.
    • Eventually Gagnon distanced himself from McKnight (after learning about an SEC probe, according to the agency), but proceeded to pitch other scams touting the illegal sale of securities. A twice-convicted felon was Gagnon’s alleged partner in one of the scams, but Gagnon performed no legwork up front.
    • Gagnon eventually learned that a man with the same name as his partner had been convicted of fraud, but “accepted” his partner’s “representation that it was not him.” Gagnon did not investigate his partner’s denials, which were false.
    • Gagnon then proceeded to another opportunity touting unregistered securities, effectively using the same blueprint he’d used when touting Legisi and the other scam in which his partner was a convicted felon. As in the other scams, Gagnon did no legwork and “recklessly ignored several warning signs.”
    • Even as he touted the third program, Gagnon had received “several” bad checks from the purported “successful” trader. Gagnon continued to tout the program.
    • Gagnon then touted a fourth program, apparently one operated by a Ugandan national Gagnon had met on the Internet. (Gagnon stopped promoting this program, according to the SEC, only after the agency subpoenaed his bank records.)
    • Gagnon has shown “no remorse” for his conduct “and has tried to downplay his culpability.”

    Whether “Ken Russo” has conducted any “due diligence” on JSS/JBP is unknown. Whether “Ken Russo” has any qualifications to sell securities is unknown. Whether “Ken Russo” qualified investors in any way is unknown. Whether “Ken Russo” retained or reviewed JSS/JBP records, bank or brokerage accounts statements or e-currency account records is unknown.

    What is known is that “Ken Russo” proceeds from scheme to scheme to scheme.

    “I would caution everyone not to listen to anyone who is posting negative comments about this program,” “Ken Russo,” posting as “DRdave” on TalkGold, urged today. “JBP/JSSTripler has changed many lives during the past 13 months and it is one of the best programs I have seen since I first entered the industry back in 1996!”

    Here, according to the SEC, is how Gagnon, who’d been pitching programs online “since at least 1997,” described Legisi:

    “IN ALL OUR EXPERIENCE IF (sic) HIGH YIELD PROGRAMS THIS IS THE ONLY GENUINE PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE EVER FOUND!”

    McKnight, like Gagnon, is facing millions of dollars in civil judgments. And McKnight pleaded guilty last month to a criminal charge of wire fraud.

    It turned out that Legisi was not “GENUINE” at all.

  • URGENT >> BULLETIN >> MOVING: Legisi Ponzi-Scheme Pitchman Matthew J. Gagnon Ordered To Pay More Than $4.2 Million In Disgorgement, Penalties

    Matthew John Gagnon

    UPDATED 10:35 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.)  Matthew John Gagnon, an HYIP huckster and promoter of the Legisi Ponzi scheme, has been hit with orders of disgorgement and penalties totaling more than $4.2 million, the SEC said.

    Gagnon, of Portland, Ore., and Weslaco, Texas, was described by the SEC as a serial promoter of fraud schemes through his Mazu.com website.

    “The Court found that Gagnon ‘purposefully built up an image of trustworthiness in the on-line investing community and exploited this trust,’” the SEC said. “The Court also found that Gagnon ‘repeatedly committed egregious violations of the federal securities laws’ and ‘has shown no remorse for his conduct.’”

    U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan presided over the Gagnon case, which the SEC brought in May 2010. The SEC case against Gagnon was not limited to his involvement in Legisi. It also addressed his involvement in a “resorts” securities-fraud scheme from which money was diverted to a recidivist felon, and his involvement in multiple Forex schemes.

    Legisi, an HYIP fraud, had a considerable presence on the TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup Ponzi forums. Legisi operator Gregory McKnight pleaded guilty to wire fraud last month.

    Here is the breakdown of the financial penalties ordered by Steeh in the May 2010 case against Gagnon: $3,613,259 in disgorgement; $488,570.47 in prejudgment interest; and a $100,000 civil penalty.

    The court-appointed receiver in the Legisi case also holds millions of dollars in judgments against Gagnon.

    Here is a snippet from Steeh’s order of permanent injunction against Gagnon (italics added):

    “[Gagnon] explained that ‘I have a trader I represent in Europe that can trade your funds in a managed account.’ Gagnon promised that investors in the European Trade Offer would experience ‘consistent monthly profits’ and ‘very few losing trades.’ Apparently, the European trader is ‘Juju,’ who is Jjunju Kateregga, a Ugandan national residing in Finland. Gagnon promoted Juju’s trading prowess after meeting him on the internet, exchanging emails and talking to him on the phone ‘a few times.’”

    NOTE: The quoted passage above pertains to a purported “managed Forex trading” offer pitched by Gagnon after he moved on from Legisi. (Read the full order at Justia.com.)

    In November 2011, the U.S. Secret Service filed a criminal complaint against Gagnon for his alleged wrongdoing in Legisi.

  • Judge Extends Asset Freeze In Matt Gagnon Fraud Case; Issues Order To Preserve Evidence And Require Weekly Financial Report To SEC

    Matt Gagnon of Mazu.com.

    A federal judge has extended the freeze on the assets of a website operator accused by the SEC of shilling for a Ponzi schemer and then trying to extort money from the schemer when the fraud was collapsing.

    Severe restrictions placed on Mazu.com operator Matt Gagnon by U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh of the Eastern District of Michigan illustrate the financial and legal dangers of using the Internet to promote murky businesses. At the same time, orders issued by Steeh destroy myths advanced on Ponzi forums that website operators are insulated from prosecution and that their business contacts and customers cannot be sucked into a Ponzi probe.

    Demonstrating the life-altering nature of Ponzi schemes and the monumental legal entanglements and inconvenience that flow from such schemes, the judge also ordered Gagnon to submit a “sworn” statement “each Friday” to the SEC. The order requires Gagnon to account for “all funds received” during the week, including funds received “by others on his behalf.”

    Steeh also ordered Gagnon and his “officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, nominees, banks, brokers, dealers, financial institutions, and those persons in active concert or participation with any one or more of them” not to destroy evidence.

    Steeh’s order applies to “books, records, documents, correspondence, ledgers, accounts, statements, files, electronically stored information, and other property of or pertaining to the Defendant,” regardless of the location of the information.

    At the same time, the judge ordered expedited discovery in the case and freed up $2,000 for Gagnon “to pay living expenses.”

    Gagnon was accused in May of using his website to pitch the alleged Legisi HYIP Ponzi scheme, which the SEC described as a $72.6 million fraud. The judge’s orders followed on the heels of an awareness campaign by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to educate the public about HYIP schemes and the filing of criminal charges by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service against Nicholas Smirnow, accused of operating a $70 million Ponzi HYIP scheme known as Pathway to Prosperity (P2P).

    FINRA issued its HYIP warning on July 15, calling the HYIP universe a “bizarre substratum of the Internet” and saying “HYIPs are old-fashioned Ponzi schemes dressed up for a Web 2.0 world.”

    In May, federal prosecutors declared in court filings in the P2P case that “[a] large percentage, if not all, HYIPs, are Ponzi schemes.” In its HYIP alert, FINRA built on that theme, declaring that “[v]irtually every HYIP we have seen bears hallmarks of fraud” and noting that schemers were using websites, forums and social-media sites such as Twitter and Facebook to spread Ponzi misery globally.

    “From January 2006 through approximately August 2007, Gagnon helped orchestrate a massive Ponzi scheme conducted by Gregory N. McKnight . . . and his company, Legisi Holdings, LLC,” the SEC said.

    “Gagnon promoted Legisi but in doing so misled investors by claiming, among other things, that he had thoroughly researched McKnight and Legisi and had determined Legisi to be a legitimate and safe investment,” the SEC said.

    Among other things, the SEC alleged that Gagnon “had no basis for the claims he made about McKnight and Legisi.

    “Gagnon also failed to disclose to investors that he was to receive 50% of Legisi’s purported ‘profits’ under his agreement with McKnight,” the SEC said. “Gagnon received a net of approximately $3.8 million in Legisi investor funds from McKnight for his participation in the scheme.”

    In its complaint against Gagnon, the SEC alleged he moved from one fraud scheme to the next and even had promoted a scheme operated by the late Bryan K. Foster, a convicted felon. Some of the money from the alleged Legisi Ponzi scheme ended up in the control of Foster, who was running a purported investment program of his own.

    The allegation that proceeds from one fraud scheme ended up as proceeds of a second scheme demonstrates the interconnectivity of schemes in the age of the Internet.

    “Gagnon has been unrelenting in his efforts to raise money from the public through fraudulent, unregistered offerings,” the SEC said in May. “He remains a danger to the investing public.”

    See earlier story titled “Requiem For The Forum Pimps . . .”  The story discusses some of the history of the Legisi Ponzi case.

  • ONLINE PONZI FORUM BOMBSHELL: Matt Gagnon A ‘Danger To The Investing Public,’ SEC Says; Federal Judge Freezes Assets Of Mazu.com Pitchman Who Promoted Legisi, Other Alleged Scams

    Matt Gagnon of Mazu.com

    Ponzi forum operator or moderator? Online HYIP aficionado? Think you’re safe pitching fraud schemes because you’re “only” a promoter or forum “expert” and not the operator of the programs?

    Have a secret partnership deal with an HYIP fraudster? Using fancy, professional-sounding terms such as “due diligence” in your forum posts? Claiming you’ve done thorough research before recommending an “opportunity.”

    Pitching programs that advertise unusually large returns — while at once showcasing your knowledge about investment scams and steering people away from certain programs because they sound too good to be true?

    In an action that may send shockwaves across the Web world and Ponzi forums such as ASA Monitor, TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup, the SEC has gone to federal court and filed an emergency action to halt “a series of fraudulent, unregistered securities offerings” made through Mazu.com.

    U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh of the the Eastern District of Michigan has frozen the assets of Matthew J. Gagnon, 41, of Weslaco, Texas, and Portland, Ore. Gagnon is Mazu.com’s operator.

    “From January 2006 through approximately August 2007, Gagnon helped orchestrate a massive Ponzi scheme conducted by Gregory N. McKnight . . . and his company, Legisi Holdings, LLC,” the SEC said.

    The Legisi scheme raised about $72.6 million from more than 3,000 investors “by promising returns of upwards of 15% a month,” the SEC said.

    “Gagnon promoted Legisi but in doing so misled investors by claiming, among other things, that he had thoroughly researched McKnight and Legisi and had determined Legisi to be a legitimate and safe investment,” the SEC said.

    Among other things, the SEC alleged that Gagnon “had no basis for the claims he made about McKnight and Legisi.

    “Gagnon also failed to disclose to investors that he was to receive 50% of Legisi’s purported ‘profits’ under his agreement with McKnight,” the SEC said. “Gagnon received a net of approximately $3.8 million in Legisi investor funds from McKnight for his participation in the scheme.”

    Then, beginning in August 2007, “Gagnon fraudulently offered and sold securities representing interests in a new company that purportedly was to develop resort properties,” the SEC said.

    In this scheme, Gagnon “falsely claimed that the investment was risk-free and ‘SEC compliant,’ and guaranteed a 200% return in 14 months. In reality, however, Gagnon sent the money to a twice-convicted felon, did not register the investment with the SEC, and knew such an outlandish return was impossible,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon took in at least $361,865 from 21 investors, the SEC said.

    Still unfinished, Gagnon — in April 2009 — began promoting “a fraudulent offering of interests in a purported Forex trading venture,” the SEC said. “Gagnon guaranteed that the venture would generate returns of 2% a month or 30% a year for his investors. Gagnon’s claims were false, and Gagnon had no basis for making the claims.”

    Gagnon next turned to another Forex sceme, the SEC said.

    From October 2009 to November 2009, Gagnon “offered another purported Forex trading venture in which he claimed to have a trader in Europe who would trade foreign currencies for investors in exchange for 40% of any profits he generated,” the SEC said. “Gagnon removed this offer from his website in November 2009 when he received notice that the SEC had subpoenaed his bank records.”

    Despite his knowledge about Ponzi and fraud schemes, Gagnon repeatedly pitched such schemes, the SEC said.

    “Gagnon has been unrelenting in his efforts to raise money from the public through
    fraudulent, unregistered offerings,” the SEC said. “He remains a danger to the investing public.”

    Despite his sales pitches, “Gagnon has never been associated with a registered broker-dealer and has never been registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer or in any other capacity,” the SEC said.

    Among the people to whom Gagnon directed money was the late Bryan K. Foster, who was convicted in 1997 of five felony counts of wire fraud and sentenced to 41 months in prison. These convictions were recorded in U.S. District Court in Montana, according to records.

    In 2000, Foster was convicted in Colorado of one felony count of wire fraud and sentenced to five years in prison, according to records.

    Between July 13, 2007 and September 17, 2007, Gagnon sent at least $800,000 to accounts in the name of Trails Home LLC, which was controlled Foster, the SEC said. Money from the illegal Legisi program was included in the sum transferred to Foster for his purported investment program, the SEC said.

    The Legisi Program

    In 2005, McKnight was an underemployed General Motors worker living outside Flint, Mich., the SEC said, adding that he had financial problems.

    “In December 2005, McKnight began offering and selling interests in a pooled investment program variously called Legisi.com or Legisi,” the SEC said. “McKnight promoted the offering around the globe through an Internet website at www.legisi.com,” promising monthly returns of up to 15 percent.

    By February 2006, “McKnight incorporated a shell company called Legisi Holdings, LLC in the bank-secrecy haven of Nevis in the West Indies,” the SEC said.

    “McKnight asserted on the Legisi website that the Legisi program was merely a ‘loan program’ through which investors would ‘loan’ money to Legisi and, in return, Legisi would pay investors high rates of interest.

    But Legisi actually was “a classic pooled investment vehicle, in which investors invested money into a common venture with the expectation that the money would be used to generate profits, for McKnight and the investors, solely through the efforts of McKnight or others working on his behalf. The Legisi program was a security in the form of an investment contract,” the SEC said.

    “The Legisi program was also a massive Ponzi scheme,” the SEC said.

    In January 2006, McKnight and Gagnon discussed a deal by which Gagnon would promote Legisi on the Mazu.com website, the SEC said.

    “McKnight and Gagnon had known each other for several years after Gagnon recruited McKnight into a multilevel marketing business called ‘Mannatech,’” the SEC said. “McKnight became part of Gagnon’s ‘down line,’ meaning that a portion of McKnight’s commissions from selling Mannatech products went to Gagnon.”

    McKnight paid Gagnon “a total of approximately $4,532,512 between January 29, 2006 and April 14, 2008,” the SEC said. “All of the money Gagnon received from McKnight consisted of investor funds. There were no ‘profits’ generated by Legisi.”

    Gagnon netted about $3.8 million in the scheme, the SEC said.

    “On behalf of McKnight, Gagnon solicited investors around the world through the publicly available Mazu.com website,” the SEC said. “Gagnon wrote and/or reviewed and approved the content of the Mazu website. No valid registration statement was filed or was in effect with the Commission in connection with Gagnon’s offer and sale of Legisi program investment contracts.”

    SEC: Forum Moderators Helped Push Ponzi Scheme

    “Between approximately January 2006 and August 2007, Mazu employees working on Gagnon’s behalf and at his direction promoted the Legisi program in emails, in Mazu Business Packs and DVDs they sent to investors, and on the Legisi Forum,” the SEC charged.

    “The Legisi Forum was an on-line chat room accessible through the Legisi.com website. Several Mazu employees served as ‘moderators’ on the Legisi Forum. Mazu’s support services also included answering questions over the telephone and email,” the SEC said.

    Forum shills performed services for Legisi and deflected concerns when CNN carried a negative report on the company, the SEC said.

    “The Mazu employees acting as moderators encouraged readers to invest in Legisi, assisted them in transferring money to Legisi, encouraged investors to bring in new investors, and offered investors personal assistance in bringing in referrals,” the SEC said. “They also encouraged investors to keep their monthly earnings with Legisi, rather than withdrawing them, in order to achieve purportedly higher returns. They made sure transfers of money between investors and Legisi went smoothly. The moderators updated investors on changes to the Legisi program like new minimum investment amounts and referral fee rules.

    “The moderators made posts on the Legisi Forum to prevent and diffuse investor rumors and concerns,” the SEC continued. “After an article questioning Legisi’s legitimacy appeared on the CNN Money website on May 8, 2007, one moderator wrote, ‘I think it is worth mentioning that the Forum is probably being read by people who are not Legisi members. So let’s not raise red flags to any bulls out there shall we. . .. Of course so far as any discussion on the [CNN Money] article is concerned I’m sure that everyone is aware that Greg went into Legisi knowing the law and planning for this eventuality. So keep a cool head and stop worrying about what you should do.”

    No Due Diligence

    McKnight was operating a classic Ponzi scheme fueled in part by Gagnon’s cheerleading on Mazu.com, the SEC said.

    Despite the relentless hype, Gagnon performed no due diligence and simply fabricated information or passed along claims as though they were factual, the SEC said.

    “Gagnon did not obtain or review any of McKnight’s trading records, bank and brokerage account statements, or e-currency account records at any point prior to, or during, Gagnon’s promotion of Legisi,” the SEC charged.

    SEC: Gagnon ‘Recklessly Disregarded’ Scam Warning Signs

    “Throughout the time that Gagnon promoted Legisi, he simultaneously warned readers about a type of fraud referred to as a high yield investment program. High yield investment programs, commonly called ‘HYIPs,’ typically involve off-shore companies promising very high rates of interest generated by investment in foreign currencies and a variety of other vehicles, along with repeated hyping of the legitimacy of the program,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon understood the HYIP fraud universe, but nevertheless pitched Legisi, which had promoted an unusually high rate of return and had other markers of the exact kind of scam Mazu.com warned about on its website, the SEC said.

    “From at least April 2006 through at least May 2007 Gagnon provided on the Mazu website an accurate description of a HYIP by stating that they (emphasis added by PP Blog):

    collect funds from lenders as investment capital or deposits and promise a return that is usually extremely high in exchange for ‘borrowing your money.’ The result? Generally after a period of time you are free to withdraw your capital and or your profits, or you can ‘reinvest’ them to earn additional profits. In theory, the compounding can create a crazy return on investment given time . . .

    * * * * * *

    Sadly, most HYIPs are offshore fronts that don’t lie within U.S. jurisdiction and you have no recourse when they steal your money. Most HYIPs realize this and they bank on it! They’ve got you right where they want you. Most also allude to making their profit in legitimate investment vehicles when in reality, you have no idea where they’re making their profit.

    And Gagnon also warned readers about Ponzi schemes.

    “On the Mazu website between at least April 2006 and May 2007, Gagnon accurately described a Ponzi scheme as an ‘investment program touting huge returns in a short period of time. Any returns someone sees are paid out of monies gathered from the investors. No real product, investment, or business takes place,’” the SEC said.

    The Legisi Ponzi began to unravel by September 2007, its decay brought about in part by “the federal seizure of an e-currency provider that was holding $1.8 million for McKnight,” the SEC said.

    Gagnon then “attempted to extort money from McKnight,” the SEC said.

    “On September 9, 2007, Gagnon informed McKnight that he was ending the partnership between Legisi and Mazu,” the SEC said. “Gagnon offered McKnight a choice: send Gagnon and several of Gagnon’s associates approximately $2.5 million, tell the Legisi members that Gagnon was starting a real estate fund, and that Mazu and Legisi were parting amicably, or Gagnon would email the entire Legisi membership and tell them ‘the truth’ about McKnight’s fraud.”

    Read the SEC complaint.