BREAKING NEWS UPDATE: New Pro Se Motion To Intervene In ASD Case Lists Phone Number Associated With ASD Figure Nate Boyd

UPDATED 5:16 P.M. EDT (U.S.A.) NOTE: After additional research, the 10-digit number cited below appears not to be a bank-account number. Rather, it appears to be a telephone number associated with Nate Boyd, a former compliance officer for AdSurfDaily. Boyd’s name also has been associated with the AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf.

A pro se motion to intervene just docketed in the AdSurfDaily civil-forfeiture case lists an “electronic transfer to” a bank account number (**Update 1:41 P.M. EDT: it’s actually a telephone number**) not listed in government references to accounts held by ASD President Andy Bowdoin.

The filing lists the email address of nate@asdcashgenerator.com and a second account number that is associated with ASD in court filings. It was not immediately clear why the filing by Robert and Evelyn Gould included the account number not associated with Bowdoin in court filings. (**Update 1:41 P.M. EDT: it’s actually a telephone number**)

An account number ending with the digits 1028 — an account number not associated with Bowdoin — is included in the Gould filing, along with the words “electronic transfer to” the account. (UPDATE 2:16 P.M. As noted in the 1:41 P.M. update, the 10-digit number is actually a phone number, as opposed to a bank-account number. The phone number is associated with Nate Boyd and a number of work-at-home opportunities.)

Nate Boyd is a former compliance officer at ASD, members said. It was not immediately clear if the “nate” mentioned listed in the email address is Nate Boyd. (UPDATE 2:16 P.M. The phone number is associated with Nate Boyd.)

Some ASD members have said some upline sponsors sold “ad-packs” directly to customers, as opposed to directing them to purchase them through ASD. “Ad-packs” then were transferred from the existing stockpiles of upline sponsors using ASD’s in-house system. The practice is problematic because some upline sponsors could have pocketed the cash, instead of transferring it to ASD, thus generating off-the-books cash sales.

Such transactions could have transferred the burden of paying for ASD “rebates” to the rank-and-file membership, while destroying the reliability of ASD’s records and giving upline sponsors the opportunity to siphon tax-free profits.

Actions by upline sponsors to sell “ad-packs” directly to customers could be construed as a form of wire fraud and money-laundering.

Also unclear is why the Gould claim was filed using the same pro se template used by dozens of other ASD members. U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer already has rejected dozens of filings that used the same argument in the template.

Collyer has not ruled on several templated submissions received after her initial ruling weeks ago that the filers had no standing in the case.

The filing also referenced an account number ending in the digits 3016 that is associated with ASD.

Federal prosecutors have listed 10 ASD account numbers in court filings, referencing them in the August 2008 forfeiture complaint and again in May 2009, in a proof of service of all defendants in rem. None of the account numbers ended with the digits 1028.

Unlike previous pro se filings, the Gould motion included a printout of the government’s form for victims of AdSurfDaily, ASD Cash Generator, LaFuenteDinero and Golden Panda Ad Builder. Check marks on the Gould form are next to the names of AdSurfDaily and LaFuenteDinero. The form submitted to the court by the Goulds appears to have been printed out and filled out in longhand.

The Gould filing suggests that Robert and Evelyn Gould filled out the government form last month, including the bank-account references.

Despite the fact the government believes ASD engaged in a wire-fraud and money-laundering conspiracy with unnamed co-conspirators while operating as a Ponzi scheme, the Goulds said in the filing that the government owes them $2,000