Blog

  • BULLETIN: Zeek Mystery Deepens: Receiver Says He Discovered ‘Foreign’ Account That Has NOT Been Seized; Meanwhile, $5 Million In Cashier’s Checks From Single U.S. Bank Found At Zeek Headquarters; Firm’s Records Described As ‘Inadequate Or Incomplete’; Secret Service Has Recovered Lion’s Share Of $293 Million Found So Far

    BULLETIN: (5TH UPDATE 6:13 P.M. EDT) The court-appointed receiver in the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme case says he discovered that Zeek has “at least one foreign account” that has not been seized.

    It was “not clear” whether the funds would be recoverable despite the fact the bank that holds the account has been served with a freeze order, receiver Kenneth D. Bell said in court filings yesterday.

    Bell did not name the bank or its home country in the filings. Nor did he say how he discovered the account.

    But Bell advised Senior U.S. District Graham C. Mullen of the Western District of North Carolina that he was working with the SEC, the U.S. Secret Service and federal prosecutors to determine “the most efficient and cost effective manner to recover the funds from the entity that controls or the bank that holds this account so that the funds can be used in the distribution plan for this case.”

    The amount allegedly held in the account was not disclosed. Zeek was operated by North Carolina-based Rex Venture Group LLC and Paul R. Burks, the SEC said in August. The agency described Zeek as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid fraud operating domestically and internationally.

    Whether Zeek had silent partners or a special class of members is just one of the many mysteries still surrounding the purported “opportunity.”

    Receiver May Have Cooperation Of Certain Insiders

    Bell’s filings yesterday — on the Columbus Day holiday in the United States — made it plain that certain individuals associated with Zeek were cooperating in the receivership probe, sometimes through lawyers. The names of those individuals were not disclosed. Nor was the degree of their cooperation.

    Filings, however, at least hinted that some people close to Zeek had stories to tell.

    “Initial interviews of the Receivership Defendant’s employees and officers who were willing to be interviewed, as well as communications with various third parties, have revealed the identities of numerous other individuals and entities that might have relevant information regarding the Scheme, including potential business associates and investors of the Receivership Defendant and its principals,” Bell advised Mullen.

    Moreover, the report revealed that the U.S. Secret Service largely was responsible for recovering the lion’s share of more than $293 million in Zeek-related financial accounts.

    Forensic Accounting Firm Hired

    Mullen ordered Bell in August to submit a preliminary liquidation plan by Oct. 8 that would update the court on the receivership’s efforts to date and lay out the early groundwork on how Zeek members could file claims.

    Bell described his investigation as “still in its preliminary stages” and “ongoing.”

    During the receivership’s first 52 days, Bell advised Mullen, it was learned that Zeek had about 2.2 million “affiliates,” but that some of those affiliates appeared to have “more than one user id.”

    Approximately 1 million affiliates “paid money into the Zeek Rewards Program,” Bell advised Mullen.

    Bell has hired FTI Consulting Inc., a forensic accounting firm, to assist in the receivership probe, according to yesterday’s receivership filing.

    Meanwhile, the McGuireWoods law firm is counsel for the receiver. Kroll Ontrack is assisting with data recovery and storage, and Gilardi & Co. is hosting the receivership website and providing a means for Bell to communicate with potentially millions of individuals affected by the alleged epic fraud, Bell said in the filing.

    Zeek’s Aug. 17 shutdown by consent after the SEC brought the Ponzi allegations did not stop bills from coming in, Bell said.

    The estate, for example, already has disbursed more than $55,000 for payroll and benefits due employees, “taxes due the United States, North Carolina, and Arkansas” and for property rent and certain ongoing business expenses.

    During the preliminary examination, Bell identified more than $922,000 in accounts payable, including “certain invoices for professional services,” according to the filing.

    Bell advised Mullen that he still was “in the process of determining the validity and amounts of these accounts payable” and ascertaining the priority in which expenses will be paid.

    Zeek Documentation ‘Inadequate Or Incomplete’

    In a passage that may read like a familiar refrain to HYIP Ponzi analysts, Bell advised Mullen that certain Zeek-related financial documentation “has been found to be inadequate or incomplete.”

    Examining paperwork and data will be time-consuming because of “the significant lack of documentation and the organization of this data,” Bell advised the judge.

    Regardless, Bell said, the receivership team would follow the trail “to identify additional assets, trace the proceeds of any fraudulent conduct, evaluate claims of creditor and investors, and identify potential claims against former employees, third parties (including Affiliate-Investors), and others that may have received assets of the Receivership Estate.”

    As the receiver’s probe moves forward and more evidence is gathered and analyzed, clawback claims will be contemplated under “applicable fraudulent transfer statutes against those who ran the operations and ‘net winner’ participants . . .” Bell said.

    Bell envisions an approach that would “first offer those who are required to return money to the Receivership Estate the opportunity to do so cooperatively in an effort to avoid costly litigation for all concerned,” according to yesterday’s filing.

    Below a subhead of “Miscellaneous Assets Recovered,” Bell advised Mullen that $5 million in cashier’s checks from BB&T Bank were located in [Rex Venture Group’s] main office.”

    Zeek mysteriously announced on May 28 — Memorial Day — that it was closing its BB&T account, along with an account at NewBridge Bank. Why Zeek allegedly was in possession of $5 million in cashier’s checks that originated at BB&T was unclear in the receiver’s filing.

    Despite Zeek’s claim online that it was closing the accounts and its prompt to affiliates to cash or deposit Zeek commission checks drawn on the banks before June 1 or they would bounce, court records show that NewBridge still had $11.64 million in Zeek-related funds on deposit.

    Some observers have speculated that events that led to the August collapse of Zeek began in May, with the report from Zeek that it was closing the accounts voluntarily. If the account closures were less than voluntary, however, it may suggest that the banks had become suspicious of Zeek and that the Rex Venture-owned “opportunuity” was engaged in a scramble to find vendors to accept and maintain deposits.

    Court records claim that Zeek used at least 15 domestic and offshore vendors, including Canada’s AlertPay and SolidTrustPay.

    As of Oct. 8, the court-appointed receiver has identified these U.S. domestic companies as providers of services for Rex Venture Group LLC, the operator of the alleged Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme. The receiver noted in court filings that “certain of the accounts listed above were closed, inactive or had a zero balance” before his August appointment.

    ‘Professionals’ To Receive Scrutiny

    Bell advised Mullen in yesterday’s filing that he also planned to “investigate potential claims against professionals and others” involved with Zeek to determine “who may be liable for the role they played in facilitating the operation.”

    Claims against the unidentified “professionals” and others will be pursued, if warranted, Bell advised the judge.

    Bell further advised Mullen that the receivership would “streamline” operations as much as possible so that Zeek victims and other creditors could receive a disbursement as soon as possible. He did not rule out the possibility of a “preliminary distribution” from seized proceeds.

    No specific timetable was laid out in the filings, but the task of formulating a claims process that potentially needs to accommodate 1 million or more people has begun, Bell said.

    Read the receiver’s filing for more details. (Document provided courtesy of the ASDUpdates Blog.)

     

  • Purported ‘Sovereign’ Arrested In Phoenix After Traffic Stop; Booking Info Gives Hint Of Strange Tale — And ‘New Times’ Fills In The Blanks

    Steve A. Baker. (Source: Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.)

    Steve A. Baker’s booking sheet at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office after his arrest Sunday by Phoenix police during a traffic stop provided a hint that officers had a strange encounter with the 36-year-old man.

    Here is how the sheet reads (italics/bolding added):

    MARIJ-TRANSPORT AND/OR SELL
    BRIBERY-TO INFLUENCE ACTION
    MARIJUANA-POSSESS FOR SALE
    RESISTING ARREST
    MARIJUANA-POSSESS/USE
    DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESS/USE

    Marijuana charges are not all that unusual. Neither is a charge of resisting arrest. But a bribery charge?

    Phoenix New Times did some digging and discovered that Baker allegedly tried to barter with the officer.

    Citing court documents, here is how New Times put it on its Blog:

    “. . . if the cop just let him go, Baker said he wouldn’t have to place a lien against the officer’s own home.”

    Yes, purported “sovereigns” now allegedly are seeking to put a chill on cops by announcing up front that they can avoid an unpleasant fate — the filing of a lien against their personal property — if they simply hop back in their patrol cars, ignore their sworn duties and let crime go unchecked.

    Read the story on the Phoenix New Times Blog.

    For additional background on “sovereign citizens” and liens, see this PP Blog story from Feb. 20, 2012: “BIRTH OF A ‘SOVEREIGN’ VERB . . .”

    For additional background on another purported Arizona “sovereign — Michael Lee Crane — see this Feb. 15, 2012, PP Blog story. The Blog reported on that date that Crane advised a judge that he “reserved” his “right” to the “Uniform Commercial Code” after he was charged in the brutal murders of Lawrence Shapiro, 79, and Glenna Shapiro, 78, and waiting to be charged in the brutal murder of Bruce Gaudet.

    On Aug. 29, the office of Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery announced it was seeking the death penalty against Crane, 32, for the Shapiro and Gaudet killings.

  • RECOMMENDED READING: Times-Picayune Details Louisiana Shootout Involving Purported ‘Sovereign Citizens’ That Left 2 Sheriff’s Deputies Dead

    Dep. Jeremy Triche (left), and Dep. Brandon Nielsen.

    On Aug. 16, Deps. Jeremy Triche and Brandon Nielsen were shot and killed in LaPlace, La. The shootings have been linked to purported “sovereign citizens.”

    Here is Dep. Triche’s “End of Watch” entry on the Officer Down Memorial Page. Here is Dep. Nielsen’s entry.

    The deputies were members of the St. John the Baptist Parish Sheriff’s Office in Louisiana.

    From today’s Times-Picayune, via NOLA.com (italics added):

    By dawn, two deputies were dead. Another two were injured. And the tangled tale of the seven people accused in connection with the shootings began to unspool.

    Two were on federal domestic terrorism watch lists, linked to the growing anti-government “sovereign citizens” movement. It is less a cult than a loose collection of pariahs, united only in their shared beliefs: that there is little authority higher than their own, that they are not subject to laws and taxes, that Americans have been enslaved by their nation.

    Their volatility frightens police who encounter them, for good reason . . .

    Read the story in the Times-Picayune.

  • BULLETIN: Judge Declines To Recuse Herself — And Denies Motion By ASD Figures Todd Disner And Dwight Owen Schweitzer To Reopen Lawsuit

    BULLETIN: AdSurfDaily figures Todd Disner and Dwight Owen Schweitzer will not be permitted to reopen their lawsuit against the government and get a different judge to hear it.

    U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia this morning denied a motion by the ASD duo that she recuse herself from the case. At the same time, Collyer denied a motion by Disner and Schweitzer to reopen the case.

    “A judge’s sworn duty is to judge with fairness and impartiality, and absent a showing otherwise, a judge is presumed to be impartial,” Collyer ruled.

    Disner and Schweitzer made no such showing, Collyer ruled.

    “Plaintiffs have presented no reasonable argument why this matter should be transferred to another judge,” Collyer ruled. “Further, Plaintiffs do not present sufficient facts that would lead an objective observer to believe that the Court has rendered a biased decision in this matter.”

    With respect to the Disner/Schweitzer motion to reopen the case, Collyer said this (italics added):

    Plaintiffs were victims of an internet Ponzi scheme called AdSurfDaily, Inc. (ASD). Federal agents investigated ASD for wire fraud and money laundering and, pursuant to warrants, federal agents seized approximately $80 million of ASD’s funds and related assets. The Government obtained in rem forfeiture judgments against the funds and other property purchased with ASD monies. Plaintiffs brought this suit, alleging that the warrants and the seizure of the funds were invalid and seeking a declaratory judgment that their Fourth Amendment rights were violated.

    Because Plaintiffs lacked standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim and because they had no privacy interest in financial records they voluntarily conveyed to ASD, the Court dismissed the Complaint on August 29, 2012 . . .

    A motion for reconsideration need not be granted unless the court finds there is an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice . . .

    A motion to reconsider is not “simply an opportunity to reargue facts and theories upon which a court has already ruled” . . . Nor is it an avenue for a “losing party . . . to raise new issues that could have been raised previously” . . .

    Plaintiffs’ motion falls woefully short of this demanding standard. Plaintiffs do not allege an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. They merely reargue the same points they previously raised . . .

    On Sept. 17, Disner and Schweitzer accused Collyer of “sophistry” in her handling of their lawsuit. The ASD duo insisted that ASD was a legitimate enterprise even after ASD President Andy Bowdoin pleaded guilty to wire fraud in May and admitted ASD was a Ponzi scheme.

    In separate court actions brought by the government on ASD-related matters, Collyer has ordered the forfeiture of more than $80 million. That money was set aside to compensate victims of Bowdoin’s crime.

    About 9,000 ASD victims already have received a total of about $59 million in compensation, and the government says it plans to reopen claims to victims who missed the January 2011 filing deadline because the ASD database very likely did not include the names of all members.

    In their motion to reopen the case, Disner and Schweitzer curiously argued that Collyer — despite Bowdoin’s guilty plea, acknowledgment that ASD was a Ponzi scheme and prison sentence of 78 months — should have assigned more weight to the opinions of purported multilevel-marketing experts that ASD was not a Ponzi scheme.

    They further ventured that Bowdoin’s confession was “coerced,” even though Bowdoin himself said it was not.

    After their ASD days, both Disner and Schweitzer became pitchmen for Zeek Rewards, which the SEC described in August as a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme.

    ASD was a Ponzi scheme that gathered at least $119 million, federal prosecutors said.

  • UPDATES: (1) Cyberstalker Resurfaces To Claim The Zeek ‘Defense Fund Is Snowballing’ And To Accuse PP Blog And Supporters Of Communism; (2) Blog Receives Separate Email That Plants Seed It Is A ‘Mercenary/Assassin For The SEC & NCAG’; (3) A Series Of Death Threats

    A cyberstalker who has used more than a dozen usernames and bogus email addresses to send harassing communications to the PP Blog resurfaced today after an absence of days.

    The stalker appears to be sending unwanted communications from a series of IPs in the region of Columbus, Ohio.

    Today’s would-be posting bid was targeted at a Sept. 26 story thread titled “SEC Says Zeek Probe ‘Is Continuing’; Agency Updates Information Page.”

    Here is what the would-be poster claimed (italics added):

    Not even a road bump in the affiliates vs the SEC. The amount of support is snowballing. The defense fund is snowballing, and you guys will look so f’n stupid for your communist thought process. down with this stupid website and it’s little communist followers.

    The communication was received at 11:37 a.m. EDT.

    Earlier, at 10:19 a.m., the PP Blog received a strange Zeek-related email that appears to quote an individual dubbed “Steel.”

    Among the claims attributed to “Steel” was this one (italics added):

    In fact, your [sic] creating this un-substantiated linkage between ASD & Zeek, makes you look more like a mercenary/assassin for the SEC & [North Carolina Attorney General] than an impartial observer and reporter.

    These words appeared below the section of the email attributed to “Steel” (italics added):

    Individually We Are Weak – Together We Are Strong[.] We Can Win This Battle & We Will Win The Zeek War.

    The PP Blog is reporting tonight that, on Aug. 6, it received a disturbing communication that “mercenaries” needed to be “[sent] out” to “take out those corrupt bankers, USG politicians, agents, judges and attorney’s that cause us all harm and demages [sic].”

    That communication went on to identify three prominent U.S. politicians — all of whom no longer are in office — and questioned why “[Prominent Politician A’s Name Deleted by PP Blog] and both [Prominent Politician B and C’s Names deleted by PP Blog] [are] still alive and running around?”

    The PP Blog reported the disturbing email to a U.S. law-enforcement agency. The Blog is declining to identify the office once held by the prominent politicians.

    “JUST LOOK AT the insane NAZI driven USA,” the email read in part.

    On Aug. 29, the PP Blog received a death threat targeted at another individual. The Blog reported that communication, as well.

    On Aug. 30, the PP Blog itself received a death threat. Here is part of that message, which incongruously ended with a smilie (italics added):

    . . . we don’t need to worry because we will pay Mr Patrick Pretty a visit. He is already under the sniper’s cross-hair and he will go down. :)

    The Aug. 30 death threat appears to be related to the Blog’s coverage of “Profit Clicking,” the “program” that evolved from JSS Tripler/JustBeenPaid.

    ProfitClicking/JSS/JBP, AdSurfDaily and Zeek are known to have had members in common.

  • Government Opposes Bids By ASD Figures Todd Disner And Dwight Owen Schweitzer To Reopen Lawsuit And Boot Federal Judge From Case

    AdSurfDaily figures Todd Disner and Dwight Owen Schweitzer should not be permitted to reopen their lawsuit against the government for alleged misdeeds in bringing the ASD Ponzi-scheme case in August 2008, government lawyers said in court filings today.

    Moreover, the bid by Disner and Schweitzer to force U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer of the District of Columbia to recuse herself from the case should fail because the ASD duo’s “dissatisfaction with the Court’s rulings is not a basis for recusal,” the lawyers said.

    Disner and Schweitzer, who became pitchmen for the alleged Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme after their ASD days ended, sued the United States in November 2011. Collyer dismissed their lawsuit in late August, ruling that Disner and Schweitzer lacked standing to bring their 4th Amendment claim.

    Collyer dismissed the case on Aug. 29, the same date upon which she sentenced ASD operator Andy Bowdoin to 78 months in federal prison. Bowdoin, 77, admitted in May that ASD was a Ponzi scheme and that the firm never operated lawfully from its 2006 inception.

    Summoning a fancy word in their bid to force Collyer to step down, Disner and Schweitzer accused the judge of “sophistry.”

    The move by Disner and Schweitzer to prevent Collyer from hearing ASD-related matters was at least the third. Two others failed — one by purported “sovereign” being Curtis Richmond in 2009 and another by Bowdoin himself in 2009.

    “Plaintiffs’ motion to reopen and set aside the Court’s Order of August 29, 2012, merely rehashes arguments previously raised and fails to demonstrate any error, let alone clear error, in the Court’s ruling granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Likewise, the record provides no support for Plaintiffs’ motion to recuse Judge Collyer and this motion, too, should be dismissed,” the government said.

    ASD was a Ponzi scheme that raised at least $119 million, federal prosecutors said.

    Zeek Rewards was a $600 million Ponzi- and pyramid scheme, the SEC said on Aug. 17.

    Precisely when Disner and Schweitzer joined Zeek is unclear.

    What is clear is that some very strange events have occurred since the U.S. Secret Service brought the civil portion of the ASD Ponzi case in 2008.

    Purported “sovereign citizen” Kenneth Wayne Leaming is jailed near Seattle on charges he brought false liens against Collyer, three federal prosecutors and a U.S. Secret Service agent who had roles in the case.

    Leaming was arrested by an FBI Terrorism Task Force in November 2011. He since has sued President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder. Separately, Leaming sued a county sheriff in Arkansas.

    Some ASD members claimed Leaming was doing legal work for them, even though he is not an attorney.

    Disner, who solicited funds to sue the government for alleged misdeeds in the ASD case, also was involved in an effort by Zeek figure Robert Craddock to raise funds to intervene in the Zeek case.

    Precisely how Craddock intends to do that is unclear.

  • ASD UPDATES BLOG: Victims Of AdSurfDaily Ponzi Scheme Who Missed Filing Deadline For Remissions Should Get Paperwork In Order And Contact U.S. Attorney’s Office To Receive Claim Form

    On Aug. 29, the PP Blog reported that U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer has authorized the U.S. Department of Justice to reopen remissions claims for victims of the AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme who missed the January 2011 filing deadline.

    Earlier in August, prosecutors advised Collyer that “it is entirely possible” ASD’s database did not contain the names of all members and that money remained to provide a disbursement.

    Under the plan, qualifying members who missed the filing deadline could receive a pro rata share of the remainder of funds seized by the U.S. Secret Service in August 2008.

    Although the date upon which the Justice Department will reopen remissions still is not known, the ASDUpdates Blog is reporting today that “they expect something to happen within the next few months regarding Claim Forms and submission of documents.”

    Visit ASDUpdates to get important info on the new round of remissions.

    Visit the ASD victims’ info site site at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia.

     

  • BULLETIN: Disbarred Attorney And Alleged Serial Fraud Pitchman Charged With Fleecing ‘Elderly Women’; James S. Quay Has Used At Least 3 Aliases And Some Of The Money Was Spent On ‘Membership At A Massage Spa,’ SEC Charges

    An Atlanta man has been charged by the SEC in an alleged scheme in which two elderly women were defrauded through an entity with the confidence-inspiring name of “Trinity Charitable Solutions.”

    The man’s name is James S. Quay — and the SEC described him as an unlicensed financial adviser, a serial pitchman for fraud schemes and a “convicted felon and disbarred attorney.”

    Quay, for instance, pitched the $35 million Ponzi scheme of Robert Copeland, another attorney, the SEC said.

    For good measure, Quay also pitched the Kenneth W. Burnt fraud scheme, according to the SEC.

    In 2005, according to the SEC, Quay was convicted in U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas of filing a false tax return. He spent time in prison and was disbarred “as an attorney by the Supreme Court of Georgia and the Supreme Court of Texas,” the SEC said.

    Quay is 50. The SEC also charged his brother: Jeffrey A. Quay, 44, also of Atlanta.

    James Quay has used at least three aliases — Jim Quay, Stephen Quay, and Stephen Jameson — the SEC said.

    In his most recent scam, Quay cherry-picked the elderly women from the ranks of the Burnt scheme and defrauded them again through Trinity Charitable Solutions, the SEC said.

    But it gets worse: Trinity Charitable Solutions was a “sham limited partnership” Quay started with his brother, the SEC said.

    From a statement by the SEC (italics added):

    The SEC alleges that James S. Quay (Quay) and his brother Jeffrey A. Quay facilitated a scheme in which the women invested $560,000 with the understanding that they were investing in a covered-call equities trading program. The Quays created a sham limited partnership called Trinity Charitable Solutions (TCS) to purportedly operate the program. However, TCS never became a legal entity, and instead the Quays merely deposited the investors’ money in a Scottrade account and personally misused at least $180,000 to afford mortgage payments, lavish restaurant meals, and membership at a massage spa.

    Part of the MO of James Quay was to “host free dinner seminars that target retirees in order to gain their trust,” the SEC charged.

    He later held “consultations” with seminar attendees in his office while showcasing his  “legal diplomas, bar certification, and other professional licenses and certifications,” the SEC said.

    But he “typically would not disclose to investors his criminal background, disbarment, and loss of professional designations and licenses,” the SEC said.

    Without admitting or denying the allegations, James Quay has settled with the SEC, the agency said.

    “The proposed final judgment orders Quay to pay disgorgement of $1,403,638.62 plus prejudgment interest of $179,118.78 and a penalty of $450,000, the SEC said.

    Litigation against Jeffrey Quay is ongoing, the SEC said.

    Read the SEC complaint.

     

     

  • Feds Arrest Alleged North Carolina Securities Scammer After SEC Sues Him; More Than $2 Million Allegedly Linked To WWebnet Lost After Being Transferred To Cayman Islands, Prosecutors Say; Robert Kelly Lied To Investors And Software-Development Team, FBI Says

    “The audacity of this defendant’s alleged scheme was matched by its simplicity. He solicited and obtained millions of dollars from investors and simply pocketed the money for personal use. He told investors they were funding software development, then told his development team he hadn’t found investors.”FBI Acting Assistant Director-in-Charge Mary Galligan, Oct. 3, 2012

    Robert Kelly of Wwebnet Inc. was running a scam in which millions of dollars were dissipated in the Cayman Islands, prosecutors said today.

    A North Carolina man sued by the SEC in August in an alleged fraud scheme now has been arrested on criminal charges.

    Robert Kelly, CEO of Wwebnet Inc., was arrested yesterday in Raleigh on charges of securities fraud and wire fraud. The criminal case was brought by the office of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara of the Southern District of New York after a probe by the FBI.

    Wwebnet was a software company developing a program “capable of transmitting music, videos, and movies over the Internet.” But Kelly effectively looted the firm to “trade options, to pay his personal income taxes, and for other purposes unrelated to software development,” prosecutors said.

    “As alleged, Robert Kelly was simply an old-fashioned grifter touting a new technology opportunity in order to pick people’s pockets,” Bharara said. “He is the latest in a long line of defendants who allegedly lured unsuspecting investors with the allure of new technology only to be caught by law enforcement, but regrettably, probably not the last.”

    Kelly is 56. He formerly lived in New York, prosecutors said.

    At least some of the money made its way offshore and was dissipated, prosecutors said.

    “[Kelly] transferred at least $2.11 million in investor funds into his personal trading account in the Cayman Islands which he used to trade options,” prosecutors said. “By May 2008, that account had a zero balance.”

    From a statement by prosecutors (italics added):

    From 2004 through November 2008, KELLY solicited investors to send money to various Wwebnet-related bank accounts by misrepresenting that the funds would be used to develop software for transmitting music, videos, and movies over the Internet. Instead of using the millions of dollars in investor proceeds that he obtained for legitimate business purposes, KELLY diverted a substantial portion of the money that he raised for his own financial benefit. For example, KELLY transferred at least $2.11 million in investor funds into his personal trading account in the Cayman Islands which he used to trade options. By May 2008, that account had a zero balance. KELLY also used money he received from investors to pay his federal and state personal income taxes. At the same time that he was using investors’ money for his own personal benefit, KELLY falsely told his software development team that he was unable to allocate adequate resources for software development and could do so only when he was able to raise money from investors.

    Read the SEC’s August complaint.

  • BULLETIN: Sunshine State Serves Up Another Bizarre One: Florida Securities Swindler Changed His Name — And Began Scamming Anew, SEC Says

    BULLETIN: (UPDATED 1:31 P.M. JULY 25, 2013, TO CORRECT NAME.) The SEC has gone to federal court in the Southern District of Florida, alleging that a Boca Raton swindler formerly known as Joseph Yurkin changed his name to Joseph Hilton and began scamming anew.

    “By changing his name, Hilton thought he could evade further SEC scrutiny and keep the investing public from finding the truth in his background,” said Eric I. Bustillo, director of the SEC’s Miami Regional Office. “The SEC is committed to pursuing repeat offenders and ensuring the open and transparent sale of securities to investors.”

    The new scam involved “investments in oil drilling projects,” the SEC said.

    The bizarre caper began to unfold last year, after the SEC obtained a final judgment in a 2007 case when Hilton was known as Yurkin and was associated with a company known as Homeland Communications Corp., the agency said.

    After that judgment, Yurkin changed his name and rolled out at at two more frauds, the SEC charged.

    Form the SEC’s complaint against the man now known as Hilton (italics added):

    From no later than March 2011 until January 2012, Hilton sold securities in the fomm of limited partnership units in at least three oil drilling projects in Tennessee sponsored by United States Energy Corporation (“U.S. Energy”). To lure investors, Hilton misrepresented his identity, the risks associated with the investment, the anticipated dividends due to investors, and the amount of oil US Energy’s wells produced.

    Not only did Hilton make false representations to potential investors, he also managed a boiler room and sales agents to assist him in soliciting contributions. Hilton caused companies he controls, Pacific Northwestern Energy LLC (“Pacific”) and New Horizon Publishing Inc., to pay these sales agents commissions in exchange for finding investors and selling US Energy securities.

    A federal judge has issued an emergency asset freeze and appointed a receiver, the SEC said.

    Read the complaint.

  • BULLETIN: International Scammers Used Mail Drops, 80 Different Domains And 130 Phone Numbers To Dupe People Into Paying For ‘Removal Of Bogus Viruses And Non-Existent Spyware, FTC Says

    BULLETIN: Calling it a “major international crackdown on tech support scams,” the FTC has charged multiple companies and individuals in an alleged fraud scheme in which consumers were duped into believing their computers were infected with “viruses, spyware and other malware” and then charged to remove it.

    To cover their tracks, the FTC charged, the scammers used “virtual offices that were actually just mail-forwarding facilities and “80 different domain names and 130 different phone numbers.”

    “And the tech support scam artists we are talking about today have taken scareware to a whole other level of virtual mayhem,”said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz.

    From an FTC statement today (italics added):

    The FTC charged that the operations – mostly based in India – target English-speaking consumers in the United States, Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, and the U.K. According to the FTC, five of the six used telemarketing boiler rooms to call consumers. The sixth lured consumers by placing ads with Google which appeared when consumers searched for their computer company’s tech support telephone number.

    According to the FTC, after getting the consumers on the phone, the telemarketers allegedly claimed they were affiliated with legitimate companies, including Dell, Microsoft, McAfee, and Norton, and told consumers they had detected malware that posed an imminent threat to their computers. To demonstrate the need for immediate help, the scammers directed consumers to a utility area of their computer and falsely claimed that it demonstrated that the computer was infected. The scammers then offered to rid the computer of malware for fees ranging from $49 to $450. When consumers agreed to pay the fee for fixing the “problems,” the telemarketers directed them to a website to enter a code or download a software program that allowed the scammers remote access to the consumers’ computers. Once the telemarketers took control of the consumers’ computers, they “removed” the non-existent malware and downloaded otherwise free programs.

    The scam was targeted at “English-speaking consumers in the United States, Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, and the U.K,” the FTC said.

    Assisting in the cross-border probe were the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) and the United Kingdom’s Serious Organised Crime Agency, the FTC said.

    All in all, the FTC filed six complaints in the Southern District of New York. The named corporate defendants include Pecon Software Ltd., Finmaestros LLC,  Zeal IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Virtual PC Solutions, Lakshmi Infosoul Services Pvt. Ltd., and PCCare247 Inc.

    Visit the FTC site to read the agency’s full statement and to access the complaints.