Tag: Steve Renner

  • LETTER TO READERS: Reflections On 1,000 PP Blog Posts, The Lionization Of Fools And An Unprecedented Crime Wave That Threatens National Security And Is Filling Stadiums With Victims

    Dear Readers,

    This is actually Post No. 1,007 since the PP Blog switched to the WordPress platform two years ago this month. We’d hoped to commemorate our 1,000th WordPress post in the actual 1,000th post, but missed the chance because of Breaking News concerning the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force’s Operation Broken Trust.

    The PP Blog's Breaking News graphic was stolen and used in a promotion for Data Network Affiliates (DNA) earlier this year. DNA, which purports to be in the business of helping the AMBER Alert prohram rescue abducted children, now apparently has morphed into a company known as OWOW, which has instructed members to advertise a secret cure for cancer.

    Several hours after we reported that the Task Force now was counting investment-fraud victims by the tens of thousands and noting that even deaf people had been targeted in massive scams, we reported that Walmart had joined the “If you see something, say something” terrorism-awareness campaign operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

    Walmart was instantly and savagely pilloried on YouTube, apparently for holding the view that DHS deserved private-sector help in its work to keep America safe. On. Dec. 6, when the PP Blog first observed the DHS video on YouTube announcing the Walmart partnership, the video had received only 310 views. That number now has shot up to 289,657. YouTube posters called DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano names that could peel paint. We’ll leave it at that, except to say that scores of Americans appear to have emerged as kneejerk critics and appear unwilling to view America’s economic well-being within the lens of national security.

    Indeed, how safe is America — and the world at large — if fraud victims are being counted in numbers that would fill stadiums and vast sums of wealth are being consumed and disappearing down ratholes? In the Task Force announcement, Attorney General Eric Holder said that, since Aug. 16 alone, cases investigated by the Task Force have uncovered losses of more than $10.4 billion. The schemes affected at least 120,000 victims.

    The victims’ count in just this relatively small cluster of cases is more than enough to fill the Rose Bowl in Pasadena or Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, America’s largest college-football stadium.

    Just prior to our Operation Broken Trust post — in Post No. 999 — we reported that the AdPayDaily autosurf, which has promoters and members in common with both AdSurfDaily and AdViewGlobal, was showing signs of collapse. Flash forward to Post No. 1,002: In this post, we reported that a New York Internet Marketer had been arrested by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service for cyberstalking.

    Vitaly Borker apparently believed it prudent to use the Internet to threaten to rape women who had received what investigators described as bogus and inferior-quality goods from him. A fair reading of the complaint against Borker shows that he used the same type of gutter language directed at Napolitano on YouTube — you know, for her apparent High Crime of asking Walmart shoppers to be aware of their surroundings in the Age of Terrorism.

    We next reported on a 54-year prison sentence handed down to a former Indiana pastor who duped Christian investors in a Ponzi scheme. After that, we reported that a company that once did business with Steve Renner’s Cash Cards International had been implicated in a massive Forex scheme that affected at least 800 investors.

    Renner was the operator of the INetGlobal autosurf, which the U.S. Secret Service said in February was operating a Ponzi scheme affecting thousands of people, including victims of Chinese descent who may have limited ability to understand English. The Secret Service said an undercover agent had been introduced to INetGlobal by an AdSurfDaily member.

    On Dec. 8, we reported that a Maryland man had been arrested after the FBI intercepted his plot to detonate a car bomb at a military-recruitment center. A similar plot had been unmasked by the FBI in Portand, Ore., on the day after Thanksgiving. It was aimed at a Christmas tree lighting ceremony, meaning it was aimed at children and families.

    Here is one way to look at the alleged Thanksgiving plot: The arrest was announced on Nov. 26. By Dec. 6, crackpots were flooding YouTube with paint-peeling comments about Napolitano and the terrorism-awareness campaign. Two days after that, on Dec. 8, a man was arrested in the Maryland plot. He allegedly also talked about blowing up Andrews Air Force Base, which happens to be the home base of Air Force One, which happens to be the aircraft used by the President of the United States.

    We haven’t even written about Wikileaks and the arrest in Britian of Julian Assange. Wikileaks’ sympathizers reacted by bringing DDoS attacks, apparently based on the belief that the best way to show support for Assange was to send out an army of bots to disrupt the websites of businesses that did not support Assange.

    By week’s end, Prince Charles and Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, were surrounded by a mob unhappy about the skyrocketing costs of getting a college education in the United Kingdom. Civility, it seems, can be cast out the door in a country minute and replaced by the taunts of a mob.

    Yesterday, as we again sought to commemorate our 1,000 post, word arrived about the apparent suicide of Bernard Madoff’s son on the second anniversary of his father’s arrest.

    There is no doubt — none whatsoever — that Ponzi = Pain. There also is no doubt that the Internet has ushered in an era of unprecedented, mass-produced, viral crime. Criminals have been aided in their nefarious pursuits by crackpots who employ no editorial filters and simply create or repeat lies that institutionalize crime as an occupation and even celebrate it.

    At the precise moment in time in which Americans and other citizens of the world could benefit most from serious words and serious research backing those words, some of the world’s great publishing companies are struggling to make ends meet. Print circulation is down. Journalists are losing jobs. Designers and salespeople are losing jobs.

    The switch to electronic publishing platforms has been accompanied by piracy, wanton theft and trademark infringement that further erodes the value of words and intellectual property, undermines the economy and adds to concerns about national and international security. People, including well-intentioned people, simply copy-and-paste entire editorial wells from one site to another. The public becomes confused about the original source of material, which often is shoe-horned to fit a specific agenda.

    If former President Bill Clinton, for example, hands out an award for commitment to the environment, it gets spun by alleged scammers as an endorsement of their company. Images of Walmart, Warren Buffet, Donald Trump and Oprah Winfrey frequently are used in promos for multilevel-marketing (MLM) and direct-sales companies to which they have no ties.

    Earlier this year, the PP Blog’s Breaking News graphic was stolen by a member of Data Network Affiliates (DNA), an MLM company that routinely targets promos at Christians and, among other things, has claimed it is helping the AMBER Alert program rescue abducted children. DNA now apparently has morphed into a company known as OWOW, which is asking members to suggest that a product known as TurboMune cures cancer.

    For months, members of an MLM company known as MPB Today have helped themselves to Walmart’s name and branding materials, claiming that a $200, one-time purchase can result in free groceries and gasoline for life. One MPB Today member apparently believed it prudent to drive business to the firm by depicting the President of the United States and the U.S. Secretary of State, a former member of Walmart’s board of directors, as Nazis.

    This is not “freedom,” as the scammers would have you believe; it is theft and piracy on the high electronic seas, plain and simple. It also often is the case that this specific brand of theft also gets mixed with appeals to faith, meaning the scammers are seeking to pluck heartstrings and separate Believers from their money.

    There simply is no way that any government or branch of government can be at all places at all times. Although it is fashionable to describe efforts to battle crime in the Age of the Internet and the Age of Terrorism as an effort by Big Brother to assign each individual citizen his or her own bureaucrat to bring commerce and freedom to a screeching halt, such opinions often are simple rants that lack any real-world context.

    Within hours of the PP Blog’s publication of a story about the alleged Portland plot, the Blog was bizarrely assailed by an MLM aficionado for DNA/OWOW as a tool for Israel. Michael Chertoff, a former federal judge, federal prosecutor and DHS secretary, was described as a “suspect” in the 9/11 attacks, which the poster blamed on Israel while calling Chertoff an Israeli scum bag.

    As noted above, when Janet Napolitano announced a simple partnership with Walmart to encourage citizens to be aware of their surroundings, she encountered vicious name-calling — and it all happened during the same week yet-another bombing plot was unmasked, the Task Force was noting that America’s largest stadiums were not large enough to accommodate recent victims of financial fraud, DDoS attacks were aimed at companies deemed by third parties to be unfriendly to Wikileaks and the future king of England and his wife were surrounded by an angry mob.

    Even if one is willing to assume that Wikileaks seeks to serve a higher, noble purpose, directing DDoS attacks at businesses and government sites hardly helps Assange elicit sympathy or understanding. He lost an important round in the PR war last week, as did the unthinking crowd that assailed Napolitano and the mob that heckled Prince Charles and the Duchess.

    The lionization of crackpots of all stripes is rapidly emerging as a dangerous, unintended consequence of the Internet — as are all the tortured claims that MLM products treat or cure cancer, create vast sums of wealth for ordinary participants and the tortured claim that appropriating the names of Walmart and Winfrey and Trump and Buffet and Clinton is just another word for freedom.

    Far from promoting freedom, the crackpots and criminals are promoting anarchy. They do not seek to compete in either a free marketplace of commerce or a free marketplace of ideas. Rather, they seek to commit crimes on a global scale and to fill entire stadiums with victims — even as would-be terrorists speculate about throwing cocktail bombs into military-recruitment centers and shooting soldiers and staff as they flee the flames through the doors.

    In Portland, meanwhile, the idea was to kill wide-eyed children contemplating the miracles of Christmas and Santa Claus with a fireball that also would consume their parents.

    We conclude this 1,000 post commemoration with a simple thought: Death and taxes are not the only two certainties of life. It is equally certain that law enforcement needs the proactive participation of the public more than ever. It is one thing to direct reasonable criticism at agencies and public officials; it is quite another to cheer against the people who are responding to unprecedented security challenges while trying to make sure the stadiums fill up with football fans, not victims.

  • BULLETIN: Company That Did Business With Steve Renner’s Cash Cards International Charged In Massive Forex Swindle; Case Against MXBK Group S.A. De CV Grew Out Of Cooperative Probe Among SEC, CFTC, FBI And IRS; SEC Charges Pitchmen With Blindly Promoting Scam, Even After Collapse

    BULLETIN: UPDATED 9:18 A.M. ET (U.S.A., DEC. 8.)

    A Mexican company listed as a customer of Steve Renner’s Cash Cards International (CCI) in a 2005 scam known as MegaFund now has been charged by the CFTC with running a massive Forex fraud scheme that gathered at least $28 million from more than 800 U.S. customers.

    Named defendants by the CFTC were MXBK Group S.A. de CV, a private Mexican financial services holding company, and its Forex trading division, MBFX S.A. Court records show that MXBK Group S.A. de CV formerly was known as MexBank Group SA de CV or MexBank.

    Separately, the SEC has charged three men with fraud for blindly pitching the MexGroup program and raising “tens of millions” of dollars in the process. Charged in Utah federal court were Clifton K. Oram, Don C. Winkler and William R. Michael.

    “Beyond the fact that none of the defendants understood how the Forex market or Forex trading functioned, neither Oram, Winker or Michael took any significant steps to investigate MexGroup, its principals, or the viability of the investment,” the SEC charged. “Instead, they blindly accepted MexGroup’s representations about its background, veracity, and track record.

    “Further, Michael and his company used MexGroup’s purported performance numbers on his company’s website and made misleading representations and omissions regarding their own Forex trading experience,” the SEC continued. “Even more egregious, Winkler and Oram continued to offer and sell the MBFX offering even after the November 2008 collapse.”

    Renner, the operator of both CCI and the INetGlobal autosurf, currently is serving an 18-month prison sentence for tax evasion. In February 2010, the U.S. Secret Service alleged that Renner was operating a Ponzi scheme through INetGlobal.

    Renner has denied the Ponzi allegations.

    The CFTC case against the Mexican companies and the SEC case against the promoters were brought as a result of a joint cooperative investigation among the regulators, the FBI and the IRS, officials said.

    Read the CFTC complaint, which alleges the MXBK Group Forex scam began in 2005.

    Here is a snippet:

    “U.S. customers sign up to participate in the Defendants’ forex trading enterprise by completing forms electronically on the Defendants’ internet website. However, when completing their customer applications, U.S. customers are required to designate certain U.S. individuals or entities, sometimes called ‘resellers’ or ‘introducers,’ who in turn act as liaisons for U.S. customers with Defendants’ operations in Mexico. The resellers or introducers receive rebates described as ‘PIPs,’ which are purportedly based upon the volume of trading.”

    (NOTE: The full complaint is highly recommended reading if you follow HYIP and Forex fraud schemes.)

  • INetGlobal Loses Court Appeal; Judge Says Magistrate Judge’s Ruling On Treatment Of Witnesses Was Correct

    Steve Renner

    INetGlobal, a Minneapolis-based autosurf firm under investigation by the U.S. Secret Service and the IRS, has lost an appeal.

    On May 28, U.S. Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel issued an order that permitted investigators to make contact with witnesses in the case under certain conditions.

    Paul Engh, an attorney who said he represented INetGlobal employees, filed an appeal, saying the Noel was misinterpreting the law and that INetGlobal employees are entitled to protection from “isolated and surprise contact” by the government.

    U.S. District Judge Paul A. Magnuson now has affirmed Noel’s ruling, saying the magistrate had applied the law correctly.

    “Because Magistrate Judge Noel’s May 28, 2010, Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, the Court affirms the Order,” Magnuson ruled.

    Noel’s ruling permitted the government to continue to contact both former and current INetGlobal employees as the probe into its business practices continues.

    “Before interviewing current and former employees of Inter-Mark and iNetGlobal, law enforcement shall first ask each individual if he or she is represented by an attorney,” Noel wrote in the order.

    “If the individual responds that he or she is not represented by counsel, the interview may proceed,” Noel continued. “If, however, the individual indicates that he or she is represented by an attorney, law enforcement shall ask that individual for the name of his or her lawyer; at that time, questioning must immediately cease until such a time as the Government’s attorney obtains the consent of the lawyer named, whether Mr. Engh or otherwise, to communicate with the individual ‘about the subject of the representation.’”

    Magnuson said the order was valid.

    “Because any individual who has chosen to be represented by counsel will not be questioned, the Government’s contact certainly is not ‘so egregious that it impairs the fair administration of justice,’” Magnuson ruled.

    “Defendants’ Appeal is denied,” Magnuson ruled.

    INetGlobal members have said in recent days that the company is in the process of relaunching. Steve Renner, who formerly operated the firm, began an 18-month term in federal prison last month for tax evasion.

    In February, the Secret Service said it believed INetGlobal was operating a Ponzi scheme. Renner has denied wrongdoing.

  • WebsiteTester.Biz Pitched On Reborn GoldenPandaAdZone Forum, Plus MoneyMakerGroup, TalkGold And Other Ponzi Havens

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This story originally was published June 30. The PP Blog later encountered a database problem, which caused the site to go down and resulted in the temporary loss of some data. The data now has been retrieved.

    This story is about a new site known as “WebsiteTester.biz,” but some background is in order.

    It turns out that the April reports of the demise of the Golden Panda Ad Zone Forum, which changed its name to the Online Success Zone (OSZ), were premature.

    OSZ now is back online — and a poster is pitching  “WebsiteTester.biz,”  which appears to be promoting itself as an upstart advertising “testing” platform.

    Positioning surfing sites as testing platforms dates back at least to the CEP Ponzi scheme. Last summer, the failed AdViewGlobal (AVG) autosurf, which had close ties to the AdSurfDaily autosurf, was trying to reposition itself as an ad-testing site.

    Just prior to going offline in April, OSZ was pushing Narc That Car and Data Network Affiliates, two highly questionable companies  whose membership roster includes people linked to alleged Ponzi or pyramid schemes. OSZ got its start as the Golden Panda Ad Zone forum after the U.S. Secret Service seized more than $80 million from ASD and its purported “Chinese” autosurf companion, Golden Panda Ad Builder.

    During the summer of 2008, with ASD at its zenith and about to be accused of operating a Ponzi scheme, a predecessor to the INetGlobal autosurf also was coming online. INetGlobal eventually morphed into a surf site that largely targeted Chinese members, according to the Secret Service, which is investigating INetGlobal as its operator, Steve Renner, is in federal prison serving time for income-tax evasion.

    The ASD and Golden Panda money was seized amid allegations of wire fraud, money-laundering, selling unregistered securities and operating a Ponzi scheme. A forfeiture complaint in the case alleged a conspiracy with unnamed participants, and ASD was sued separately under the federal racketeering statute by members who also alleged a conspiracy was under way.

    Participants’ marketing of WebsiteTester.biz. occurs against the backdrop of a forceful statement by federal prosecutors in Illinois that virtually all HYIPs are Ponzi schemes. Autosurfs are a form of an HYIP program.  The business model of WebsiteTester.biz is unclear, and the company has not been accused of wrongdoing.

    In the Illinois case, Pathway To Prosperity (P2P) was alleged to have operated a global Ponzi scheme that gathered more than $70 million and fleeced more than 40,000 people. Nick Smirnow, P2P’s operator,  has a criminal past dating back to at least 1979, including convictions for breaking and entering, driving the getaway car in a robbery and cultivating and selling drugs. He also told a colleague he was involved in a double homicide in Canada and claimed to have ties to organized crime in Ontario, according to court filings.

    Posts on forums such as ASA Monitor, TalkGold and MoneyMakerGroup sought to sanitize the P2P scheme, authorities said. This important piece of information seems to have escaped the OSZ forum, which apparently continues to operate on the theory that HYIPs, autosurfs and cash-gifting programs somehow are a legitimate form of commerce.

    Incongruities abound in the autosurf and HYIP universes. “WebsiteTester.biz,” the apparent new darling of Ponzi boards such as OSZ, has a domain that is registered behind a proxy. It is unclear if any of its early boosters even know who owns the company or could name a single executive or a board member. Because the site’s business model is unclear, promoters are pitching a program they know virtually nothing about.

    The mere fact the “opportunity” is being pitched on the Ponzi boards shows, at a minimum, that promoters instinctively turned to the cesspools to drive business to the company.

    On its website, Website Tester, which purportedly is in prelaunch,  says this (italics added):

    “FINALLY . . . This is the business you have waited for so long:

    “It is completely free, you earn through EVERYBODY who registers after you, even if you do not sponsor people; you must not sell or buy anything. Guaranteed!

    “The faster you register, the more can be your potential income, even if you do nothing else than register for free . . .

    “How does it work? – It’s simple!

    “A market research company from the USA is searching for internet users all over the world, who get paid for testing websites and giving a short opinion. You also can earn up to 1,000 US$ per month working 1 to 10 hours weekly.

    “Even if the job as a website tester is not for you, you can earn two passive incomes month after month.”

    Excuse us while we vomit.

    Based on information on the landing page of WebsiteTester, the upstart company appears to have a tie to an upstart, Las Vegas-registered company known as Alpha Market Research Inc.  Alpha Market appears to have a Twitter site from which it relentlessly links to self-produced news releases that are posted on PRLog.org, a free press-release distribution service.

    Hey, did you see how the SEC described a scam yesterday that allegedly relied on Twitter and Facebook to help line up people to be fleeced in a securities swindle?

    Here is a paragraph from one of Alpha Market’s PR gems:

    “Global marketing is nothing but marketing done on national and international level and which involves understanding the similarities, dissimilarities and taking advantage of the opportunities to attain the goal.”

    Here is another gem:

    “When you buy something from eBay, Amazon.com or any online store, you’ve participated in e-commerce.”

    Meanwhile, here is yet another:

    “If you do not have a ghostwriter writing your blog content, then it means you will need to spend some time writing some blog posts.”

    Separate from its news releases, Alpha Market says this (italics added):

    “Potential clients who are disturbed by trifles during the ordering process are often unaware of exactly why. For you, the entrepreneur, the big questions remain: why did the potential client visit your website and why did they accept or not accept your offer?

    Alpha Market Research, Inc. starts exactly at this point: we make your website available for thousands of AMR website-testers, assigned in groups of age and interest – this way we get detailed feedback with an honest evaluation of your website.

    Like WebsiteTester.biz, AlphaMarketResearch.com is registered behind a proxy. The Alpha Market site was registered May 28, according to records. The Web Tester site was registered five days later, on June 2. Alpha Market’s Twitter site appears to date back to June 4.

    The buzz about Website Tester also is occurring against the backdrop of the launch of yet-another surfing company: AdPayDaily (APD).

    APD, which appears to have promotional ties to ASD and AVG, is running an AVG-like series of promotions that offer bonuses.

    Interestingly, APD, which appears to have only about 550 members despite virtually nonstop flogging for weeks, now says members can send in as much as $10,000.

    Website Tester, at the moment, appears just to be gathering names — and generating excitement by publishing the names of the latest registrants on the left side of its landing page. The names suggest the enterprise is attracting many people from outside the United States, but it is far from clear if anything about the company is real.

  • UPDATE: Renner Begins Sentence In Tax Case; INetGlobal Operator Housed In Minnesota

    Steve Renner, the operator of the Minneapolis-based INetGlobal autosurf, is an inmate at the Federal Prison Camp (FPC) in Duluth, Minn., according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBP).

    Renner, 55, was sentenced in May to 18 months for income-tax evasion. He was indicted in September 2008 and convicted in December 2009.

    The Duluth FPC is a “minimum security” facility located at the former Duluth Air Force Base. FPCs have “dormitory housing, a relatively low staff-to-inmate ratio, and limited or no perimeter fencing,” according to the FBP. “These institutions are work- and program-oriented; and many are located adjacent to larger institutions or on military bases, where inmates help serve the labor needs of the larger institution or base.”

    Renner was listed last week as in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service and “in transit” to an unnamed federal facility. For security reasons, there may be lag time between when a federal prisoner is being transported to a facility and when he or she is listed as an inmate at a specific facility.

    As of this morning, Renner was listed as Inmate No. 14166-041 at FPC Duluth. Renner’s conviction occurred prior to allegations by the U.S. Secret Service that he was operating a Ponzi scheme through INetGlobal and related businesses.

    A federal probe into Renner’s business practices continues. He has not been charged with a crime, and has denied wrongdoing.

  • Prosecution, INetGlobal Strike Interim Agreement That Frees Money To Pay Employees, Insurance Under Court Supervision

    UPDATED 6:14 P.M. ET (U.S.A., JAN. 20, 2011.)

    Employees of an Internet company under federal investigation amid allegations it was operating a Ponzi scheme have received some good news: a sum of $125,000 has been released to pay their past-due salaries and $25,000 has been released to pay their past-due healthcare benefits.

    Meanwhile, $200,000 per month will be released to pay the “ordinary and necessary operating expenses” of INetGlobal and affiliated companies as the probe into their business practices continues.

    News for commission-based affiliates of INetGlobal was not good. No money has been released to pay them.

    Dubbed an “interim agreement,” the release of funds was negotiated by attorneys for both INetGlobal and the government. It will be in effect “until such time as the government files an indictment or information containing forfeiture provisions, a civil forfeiture complaint against the funds seized on February 23, 2010 and in later days, or determines that there shall be no prosecution or forfeiture complaint,” according to the terms.

    The agreement does not mean that INetGlobal no longer is in legal jeopardy.

    A separate action against a San Diego property the government alleged was acquired with fraud proceeds has been suspended under the terms of the agreement. The case against the San Diego property has not vanished; under the terms of the agreement, it is being placed on hold “until the related criminal case or investigation is resolved or, in the event that the government determines that there shall be no prosecution, until the government either files a separate civil forfeiture complaint against the funds which were seized on February 23, 2010 and in later days, or determines that there shall be no prosecution or forfeiture complaint.”

    In February, the U.S. Secret Service said it believed INetGlobal operator Steve Renner was running an international Ponzi scheme. About $26 million was seized in the case.

    Companies covered under the agreement include INetGlobal, Inter-Mark Corp. of Nevada,
    Virtual Payments Systems LLC of Wisconsin, V-Media Marketing LLC of Minnesota, Cash Cards International LLC of Minnesota and SMR Investments #1 LLC of Minnesota.

    NOTE IN BOLD ADDED JAN. 20, 2011: An Indianapolis-based company known as Virtual Payment Systems Inc. has contacted the PP Blog to let it know it is not affiliated with the Renner company Virtual Payment Systems LLC of Wisconsin, which is referenced in the paragraph above.

    SteveRenner.com described the agreement with the prosecution as “an incredible turn of events,” reporting it was “worth millions.” The website also reported that the firm has become “the 1st company ever” targeted in a government investigation to receive money back.

    Prosecutors told the Star Tribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul that the government agreed to the release of funds so employees could get paid. (See link to Star Tribune story below.)

    Payments will be administered under court supervision by a court-appointed attorney, according to the agreement. The agreement calls for the IRS to receive “up to” $650,000 and the Minnesota Department of Revenue to receive “up to” $150,000 for tax payments delayed by the probe. Renner will receive $151,484.75 upon providing “proof that Inter-Mark Corporation and/or V-Media Marketing, LLC and/or Cash Cards International, LLC” owe him that sum.

    Renner, 55, was listed last week as in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service and “in transit” to a federal detention facility to begin serving an 18-month sentence for income-tax evasion. He was convicted in December 2009 and sentenced in May for actions that occurred prior to the INetGlobal Ponzi scheme investigation.

    Renner-related companies have ties to at least four other Ponzi or investment-fraud cases, according to records.

    Read the Star Tribune story on the interim agreement.

  • INetGlobal Operator Steve Renner In Custody Of U.S. Marshals Service To Begin Sentence In Tax Case

    Steve Renner

    Steve Renner is in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service, the agency said this afternoon.

    Renner, 55, was the operator of the INetGlobal autosurf. He was convicted of income-tax evasion in December 2009. On May 5, he was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank to 18 months in prison, although Renner was not immediately jailed after sentencing and was given permission to report on a date uncertain.

    His prison term appears now to have begun.

    Renner is listed by the Federal Bureau of Prisons as “in transit” to a federal detention facility. The name and location of the facility were not immediately clear, and the Marshals Service said it could not provide any additional details.

    INetGlobal continues to be under investigation by the U.S. Secret Service amid allegations Renner was operating an autosurf Ponzi scheme. Renner’s tax case was separate from the INetGlobal probe.

    Renner was indicted on the tax charges in September 2008, about a month after the Secret Service raided the Florida headquarters of AdSurfDaily, another alleged autosurf Ponzi scheme.

  • INetGlobal Enters Objection To Magistrate Judge’s Ruling Permitting Government To Approach ‘Current And Former’ Employees In Ponzi Probe

    Steve Renner

    The investigation into the business practices of INetGlobal is turning into a legal slog reminiscent of the AdSurfDaily autosurf Ponzi scheme case.

    In April, attorney Paul Engh filed a motion, saying he represented INetGlobal employees. Among other things, Engh sought an order that effectively would have blocked the U.S. Secret Service from interviewing the employees, as the agency’s Ponzi probe into the company moved forward.

    Engh asserted that, by contacting employees on a cold-call basis, the government was  conducting the investigation “on some federalist notion of superiority or entitled sense of un-accountability.”

    Prosecutors shot back in May, claiming INetGlobal was trying to derail the probe.

    “Mr. Engh indicates that he ‘was hired’ to represent these employees, but refrains from indicating who it was who hired him,” prosecutors said. They added that “many of [Engh’s] purported clients seem to have never spoken with him.”

    On May 28, U.S. Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel issued an order that required Engh to compile  “a complete list of the names of current and former Inter-Mark and iNetGlobal employees whom he purports to represent” and permitted the government to continue to contact both current and former employees.

    “Before interviewing current and former employees of Inter-Mark and iNetGlobal, law enforcement shall first ask each individual if he or she is represented by an attorney,” Noel wrote in the order.

    “If the individual responds that he or she is not represented by counsel, the interview may proceed,” Noel continued. “If, however, the individual indicates that he or she is represented by an attorney, law enforcement shall ask that individual for the name of his or her lawyer; at that time, questioning must immediately cease until such a time as the Government’s attorney obtains the consent of the lawyer named, whether Mr. Engh or otherwise, to communicate with the individual ‘about the subject of the representation.’”

    Last week, Engh filed an “appeal from the order,” saying the judge is misinterpreting the law and that INetGlobal employees are entitled to protection from “isolated and surprise contact” by the government.

    In February, the U.S. Secret Service said it believed INetGlobal operator Steve Renner was running an international Ponzi scheme through his affiliated companies that largely targeted Chinese members, including members from Mainland China. No criminal charges have been filed, but the government has seized about $26 million in the case, alleging wire fraud and money-laundering.

    Prosecutors later filed filed a forfeiture complaint against a San Diego property allegedly acquired for $595,000 by Inter-Mark in August 2009 with criminal proceeds from a Ponzi, wire-fraud and money-laundering scheme.

    Inter-Mark is INetGlobal’s Las Vegas-based parent company. INetGlobal operates from Minneapolis. Renner has denied wrongdoing.

    Donald Allen

    In late April, Donald W.R. Allen II, a former Renner employee, said he’d been contacted by the Secret Service and was cooperating in the probe “100 percent.”

    Allen complained that the company had blocked access to a public-affairs Blog he published and that he was being punished by the firm “for coming forward to answer ANY questions the Government has regarding iNetGlobal.”

    Renner then got a restraining order against Allen, asserting that Allen tried to extort $100,000 from the company and had engaged in a pattern of abusive behavior, including raising “havoc” with employees, threatening “to destroy him and his family,” posting libelous and defamatory material on the Internet and engaging in verbal harassment.

    Allen also was accused to taking pictures of Renner’s offices and employees without their consent.

    “[Allen] has attempted to extort $100,000 from Petitioner’s businesses [and] if not paid will go to the FBI and Secret Service,” Renner asserted.

    Allen denied Renner’s claims, saying Renner had made similar extortion claims against Steven Keough, INetGlobal’s former chief executive officer and potentially the government’s star witness in the case.

    Ponzi litigation against assets tied to AdSurfDaily has been under way for nearly two years. The government has been awarded title to tens of millions of dollars seized in the ASD case, but ASD President Andy Bowdoin has filed an appeal.

  • Affiliate Links Show That Surf’s Up Mod And ASD Members Hold High Positions In Upstart Surf: Things To Consider If You Are Tempted To Join AdPayDaily

    Alfred E. Neuman: From Wikipedia.

    Dear Readers,

    We have received a few inquiries about a new surfing program called AdPayDaily (APD). Our initial take is that the program is a dressed-up version of AdSurfDaily, AdViewGlobal, BizAdSplash and AdGateWorld and that the operators are persuaded they’ve found a word combination and legal structure that will neutralize critics and law enforcement should concerns about the sale of unregistered securities and a Ponzi and pyramid scheme be raised.

    AVG, BAS and AGW were positioned by former ASD members as offshore “clones” of ASD. APD, like ASD, appears to be operating in the domestic United States.

    In our view, APD’s presentation raises numerous red flags. At a minimum, it is starting out as an MLM absurdity, if not a potential monstrosity. To get a flavor of the absurdity, imagine that Walmart was clueless enough to start an autosurf and provide a corporate-approved greeter who says, “Welcome to Walmart Pay Daily. We count all the money out of sight in the back room at midnight to determine how much you get, and keep 50 percent of the cash for ourselves. Don’t worry. We have excellent lawyers, and we’ve instructed the money-counter not to rip you off.”

    That’s effectively what APD is saying.

    Another red flag is the fax number listed on a document APD refers to on its website as “Ad Pay Daily’s Conference Registration Form For July 30th and 31st 2010.” The fax number is listed online as a number used by a Kansas real-estate flipping company billed as National Flips. Like APD, the National Flips domain registration is hidden behind a proxy, although the website says this: “To learn how to become a Hard Money Lender and earn 30+% per annum, call [a telephone number] . . .”

    Meanwhile, the invitation for the APD conference that uses the National Flips fax number says this — not once, but twice: “Any person who does not provide photographic proof of identity will not be permitted to attend this event, so don’t forget your photo ID.”

    Why a photo ID would be required to attend a sales pitch for an advertising company is left to the imagination. Undercover Secret Service agents have been known to attend such functions, however.

    Virtually every autosurf that has come along has used strange approaches or applied language tweaks designed to skirt securities laws, disarm critics and sanitize the “opportunities” for prospects. Serial autosurf promoters are infamous for telling prospects that a particular surf has found the magic pill that makes everything legal. Historically they rely on the surf operators to provide a legal cover. When things go south, they claim no one can blame them for promoting the schemes. After all, they relied on the assertions of the operators that everything was above-board and legal. They have been disingenuous in the same way that Alfred E. Neuman, Mad magazine’s fictional mascot, was disingenuous.

    “What, me worry?”

    Worry, however, appears to be front-and-center at APD, which is preemptively denying in multiple places that it is a Ponzi scheme. This strikes us as a big red flag. There are others.

    ASD, Surf’s Up Members Become APD Players

    During its early research into APD, the PP Blog has determined that a number of members of the alleged AdSurfDaily autosurf Ponzi scheme have high positions in the APD venture. Some of the former ASD members hold more than one position in the top 80 positions in APD, including a former Surf’s Up Mod who appears to hold positions 76 and 77. It is possible that another Surf’s Up Mod also is high up in the pecking order of APD affiliates at No. 56.

    The Blog determined the names of APD promoters by researching the method by which APD creates affiliate links. At least one ASD member who made himself part of the ASD Ponzi litigation by submitting pro se pleadings holds positions 9 and 10 in APD, according to the affiliate links.

    Surf promoters are not fond of pointing out the pain of previous prosecutions of autosurfs and the time-consuming and expensive litigation involving both the government and court-appointed receivers that may occur when a surf collapses. It is not uncommon for millions of dollars to go missing in a surf.

    ASD’s Andy Bowdoin has told members that he has spent more than $1 million in his legal defense. Nothing (other than GIGO passed along by promoters) suggests Bowdoin was a man of means prior to the Secret Service raid on ASD’s headquarters in August 2008. His money for his defense appears to have come from ASD members. On a side note, Bowdoin tried to persuade members in September 2009 that the million dollars he dropped to keep himself out of prison was for their benefit. At the same time, he claimed his fight with the government was inspired by a former Miss America.

    ASD gathered at least $65.8 million. When the sum seized in the Golden Panda Ad Builder action, which is part of the ASD litigation, is factored in, the number surges to more than $80 million. That’s a big number, of course — one that shows why others want to start surfs and just tweak and tweak and tweak in search of the elusive magic pill.

    APD’s website was registered on Nov. 18, 2008. That’s just one day before U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled that ASD had not demonstrated it was a lawful business and not a Ponzi scheme. APD’s domain-registration date also coincides with a string of registration dates by the so-called ASD clones:

    • Aug. 18, 2008: Domain name for AdGateWorld registered. (About two weeks after the ASD raid by the U.S. Secret Service, which is working in concert with the IRS and federal prosecutors.)
    • Sept. 22, 2008: Domain name for AdViewGlobal registered. (AVG had very close ties to ASD.)
    • Nov. 7, 2008: Domain name for BizAdSplash registered. (ASD and Golden Panda figure Clarence Busby purportedly was both the “chief consultant” and owner of BAS.)

    APD’s domain was registered just 11 days after the BAS domain was registered and only a couple of weeks before ASD declared that the now-defunct Surf’s Up forum was its official organ for ASD news. Surf’s Up became infamous for shilling for Bowdoin, fracturing the facts of the ASD wire-fraud and money-laundering case and misinforming members.

    Each of the surfs in the bullet points above failed spectacularly. Each of them blamed members for their problems. Each of them had promoters and members in common with ASD. Each of them also offered various “bonuses” to join — something APD is doing at the moment.

  • KABOOM! Alleged Commodities Ponzi Scheme Run By Mexican Nationals On U.S. Soil Dumped Money Into TWO Other Failed HYIP Fraud Schemes, Investigators Say; Ruben Gonzalez, Jose C. Naranjo Charged By CFTC

    UPDATED 10:17 A.M. EDT (May 25, U.S.A.) It has been another nasty day for the HYIP and autosurf “industries” and their apologists. Investigators have charged two Mexican nationals with operating a Ponzi scheme on U.S. soil. The alleged scheme, which used names such as New Golden Investment Group LLC (NGI), NGI Group LLC, New Golden Management, New Golden Entertainment LLC, Grupo NGI International Inc. and NGI International Inc., targeted Latinos in Greater Los Angeles, authorities said.

    Charged by the CFTC is the case were the companies and their operators, Ruben Gonzalez of West Covina, Calif., and Jose C. Naranjo of La Mirada, Calif. Both men are Mexican nationals. Their ages were not immediately known. Gonzalez was jailed in October on immigration charges, authorities said.

    Gonzalez also has been indicted on criminal charges of mail fraud and wire fraud, the CFTC said.

    The alleged NGI scheme has ties to other fraud schemes, including the Traders International Return Network (TIRN) scheme and the alleged Finanzas Forex scheme, authorities said. Criminal charges have flowed from the TIRN scheme, and the Finanzas Forex scheme — allegedly part of an international scheme known as Evolution Market Group (EMG) — has resulted in allegations that proceeds from the EMG scheme found their way into bank accounts seized by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in a narcotics investigation in Arizona.

    Meanwhile, the TIRN scheme, which operated from Florida and claimed a presence in Panama, also has a tie to the alleged INetGlobal autosurf Ponzi scheme. Both TIRN and INetGlobal used the same debit-card company to pay members, according to court filings.

    Gonzalez and Naranjo gathered $3.65 million in the NGI scheme beginning in August 2008, dumping at least $100,000 into TIRN and $290,000 into Finanzas Forex, the CFTC said. All of the money appears to have been misappropriated, with Gonzalez transferring “at least” $260,000 from NGI member funds to his personal bank account and Naranjo transferring “at least” $267,000 from NGI member funds to his personal bank account.

    About $62,000 transferred into Naranjo’s bank account was withdrawn in cash, the CFTC said.

    The men “used investor funds to purchase a Mercedes-Benz, airline tickets, various other retail items and to make payments on a home,” the CFTC said.

    It is possible that as much as $1 million was directed at Finanzas Forex, the CFTC said.

    Gonzalez and Naranjo tricked investors by making them believe NGI was a real commodities-trading business.

    “Gonzalez, Naranjo and NGI falsely presented NGI as a successful trading company by displaying trading software on NGI’s office computers to make it appear to customers and prospective customers that NGI was engaged in electronic commodity futures trading,” the CFTC said.

    In reality, “NGI did not trade commodity futures for customers and did not make any of their advertised profits. Instead, Gonzalez and Naranjo allegedly ran a Ponzi scheme using new investor money to pay purported profits to existing investors,” the CFTC said.

    Part of the NGI sales pitch was similar to the sales pitch of yet another Ponzi scheme: the Learn Waterhouse scheme, which operated from California and also has a tie to INetGlobal, according to court records.

    INetGlobal operator Steve Renner provided payment-processing services for the Learn Waterhouse Ponzi scheme through an entity known as Cash Cards International, according to court records.

    Learn Waterhouse talked about purported investments in “gold” in Mexico. According to the CFTC complaint in the NGI case, NGI did the same thing, falsely claiming to customers that “they would double their money within a year in oil, gold, silver and other commodities.”

    NGI stopped making payments to investors in about June 2009, the CFTC said. At least 165 investors were affected.

    Gonzalez and Naranjo told customers that the payments stopped because a bank in Mexico was holding the funds and refused to release them. The men then told investors to have patience because a new deal involving oil was on the horizon and that investors who left their money with NGI son would have “huge” profits, the CFTC said.

    Investors were encouraged to fund accounts with money from credit cards or retirement savings, the CFTC said.

    NGI had been operating since about August 2008, according to records. That’s the same month INetGlobal was coming onto the autosurf stage, and AdSurfDaily was exiting the stage.

    The U.S. Secret Service said it believed both INetGlobal and AdSurfDaily were operating Ponzi schemes.

  • Debit-Card Firm Spotlighted In Purported Training Material For Minnesota-Based INetGlobal Was Referenced In $22 Million Ponzi Case In Florida Last Year; Renner Company Now Has Link To Third Ponzi Court Scrape

    Part of the purported INetGlobal training material on how to transfer money to a debit card. (Red bar added to screen shot by PP Blog to block account number.)

    Training material purportedly produced in November 2009 and published online shows prospects of INetGlobal how to transfer money from the company to a reloadable debit card. The presentation reveals that INetGlobal was using the same debit-card firm that provided services for a Florida man implicated in October 2009 — just a month before the INetGlobal training material purportedly was produced — in an alleged international fraud scheme that gathered at least $22 million and made Ponzi payments to members via debit cards.

    The training material is confusing in places, and the form in which it was published suggests that some INetGlobal members with Chinese names shared information to recruit Chinese prospects.  At the same time, the training material and other information accessible at the same website suggests Chinese members also worked together to create instructional materials that showed other Chinese members and prospects how to offload their profits in cash at ATM machines and receive $300 sign-up bonuses that may not have been available to all INetGlobal members.

    It is possible that a single member or group of members created the training material and the companion information. Whether the material, which does not purport to be hypothetical and appears to include no disclaimer language, used the names of real members was unclear. Also unclear is whether the approach had the approval of INetGlobal. What is clear is that the information was published openly online and purportedly reflects INetGlobal financial transactions that occurred among Chinese members in November 2009.

    A “Contact” address on the website that published the information lists a street address in British Columbia, even though the domain itself lists a registration address in Mainland China. The British Columbia street address returns a page in Google search results that purports to lay out a conspiracy case against judges in Canada for issuing unfavorable rulings in what appears to be a matter unrelated to INetGlobal.

    Just two months earlier, in September 2009, some Clickbank vendors were complaining that links to their businesses were being placed in INetGlobal’s advertising rotator without their knowledge. The Clickbank vendors also complained that INetGlobal was passing along bandwidth costs to them and that their businesses were experiencing a surge in unproductive traffic from China.

    The author of the training document on debit cards was listed as Annie Zhang, according to the “Properties” of the document, which was published in PDF format.

    The training document was published on a website whose domain-registration address was listed as “Xian, Shanxi  . . . China.” The domain on which the information was published was registered to Jun Zhang. The website encourages prospects to submit their email address and wait to receive a return email “to get a referrer ID and referrer name that you will need in the registration process.”

    Visitors to the website registered in China are told that, by registering for INetGlobal in this fashion, they can “Make Free Fast Money $300 Right Now.” The site instructs viewers to purchase a “$2000 Executive Business Package,” provide proof of the purchase by return email and wait to receive their bonus.

    “We will send $300 free fast money to your V-Cash account,” the site tells viewers. “If you prefer, we can send $300 to your PayPal account too!”

    Another URL at the same domain instructs prospects on how to register for a Clickbank account to promote products through INetGlobal. The instructions are available in multiple languages, including English, Chinese and Japanese.

    The debit card featured in the PDF training material on the website registered in China is known as the “Exclusive One” card and is issued by Anres Technologies Corp. of Las Vegas. The Exclusive One card is pictured in the INetGlobal training material, and Anres’ name is referenced in court filings by the U.S. Secret Service in the INetGlobal case.

    Anres’ name also is referenced by the SEC in a case filed last year in Florida against David F. Merrick, Traders International Return Network (TIRN), MS Inc., GTT Services Inc., MDD Consulting Inc. and Go ! Tourism Inc. Merrick and the companies were accused of running a Florida-based Ponzi scheme that used debit cards and claimed a presence in Panama.

    Among the claims in the SEC case was that “Merrick and TIRN falsely represented that investors requesting a withdrawal of funds would receive a debit card loaded with their initial investment and return on their investments, when, in fact, the money loaded on the cards was money from other investors,” according to the SEC.

    The PP Blog wrote about the TIRN case on Oct. 15, 2009.  Millions of dollars were moved across borders, the SEC said.

    “[A]t least $2.3 million of investor funds were transferred to accounts in Panama, Mexico, Malaysia, Switzerland and the Netherlands,” the SEC said. It added that about $8.8 million was placed on debit cards to make Ponzi payments to members..

    Although TIRN was not an autosurf, debit cards have become increasingly popular in the autosurf universe. The TIRN case demonstrated that alleged fraudsters were relying on debit cards to pull off international financial schemes.

    Anres was not named a defendant in either the TIRN case or the emerging INetGlobal case. The company has not been accused of wrongdoing.

    In recent months, the FBI has expressed public concerns that criminal organizations were turning to preloaded debit cards to launder money and that users were taking advantage of a “shadow” banking system.

    Card Highlighted In Instructional PDF For INetGlobal

    The purported INetGlobal training material appears in a PDF that includes screen shots. The person (or persons) who assembled the material appear to have Chinese names, and the English-language material walks prospects through the process of converting electronic credits to cash that can be loaded onto an Exclusive One debit card and withdrawn at ATMs.

    In February, the Secret Service said it believed INetGlobal was targeting Chinese members in an international Ponzi scheme. The purported training material lists IP addresses in the United States and Canada in a manner that suggests Chinese members in both countries were working together to train other Chinese members how to offload profits onto debit cards and also how to transfer money using INetGlobal’s internal system from one Chinese member to another.

    Among the assertions against INetGlobal by the U.S. Secret Service was that the company was engaging in wire fraud and money laundering. The IRS now has entered the case, which suggests that the government also suspects tax crimes.

    Material Suggests Account-Sharing And Cross-Border Planning

    The second page of the 18-page PDF purportedly shows the back office of an INetGlobal member who appears to have a Chinese name. This page lists the member’s name as “Dong,” lists a five-digit INetGlobal member number, a six-digit V-Cash account number and an IP address that comes back to Minneapolis. The page notes that automatic repurchasing of additional “adpacs” was enabled and set for 50 percent. Viewers were prompted to click on a tab labeled “V-Services.” In the next step, viewers were prompted to click on a graphic labeled “V-Cash Online Payment Services.”

    This page forwarded to another prompt to click on a V-Cash logo, which led to a login screen that prompted members to enter a user ID and a password. A “Welcome” screen followed, and members were instructed to click on a tab that prompted them to go to the “Member Center.”

    Once inside the Member Center, members were prompted to click on a tab labeled “V-Cash.” This led to a screen that prompted them to enter a password for their V-Cash accounts. The next screen shot showed that V-cash was logging members’ IP numbers; the IP number logged in this screen shot came back to Toronto. Why the shot displayed a Toronto IP when the earlier shot displayed a Minneapolis IP was unclear.

    The Exclusive One Card, as pictured inside the training material.

    The next screen shot prompted members to click on a tab labeled “balance.” This screen noted a “Currency balance” of more than $3,038 in the account. The next screen was confusing because the currency balance had been lowered by $200. Why the balance was lowered was not made clear in the presentation.

    In the next screen shot, the presentation provided the initial instructions on how to transfer money to the Exclusive One card, which is pictured in the document. This screen shot also purported to show that members could transfer money from their V-Cash accounts to other V-Cash accounts from within the company’s internal system. The presentation prompted viewers to select the option to transfer money to the Exclusive One card and press “Continue.”

    Thereafter, the presentation showed a purported transfer of $2,000 to the Exclusive One card. The presentation noted a $30 fee incurred when making the transfer. The fee rate for the transfer service was described as 1.5 percent. The screen shot noted that the total amount transferred, including the $30 fee, was $2,030. Viewers were prompted to “Click to Confirm” the transfer.

    Part of purported INetGlobal traning material. (Red bars added to screen shot by PP Blog to block account numbers.)

    One of the screen shots that followed purported to show a “History” of transfers to and from the account. One of the transfers showed a purported transfer “from” Annie Zhang to an INetGlobal member in the amount of $3,000. It was dated Nov. 3, 2009.

    A person named Annie Zhang purportedly is one of INetGlobal’s top recruiters. Some promos for the firm have asserted Zhang was making $100,000 a month as an affiliate of INetGlobal.

    Parts of the PDF presentation are confusing. For example, the member’s name that appears on the second page of the presentation does not agree with the member’s name that appears on Page 6 — even though the INetGlobal member account number appears to be the same, as does the V-Cash account number.

    On Page 2, the member’s name is listed as “Dong” with an IP number that comes back to Minneapolis. On Page 6, however,  the screen welcomes a member named “Lei.”  An IP shown on Page 9 comes back to Toronto — not Minneapolis.

    In the document’s published form, both Dong and Lei appear to have the same 5-digit INetGlobal number and the same six-digit V-Cash account number. Why two purported INetGlobal members would have the same account numbers is unclear.

    INetGlobal Now Has Links To Three Ponzi Cases

    In February and March court filings, the U.S. Secret Service linked INetGlobal to the alleged AdSurfDaily Ponzi scheme, alleging that an undercover agent was introduced to INetGlobal by an ASD member. The Secret Service brought the Ponzi case against ASD in August 2008.

    The appearance of the Exclusive One card in the purported INetGlobal training material links INetGlobal to a second Ponzi court scrape: the SEC’s case against the alleged David Merrick/TIRN Ponzi scheme, which appears to have used the same debit card as INetGlobal to pay members. The CFTC also filed allegations against TIRN, and the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida also is investigating TIRN.

    Separately, INetGlobal operator Steve Renner was linked to a Ponzi scheme known as Learn Waterhouse in 2004. A company Renner operates — Cash Cards International (CCI) — provided payment-processing services for the Learn Waterhouse scheme, and Renner himself purportedly was an investor in the scheme, according to court filings.

    Four of the scheme’s operators were sentenced to lengthy prison sentences in the Learn Waterhouse case. (If you have the time, the PP Blog highly recommends you read this document from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, denying appeals in the case.)

    The document recounts the history of the case, including astonishing allegations that Learn Waterhouse told investors that it “had invested $2 billion in a gold mine in Mexico, and [was] working on a billion-dollar Columbus-era ‘find’ on the bottom of the ocean.”

    Renner was alleged to have provided payment-processing services for Learn Waterhouse through CCI and to have spent investors’ money on personal purchases.

    Randall Treadwell, the ringleader of the Learn Waterhouse scheme, “often claimed that he had a God-given ability to make money, but in hindsight it appears that his talents lay in extracting funds from duped investors,” according to court filings.

    Indeed, according to filings in the Learn Waterhouse case, the “purported investments
    did not exist at all.

    “By the time the defendants’ far-reaching Ponzi scheme collapsed, more than 1,700 investors throughout the United States had lost their investments. At trial, the defendants produced no evidence to suggest that any investment profit was generated by their companies.”

    Losses in the Learn Waterhouse case totaled at least $44 million.